No exceptions

Edit : replied to the wrong comment. My mistake.

Ah, the "man do it too" cliche. It's been a long time since I heard that.

Interesting, how even when this sub is quarantined, someone still manages to virtue signal with their whataboutism.

Now lets talk about the "studies prove men cheat more than women" cliche.

The funniest thing is our overly educated people in general, like u/yellowlakes seem to miss one major factual point in this so called researches who somehow "prove" men cheat more. What is that point? Here it is :

Men do not actually cheat the most. Men simply Admit to cheating the most . Because compared to women, men are more honest even if that honesty bites him back.

Now, why do men admit to cheating the most? Well simple, men have to. When the privileged gender(female) refuses to admit the truth and straight up lie even in such researches, the honesty has to come from one side at least. Unfortunately the honesty only comes from the human doing's side(men's side) and people start mentioning that against men to devalue men's arguments with their "men do it too" card. Funny, but interesting.

These so called "Researches who prove men cheat more than women" also miss another factual point because they are afraid to say it as they dont want negative female attention, as feminists will target them if they dare to mention this :

A woman will never admit to someone, just like that, about the following four things :

1)her body count

2)Her sexual past

3)what kind of "adventures" she had

4)Her cheating on her man or any kind of wrongdoings against the man

Show me a woman who is honest about the above points to her man openly, just like that and I will show you a horse with wings flying around in the clouds.

Now I already know what kind of replies I am going to get, but lets see how it goes. What do they say in america? There's a first time for everything.

You're not talking about actual relationships though

Oh he is. Each and every relationship between a man and a woman is transactional. That fictional "unconditional romantic eternal love" is just another one of those disney fantasies that people like to have because no man wants to be logical, indifferent and stoic when it comes to relationships and that is why it's men who majority gets fucked in relationships.

In those relationships the woman is just using the man for his assets

Women marry for money and other form of gains. Without any monetary or othet form of gains which specifically benefits her and gives her security, status, satisfaction & money, an association is not going to be possible. Go look up briffault's law. Search on google or whatever engine you use, with this : "briffault's law Psychology today" and you will get a detailed article about what it is u/yellowlakes.

Maybe you can point the knife at those shitty women but women in healthy relationships do pull their own weight and do a lot for their man

Shitty women? I don't women shitty for their evolutionary biological and psychological nature. You are doing that.

As for the "women do a lot for their man", in the ahort term of course because she is attracted to him at the start of a relationship(if there is any attraction). It's time and the tingles which slowly show the actual human nature on a biological level. When a woman exercises that, then the show becomes interesting. Disney fantasy does not work in real life mate, or girl, whoever or whatever you are, since westerners tend to have 1200+ genders nowadays.

Anyways, I dont have time to educate you on the other factual information such as the Alpha Fux Beta Bux(AFBB) dynamic which is a important part of male female dynamics that play a huge role in relationships, Briffault's Law, hypergamy, alpha fucks beta bucks(AFBB) etc, the Light Switch Effect, hypergamy, difference between sluts & studs, difference between Men in love vs Women in Love and why they are not the same, the dark triad(bad man personality) and why women are attracted to that, . Since I dont need to explain who rollo tomassi is, or the factual information about evolutionary female nature, as it will take a lot of time and efforts. Looking at your reply I dont think you are really that interested except for virtue signalling and downplaying OP's argument by saying the same old "men do it too" cliche.