TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Example #43,076 of Male Disposability, with a little "Men Slaughtered in War, Women Most Effected" for extra Misandry points

April 18, 2023
55 upvotes
post image

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/EverydayMisandry.

/r/EverydayMisandry archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Example #43,076 of Male Disposability, with a little "Men Slaughtered in War, Women Most Effected" for extra Misandry points
Author Unnecessary_Timeline
Upvotes 55
Comments 3
Date April 18, 2023 7:08 AM UTC (5 months ago)
Subreddit /r/EverydayMisandry
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/EverydayMisandry/example-43076-of-male-disposability-with-a-little.1214589
https://theredarchive.com/post/1214589
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/12qec3d/example_43076_of_male_disposability_with_a_little/
Red Pill terms in post
Comments

[–]Unnecessary_Timeline[S] 11 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Also for a little extra context, from 1914 to 1921 the American female population increased by 10.40%, while the male population increased by 8.66%.

Now that obviously does not directly translate to the % of men who suffered awful deaths in those European trenches, but it certainly gives us a starting point.

Just to start, if the male population had increased at the same rate as the female population during those years, there would be an additional 885,365 American men in 1921 than there actually were.

But yeah, the lack of those men resulted in a number of women not having a wage slave for her to live off of. So the real problem is the suffering women were subjected to as a result of not having her male meat wallet.

ugh

[–]RatDontPanic 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You know, if it weren't for the men that suffered, I'd say there should have been 75% less men. Just to watch the women have to cope with that. Oh the privileged whining that would have happened, lol

[–]az226 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They’re right tho. The wrong is in forcing conscription on men only and on forcing conscription. Make it voluntary.

At the end of the day, making that choice is a choice that may impact others around you.

The US also has a much larger military presence than is necessary.

This all said, the comment is an example of r/WomenMostAffected

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter