I saw this on a Facebook page of a feminist, apparently copied from another feminist page.

Why is this sooo wrong? Creepy uncles are not omnipresent, and uncles may be called ‘creepy’ just for innocently liking their niece. Porn isn’t there to ‘teach’ people anything (and is only violent when the consumers have a fetish in that direction). Several relationships started because somebody didn’t take a first ‘no’ for everlasting (which is not the same as violently ignoring it). Rape within a relationship is not accepted at all, though that may have been different decades ago. The same goes for more phenomena mentioned here. ‘Disbelief’ in this context often means ‘the accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty’. Any advice on how to avoid being raped can and will often be called 'victim-blaming'. And of course sexual history can sometimes, partly, predict sexual desires, I wouldn't know how that would legitimize rape in any way.

It is a typical example of collecting arguments that might support your point while ignoring everything that might contradict it, or every weak point of it. So that way there remains a belief in mythical phenomena like ‘rape culture’.

https://preview.redd.it/hekxw6kg5yo51.png?width=720&format=png&auto=webp&s=abb6dc253dcb6e994f8bef05dae45f049e51275a