~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
bigeyedbunny
[–]ransay327720 points21 points22 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Of course it is. Notice that these "feminists" are low SMV women. Feminism is the fruits of their envy. Rush Limbaugh put it very nicely. Feminism was developed to allow unattractive women to enter the mainstream.
[+][deleted] 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]Genetiks273 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You're correct that there are beautiful feminists today but during it's inception as a movement they were all ugly as sin. Hence the stereotype of the frumpy, dumpy, buck-toothed, saggy-titted, hairy, overweight feminist. I mean, it's still somewhat true today but less so than it was.
The pretty ones just jumped on board when they realised what they could get out of it as well, ie: no fault divorce, become career women and mothers without the tedious hassle of having to bring the kids up, a shameless ride on the cock-carousel, the ability to marry the state, etc etc.... and who wouldnt want to take advantage of a system that allows you to lose your responsibilities whilst gaining privileges? Fuck, it's like becoming a child again.
[–]nb4hnp6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
The fuck is a "professional rapist"? Is there someone out there hiring people for an hourly wage to go out and rape whoever they can?
[–]thrownaway_MGTOW2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
LOL... yes. Women.
They just refuse to actually pay up afterwards. Instead they like to reverse the charges on the bill.
[–]User-31f64a4e2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Apparently anyone raping for fun is doing it wrong, as they could be getting paid for that shit!
Or, maybe it's just more feminist made-up words and redefinitions. Patriarchy, testosterone poisoning, rape culture, wage gap, professional rapist ... if it's in the feminist lexicon, it's bullshit.
[+][deleted] 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Don't be insulting uncle Adolph like that!
He wasn't anywhere near as bad looking as these cunts.
[–]lostapwbm1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Who does a "professional rapist" send their invoices and expense reports to?
Asking for a friend.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why do all feminists look like catwoman and/or significantly ugly?
[–]legault88[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's always been a female advicacy at all cost movement, the hate is just a bonus.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
How can you not laugh at this?
[–]Bartand-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It is not hate when the democrat are in power . . . .
[–]Griever114-4 points-3 points-2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Originally no. Currently, absolutely.
[–]the-tominator-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The point of this post is to show that there was a hateful streak long ago.
I don't think the suffragettes were 'feminists' in any way like the modern sense. For a start, they had a clear focused purpose, reflected in their name "suffrage -etts/ists". Neither did they call themselves feminists (as far as I know), although the word "feminist" has existed since way before then.
Looking at feminism, there is no clear objective or purpose in the name. The only thing it implies is "female -ist", which is telling because it's hard to pin down exactly what feminism as a whole is, except for 'pro-female'. Individual feminists and strains/subgroups of feminism sometimes have one or more clear goals, but overall there isn't one clear, practical goal that unites them all.
For example, while a feminist in an Islamic country might have the goal of equal rights, a feminist in the West won't have that goal (although they think that's their goal) because they already have that and more here. Their goals move, to providing shelter for female domestic violence victims, to campaigning against manspreading and mansplaining, to whatever objective they think will help advance women in general - sometimes noble (like DV shelters, if they don't exclude men or campaign against male ones), sometimes not.
The suffragettes were a focused "single-issue" group (these groups are the ones who normally get the most success because they'd focused on one thing, and don't normally "overstep their bounds"). Feminism is really an umbrella term, like conservatism or liberalism, that includes quite different groups but are loosely united in some way. For feminism this is the benefit of women, for conservatism it is the preservation of tradition, and for (classical) liberalism it is choice - to continue with the previous examples.
[–]thrownaway_MGTOW0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't think the suffragettes were 'feminists' in any way like the modern sense.
Then you need to learn a bit more about their actual history.
Don't take the white-washed "textbook" revisionary history as if it were the gospel truth, because it isn't.
[+][deleted] 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
[removed]
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Who's going to support all of these women, then? Themselves?
This is why there's a man for every woman.
[–]RfrankieR2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Forget about evolution they won't last a week.
[–]bigeyedbunny[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There are over 4,000,000,000 women in this world. And you want to reduce the number of men? WTF. You want to be the next Hitler? :/
[–]Botanical-Concepts0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well yes there has always been a difference in male: female ratios depending on various factors i.e. war time/peace time.
You first, be my guest
[+][deleted] 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]bowie747-4 points-3 points-2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Or they'd have their choice. These wouldn't be ordinary beta men they'd be the cream of the crop and have 2-4 ladies a piece.
[+][deleted] 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]ransay327720 points21 points22 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]Genetiks273 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]nb4hnp6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]thrownaway_MGTOW2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]User-31f64a4e2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]thrownaway_MGTOW2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lostapwbm1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]legault88[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bartand-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Griever114-4 points-3 points-2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]the-tominator-1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]thrownaway_MGTOW0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (11 children) | Copy Link
[removed]
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RfrankieR2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bigeyedbunny[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Botanical-Concepts0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]bowie747-4 points-3 points-2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]