~ archived since 2018 ~

The odds ratio of 1.13 for lifetime sexual partners obtained with the face-to-face mode of interview indicates that the probability of infidelity [by women] increased by 13% for every additional lifetime sexual partner...the probability of sexual infidelity increased with more lifetime sex partners

February 19, 2021

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/BlackPillScience.

/r/BlackPillScience archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title The odds ratio of 1.13 for lifetime sexual partners obtained with the face-to-face mode of interview indicates that the probability of infidelity [by women] increased by 13% for every additional lifetime sexual partner...the probability of sexual infidelity increased with more lifetime sex partners
Author LePetitPhagette
Upvotes 97
Comments 12
Date February 19, 2021 6:09 AM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit /r/BlackPillScience
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/BlackPillScience/the-odds-ratio-of-113-for-lifetime-sexual-partners.741587
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/ln8lqx/the_odds_ratio_of_113_for_lifetime_sexual/
Top posts by LePetitPhagette

[–]LePetitPhagette[S] 6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link


Whisman, M. A., & Snyder, D. K. (2007). Sexual infidelity in a national survey of American women: Differences in prevalence and correlates as a function of method of assessment. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.147


Edited for brevity. Excerpts in full can be found in the source. While they were edited to fit the 300 character count, none of the meaning was substantially changed. I welcome anyone to ctrl-f the quoted pieces in the article to see my edits in full.

[–]alexaxl5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There is a concept in ancient eastern wisdom called “samskaras” or “impressions” that embed deep into the consciousness.

It’s not even about good or bad/ evil but their hold on the human ego/ identity that prevents the consciousness from becoming “free” from “Wordly entanglements”.

It’s not even about abstinence but about awareness so as to moderate the bio electric impulse & desire driven system with heightened awareness; likely cultivated by practices such as meditation and introspection/ reflection.

I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s not playing out in such scenarios and thus leading to more instability in the mind with respect to fidelity.

I’d think it affects individuals of both genders, maybe with some differences in how it does do & to what degree; and the flavors of impressions. But largely individual self awareness or blindness of one’s own patterns and repetition.

Be it Sex, foods, drug, drinks, smoke, or any habits or patterns - considered good or bad.

Fitness regimen, reading disciplines, mental patterns, being alone or needing people, extroversion or introversion or a mix of both, social or solitude, flavors of anything & everything; so called (7) sins are nothing but impressions that have strong imprint and hold on one’s system.

Be it a pattern of getting angry, of fights, violence, being manipulative or lying or letting things pass or laughing off life’s trials & tragedies or being locked by some emotions.

To be a Buddha is to clear all impressions & patterns and their hold / effect on one’s system.

[–]CursedSurrogate6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

And in other news... Water is wet.

[–]International_Care145 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

So if the probability of infidelity by a virgin is say 20%, it is 22% for a woman who has had sex with one man before? And 230% for a woman who has had 20 partners?

[–]LePetitPhagette[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s less than 10%, and it levels out at around 50±5%. There’s negligible difference between 25 and 40, for example.

[A]pproximately half of women in the top quintiles of sociosexuality [def. willingness to engage in sexual activity outside of a committed relationship] had been sexually unfaithful to a steady partner; this was more than a tenfold increase over the corresponding rate for people in the bottom quintiles.

Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78(3), 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.3.537


Women’s number of pre-marital partners: percent [of wives] who cheated once married

  • 2: 10.4%
  • 3: 14.9%
  • 4: 17.7%
  • 5: 21.6%
  • 6-10: 26.0%
  • 11-20: 36.7%
  • 21+: 46.8%

NORC General Social Survey. (2011, October 02). Female Infidelity Based on Number of Premarital Partners — Statistic Brain. Retrieved July 5, 2015, from http://www.statisticbrain.com/percent-of-female-infidelity-based-on-number-of-premarital-partners/

This latter data is suspect—I’ve never been able to independently verify it. It seems to become a coin toss.

[–]JoeLouisBarrow4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I was looking for r/bluepilled science but got lost here. Can anyone give me directions ???

[–]Beej671 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

The study itself was a comparison between F2F interviews and computer assisted self-interviews. Has anyone looked at the body of the study to determine the differences between the title statistic when measured F2F and by the computer method?

[–]LePetitPhagette[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes. It’s actually in the study.

F2F OR: 1.13

A-CASI OR: 1.07

[–]Beej671 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

So 7% for the other interview set?

I'd like to see the same thing run with men to see what the answers are.

[–]LePetitPhagette[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Get a postgraduate degree and apply for a grant.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link


[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry UbiquitousPissant, your submission has been removed from BlackPillScience because your account is new.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter