Linkedin Study: https://business.linkedin.com/talent-solutions/blog/diversity/2019/how-women-find-jobs-gender-report
This LinkedIn study from 2019 used their internal data to examine differences between men and women when job searching. Among the key findings are the fact that men and women view a similar number of jobs though women apply to 20% fewer. A recruiter is 13% more likely to view a man's profile which she described as result of a problematic bias that must be corrected (even though they also found that recruiters will still contact both genders at equal rates).
However, the author (Maria Ignatova) makes no effort to hide her own bias (and sexism) by writing:
The good news is that when women do apply to a job, they are 16% more likely than men to get hired. In fact, if the role is more senior than their current position, that number goes up to 18%.While this is an uplifting stat, it does show that women do a very thorough job at vetting roles — sometimes maybe too thorough. If women only apply when they feel extremely qualified, this could also indicate they are not pursuing stretch opportunities.
Linkedin is a mainstream website, not a fringe feminist blog. Yet blatant discrimination in hiring practices is celebrated as "good news" and as "uplifting stat(s)". This doesn't lead to equality, it's just another piece of evidence that equality isn't the actual goal.
Her analysis is also very weak and uses the usual strategy of reframing all issues so that women are the real victims. I think a more plausible hypothesis for why men apply to 20% more jobs is because if we are getting rejected more often then we need to submit more applications to increase our chances of finding work. Of course I would submit fewer if I was getting offers at 16-18% higher rate.
For most of us, this is just seeing statistics that support what we already knew is happening. The worst part is just being gaslit, and told this is "equality" and if we have a problem with it we are misogynist or examples of "toxic masculinity". I just wonder how far it will continue to go.
[–]TheSpaceDuck 50 points51 points52 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]PricklyGoober 22 points23 points24 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]CodeOfFire 12 points13 points14 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]goronslime 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Affectionate-Ad-9450 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Digedag 15 points16 points17 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]MostLikelyPoopingRN[S] 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Talik1978 12 points13 points14 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]MostLikelyPoopingRN[S] 20 points21 points22 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fede10204 5 points6 points7 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]MostLikelyPoopingRN[S] 11 points12 points13 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Talik1978 -4 points-3 points-2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (6 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate[M] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]MostLikelyPoopingRN[S] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Talik1978 -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoMoreMisterMaybe 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Talik1978 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MostLikelyPoopingRN[S] 1 point2 points3 points locked comment (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Talik1978 0 points1 point2 points locked comment (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jacksleepshere 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Blutarg 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link