The Indian law say:

The husband cannot absolve his responsibility to maintain and to provide for the adequate maintenance to the wife unless there are evidences to support that the wife is no longer required to be maintained in view of certain changed circumstances.

This mean that after the divorce if the woman decide to not work the man will be forced to provide for her. she is not his wife anymore but the law stil treat her as his wife and force him to be provider. i think this is sexist. and a violation of men's rights.

I posted "This is crazy ! why the man is responsible for a stranger woman ?! all governments around the world are changing the laws dealing with women giving them equal rights (sometimes even extra privileges) in term of education/employment but at the same time nothing changed with men ! women of the 21 century are governed by the 21 century laws and men of the 21 century enslaved by the laws of the 14 century !! "

But this was removed as violation of rule 02 (egalitarian values) . the question for you is: do you think forcing a man to provide for stanger woman is egalitarian ? think about it. the man and woman live in different houses. she has no obligation toward him. but he has obligations toward her. is this equality ?!