~ archived since 2018 ~

The future of online dating thanks to chadfish

June 22, 2019

I think chadfishing is going to destroy or at least seriously hinder online dating and perhaps dating in general. Throw a bit of leverage back towards men.

Black pill and red pill concepts are mostly conceptual until we see examples and those with a pro feminist agenda use the ambiguity to attack the credibility of these idea.

But AFBB has never been clearer with the examples we now have. Sure there are weak minded men who will believe the weak justification that these are photoshopped, but ultimately more men than ever are going to wake up from this.

The feminist reaction is going to sway even harder than it sways right now, in an attempt to deny the truth and people more than ever are going to be forced to pick a hard side, due to the hard evidence on one side and the hard ideology on the other.

Look at the way people go after Jordan Peterson because he offers a fairly CENTRIST view. By today’s standards they attempt to call that ‘alt right’.

It’s all a Fucking mess. Be glad you are in the know at this point in your life and not later. Maybe you can make the most of it. That means giving up on women, being happy with very low SMV options (where available), finding a situation that works for your SMV (going abroad) or setting up a regular paid interaction.

Also I’ll say it again. I hope someone is archiving this shit. Because this will get wiped out soon and the content here is incredibly valuable.

Once women become more aware of chadfish as a concept they’ll stop being so open in their messages (and only open about their degeneracy in person with chad) in order to sway social perception and power back to their side. Let’s make the most of this while we can.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/Chadfish.

/r/Chadfish archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title The future of online dating thanks to chadfish
Author empatheticapathetic
Upvotes 26
Comments 27
Date June 22, 2019 2:07 PM UTC (3 years ago)
Subreddit /r/Chadfish
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/Chadfish/the-future-of-online-dating-thanks-to-chadfish.332305
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/chadfish/comments/c3q3fa/the_future_of_online_dating_thanks_to_chadfish/

[–]I_FUCKED_YOUR_HOE 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

In what universe is Jordan Peterson centrist? If you think he's centrist then you must be far right. He's a typical traditional Christian conservative, solidly on the right. He's not alt-right but anyone who thinks he's centrist probably is.

[–]Ted_Kool 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

He's a classic liberal who believes the foundation of society is the individual and not the family like a conservative would think.

[–]Slothvibes 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This x100

[–]zorklan 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Classical liberals can be right-wing.

[–]Ted_Kool 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link


[–]zorklan 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Classical liberalism is a political ideology and a branch of liberalism which advocates civil liberties under the rule of law with an emphasis on economic freedom.

Literally the first definition on Google.

[–]empatheticapathetic 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link


[–]zorklan 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

What? Do you not know what a classical liberal is?

[–]tortieaway 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

He's considered a tradcon. In context of the blackpill vs bluepill debate he is centrist. Look at at his many lame bluepill views. He criticizes feminism and uses guilt tripping to get men to "man up" and save a hoe.

[–]blackkindergods 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

He’s as close to honest as you can be (not very) while also having faith in anything non material. I respect his efforts but he’s a religion inspired tard, there’s no purpose, unless society comes together and creates one, but this is what secularism gets you: hedonism and nihilism

[–]zorklan 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Being bluepilled or blackpilled doesn't point to a certain political belief though. There are a wide variety of political beliefs in the blackpill community, same with the bluepilled normies.

[–]edgelordfairy 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link


[–]zorklan 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This was a hard read. Very pathetic. You sound like a child that just discovered right-wing YouTube.

Someone can be a feminist and be blackpilled dumbass. (For example, myself.)

Jordan Peterson is a right-wing and conservative moron. Saying he's a centrist is ridiculous. I don't think you understand political terminology at all.

Us Chadfishing and Stacyfishing will have a very minimal effect on the dating landscape. You're overestimating its effects. Catfishing has been around since before you were born online.

[–]empatheticapathetic 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You made no points in your reply, but you’re a ‘blackpilled’ feminist. Your entire identity is an oxymoron.

‘Blackpilled feminist’ is just the next tactic out there to try and deny and scramble the effects of this next wave of blackpilling.

[–]tortieaway 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It was a troll. The blackpill is kryptonite to feminism.

Feminism is what caused all of this to transpire in the first place and they should be persona non grata on this sub.

[–]zorklan 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm not a troll. If you truly believe the people saying "fuck men" are feminists then you're lost.

Many people that claim they are "blackpilled" ignore the pathetic sexual drives of men. We're all human and fucking stupid. That's the ultimate blackpill.

[–]empatheticapathetic 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

No true Scotsman feminist would say that.

[–]zorklan 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link


In all seriousness, I don't think you know what being blackpilled or being a feminist means. You using Jordan Peterson as an example in your post is basically proof you are just regurgitating right-wing bullshit. You have no understanding of politics, especially the terminology, at all.

You must be new around here. Stacyfishing is a thing you uneducated fuck. Ever heard of those premium SnapChat scams? Yeah. That's Stacyfishing. Go fuck yourself. You have no understanding of anything you say.

Ad hominems are useful when they prove a point. I believe one of those right-wing YouTubers constantly says people are using ad hominems against him. You have no originality.

Once again, you're embarrassing yourself.

[–]empatheticapathetic 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

you’re embarrassing yourself


[–]zorklan 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Nice job ignoring everything I said.

[–]tortieaway 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Get the fuck out of here, troll

[–]zorklan 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

That's a nice reference to our time spent together in season 1 of the u/zorklan anime.

[–]empatheticapathetic 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow. What a PATHETIC sense of humour. Get back to ITcucks

[–]zorklan 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Look at my post history darling. Just because I don't watch YouTubers for angsty pre-teens doesn't make me not a member of this community.

[–]Deoxysxx 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Chadfishing isn't common enough for all of that to happen.

[–]empatheticapathetic 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Not sure you understood my point.

[–]tortieaway 1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Which was?

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2022. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter