~ archived since 2018 ~

China Ponders Reproduction Fund Tax on under 40s w/o 2 kids

August 17, 2018

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/MGTOW.

/r/MGTOW archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title China Ponders Reproduction Fund Tax on under 40s w/o 2 kids
Author Eidolon3436
Upvotes 11
Comments 14
Date August 17, 2018 10:50 PM UTC (4 years ago)
Subreddit /r/MGTOW
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/china-ponders-reproduction-fund-tax-on-under-40s.508007
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/986t6r/china_ponders_reproduction_fund_tax_on_under_40s/
Red Pill terms in post

[–]Judah_Earl8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

They want all these new people for when they begin colonizing Africa.

The Chinese aren't building cities and infrastructure over there for nothing.

[–]Eidolon3436[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They will need them to go to to toe with the Indians long before they Sinicize black Africa.

Shiva's children are no joke. They can pile bodies just as well as the Middle Kingdom.

We Americans are VERY fortunate to have oceans between us and Asia.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The day they do that here in the US is the day I check out of the system and fake every fucking psychological disorder there is so I can suck off the government cheese.

They kind of already do it though by rewarding women for having kids with welfare. Of course hearing their excuses about there being "no good men" gets fucking tiring after you observe them eyeballing Chad time after time trying to get in his pants and dating alcoholics and other assorted trash men.

[–]Eidolon3436[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If parasitism should eventually appeal.. seek public sector employment.

It doesn't matter HOW they are misusing one's tax dollars if every one of those tax dollars (and the rest of the pay) was already someone else's tax dollars. I mean..it matters.. but it's not such a deal.

"Taxes" become more like fees that lower the handout..if that makes sense.

[–]MGTOW-Balance5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

i can see it all now. in the west this will be the single mother thot fund. most of the funding will be paid by single men because women would bitch not to be included

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Like the tax breaks they get for kids now.

[–]Eidolon3436[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"Chinese scholars have caused public outcry for proposing salary deductions for all under-40s to subsidize families with 2 kids in a bid to encourage more births.

China recorded 17.23 million births in 2017, 630,000 less than in 2016, with births in the first half of 2018 at least 15 percent less than in the same period in 2017. "The peak birth period since the 'two-child' policy has passed," the newspaper, Xinhua Daily, said on Tuesday.

The number of Chinese women in their peak fertility age will drop by 40 percent within the next 10 years. China's fertility rate faces a significant drop, the report noted.

The report stressed that the country should "immediately remove birth limits as a short-term response."

The report also proposed to establish a fertility fund where citizens under the age of 40 would be required to contribute to the fund every year until they have two children."

[–]Docbear644 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

How do they expect this to work? You tax people getting rid of some of their expendable income but then expect them to date and cavort with each other more?

That's ridiculous.

[–]MGTOW-Balance3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

as long as you pay for their babies, govern[MEN]t wins because they don't have to pay for it = fuck yo' feelings to single men

[–]Eidolon3436[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe the idea being that if you want out from under the tax you might breed , just like nowadays fools in the U.S. talk about the tax savings if married?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's probably more expensive to raise a kid than paying the tax so... nothing is gonna change, men are rational, we do the math and we make the right choice, sometimes it just takes a while to believe and process what we're seeing, but eventually we accept it and then shit hits the fan.

[–]DangZagnut1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Government in action.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter