TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Anti-male bigotry in r/TrollXChromosomes

January 9, 2022
92 upvotes
post image

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/EverydayMisandry.

/r/EverydayMisandry archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Comments

[–]Antanarau 19 points20 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

To see what is wrong you need to do is:
" "Black people get murdered too!" Yeah usually by other black people"

Suddenly, the "caring" and "acceptive" comment is no longer as "caring" and "acceptive" .

I wonder how people go off writing shit like this and NEVER notice that they are doing literally what they are fighting against - sexism(or racism)

[–]abgfkh333[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

What this person is saying can only be the case if you define rape as only being involuntarily penetrated but the real definition of rape is much more expansive than that. Rape is any sexual activity that is done without consent. If we go by this definition, most male victims of rape had female perpetrators.

https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/men-ipvsvandstalking.html ( I have used this source as it is from the cdc and dense in data but I want to point out that this document is problematic in it’s own way. Somewhat ironically it defines the term rape as “any completed or attempted unwanted penetration of the victim through the use of physical force or when the victim was unable to consent due to being too drunk, high, or drugged” and due to this it says that most male rape victims had male perpetrators. But just a few lines after this it says that “82% of male victims of sexual coercion reported only female perpetrators.”. As far as I’m concerned this should be the only statistic that matters as we shouldn’t use the other, way more reductive definition of rape.)

[–]abgfkh333[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

What bothered me the most wasn’t that such a comment had been made or even the number of upvotes but the fact that nobody corrected this person. There were comments saying that every rape victim is valid (I’m paraphrasing) etc but nobody stopped and thought “wait is that true, maybe I should google it”. They just assumed that it was true.

[–]Inevitable_Cup_70 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, this is technically true, but only because women can't be charged with rape.

[–]Crushed_95 8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Boys get raped all the time by women

[–]WorldController 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you referring to statutory rape, specifically?

[–]redgarnetamaranth 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"we have defined rape perpetration to specifically require having a penis then using our own metrics have concluded that men are mainly raped by other men" well no shit you're going to find that if you just don't count female perpetration, dumb fuck.

[–]false_thr0waway 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

these lonely fuckers need to go back to twitter

[–]WorldController 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

And people think feminism is somehow "left-wing," despite that this and similar rhetoric is routinely parroted by its adherents. 🙄

[–]AndyBrown65 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Female chauvinists are obsessed about the gender of the perp, and refuse to acknowledge than men can be victims

[–]gabrielcoronel_ 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly! They pay more attention to the perpetrator's gender than the victim.

[–]Richardsnotmyname 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Misandry AND homophobia at the same time. Nice combo

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter