They roots of feminism actually has its roots in the 13th century Catholic Church. Except then it was called pussy worshipping Mother Mary. The Roman Catholic Church was already corrupt as hell so it was easy for women to subvert it. Mother Mary gave women indirect power, so nunneries where ran by women, essentially they have the power while men have the responsiblity for protection. Mother Mary also acted like a surrogate mother to these cucks.

Flash forward to Calvin, Luther etc. Essentially these men looked at the Christian teaching with a masculine eye. With masculinity, ideas are debated etc. So for Calvin, he stated the Bible has errors in translation and copying. But he saw it as a path to enlightenment, by thinking about it, debating what do the passages mean. This is opposed to blind Faith. The rise of Britian, Holland, Germany etc can be attributed to Protestantism.

The roots of modern feminism stem directly from the Prohibition movement from Churches in the 1900s. This flies directly in opposition from Christian teachings where Jesus said there should be a clear separation between church and state. Render unto ceasar what is Cesars. The arguments for Prohibition where similar to the porn arguments and now the sex doll arguments.

Flash forward to modern times. Feminism often rebrands itself as humanist groups. This is where the athiest/agnostic feminists of old go, now that it hard to peddle their rubbish. Or you have your standard tradcuck Christan movements.

How do you judge if these groups are feminism under a new mask? As Jesus said, you judge a tree by the fruits it bears. So casually mention to one of the group members about a guy who got divorce raped because his wife filed false allegations of abuse. Mention how your buddy was shocked that women could file these accusations without substantial evidence. If the hamster wheel starts going hypersonic justifying the woman's actions that answers your question.

The best model for the feminazis disease is a mind virus. Viruses mutate and look for new ways to infect their hosts.

As for the cucks who are infected with this disease. Look at them as ill people. That doesn't justify their behavior, it is describing how the pathogen works. Like a person infected with a biological disease like the ebola virus, they can be extremely deadly. So caution is advised.

Men who have not been infected with this disease need immunization. Drop a few red pills carefully.

Edit - my history of feminazism and Christianity isn't 100% accurate. Obviously in could write entire books about the subject. One can not cram 1500+ years of history in 5 paragraphs.

Whether or not my history is 100% correct is immaterial, it is the essense or idea that counts. It is like the story of Samson in the Bible, did Samson exist? Did Delilah exist? Did Samson really get his strength from not cutting his hair? Did he actually push down the pillars of a temple after he was blinded?

Probably this story/fable/parable is based on countless composite characters. To think to learn is Deilah kept in poking at Samson till she found his weakness. Then she used it against him.

The Athiest will attack the moral of the story on whether or not a sky God exists instead of learning from the essense/moral. Hard core athiests like to pick and choose their morality.

An agnostic like the historical economist Naill Ferguson shows that the rise of western nations was due to the Protestantism.