~ archived since 2018 ~

r/againstmensrights said women were 1 THOUSAND time more likely to be raped then men

December 5, 2022


This were blatant misinfomation.Literially one google search disprove it



And since male rape victim coming out is taboo,the number of raped men may be even higher

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/EverydayMisandry.

/r/EverydayMisandry archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title r/againstmensrights said women were 1 THOUSAND time more likely to be raped then men
Author huysocialzone
Upvotes 64
Comments 18
Date December 5, 2022 2:37 PM UTC (3 months ago)
Subreddit /r/EverydayMisandry
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/EverydayMisandry/ragainstmensrights-said-women-were-1-thousand-time.1142828
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/zd8gb6/ragainstmensrights_said_women_were_1_thousand/

[–]ThrowAway640KB 30 points31 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women Rape men as frequently as men rape women:

And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011).

In other words, if being made to penetrate someone was counted as rape—and why shouldn’t it be?—then the headlines could have focused on a truly sensational CDC finding: that women rape men as often as men rape women.

And yet, men reporting rape are ridiculed and dismissed at rates which would cause a national outcry if they were women instead.

[–]BCRE8TVE 10 points11 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Funny that you quote Rainn too, since they take their data from the CDC, and the CDC deliberately and systematically exclude male rape victims by female perpetrators from the stats, calling it "made to penetrate" instead.

We get to thank feminist Mary Koss for that.

[–]huysocialzone 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

well that just prove my point that what she said is blatant misinfomation

[–]BCRE8TVE 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh absolutely, there's rampant misinformation in most feminist circles not just about the over-exaggeration of female victims, but also a complete dismissal of male victims too. It's really frustrating to see this hypocritical double standard perpetuated by the very same people who say they we should care about victims.

[–]NohoTwoPointOh 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Good to know! Thanks!

[–]BCRE8TVE 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link


I find it really upsetting how feminist theory keeps saying how female oppression is a thing and they're focused on feretting it out, but then they just can't even acknowledge the possibility that maybe the same thing is happening to men too, as though victimhood and oppression is a female-only club.

Don't get me wrong women do face problems and those problems do deserve to be addressed. It's just frustrating that empathy goes out the door the moment the people they're talking about have a penis.

[–]Kuato2012[M] 0 points1 point  (12 children) | Copy Link

Please redact identifying information. Removed.

[–]huysocialzone 0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

I have changed the archive link into an np link,if we can link like that normally we should be able to archive it,right?

[–]Kuato2012 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

It's a prickly situation, because admins seem to be cracking down on anything they perceive as inter-subreddit drama. See here: https://np.reddit.com/r/ModSupport/comments/yxwy3h/sub_just_received_a_modcodeofconduct_message

While I don't like censoring the users here, my overarching goal is to keep this sub from being shut down. I may need to make a new rule preventing all inter-subreddit links.

[–]huysocialzone 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

But how would we be able to do,well anything if that is the case.

[–]Kuato2012 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Links to need articles, misandry in tv and movies, Twitter, etc. Just not Reddit.

[–]huysocialzone 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

But isnt that really counterproductive?that way,we are literially fighting on everywhere except on your home turf,how are we supposed to get people on reddt to join us if we only fight misandry everywhere except reddit itself.

[–]huysocialzone 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

And also,subreddit like againsthatesubreddit and subredditdrama are allowed to operate just fine despite constantly linking to other subs.

[–]Kuato2012 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Yup. Two sets of rules being enforced.

[–]Disastrous_Offer152 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Ok so,have they(reddit admin) have actually give you any formal warning?

[–]Kuato2012 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

No. And they didn't offer any warning when shutting down r/misandry.

[–]huysocialzone 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well but shouldnt just shut down an importion part of the subreddit like that without an admin warning,it is really self defeating,and kinda cowardly,really.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Reminder everyone - Don't brigade the crossposted sub. It's against reddit rules.

You can also report misandry directly to the admins here.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter