~ archived since 2018 ~

The irony of them saying this when male rape by women is legal in most places

July 5, 2022
59 upvotes
post image

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/EverydayMisandry.

/r/EverydayMisandry archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title The irony of them saying this when male rape by women is legal in most places
Author abgfkh333
Upvotes 59
Comments 12
Date July 5, 2022 10:03 AM UTC (6 months ago)
Subreddit /r/EverydayMisandry
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/EverydayMisandry/the-irony-of-them-saying-this-when-male-rape-by.1122951
https://theredarchive.com/post/1122951
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/vrudon/the_irony_of_them_saying_this_when_male_rape_by/
Comments

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

If you want to learn more about made to penetrate rape - https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/stories-49057533.amp

[–]RatDontPanic 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Mary P Koss, the one who (in)famously invented that "1 in 4" statistic, said men cannot be raped by women. Feminists must be held accountable for this. And "not all feminists" must be rejected just like they reject "not all men" because feminists never contradicted her nor are they fighting for gender neutral rape laws. In fact if they see this they'll say THIS is misogyny.

Never forget.

[–]TheSpaceDuck 15 points16 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Men will respond by legalizing rape

And yet again, a feminist textbook example of projection.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Similar things have been done by feminists in a bunch of countries. Honestly makes my blood boil.

[–]SyPanda 18 points19 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

They are living in a completely different reality. There is no place on earth that you can rape someone and walk free legally. Just in warzones may be, even then there will be a military comitee that will bottleneck your life in most modern armies. From most liberal Sweden to most Islamist Iran, rape always on all accounts meets with harsh legal punishment and its the healthy way, good way.

Also PS : They stated that most rape cases are not resulting in punishment is a bad thing, may be an indication of lying on women’s behalf? Like are we seriously gonna believe all women no matter what? Thats so missandrist..

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

It is legal for women to rape men in most places though. For example, it is legal in UK

https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-49057533.amp

But what if a woman makes a man have penetrative sex with her, without his consent? That's not rape under the law of England and Wales, but the author of a new study of the phenomenon says perhaps it should be.

[–]googitygig 6 points7 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

It's not legal. The issue is that it's not legally considered rape. It is still considered sexual assault and therefore illegal.

The wider issue is that sexual assault by females is not taken as seriously as sexual assault by males. This results in less men realising they have been assaulted, reporting their assault, securing a conviction of their assaulter and when the assaulter is convicted they generally receive more lenient convictions than a male would.

[–]RatDontPanic 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

The issue is that it's not legally considered rape.

Uh, he just said that though. She can't be jailed for rape. Rape charges tend to carry heftier sentences.

[–]googitygig 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

He didn't say that. He said it was legal for a woman to rape a man. That's not true. She can't be charged with rape but she will be charged with SA. So the act itself still illegal but they will get away with less punishment. That's exactly my point.

[–]BloomingBrains 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

If women start refusing to have sex en masse, men will just invent better and better replacements for them. (I.E. sex bots). It’s already happening, but not because men only value women for sex. It’s because they already feel real women aren’t giving them anything a robot couldn’t (i.e love) anyway.

It amazes me how much hardcore feminists try to use sex as a weapon/threat while complaining about men objectifying them.

[–]ChimpPimp20 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm gonna combat that. The reason why women use sex is because men they encounter see them as such. As a result they use it. It's akin to Catwoman using her charm and sex appeal to fight thugs.

However, I think this also leads into why men and women will laugh at the trend that is NNN. It's basically a role reversal. In this case men are the ones consistently saying "not tonight honey." It's not that this doesn't happen already but you get the idea (check out deadbedrooms if you don't believe me). I wanna say this is rare given that a lot of people there are indeed young virgins though. All in all, it negates the idea of men not having control over their bodies.

Also, watch out with how you talk about women and sex bots. I'm not understanding what a human can get out of a bot than a person. Maybe I'm missing something?

[–]BloomingBrains 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course a human can provide more than a sex bot. Genuine love, connection, etc. not just sex. But men are inventing sex bots as replacements for women. Why do that if they don't only want sex and see women as sex objects? Because they feel they can't/won't ever get real love OR sex anyway. We can't fix the love part scientifically, but might as well be able to at least have sex right? In other words, if all women can offer is sex, then they aren't doing any better than a robot.

My point was that its odd how you see some women (especially feminists) try to use sex as a weapon or withhold sex as if that's the main value women have, then turn around and complain about men building sex bots as evidence of "only seeing women for sex". Its like, no honey, you're the one that sees women as only being useful for sex.

It should be a completely trivial endeavor for almost any women to offer more than a sex bot. But we seem to have a weird thing in our culture where feminists want to have it both ways. They want the low effort of only offering sex, but they also want to be seen as more than a sex object. Its contradictory.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter