Redistribute unpaid work | UN Women

the majority of rapists and initiators of violent crime and rape are men

But men are more likely to be involved in dangerous car accidents

You obviously missed the point of this comment… My point is not that men are virtuous, my point is that in heterosexual relationships, male partners too assume gender roles that translate into paid careers, so the feminist talking point of female partners doing “unpaid labor” at home that warrants compensation is redundant because it is not a gendered issue—and it if there’s no gender inequality, it doesn’t even satisfy the preconditions to be a feminist talking point.

Also side point: Male crashes tend to be deadlier and more expensive (hence the higher insurance premiums for males, and the fact that men receive the most speeding tickets), which tells you that men are crashing because they are riskier drivers, not necessarily worse drivers. For example, a NASCAR driver is more likely to crash than you or me, but that’s obviously because he drives more often, and at higher speeds than we do. But you wouldn’t for a second say that a NASCAR driver is a “worse driver”than you, would you?. If you and your friend pick up skateboarding as a hobby and your friend attempts all the tricks but you attempt no tricks, does that mean your friend is a worse skateboarder? No, it just means you friend takes more risks than you, so you would expect them to crash more. Women get into the majority of fender-benders and low-speed crashes that are the most avoidable. In countries that have female-only parking spaces, the female are larger than the regular spaces. Men typically crash due to wrecklessness, Women typically crash due to incompetence. It’s no wonder female-only parking spaces are larger.

Many single mothers

Oh, let’s not get into the income of single mothers…who already rob their ex husbands of alimony and child support via legal extortion in family courts. Also we were talking about relationships, so why did you redirect to single people? Of course you’ll be responsible for doing everything if you live alone???

What normal person, if not a celebrity, routinely hires a body guard?!

I could ask you the same: What normal person, if not a celebrity, routinely hires a personal chef, or a surrogate mother? The average American income lingers at $40,000/yr, but apparently you want women to be compensated at these outrageous salaries for giving birth and cooking.

And in that case the most suitable person for the job would be picked. Likely to be a man as physically stronger. That’s just biology?

Is that your final rationalization for why male gender roles do not deserve compensation, but female gender roles do deserve compensation under the feminist lens? Because their biology facilitates their fulfillment of these roles? Okay, the same applies to women: Gestating and giving birth is part of their biology, so they shouldn’t be compensated for it. That’s also “just biology”. Women are naturally better multitaskers, and enjoy indoor, sedentary hobbies, so they shouldn’t be compensated for indoor, sedentary labor like cooking and cleaning. The precedent that you just set is self-defeating to your own cause (when it is applied to female gender-roles).

Who hurt you?

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=who+hurt+you

There’s nothing wrong with gender equality

Which is precisely why I am an anti-feminist. While I would love to go further into why feminism is has never consistently been about gender equality, I think this woman eloquently gives the anti-feminist position far more justice than I ever could: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=87klmHw_DkY&t=12s

I would highly recommend watching her YouTube series in full labeled: The Fiamengo File when you have spare time, as she succinctly goes over the history of the transgressions of feminism since it’s departure some hundred years ago until today.