~ archived since 2018 ~

Curfew By Jayne Cowie

July 7, 2022

(cut and pasted from Left-Wing Male Advocates)

Fair warning, I'm going to be ranting and venting in this post. I have to after how pissed I got seeing this book at work earlier, reading it's premise and also checking the author's afterward. I came this close to an epic swearing fit and ripping the book to pieces. Why? Well, read on...

At work today, I took notice to a book on display in the Sci-Fi section called Curfew. What made me notice? The tagling on the front, which is "It was supposed to keep women safe." Reading the premise on the back (and I should note the back also describes the book as being like The Handmaid's Tale but with women in charge; let that sink in), it concerns a female-dominated government in which all male civilians are electronically tagged and required to be curfewed to prevent violence against women and it mentions how women can now safely go about their lives and routine not being in fear. The usual feminist BS about how women are in fear of their lives and safety every time they go outside and as usual, ignoring the fact men are also at risk and actually comprise the majority of violent crime victims including homicide, and many women are also violent against men. As usual, men's safety and well-being not mattering. Oh, but it gets worse when we get to the author's afterward.

In the afterward, the author though not quite endorsing an anti-male curfew she makes her stance pretty clear and obvious that she does. She goes on with the usual feminist garbage about how there's an epidemic of male violence against women, how domestic abuse cases are overwhelmingly perpetrated by men against women and men commit higher levels of assaults against women. As usual failing to acknowledge many men are also victims of female violence and instances of female on male violence are vastly underreported due to many male victims afraid to come forward and also very few abuse shelters that help them. But the kicker? She had the nerve to accuse people using the hashtag of #NAMALT (Not All Men Are Like That) in response to the male-bashing of deflecting the issue and that it was basically blaming women instead of viewing men as the problem. She even had the double nerve to say if women used the #EMALT (Enough Men Are Like That) hashtag if it would offend men. What a lot of damn nerve she has! It's bad enough she demonizes men as a whole and fails to acknowledge male victims of female violence, but she's going to employ this nonsense as well?

I got so angry reading this to the point I came incredibly close to shredding the book to pieces and having a swearing fit. I'm so sick and tired of the misandry and anti-male bashing and fear-mongering that's become so widespread and socially acceptable and ingrained over the past half-decade or so. Both men and women are violent to one another and do horrible things to one another. Rape, sexual harassment/assault, abuse, murder, etc. men and women do these things to one another in comparable numbers, and female instances of violence against men are much higher to believed or reported, but as usual this author is irresponsibly downplaying and warping that to fit her feminist narrative. I'm so fed up with this. The book apparently also raises the issue if curfewing all men would bring crime rates down, and we all know that's a load of BS because plenty of women also commit crimes and at comparable rates, and men being curfewed would be a disaster for military, law enforcement, first responders, etc. since those occupations are overwhelmingly male and men in these occupations being curfewed would see a tremendous spike in crime and violent incidents.

This is exactly the same kind of BS white supremacists pull with how they demonize non-white people and ignore the fact plenty of terrible white people also exist, and their delusional nonsense about how an all-white nation would be free of crime when that would definitely not be the case. Feminists show time and time again with this sort of thinking that they're absolutely no different from the likes of white supremacists and no better, at all.

This author and the publisher of the book should be boycotted. They're promoting blatant sexism and fear against men with this and exploiting female victims to enforce their disgusting, hateful agenda. This garbage is in the same category as hateful propaganda like The Turner Diaries. I know I rant about this sort of thing a lot here, but I'm so pissed right now as I type this after seeing this book, reading the premise on the book and the author's afterward. I can only imagine the uproar there'd be if a male author wrote a book with this premise with the genders reversed and the backlash he'd (rightfully) get. Cowie deserves the same backlash and scorn.

As always, I'm immensely grateful this sub exists and I'm sure you all feel exactly the way I do about this damn book. Enough with bashing and hating men and women alike, this is nothing but hateful propaganda meant to incite fear and hatred of men.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/EverydayMisandry.

/r/EverydayMisandry archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Red Pill terms in post

[–]TheLWMA 7 points8 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

I've noticed that there are a lot of these novels coming out where men are either completely subjugated or wiped off the face of the earth, leaving only women behind. And of course, the worlds depicted in these novels are basically a utopia, where crime rarely happens and there's world peace.

It scares me that a lot of women (not all, obviously) have this authoritarian mindset. That if all men were gone or closely controlled, the world would be a better place.

This is beyond simple manhating. This is female supremacy.

[–]Skeleton_Warrior[S] 6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

It's the same stupid and ignorant way of thinking white supremacists have. A civilization and society with only white people and no non-whites would be peaceful and free of crime, when there's plenty of terrible white people who also commit crimes. Same stupid logic applies. It's frightening how similar feminists and white supremacists are with their beliefs and outlook.

[–]RatDontPanic 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Feminism is like racism but without the mass shootings.

[–]Skeleton_Warrior[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They're as bad as each other.

[–]RatDontPanic 1 point2 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

"Y: The Last Man" the TV series really deconstructed the hell out of that.

Episode 4 had a woman hiding her daughter under a shelf in a dead, picked-clean pharmacy. Now ask yourself what she was hiding her kid from...............

[–]Skeleton_Warrior[S] 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I didn't even bother to watch that series.

[–]RatDontPanic 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Ohhhh you're missing out. It utterly destroys the Kill All Men fantasy scenario. The way women feed on each other in that show would make the Taliban blanche.

[–]Skeleton_Warrior[S] 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

In that case I'll have to kill it a look. It's good that there's a piece of media that counters the anti-male narrative and shoots down the BS notion that an all-female world would be peaceful and free of things like war. Women are capable of the same terrible things as men and it sounds like this illustrates that. I'm honestly a bit shocked it was allowed to see release, given the horribly misandrist climate we're living in.

It's the same dumb logic white supremacists have that if the world was all-white we wouldn't have crime. When plenty of white criminals exist as well and you'd still have high crime rates. Attributing the world's problems solely on one or two demographics is ridiculously ignorant and narrow-minded.

[–]Skeleton_Warrior[S] 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

You know what that also reminds me off? What a horribly ignorant and sexist notion it is that women need female-only safe spaces to protect them from potentially predatory men. So protect them from potentially harmful men, only to leave innocent women more vulnerable to predatory women? There's plenty of innocent women who've been victims of terrible women. There's the Daphne Wright case and the Shanda Sharer murder, both of which are stomach-churning to read the details.

[–]RatDontPanic 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Predatory women? How dare you. That's unpossib-er whoops

[–]Skeleton_Warrior[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Amazing how feminists will always deny and dispute blatant facts and evidence even when it's right in front of their eyes to see.

[–]TheLWMA 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Although I haven't watched the show, I have heard that "Y: The Last Man" subverts the whole idea that if women ran the world, it would suddenly be a better place.

[–]RatDontPanic 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

It's more than that, it's an absolute shitshow for women, entirely of their own doing. It became my favorite series of all time, just sitting there from episode to episode watching the superior gender fall and go splat over and over again. I imagine that a woman who believes in "Kill All Men" would see it as a terrifyingly humbling splash of cold water on their fantasy.

[–]Skeleton_Warrior[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Knowing the average feminist they'd likely rail on about the show being misogynistic propaganda or some such BS. Even though it's being absolutely true in what it's depicting.

[–]Kuato2012 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It's like that joke that gets told in The Boondocks Saints... A genie will grant three wishes, so the first guy makes all the black people go away, the second guy makes all the Hispanic people go away, and the third guy orders a Coke. The implication is that everything would be nearly perfect once the first two wishes are fulfilled.

If one recognizes that joke as horribly racist, then they should also recognize that these feminist utopian fantasies are horribly sexist. The fantasies are predicated on the idea that once we make the men disappear (or just thoroughly subjugate them), then the world would be pretty much perfect.

Time to fire up the ol' r/menkampf machine and watch the sparks fly...

[–]Skeleton_Warrior[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's the same logic. Thinking the world would be better if certain demographics didn't exist is beyond ignorant and bigoted. The fact this book is allowed to see publication and be sold is nothing short of disgusting and disgraceful. The uproar over a book like this with the same premise but the genders reverses would (rightfully) cause outrage and see boycotts and protests. I really hate this gender wars BS.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter