~ archived since 2018 ~

'Women's Lib: They're Spoiling Eve's Great Con Game' by Taylor Caldwell, 1970, American Opinion magazine

October 11, 2016

[The following essay, written by a traditionalist woman, is from the anti-feminist position of 1970. What is remarkable is how much of its worst ideas are now part of feminism and how much of its best ideas are recognised by MGTOW.]

The left, alas, is now running yet another "Liberation Movement," this one championing females who believe that the male sex has somehow done the ladies wrong. The members of this Front say they want all the spoils the boys appear to be getting out of life. They're quite mad, of course. What these "girls" are about to do is ruin the biggest Con Game, and the most ancient, which one section of humanity has ever imposed on another, since Eve invented it. I'm just jealous, myself, having been deprived by circumstances from getting into that Big Con Game...alas, alas, alas. But I've stood on the sidelines and seethed with envy, and now I hope - I say with a grin over clenched teeth - that the Liberation "girls" will get exactly what they want. It's all they deserve.

I am convinced that the Liberationist females, judging from their photographs at least, and on some personal observation, are so unattractive mentally, physically, and in personality, that they are envious because they can't even qualify for the Big Con Game, and so don't want other women to wallow in it with sweet and secret smiles. As for myself, I am only wistful, and plenty happy that my two beautiful daughters are in on the Game and enjoying every minute of it, and wouldn't even dream of Female Liberation. I brought them up to appreciate their blessings -- and to shut their mouths around their husbands, for fear the boys would catch on and demand liberation for themselves, which is exactly the calamity these rampant females in the "Liberation Movement" are going to precipitate. God help the contented women who will be their victims!

The Liberation Ladies would have just loved my Mama, who was very advanced and ultra-modern, perhaps even more than most women of today. Mama believed in rearing girls exactly as boys were reared, and no nonsense about the weaker sex and the softer yearnings in a girl's heart. Mama believed that what a boy could, and should, do, a girl could and should do, also; and if a girl had softer muscles and more tender feelings, well, that was tough. So, I was reared just as my brother was reared -- except that Little Brother was somewhat smarter than I was and ran his own Con Game against Mama, and succeeded to an enviable extent.

From early childhood I hauled heavy scuttles of coal in from the coal shed, in England, for my parents' fires. The housemaid refused to do it. "It's a man's job," she would say, but Papa, having a dominant wife, lay down on the job. Mama, who had a convenient memory, forgot that what a man can do, a woman can, too, and did not haul the coals. She remembered that only when it came to me. So I did the hauling and nearly pulled my arms from the sockets in the rain and the snow and the harsh winds of a British winter. I did notice that the young daughters of our neighbors did not stoke the fireplaces and drag scuttles, nor clean out the fireplaces in the cold grey dawns. The fathers and the boys of the family did this, while the mamas and the daughters stayed snuggled-up in bed. My first resentment began, but being a discreet child and knowing the weight of Mama's hand, I said nothing. Ah, Mama was a real Liberation Movement in herself! And when we came to America, guess who did most of the stoking of the huge furnace and the carrying out of ashes. Right. I did. "There's nothing wrong with you," Mama would say, roughly, when I felt that I would collapse. "What a boy your age can do, you can do, too. Girls are just as strong as boys. You're not going to pamper yourself as long as I am around here!"

Then, there were the enormous snows, often reaching four feet, almost as high as I was. I had to take the weighty coal shovel and get rid of that snow, all by myself. "No coddling here, just because you are a girl," said Mama. See how she echoes the Liberation Ladies of today? My ears would ring and my arms scream with exertion, and my heart would pound in my throat. Neighbors would notice, with outrage, but when one of them complained gently to Mama she would say, sturdily, "What a boy can do, a girl can do! No cossetting in our house!"

When I was fifteen and an adult, Mama decided that I was quite old enough to go to work -- at the first work I could obtain. I was an Adult and should have a job. So, I was pulled out of school and sent job-hunting, and I found heavy laboring work in a factory, six days a week, twelve hours a day. "Why shouldn't a woman do the same work a man does?" the Liberation Ladies of today ask. Girls, I wish to God you had had a Mama like mine! You'd be silent these days, instead of noisy and stupid. I stood on my feet for those twelve hours a day, at a machine, bending and stooping and hauling, in danger from wheels and lathes and whatever. I worked like a man all right.

It was around this time that I first noticed that Boys were not all as objectionable as Little Brother, and that some Boys did not resemble Papa in the least. The first feminine instincts began to stir in my fifteen-year-old heart. The boys were in the factory, and sometimes when they saw me panting too heavily they would force me to sit down for a few minutes and take my place, in mercy, at the monstrous machine. And it was about that time that I began to dream of someday marrying a kind and considerate husband, one who would cherish me and know me for a female and not a Liberated Woman, and take care of me and love and pamper me and hold me precious as a queen, and buy a pleasant house for me where I'd have nothing to do but housework and taking care of children -- children quite unlike Little Brother -- and shop and cook. I would no longer have to be anxious about carfare and worry if my allowance would cover lunch, and I'd have pretty clothes and be protected all my life -- with no effort on my part. (Alas, alas, alas.)

After work, the snow-shoveling and the carrying of ashes was still my job, and to this had been added outside window-washing, gutter-cleaning, grass-cutting and cultivating, and shingle repairing. Papa, prodded by Mama, was quite an overseer. He would stand, smoking his pipe, while I teetered on a long ladder and pounded shingles and nails into the roof, and he directed my efforts. Papa, too, would have loved the modern Liberation Movement for Women. Frankly, I think he and Mama invented it. When I infrequently complained, pleading exhaustion, Mama would toss her head with a triumphant warning smile, and say, "What a man can do, a woman can do! There's no difference. Sex has nothing to do with it!" Just once, seeing Papa hanging up the laundry, I sarcastically remarked, "And what a woman can do a man can do, too." This earned me a clout from Mama.

My Aunt Pollie and my Uncle Willie lived not far from us. Aunt Pollie was not a feminist. She was a lovely gracious lady with long blonde hair and big blue eyes and a dainty charming manner. She had a Mama, too, but fortunately, a Victorian Mama who believed that a woman's place was in her house, and she a queen in her house, and that gentlemen were born for the cherishing, guarding, loving and pampering of ladies. (Ah, me.) To Aunt Pollie, Ladies were Ladies. Gentlemen earned mysterious livings "at business," and it was none of the Ladies' affair, except when it came to wills. Girl-children were brought up in the graceful womanly arts of cooking, house-managing, children-rearing, sewing, embroidering -- and civilized leisure. It was a woman's place to be an ornament and a comforting presence in her home, adored alike by husband and children, and never was she to be exposed to the harsh elements of competition and outside work, and it was incredible that she should ever be expected to be a "partner' to her husband. She was above such nonsense. She was her husband's queen, presiding beautifully over the table he provided and over the silver-covered dishes, the contents of which she had toothsomely prepared herself. As for holding a job and "helping out," Aunt Pollie would have raised a gilt eyebrow in incredulous amusement. Such things were "below" a woman's existence.

Aunt Pollie, clothed exquisitely and smelling delightfully of perfume, would go with her redoubtable Mama to twice-weekly matinees, then come home to prepare fragrant tea and bake luscious scones to be eaten with homemade strawberry jam. Though she had no modern washing-machine and used flat irons and hung out her laundry and had no vacuum cleaner and other "aids," she managed to look serene and rested at all times, and had many hours of leisure every day. Aunt Pollie, the Queen, a gentle and lovely wife, a "dependent' wife with no ambitions to do a man's work in the world, would been despised by feminists and Liberation Ladies. But Aunt Pollie was truly a woman, and not a grotesque neuter full of envy of the male sex -- who have always had it much harder than women, with much less physical stamina, and have been conned by women for endless centuries to make life soft for them.

Unlike our brawling household, Aunt Pollie's house was a place of sweet quiet refuge for a tired girl like myself. Even at the cost of having to go with Uncle Willie to his grim Scots Presbyterian Church on Sunday evenings, I would visit Aunt Pollie for the soothing joy of being in a real home, among soft voices and gentle music, among fragrances and graciousness, and topping it off a real British Tea, produced apparently without effort. And I observed that Uncle Willie was masculinely deferential to Auntie's femininity, elaborately courteous to her, and overwhelmingly loving, while she cosseted him in her daintily feminine fashion. Aunt Pollie was a discreet Scotswoman, so she did not criticize my parents and the back-breaking labor she knew I was doing all the long hours of the week. But once she said to me, seriously, in her beautifully modulated voice, "Janet, the only way out for you is more education and then...and then breaking away."

It was to Aunt Pollie that I took my literary efforts -- written long after mid-night and before my rising at six a.m. She would read them closely and carefully, then gaze at me with her tender thoughtful eyes and remark, "Janet, you must get an education." So, I went to night high school five nights a week. And believe me, kiddies, at fifteen -- a "child," to use modern parlance -- I had very little time to sleep or eat after that! There were no adolescent "difficulties" or "traumas," either, no "turmoils," no "rebellion." Life had become a stern business of surviving each day and working and living for the future. The rage still lives in me that despite the financial comforts of my family I was expected to do a boy's and man's work, and "no nonsense about you being a girl, either." All I wanted to be was a girl, and then a cherished woman! Alas.

While I worked and studied, my dream of being the Cherished Woman -- like Aunt Pollie -- grew stronger in me. But all the hard work I had had to do since I was a child, and the living I had had to earn since I was fifteen, and all the exhortations I had had to listen to at "home," gave me too much independence of manner, too much self-assurance, too much of an appearance of confidence. This definitely put off men who wanted a Queen for their houses, a soft and yielding gentle sweet creature like Aunt Pollie, a charming hostess pliant soothing and full of musical laughter and kind wit. For such a woman, men were ready to work their poor hearts out, considering themselves blessed. But a girl like myself, who knew hard labor, and knew how to earn a buck, and had a sharp and independent voice and manner, was not attractive to them. They did not want a "partner," and a fellow wage earner. They did not believe that "a woman can do anything a man can do." They were right, of course.

So, I did not attract the manly men I secretly adored, the masculine, strong men, the cherishers of women, the protectors of women, the admirers of women, the men who believed it was their duty to provide for wives and children, the men who built nice houses for their women, who guarded them against the evil brutalities of living. I attracted the weak sisters among the men, who subconciously recognized that here was a girl who would earn a living for them, take care of them, protect the, and be the man of the house, while they indulged their "sickly" physiques and their "ailments" and their delicate psyches. They clung to me, the creeps, begging for instant marriage -- while the men I yearned for married helpless little creatures who knew nothing of "business" except it provided them, via men, with the luxuries and comforts of life, and the protection. But, of course, they had not had my own dolorous life, and had not had the parents I had.

At eighteen, I fell desperately in love with a true man, a man of strength and masculine vitality and courage. He was attracted to me, too. But then one night he said to me, "Janet, you aren't the gentle little woman my mother was. My father worshipped her, and no wonder. You are too strong, yourself, and too independent for me. There'd be conflict in the house. You wouldn't be satisfied just to be taken care of; you'd want to do something on your own, and be a 'partner' to me. It's just no use." I was struck dumb at this horrifying statement. I wasn't very articulate then. He gently picked up my hands and shook his head at the old callouses, and as gently put them down. I wanted to cry out to him, " But I want to be like your mother! I want you to take care of me and deliver me from my hateful daily job! I want you to cherish me! I want only to be your wife and have your children and keep your house! I don't want a career or anything else. I just want you." But I couldn't say it. I had no words. My rearing silenced me. And so I never saw him again. But I saw the creeps, all right! They hung on me like leeches. Charity prevents me from elaborating on the matter. After all, a girl has to marry someone, doesn't she, when her yearning for love and protection overcomes her. And, believe me, unless she is a dyke or a Liberated Commie, that yearning is natural and heart-breaking.

I am too old now to have dreams, or to hope for them. It was only very recently, however, that I had to abandon the old desperate yearning to be a wife only, loved and cherished and protected, guarded by the serene walls of her house and her devoted husband, her days full of calm and sunlight and leisure, with no infernal damned career to follow, with no one dependent on her earnings for sustenance. And I look on the ladies who have never been forced to work as I have been forced, the ladies who are adored by their husbands and provided for by their husbands, who garden placidly and drive out for lunches, and shop and know nary a moment of financial anxiety and never the pressure of making a living for "sick dependents." I envy such women. I envy them as I never envied another human creature. They tell me, with simpers, how they"envy" me, and "how much you have accomplished, famous and all, while I am just a "housewife," and I hate their complacent guts. Not one of them would exchange her life for mine, "fame" or not. They were brought up to be tenderly dependent -- and they reap the rewards now of that upbringing. They lie in their teeth -- and I don't blame them, really -- when they tell me wistfully that they wish they'd had a career, too.

I told my daughters: "Marry men who will not permit you to work after marriage. Marry strong men who will take care of you and cherish you, and not tell you their business, and will refuse your 'help.'" I had told them from the very beginning that unless a woman is powerfully (and by birth) motivated to the arts and the sciences and the professions, and is deeply gifted and cannot be denied, she should refrain from going out into the market places with mediocre abilities. Once she has earned a paycheck, I told my daughters, she is practically doomed -- unless she can persuade a man that that paycheck is only a stop-gap before marriage, and she is only too happily willing to throw it over. She must then keep to her resolution: Never again to earn money outside her house. Never again to be a "partner, shoulder to shoulder with her man." Never again to be independent. In short, she should play the Big Con Game with her husband as shrewd and intelligent women have done for centuries.

I have accomplished the one success of my life: I have brought up daughters who have manly and cherishing husbands, who have never wanted to earn money outside their pleasant homes, who have concentrated on the sole and natural business of women: To be good wives and prudent mothers, soothers of the masculine brow, good cooks, pleasant companions, and truly feminine. I wish I'd had a mother just like me.

I fear that men are beginning to suspect that we women conned them through the centuries. I fear they are asking themselves -- to women's terrible hurt -- why they should support an able-bodied woman who can earn a good living too, and why should they be responsible for providing a home for women. Why can't women be architects and bricklayers and plumbers and stone-masons and lawyers and doctors and business women too, and pile up a fat bank account to be inherited by husbands? Why should a man give his ex-wife alimony and child-support checks, when she is just as capable, if not more so, of rolling up her sleeves and getting on the 8:00 bus of a morning for an arduous day in the factory or the office? After all, men whisper among themselves -- I have heard -- that women in Russia are treated exactly as men, and are farm-laborers plowing and seeding and harvesting, and they manhandle big machines in factories, empty garbage and shovel snow, learn to be bricklayers and steel-workers as well as doctors and lawyers, serve in the armies, drive trucks, wear felt pants, dig sewers and lay pipes, clean chimneys and work in the forests, and do the heaviest of manual labor.

Men, in short, are licking their lips and, for the first time in history, are readying themselves to be exploiters in their turn -- to be the soft gentle creature in the house, the soother of exhaustion, the serene person who has nothing to worry about in his pleasant life. Mom's out there, plugging and "fulfilling" herself, and why should Pop worry? He's had it coming to him since Eve.

Pick up any woman's magazine, particularly a certain one which was once run by men who promoted good articles and fiction , and which are read by as many men as women. Read there the articles by shrewd sly gentlemen who proclaim a woman "has as much 'right' to do any of the world's work as men, as much 'right' to a job or a career, as much 'right' to be head of the household." Those boys know what they're up to: The real enslavement of women. Tragically, such near-men and the Liberation Ladies can never crush the longing of a woman's heart to be cherished, to be protected, to be guarded, to be honored and deferred to, to be loved dearly and devotedly, to be a true helper, to be a complement, in her femininity, to the masculine nature; her longings to be the patroness of beauty and tranquility, to be the dear mother of respectful children, to be, as the Holy Bible says, "a good woman, whose price is far above rubies," the adorner of life, the civilizer, Godly, with beauty of spirit long after her youthful beauty has gone.

It is a woman's nature to make a sanctuary of love and delight in her home. That is the true "career" for women. Alas, alas, that so many multitudes of women are now forced -- or choose -- to abandon that career, and to become imitation men in society. The true men won't marry them. The creeps will throng about them. They will reap the betterness I have had to reap -- though I never wanted a career, never wanted to be "stalwart." I just wanted to be a woman.

You really can't change human nature, and the instincts of that nature, for good or evil. I know a prosperous young man in New York, in his early thirties, who has a "pad" in a penthouse, and is up-to-date on everything, including Ladies' Liberation. He highly approves of it. It is time, he told me, that women "stopped being parasites" and worked to the day they dropped dead or retired, as men do, and not expect a man "to support them." He is very enthusiastic, too, about women's "sexual liberation," and always manages to get a girl who, the dupe and dope, heartily agrees with him. "After all," says the young man, "women get as much fun out of it as men do, so why should a man feel obligated to marry them, or give them more than a drink and a dinner in exchange? I'm all for this new freedom for the girls."

He belongs to the Key Club. You know the kind I mean. When I was in New York recently he invited me to meet his "newest girl" at the Club. The "girl" happened to be a member of an advertising agency, a smart, pretty cookie with swinging hair and bright cheeks and eyes, and good manners and an engaging way with her. Only her eyes were vulnerable, and soft and tender as she gazed at my young masculine friend. The lovelight shone in those eyes, deep and passionate and devoted. I thought those two hit it off wonderfully well, and I thought, too what a wonderful marriage they would make and what handsome and intelligent children they would have. After all, the girl came of a good family, had a master's degree in publications and advertising, and money of her own. And I could plainly see that marriage was fixed in her own ardent wishes and hopes.

When she went to the "powder room" I said to my sophisticated, progressive, and with-it young pal: "Are you going to marry Sally soon?" He looked absolutely shocked! Suddenly the primitive man was there and not a "modern" man in a dinner jacket and black tie, in a Key Club with bunnies running around and the smell of winey cooking in the air. He was aghast. He said "Excuse me, but you can't be serious, can you? Sally's all right. But, after all, she is a modern girl -- she likes a romp as well as I do. No inhibition." He paused. Then he said, "Playmates for play-time. But only maidens for marriage!" And he laughed.

Whe I still stared at him cynically, he got a little mad. "Let's face it," he said. "The liberated girls have made their own public bed, and they can lie in it, and we men love it. but if they think we are going to marry them, they're due for an awakening. No man wants a woman who's been out on the town with every Tom, Dick, and Harry. When we marry, we don't want a 'modern' woman." He laughed again. "Oh, we encourage the women to be 'liberated'! It's cheap for us, and we get all the free sex we want before we settle down with a decent girl."

Sally came back, glowing at the boyfriend, her heart in her eyes. No one ever told Sally that she was being used, that her womanhood had been cheapened and degraded by her sister-women in the name of "liberation." Sure, Sally had her "identity," as they wickedly call it, and her "freedom," and she was being fulfilled all right, all right! She had her good job and her independence and her nice little apartment...and she was twenty-seven years old and she would soon be middle-aged, and all she could marry then (and even now) would be some "Liberal" creep eager to live on her salary and permit her to support him. The young man now opposite her, with his urbane manner and excellent income and ambitions, would never marry Sally. He would marry some sweet, untouched creature who would not "stand shoulder to shoulder with him in the battle for life," but who would make him a pleasant little wife of whose decency he would be proud, and who had never heard the phrase, "women's liberation." Well, I suppose, it serves Sally right and all her deluded and pathetic sisters who sprint off to work every morning and take care of themselves and are as "free as men." But deep in their deprived hearts they know how tragic they are.

Girls, the men are catching on -- through your sister-women who have been "liberated -- that they have been victims for ages of the Big Con Game, and the first thing you know they will be demanding Civil Rights and Equality for themselves, too! It's up to you, in behalf of future generations, to lull them back and to again become superior. Who wants Equality with men? No woman in her right mind.

Remember this: The strongest sign of the decay of a nation is the feminization of men and the masculinization of women. It is notable that in Communist nations women are exhorted, and compelled, to do what has traditionally been men's work. American women, some of them, feel triumphant that they have broken down the "barricades" between the work of the sexes. I hope they will still feel triumphant when some commissar forces a shovel or an axe into their soft hands and compels them to pound and cut forests and dig ditches. I hope they will be "happy" when a husband deserts them and they must support their children and themselves alone. (After all, if a woman must be "free" she shouldn't object to men being free too, should she?") I hope they will feel "fulfilled" when they are given no more courtesies due to their sex, and no kindnesses, but are kicked aside on the subways and buses by men, and jostled out of the way by men on busy sidewalks and in elevators. I hope that no man will extend mercy to them because of obvious pregnancies, but will rudely tell them that that is no excuse to shirt a day's heavy labor, and they should be like Russian women. I hope they will be proud when some court demands that they support "delicate" husbands for a lifetime, and pay alimony. I hope, when they look in their mirrors, that they will be pleased to see exhausted and embittered faces, and that they will be consoled by their paychecks.

The decay and the ruin of a nation has always lain in the hands of its women. So does its life and strength, its reverence for beauty, its mercy and kindness. And, above all, its men.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/MGTOW.

/r/MGTOW archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title 'Women's Lib: They're Spoiling Eve's Great Con Game' by Taylor Caldwell, 1970, American Opinion magazine
Author tetsugakusei
Upvotes 73
Comments 35
Date October 11, 2016 9:45 AM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit /r/MGTOW
Archive Link
Original Link
Red Pill terms in post
Top posts by tetsugakusei

[–]lostapwbm20 points21 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

The strongest sign of the decay of a nation is the feminization of men and the masculinization of women. It is notable that in Communist nations women are exhorted, and compelled, to do what has traditionally been men's work. American women, some of them, feel triumphant that they have broken down the "barricades" between the work of the sexes. I hope they will still feel triumphant when some commissar forces a shovel or an axe into their soft hands and compels them to pound and cut forests and dig ditches.

I would enjoy seeing this immensely, but it would also mean that I had lived long enough to see America turned into a Soviet state.

[–]Banned_For_Opinion11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You would also see timber production drop.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The strongest sign of the decay of a nation is the feminization of men and the masculinization of women. It is notable that in Communist nations women are exhorted, and compelled, to do what has traditionally been men's work. American women, some of them, feel triumphant that they have broken down the "barricades" between the work of the sexes. I hope they will still feel triumphant when some commissar forces a shovel or an axe into their soft hands and compels them to pound and cut forests and dig ditches.

She pretty much summed up clarity in the same instance of what I've believed this entire time. I just needed a moment of reassurance.

[–]methylotroph1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Part of me feels it would be worth seeing, comrade

[–]lostapwbm1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link


[–]oldredder0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I would laugh beyond belief to see some dude on the corner in NYC seriously screaming "I barter you food cans for ammo, yes? Crazy Ivan be barter you for ANYTHING!" and for it not to be a joke

[–]oldredder0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That happened 15 or more years ago. You haven't been keeping up with what happens to all those prisoners. They do get forced to work. Although many have been put to work, of all things, making the shields and armor police use in riots to quell people to bring them in as more prisoners.

[–]Darth_Bicycle13 points14 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Great article. Great find. It made me think of this online conversation I've been having with one of these liberated European females;

She originally responded to some tradcon guy by stating what we have come to expect: That women are free now. They want to have careers. They are not baby making machines anymore...All the usual. In many ways all of that is just fine, as long as you understand what you are getting into. A lot of these modern women think of careers as ”super-happy-fun-things” -to have. That careers will satisfy their deeper existential needs. They think that guys used to have careers just for fun. It doesn't quite occur to them, that guys had careers to bring food on the table. Job, is after all a job.

I also tried to explain to her, that trying to land a husband at the ripe age of 35 might be a problem. But apparently that's not really a problem for European career women for some reason. Not exactly sure why, but so she assures me.

There is so much delusion with these European women, that the ”female bubble” will pop at some point. Women in my country are already complaining about being exhausted at work and it will only get worse as the state hungers for more tax revenue and corporations cut costs.

They also labor under the delusion that the answer to migrant crisis and resource depletion is, ”tolerance”. I shit you not. I tried to explain this woman that tolerance won't put fish back in to the oceans or oil in the ground. But apparently that's not a problem because we will power our economy with European self righteousness and green farts. Europe is really headed for a deep, deep crisis when people finally realize that gravity and resource depletion work here too the same way as elsewhere. So much delusion. But for now, the female bubble will go on, and we will have ”super-happy-multicultural-fun-time” for a while.

[–]methylotroph1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Until the Muslim dicking becomes to much for them to handle.

[–]Darth_Bicycle0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps. But I think that we are in the beginning stages of ”fempocalypse” that GWW talked about;

Europe educated it's women (women's liberation) → educated women have less babies → Less babies, less tax payers → system begins to crumble → import taxpayers from outside, AKA refugees → refugees want welfare → more red ink on the state budget → system begins to implode → fempocalypse begins!

[–]methylotroph1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The best part is people won't blame women for wanting it all and not breeding, they will blame the immigrants, instinctively women can never be blamed. My hope is automation will get advanced enough to fix the labor shortage problem and then the machines kill us all: good riddance to humanity.

[–]Darth_Bicycle0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

True. They won't get any blame. In fact they might be the ones forcing men to go out and fight the migrants once the welfare money runs out. Man, the women are going to be pissed and then the white knights will go and fight. But yeah, women will escape blame. In my country that's what the conservative women are starting to do. They shame men for letting the migrants in.

[–]oldredder0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

multiculturalism has never been a problem in Canada. No reason for it to be a problem anywhere else, or to magically only turn to being "Muslims"

Got a hint for ya: if you want Muslim people to stay where they live stop murdering all their children and bombing all their lands to steal their oil

[–]methylotroph0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well it will be a problem when their populations reach >10% of the population and their demands for sharia law become unsuppressible. Also it is not Europe who bomb the fuck out of them and is stealing their oil.

[–]PanicWrestler12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Great article. Truly prescient. This author was way ahead of her time. Thanks for sharing

[–]T00000099 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link


[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link


[–]redsfan2776 points7 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Smart woman indeed. She completely saw through the bullshit of both one which women were princesses they at least were well taken care of.

But sadly what she is implying would happen didn't happen....the masculine men left then many more bluepill men took their shoes and provided for these sweet angels...the problem with this is that nowadays women want it all...they want to be treated like princesses and equals...equals to the alpha when it suits her, and princess to him always.

Bluepill men are realizing this rather slowly and are opting out. Masculine men will always be wanted by women...and these are the asshole men these women chase by the must just use and abuse them but alas in the end he will also probably be used

[–]nbennett2q50 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Men are ignorant to female evil

[–]oldredder0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

blue pill slaves are ignorant.

Men are not, not once freed. Women can be ignorant too, not understanding how much they need us men by NOT fucking around with our emotions or priorities, and how they will get shit on if they turn to government instead.

[–]hardtostarboard20163 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

they dropped one con and got another: bluepillism, feminism, cuckism, etc.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

She's right you know..even predicting that what they do ,the "Big Con Game" aka being Parasites,is gonna get exposed for what it is.

I have to thank feminism made ALOT of men nope out of marriage & slavery.

[–]neon14052 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Why should I care ? 'The decay and the ruin of a nation has always lain in the hands of its women.'Why should I remember?'Remember this: The strongest sign of the decay of a nation is the feminization of men and the masculinization of women'...Why should I care what a woman has to say if her wisdom (collective wisdom)is a handicap in my road to freedom, a hindrance in my idea of happiness. I a man as an individual dont live for a nation.. not for history.. not for a civilization... I am a bubble, a momentary existence.. not knowing when will it burst... and for that short assumed duration called life, all i care is me and not some fucking nation, after all a word, a illusionary world implanted in people for the benefit of the ruling class.. I care about me.. my happiness and in times when this liberation of women is happening , i feel great that atleast there are chicks available in the open market to atleast try my luck.. not a fucking scenario where all the girls have been happily married...and one to me too.. and all I have is to bear this one for the rest of my life without a change of taste, without the hope of going back to my teen years, without the excitement you feel for some new thing.. I live in the present .. and I love liberation of the women..all the long essay.. written in 1970 or today..if it has some meaning ..some s for women not me as man.

[–]oldredder0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

So wrong.

The biggest indication of decay of a nation is debasement of its currency and the desire of that nation to have strong borders to keep good trade out and strong workers in.

[–]PassifloraCaerulea1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Should've had more details on "Little Brother's Con Game".

[–]Brokemgtow1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

*absolutely no complaints i cant add anything to this** Women are smart enough to recognize the damage they've done. Mgtow it is! from here and out we are the real rebels.

this shit is fire* this is why bitches should not be voting

[–]oldredder1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Doesn't matter who votes anymore.


[–]Benny7571 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Excellent! Just an excellent read.

[–]BooDoug1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I brought them up to appreciate their blessings -- and to shut their mouths around their husbands, for fear the boys would catch on and demand liberation for themselves, which is exactly the calamity these rampant females in the "Liberation Movement" are going to precipitate. God help the contented women who will be their victims!

"Playmates for play-time. But only maidens for marriage!"...The liberated girls have made their own public bed, and they can lie in it, and we men love it. but if they think we are going to marry them, they're due for an awakening. No man wants a woman who's been out on the town with every Tom, Dick, and Harry. When we marry, we don't want a 'modern' woman." He laughed again. "Oh, we encourage the women to be 'liberated'! It's cheap for us, and we get all the free sex we want before we settle down with a decent girl."

MGTOW - liberation

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"for fear the boys would catch on and demand liberation for themselves, which is exactly the calamity these rampant females in the "Liberation Movement" are going to precipitate."

Major driving force of modern MGTOW if I ever saw one.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is practically a summary of Esther Vilar's the Manipulated Man.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter