https://www.classfmonline.com/1.11836715

What is up with all the sex doll articles today?

What do sex dolls say about a woman’s role in the world?

Nothing, what do vibrators say about man's role in the world? Nothing, but to feminism, everything is a feminist issue, and if it isn't, they'll make it up!

With sex dolls getting more and more realistic, it seems like only a matter of time before they become part of our everyday lives. What does it say about an ‘equal’ society when the vast majority of dolls are of the female form? Are women still objects? Women as inanimate objects might make for uncomfortable viewing but that’s kind of artist Stacey Leigh’s point...

It says that despite the lies and propaganda, women's biological imperative is resources. You make a sex doll shaped like a never ending ATM, and they'll buy it. They do make male sex dolls, but male sex dolls can't make them money you see, so they'll maybe get bought by gay men? But the robotics of fucking you realistically is years away. Full fledged robotics. See men fuck, women are penetrated. You're not very necessary to the process other than for some reason your internal organs moving around a wet flesh tube feel good to men. No idea why. Evolution I suppose.

It's female dolls, because men evolved to like fucking which made more little humans. Women evolved to crave resources and money, so those little humans would grow up to fuck and make more little humans.

Females enjoy sex just enough to participate and get impregnated. But women simply do not have male sex drives with anything approaching equality. Sure they like sex, but not anything like men do. It's like at best, 10%.

Biology bitches.

So sex doll companies, seeing men are idiots and would stick their dick in a blender if they could get off on it, start creating realistic fuck toys to simulate a woman with their flesh tube.

That's it. There's no politics, no meaning, not vast conspiracy, it's the free market. Kind of like women and shoes, box wine, and cats. And gold digging.

My hand masturbating me isn't a political act, although occasionally a messy one. Not art either, but I could finger paint I suppose.

Are women still objects?

How many times do I have to explain this. I'm a feminist. Feminism tells us women are nothing but holes. Holes are negative space, therefore not objects. Negative space is an art term lady.

That's not to say women are nothing per se, but they're holes. Don't yell at me, go yell at your feminist leaders, I didn't decide it. Some of them can be pleasant to be around when they're being good.

Women as inanimate objects might make for uncomfortable viewing but that’s kind of artist Stacey Leigh’s point.

There's a picture in the article of some sex dolls sitting on a couch or something, dressed normally, and is supposed to be "art" according to the artist. Pretty lame. It's the same thing you could see at Disney World in their Carousel of Progress, still my favorite ride. Which I'm sure they've gotten rid of by now.

Her stark images have been compiled into a book called Play With Me by Grace Banks, a writer and editor of popular culture.

Sounds like a real page turner. Wait, doesn't that mean you're suggesting that women are objects to be played with? Or are you trying to be subversive with double meanings to make us think deeply about feminist art. Wowzers....

Grace says the book looks at ‘ownership of the female nude in today’s current political, economic and social climate’, using sex dolls, mannequins, CGI, nude neon reliefs to depict appropriations of the female form.

Grace should have titled it, Ambien : The written word in pictures.

While also seeing the dolls in the bedroom, a more recognisable terrain, the work is questioning whether a woman is seen as more than her body.

Nope. Nada. Nein. You know how you cupcakes have your thousand points you want in a partner? Men don't give a shit about that stuff. Your education? Meh. Opinions? Whatever. You have two whole things to do. Attempt to have a pleasant personality, and at least make an effort to be fuckable. Do that and the world is your oyster. Why women keep fucking up those two things I have no idea. I mean, go do whatever career makes you happy if you'd rather go down the road on your own, enjoy that cubicle for the next 45 years, then you can "retire" and do whatever post-menopausal women do, muff dive or something. But you can't have it all, so don't be like all these other retards writing articles about how "unfair" it is that you can't have a family and only get retard babies from your raisin like eggs when you're a hard working career gal. Pick one or the other.

Why you want to work when you could sit at home and do nothing all day long except ignore a crying baby, I have no idea. If you weren't so hypergamous, one of you rich princesses could marry down to me and I'd sit at home all day and do nothing but nudge the sleeping baby with my shoe now and then, because its bottle would have a non-trivial amount of scotch in it.

‘Artists are reclaiming the ownership of the female body from the pervasive male-defined tropes and spaces for the female body in contemporary art,’ Grace Banks says.

Uh, males don't dominate art. Women are all over the art scene. You can tell because the art is pretty crappy and does nothing but whine about some political idiocy with the subtlety of a Mac truck going through a crowd in Paris. Wait, was that just some subversive art?

‘The female nude is one of the most contentious topics of our post-internet age.’ Banks is keen to talk about Kim Kardashian-West and THAT naked photo with two black stripes censoring her body.

This isn't "post-internet", did the internet go somewhere? Did you not pay the internet bill? We're post-industrial because we're a service sector economy, and 80% of people (in the U.S.) work in offices. Not factories.

So if we're post-internet, then what are we in <current year>?

Also, how dare you slut shame another woman. You ma'am, are a racist.

‘Was this a harmless post or a step back for feminism?,’ she asks.

She made millions, and feminists crave money and power, so shouldn't they love her? Oh right, marxism doesn't pay, but apparently capitalism does. Market forces win biotch!

The world reacted, the internet broke but it really brought out varied views on where the female body is in society.

i wasn't aware she had done that, but I do know it doesn't matter. Why do you keep focusing on those idiots (who out earn you) if you don't like them? Stop giving them power. What is she, the first naked chick on the internet?

Bette Midler said that ‘if Kim wants us to see a part of her we’ve never seen, she’s gonna have to swallow the camera’.

Among other things.^{Did it just get dark in here?Poppshoutout!}

Piers Morgan told her to ‘put some clothes on’, while Chloe Grace Moretz said role models need to teach young women ‘we have so much more to offer than just our bodies’.

They make money, they don't give a fuck about being 'role models', they're there to sell shit and make millions. I know you feminists are all about role models. Why don't you become any? Oh right, fat ugly sexual failure feminists can't succeed at anything but the oppression olympics and you classist white women still only come in with the bronze.

When her sister Kylie Jenner turned 18, she was offered $10 million to make a sex tape by a pornography site.

When I was 18 I had to mow the lawn for free.

Two years later, she has a business worth over $900m (£700m).

If she was a feminist she'd be broke, in debt, and fat. Sounds like she made smart choices.

But commentators still say the Kardashians/Jenners ‘are little more than walking blow-up dolls’ and are not good role models.

Wah. They have no wish to be. They aren't intellectual giants. They aren't a moral authority. They're plastic whores getting paid.

‘I definitely find the whole commodification of feminism really problematic,’ Banks told ID magazine.

Bingo! Unironic Problematic is a word stupid people use to try and sound intelligent when they have nothing to say.

Commodification of feminism? What? You mean feminism and all its focus on just constantly raising money for personal use while doing absolutely nothing of value to anyone about anything? Or is this money being raised as a defense fund for all the feminist child rapists?

Feminism is a shit investment.

And I’m still conflicted.

Try some fiber.

I feel quite strongly about supporting the virtues of fashion and beauty for women, but I do not think wearing a T-shirt that says “feminism” is a feminist act.

How is it not? It is virtue signaling, like rainbow hair, for people to stay away from 'it'. Anyone openly advertising being part of a religious hate cult is someone I'm not wasting time with. Like feminism.

‘But then much of what highly educated feminists do are not feminist acts either.’

Their behaviors speak otherwise. When there's berkeley professors in anti-fa and attacking regular people, they're feminist acts, but as I said, religious hate cult.

After a sex doll brothel opened in Paris, Lorraine Questiaux of feminist group Mouvement du Nid (Nest Movement) reportedly said it was a ‘place that makes money from simulating the rape of a woman’ and called for it to be banned.

I love how the assumption is that rape will take place, rather than just wanting to fuck something vaguely woman shaped, rather than deal with the pain in the ass of a woman who is nothing but a problem. Problematic some might say.^ironically

To you feminists, all sex is rape, it's all you focus on. I wonder why that is? I assume it's because no one wants to fuck fat blue haired trolls so you just have to dream about it all day.

Members of the MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) movement have argued that replacing women with sex dolls would be ‘cheaper’, ‘hotter’ and ‘the future’.

Thanks for the shout out. They will be hotter, and quieter, and certainly cheaper and less stressful.

Also, not a movement. We just don't really like you that much, mostly, because you've never had to earn respect, and you're not even that interesting, which you'd think the life support system for holes would be, but really, after the first couple dozen, you're not that unique, and you all say the same shit all day long.

Doesn't this sound exactly like the last article I ranted about, with all the reddit posts? i wonder if there's been a push, or that feminist writers simply have nothing original to say, so they just steal each other's shit and reword it.

A new wave of art is working to depict the female form on women’s terms in what Grace describes as a ‘wide movement of feminist art’.

See? Already I can tell the art will suck, but somehow the NEA will waste tax dollars on this bullshit.

Let me guess, art depicting land whales?

‘These are contemporary artists, sure, but they’re also activists, theorists, political commentators and more,’ Banks says.

Yeah the art definitely sucks.

‘They deal with online post-internet feminism, but in working largely offline their work shows a triumph of real-life feminism versus online activism.

Just post that shit to deviantArt like all the other perverts. Real life feminism, posing sex dolls. Yeah. Real on the nose art that will keep the critics guessing what your hammer to the nail "meaning" is. God feminist artists suck.

‘With the tools once used to objectify them, these artists transform women’s bodies into a self-governed piece de resistance.’

Great. So will those "tools" have the pulsating RealFeel^tm vaginas?

Also, can I fuck your art? What if I do fuck your art? Am I part of the art then? Is it a very quick and poorly done performance art?

China’s online sex toy market is already worth $3bn-a-year and is expected to grow exponentially in years to come.

Yay China.

The sex doll, seen by many as a mass produced version of the female stereotype, is driving a significant part of that growth.

And? Credit cards set you free of the shackles of servitude. When you look at a Visa, it's a triumph of men's art, as a liberator of women to spend their own money and acquire their own debt. So every credit card you pay the bare minimum on, is an act of men's art, that you're now part of.