8,000 YEARS AGO, 17 WOMEN REPRODUCED FOR EVERY ONE MAN

NietzscheExplosion · 2017-10-26T14:21:36+00:00

The 80/20 rule has existed for longer than I realised.

2017-10-26T16:18:31+00:00

Legalize RAPE ^{^{^What}} ^{^{^is}} ^{^{^this?}}

NietzscheExplosion · 2017-10-26T16:37:04+00:00

Neolithic, or immediately post neolithic Chad was really just a super farmer or someone who could protect or trade or pilfer the goods.

That basically covers the 4 main archetypes. Some of these bitches probably fucked all 4.

1v1crown · 2017-10-26T15:33:05+00:00

Damn wish I lived back then... I'd have 17 bitches.

ScatteredCastles · 2017-10-26T17:19:22+00:00

Somewhat related...
One of my favorite bits of trivia: we're all the product of incest. You have two parents, four grandparents, eight great-grandparents, and so on. The number of ancestors doubles with each generation going back in time. If you go back 32 generations, perhaps just 700 or 800 years, you have 4.3 billion ancestors, but that's far greater than Earth's population back then. The explanation? You're the product of incest; it's guaranteed.

chadbhava · 2017-10-26T19:04:26+00:00

wehuntedlandwhales.com

DereIzNoPoint · 2017-10-26T20:18:10+00:00

This is why the 80/20 meme needs to be ditched, it gives the rich betabux (high-level beta) the false impression they're actually alpha. More accurately the rule is like 85/5 or somthing like that.

SnapshillBot · 2017-10-26T13:17:07+00:00

Hey all. reddit decided to add an attribute to the reddit API which makes submitting comments an endeavor that becomes difficult. You may not get snapshots periodically while this issue is being resolved.

Sorry about that. :/

Snapshots:

This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, archive.is

^{I am a bot.} ^(Info ^/ ^Contact)

DigitalScetis · 2017-10-26T15:59:41+00:00

Simple Mendelian Genetics can explain this result without having to rely on myths of stone age chad and his seventeen moisty hoes.

The_Law_of_the_Land · 2017-10-26T20:56:45+00:00

And I'm calling BULLSHIT due to logic and common sense.

Common sense would tell us that 8000 years ago, 17 women most of whom would be pregnant starting 15 and dead by 30 can't contribute much in the fields. It is on the backs of men that society has been built. Sorry but females the primary source of labor in a pre-industrial age just sounds too stupid even for these pseudoscientists.

Now the logical argument against this, mitochondrial DNA mtDNA (see the works of geneticist Spencer Wells) can not be tracked through lineage with any accuracy. Also, you can only Y-DNA lineage for males. How the fuck do you draw a conclusion that the 3.5 billion females on the planet were subject to the same rules as the males in the sample population.

Finally if you observe more primitive human tribes today, you will notice that most all men in the tribe will mate. The agreement to trade your labor to the tribe for a m8 is a requirement which primitive man knew better than liberal paleo-geneticists.

.....

WHY? WHY LIE about the origins of man?

...

Man did not build civilization, women did. All 17 of them. He was just a sperm donor who spent all his time fucking to ensure that he produced hundreds of babies.
There was a great cataclysmic event that occurred 8000-10000 years go, that nearly ended man kind and brought our numbers down to a handful of survivors but it's one of those points of cognitive dissonance that the "scientific" community will never acknowledge. Instead we have to come up with retarded theories like this to explain why there was a bottleneck in the genetics of humanity.

Reprogramming_Life · 2017-10-26T19:39:32+00:00

I'm skeptical of any DNA evidence that goes back more than a generation or two, tbh, really altogether. I read some articles that said those ancestry tests are pretty much mostly bullshit. If they can't even come close to accurately tracing back the dna history of someone who's alive, how the fuck are they going to do it for people who died 8k years ago? lol It's bullshit to push an agenda, for funding, or just to get their names in a paper/article. It's pretty much a bunch of overpaid people guessing and manipulating data to fit their guess or concluding things based on nothing.

Scientists supposedly have this deep knowledge and understanding of DNA yet how many genetic diseases have been cured even through prevention? Fucking 0, none, nada. I wouldn't be surprised one bit if DNA is a scam, not that it doesn't exist but in how it's presented to us.

If you really want to see how scary it is, read up on how bullshit DNA analysis for crimes is utter bullshit when it gets someone convicted or gets them off a charge years after the fact. It's just another control mechanism. Again, I'm not denying DNA exist but scientists understanding of DNA itself, I think they know very little about it. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/a-reasonable-doubt/480747/ Here's one of the articles I've read about it in the past.

If they had any real understanding of DNA super chads would be produced in female volunteers for the military or in an artificial womb. lol FOH with claims they know how many men reproduced per woman.

2017-10-26T20:39:05+00:00

[deleted]

Title	8,000 YEARS AGO, 17 WOMEN REPRODUCED FOR EVERY ONE MAN
Author	Ludakrit
Upvotes	100
Comments	51
Date	October 26, 2017 1:16 PM UTC (6 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/78vh4f/8000_years_ago_17_women_reproduced_for_every_one/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/8000-years-ago-17-women-reproduced-for-every-one.543424 https://theredarchive.com/post/543424