I've often seen the argument about how some of the worst and/or more dangerous jobs out there having almost exclusively male workers, whether it's referring to issues like the enormous workplace fatality gap or as criticism to the feminist idea that there should be gender quotas for women in management roles or other desired jobs.

Without going into the debate of whether quotas are a proper answer to workplace inequality (which I personally don't agree but that's another topic entirely) I personally think that demanding more female garbage cleaners/miners/etc. entirely misses the point by attempting to tackle the effect of the issue rather than the cause.

Let's assume for a moment such quotas existed and that after hiring X male garbage cleaners only female ones could be hired. The result would likely be the role being severely understaff due to not enough women applying, just as they don't currently. Instead of stating that "men work unpleasant/dangerous jobs" we should take a look at why this happens.

The main issue here is not men working undesirable/dangerous jobs, it's men not being hired to safer/more pleasant jobs. If you have a degree, a good curriculum and work a qualified job you'll be good regardless of gender. However when it comes to unqualified jobs the gap widens a lot. This is due to jobs that involve dealing with people often preferring women or even not hiring men entirely. This is due to the general view that men are dangerous/predators/violent that results in the customer feeling automatically safer and more at ease with a woman (and the employer hiring one).

Me and my friends all had experiences with this. My experiences include being rejected from a pub in Norway where workers earn about 2000€+2000€ more in tips because "we only hire women" (they didn't shy away from declaring it) or not being able to land a job in a hostel/hotel due to "lack of previous experience" while my female friends got hired to high-end hotels despite no previous experience or academic background in tourism. My friends' experiences included most clothing stores in Portugal not hiring male workers, again including cases of them just straight up declaring it.

If any sort of legislation/quotas would create workplace equality that's not focused solely on the upper classes, it wouldn't be achieved by demanding more women in dangerous/unpleasant jobs. It would be achieved by demanding more men being hired into hotels, hostels, pubs, clothing stores, etc. - not only this would solve the problem of so many men working horrible or dangerous jobs (because men would have an alternative), it would also create equality in fields that are currently almost entirely male, since the amount of people that don't have a choice but to take those wouldn't be so overwhelmingly male but more equally distributed.

TL,DR: Don't demand more female miners, garbage cleaners, etc. - demand more men in hotels, hostels, pubs, clothing stores, etc.