~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
BlackPillPusher
[–]Infinitewisdom19845 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Has to be satire. I won't be surprised to find that it's not, but for fuck's sake please be satire lol
[–]Phaggo6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I’ll give tree fiddy
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
🤢🤮
[+][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]doom23452 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why would someone want someone else's low-IQ, special-needs, crack-addicted baby?
[–]Ocjab1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This creature belongs in a mental hospital.
[–]Vaxel000 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
As an anarcho capitalist, I don't see anything wrong with this.
[–]BlackPillPusher[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
As an anarcho capitalist, I think causing suffering in others is a NAP violation.
[–]Vaxel003 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Kids are the property of the parents and property can be transferred in exchange of payment.
In this case, the kid is better of with someone that actually wanted it enough to pay.
[–]BlackPillPusher[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
That comment acually make me think, I'll be following you, and yeah, you are right,
most people do treat their kids as property, much more so the reeducation camps that public schools are, it ties in perfectly with schopenhauer's theory of will, female hypoagency and male mother need actually, people procreate out of pure instinct, they rarely think about the the world they helped create and are leaving for their offsprings, that much is obvious, since for most people instincts are god, not unlike in most animals, especially mammals, which all of us are.
[–]Vaxel001 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I mostly attribute it to agency and responsibility.
In the 1800's men could "sell" their wives, as a response to divorce laws and how the man was supposed to carry all of the woman's debts even if she was not living with the husband. The men passed the property of the wife and all the debt and responsibility to the man that wanted to buy her.
Extend that to children in this case.
[–]PhantomCowboy0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
pretty sure this goes against the Craigslist TOS
© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Infinitewisdom19845 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Phaggo6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]doom23452 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ocjab1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vaxel000 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]BlackPillPusher[S] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vaxel003 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]BlackPillPusher[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Vaxel001 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PhantomCowboy0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link