~ archived since 2018 ~

The sexist mods of feminismuncensored don't believe "kill all men" is harmful.

January 19, 2022

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/EverydayMisandry.

/r/EverydayMisandry archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title The sexist mods of feminismuncensored don't believe "kill all men" is harmful.
Author Forgetaboutthelonely
Upvotes 46
Comments 6
Date January 19, 2022 8:37 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit /r/EverydayMisandry
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/EverydayMisandry/the-sexist-mods-of-feminismuncensored-dont-believe.1096653
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/s7zve9/the_sexist_mods_of_feminismuncensored_dont/

[–]Deadlocked02 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I like the idea of subs like FeminismUncensored and FEMRAdebates in theory, which is why it’s a shame that they always turn out like this, with rules being selectively enforced to punish the MRA side.

In FeminismUncensored’s particular case, InfinitySky’s strategy was to get herself a henchman to do the dirty work for her by selectively enforcing rules to ridiculous extents, while she maintains a facade of free speech herself, since she’s not the one enforcing the rules.

TooNuanced herself has expressed her frustration with the state of the sub and the prevalence of MRAs there on AskFeminists. A few days after that, she begins to over-enforce rules even more than she did before, permabanning several users (myself included).

Given their very subjective civility rules and rule 8 (which doesn’t seem to apply to herself and InfinitySky), it’s only a matter of time until she permabans most MRAs and non-feminists. Or at least turns them into a tiny enough minority for feminists to feel comfortable on the sub. And it’s very clear this is her agenda and she’s hellbent on remaking the sub to her liking.

Feminists had their chance with FEMRAdebates and FeminismUncensored and they failed, which is why I think it’s time for MRAs to give it a shot. With a diverse moderation that includes feminist mods, of course, but with a MRA as a top mod for once. And a more relaxed moderation, but one with better defined rules that prevent them from being selectively enforced, as well as discourage the bad faith participation of users like Mitoza.

[–]Forgetaboutthelonely[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's the problem though.

Feminists will not participate if the rules aren't biased in their favor.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Reminder everyone - Don't brigade the crossposted sub. It's against reddit rules.

You can also report misandry directly to the admins here.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Moderators there believe in Free Speech -- not in selectively allowing offensive speech against just men.

The best approach sees Free Speech as an Ethical Value and tolerates "offensive speech" to a great degree. This is the way American Society has been for several decades. Under this approach both "kill all men" and lyrics of Marshall Mathers LP would be tolerated. Even though Free Speech may have drawbacks and abuses, these abuses are much smaller then abuses of Totalitarianism.

[–]Forgetaboutthelonely[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I reworded the exact statements given and made it instead about feminists. it was removed.

This is selectively allowing offensive speech against just men.

not to mention several other comments being removed for similar "Civility" rules.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter