~ archived since 2018 ~

A REAL book titled "How to Destroy A Man Now" (with both true and false accusations) - or why I will never respect feminism. (Cue Kool Aid Man yelling "NAFALT!")

July 12, 2022
post image

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/EverydayMisandry.

/r/EverydayMisandry archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title A REAL book titled "How to Destroy A Man Now" (with both true and false accusations) - or why I will never respect feminism. (Cue Kool Aid Man yelling "NAFALT!")
Author RatDontPanic
Upvotes 31
Comments 9
Date July 12, 2022 12:40 AM UTC (8 months ago)
Subreddit /r/EverydayMisandry
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/EverydayMisandry/a-real-book-titled-how-to-destroy-a-man-now-with.1123110
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/vwxw0o/a_real_book_titled_how_to_destroy_a_man_now_with/
Red Pill terms in post

[–]TheLWMA 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Did a feminist write this?

[–]RatDontPanic[S] 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm going to be fair and answer that with a guess of 50% odds.

[–]TheLWMA 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

From what I have found, Dr. Angela Confidential is a business psychologist, consultant, and human resource professional.

Haven't found if this "Angela Confidential" describes herself as a feminist. If she did, then her rhetoric is so revolting that not even other feminists want to associate with her. Except maybe the feminists over at FDS.

But then again, we MRAs don't like to be lumped with Tradcon PUAs who occasionally use our talking points, so I wouldn't throw around accusations.

[–]RatDontPanic[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It is possible that Angela Confidential may not be a feminist. I'm open to any evidence.

I have problems with MRAs like I do with feminists. Paul Elam really ruined it for me. But the MRAs who were glad Trump won even though Hillary Clinton was chomping at the bit to make Selective Service gender neutral basically was what handed me my walking papers right out of the MRM.

I can't join any movement that only cares about its own gender. I can and will defend my gender but when actual real misogyny comes up I won't be silent about that either.

[–]TheLWMA 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's a fair position.

[–]Kuato2012 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

From what I've seen, this is actually a pro-men book that uses the sensationalist angle to drop "red pills" on the reader. Here is an excerpt:

It's patriarchal society that defines violence as physi­cal, in terms of beatings and broken bones, but never in terms of allegations and broken lives. Even when studies show that women are just as violent as men when "violence" includes things such as verbal abuse, reputation ravaging, and emotional abuse, patriarchal society still cannot perceive women as aggressors. Despite men being far more likely than women to be the victims of violent crimes like homicide, men are still perceived as less deserving of protection. Even present-day federal law still requires men, but not women, to register for selective service-the military draft. In other words, with women gaining power in politics, we can send men to die for us in war without ever having to go ourselves! Patriarchy's persistent perception of women as weak is so deeply ingrained in society that it's embedded in law. So, rather than trying to change patriarchy, women have mastered "societal judo" by leveraging the prin­ciples of patriarchy against men. We're defeating our oppressors by turning the captain's command of "women and children first" into "men last" while we sink their ship.

[–]RatDontPanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

If that is the case, dear God this author split the atom of bad taste.

[–]TheLWMA 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Recognizing that women can be bad people is not inherently pro-men. In this case, it's female supremacists who have the self-awareness to recognize how terrible their beliefs are.

I remember back when the whole Johnny Depp/Amber Heard controversy started a few years back and subreddits such a TwoX, TrollX, feminism, and askfeminists were denying that Amber was abusive. They believed that either both of them were abusive to each other or Johnny was solely abusive. But you know who didn't? GenderCritical. If you didn't know, when it came to misandry, GenderCritical made FDS look tolerant by comparison. Before that sub was banned, I remember reading posts like how half of the male population should be physically castrated at puberty to reduce aggression and sexual desire, how men should be used as slave labor (going as far as to describe the economics of how that would work), how men should be imprisoned for having even the slightest digression (perceived or otherwise), and how men should be regularly reprimanded and, if need be, beaten, to know their place as "dumb, rapist brutes". Even a few commenters there outright admitted that they abused their sons, physically and emotionally. And yet, that sub was basically the only female-centric subreddit to admit that Amber was the sole abuser. Why? Because they know from experience. They didn't use any veneers, because they didn't care to hide their evil.

Also, this idea that "patriarchy" doesn't perceive women as being aggressors is complete nonsense. It's feminists who refuse to recognize that women can be aggressors, ala the Duluth Model, which states that women cannot abuse men because men supposedly have more "systemic power".

[–]RatDontPanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Patriarchy and feminism alike refuse to recognize the fact that women can be violent and evil to the same degree as men. This is part of what makes both cultures deplorable.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter