~ archived since 2018 ~

Women in TwoX "Hate Men," But Reddit Admins Deny this is Hate

MazerTag
May 26, 2022
53 upvotes
/r/EverydayMisandry
https://np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/ux15db/rightwing_libertarian_men_we_hate_you/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/EverydayMisandry.

/r/EverydayMisandry archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Women in TwoX "Hate Men," But Reddit Admins Deny this is Hate
Author MazerTag
Upvotes 53
Comments 12
Date May 26, 2022 4:13 AM UTC (10 months ago)
Subreddit /r/EverydayMisandry
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/EverydayMisandry/women-in-twox-hate-men-but-reddit-admins-deny-this.1118546
https://theredarchive.com/post/1118546
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/uxz91f/women_in_twox_hate_men_but_reddit_admins_deny/
Top posts by MazerTag

Two X Literally Creates a Hate Post, and Reddit Says It Is Not Hate

39 upvotes
May 25, 2022
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Self-Described Hate Speech Reddit Admins Refuse to Acknowledge Is Hate

1 upvotes
May 25, 2022
/r/EverydayMisandry
Comments

[–]MooreanShiftingUrArg 31 points32 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

These people are actual psychopaths. I don't like right wing politics, but imagine calling half of men rapists. Also +1 for deliberately leaving out right wing women.

[–]MazerTag[S] 15 points16 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

There's the rub: more than half of prolifers are women.

[–]MooreanShiftingUrArg 11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists only have a passing relationship with the truth.

[–]country2poplarbeef 11 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

fuck that 'friendzone' talk. If friendship is bad to you, you can uck right off and die alone, i wouldn't even dream of being your friend.

Lol, I find this whole argument kinda dumb. Women take it personal that we don't wanna be your friend, but they don't get that we don't have trouble making friends, just like they don't have trouble getting laid.

It's not that I don't value friendship, I just literally don't have the money or time to manage multiple different friendships and give all of you the time you deserve and, tbqh, you kinda have to have more in common as friends if there's no romantic interest just because it's hard to coordinate schedules as an adult.

Also doesn't help that women generally won't invite themselves to pretty much anything. Lol If you're just a friend, you're only gonna stay that way if you care enough to invite yourself along with my other friends.

[–]MazerTag[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That whole argument is just gaslighting weak men to keep hoping and simping until the woman needs to use them. I've seen it play out a million times.

Rollo T. just had a discussion about this on Youtube - how the whole "I won't be with you now, but if we're both still single at thirty..." gimmick gets lapped up by men with few options, or a fixation. It's insulting and duplicitous.

[–]BloomingBrains 5 points6 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Am I crazy or does the line "But it won't last. Our rage runs deep and long, and you will all pay for this for years to come" sound like something Elliot Roger would have written? Isn't that just the ultimate irony.

I don't really agree with that characterization of ALL right-wing men, but I can at least see why they say that. But libertarian men? I don't get the vitriol.

Most of this is standard "you are all misogyists" fare. But the one that really gets me is "Your gun lust kills our children." Uh, how about no? The "gun nuts" want to protect kids at school with guns, and politics is preventing that. So it is actually the other side's irrational fear of guns that is killing children.

More and more of you will be friendzoned. Rejected. Dumped. Alone.

I doubt these men will be lamenting the "loss" of such misandrist women all that much.

[–]34T_y3r_v3ggi3s 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

The "gun nuts" want to protect kids at school with guns, and politics is preventing that.

I'm gonna have to disagree with you there. After something like Uvalade where even the police couldn't be competent enough to deal with the situation, what makes you think arming teachers would be a viable solution? The US has a serious problem with gun violence (in all forms) because of the abundance of them. Especially in places like Texas where you can get a gun as easily as buying a pack of cigarettes (albeit a lot more expensive).

[–]BloomingBrains 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well, you're not going to stop criminals from getting guns. I'm all for stricter rules and more background checks, but they aren't going to solve everything. Its insane to me that we protect rich, elite politicians with guns, but not our own kids.

Maybe arming teachers isn't the best idea, sure. Not everyone is responsible enough to handle a gun properly. (More people should be brought up that way, but nothing we can do about that). But there should at least be armed and trained professional campus security with guns, so we aren't relying solely on the police.

I'm sure we could get some army vets to do it, provided they're psychologically cleared to not have PTSD. They can use some of the funds that supposedly go to "school lunches" but are really lining politician's pockets, since kids are served crap food anyway.

[–]34T_y3r_v3ggi3s 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I suppose having guards is a good idea in school is a somewhat good idea. But the idea is to have fewer high powered assault weapons in the presence of schools, not more of them. As I said arming teachers is a bad idea, as in the Uvalde shooting even the cops were too cowardly and negligent to danything, so relying on people who's job it is to educate kids and not carry and use firearms at a moments notice is a horrible idea.

I'd also like to add that you can't really accomplish any of these things if some sort of reasonable gun control measures are taken. You have to admit in a place like Texas you can buy a gun as long as you're 18 and have enough money to afford it, virtually no questions asked, is a problem.

[–]EndHlts 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

sound like something Elliot Roger would have written? Isn't that just the ultimate irony.

It's the gender version of arr/stormfrontorsjw

[–]RatDontPanic 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well at least in this TwoX example their rage is aimed at an ideology - something we can choose to be or not to be. That's appreciably different from the "all men" nonsense that they normally resort to.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter