'But if you are considered unattractive and ‘low value’ then you will be excluded from what Henry Miller called ‘The World of Sex”, a place of freedom and adventure, erotic fulfillment and pleasure, and love and companionship. To be deemed undesirable and ‘unfuckable’, of having no erotic worth at all is painful and soul crushing. This shouldn’t merely be sneered at as the delusional whining of losers drunk on entitlement. Human beings need to be loved by others, to pleasure and be pleasured by others, to develop intimate connections with others, to have fun with others. Being the social species we are it demands it. People are not wrong to want it and feel alienated when it proves extremely hard to achieve, because they are not desired by others for being who they are.'

'Yet, discrimination is simply a fact of dating. (...) Dating is not a democracy and nor should it be. (...) But, while we have a right to our preferences, we should also be able to critically reflect on why we desire what we desire and what influences it.'

This article is mainly about the possibility of racism and transphobia in dating preferences. But many single cishet white men (and maybe even women) will recognize the mechanism: not only when you're rejected, but also when you're successful at 'making it' with someone, it feels shallow and not at all what your dream about physical love was when you were in your early teens. Is it time, after some puritanic centuries and then some more and more impulsive decades, to find a balance between desire and ratio in dating preferences? What cultural changes would be needed for that and are they at all possible?

https://unherd.com/2020/10/the-dangerous-politics-of-desire/