~ archived since 2018 ~

You want to know why he’s targeting woman’s education specifically? It’s not actually because he cares about women (though he’s trying to get brownie points for the virtue signaling) — it’s because women’s education is the best predictor of lower fertility rates.

April 9, 2020
75 upvotes
post image

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/MGTOW.

/r/MGTOW archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title You want to know why he’s targeting woman’s education specifically? It’s not actually because he cares about women (though he’s trying to get brownie points for the virtue signaling) — it’s because women’s education is the best predictor of lower fertility rates.
Author banned_by_cucks
Upvotes 75
Comments 34
Date April 9, 2020 12:09 AM UTC (2 years ago)
Subreddit /r/MGTOW
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/you-want-to-know-why-hes-targeting-womans.362522
https://theredarchive.com/post/362522
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/fxi0gk/you_want_to_know_why_hes_targeting_womans/
Red Pill terms in post
Comments

[–]weebs8611 points12 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/jack-dorseys-1bn-donation-actually-shady-vehicle-tax-avoidance. I thought this article was interest about the 1 billion dollar pledge. Tax avoidance? Probably. Also it talks about he doesnt even have to use that money for anything. He can just let it sit there.

[–]banned_by_cucks[S,🍰] 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Wouldn't doubt it. But there does come a point for a lot of elites where they reach a point of wealth where they care more about influence and power instead of optimizing wealth. Might be trying to kill two birds with one stone?

[–]weebs861 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ummm...yeah i suppose two birds one stone. After avoiding income tax the next step is to avoid asset tax (estate tax) and yes maybe its more about using your wealth for a cause you belive in then it is just to keep wealth.

[–]Friendlyfire81023 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Thanks for bringing this to light. This quote from your link speaks volumes about him: "Remember when Jack Dorsey said he would give away nearly a third of his stake in Square? That was five years ago. Spoiler: He never did."

[–]weebs860 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You bet! It is telling that he still until maybe now. Oh wait its probably because he hasnt found a cause until now...muahah.

[–]weebs860 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh and warren buffet saying they should tax him more? It easy to say when you know just know a higher tax would not effect him.

[–]DangZagnut3 points4 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

UBI doesn't need experimentation, because logically it won't work. But whatever.

And education and reproductive control do solve poverty, since women are no longer required to have 30 children just because they had sex whether they wanted to or not.

The Catholic church find condoms so horrible they would rather people have AIDS and die rather than deny making more little Catholic slaves to make them money.

Education makes everyone better. Of course these days the education is terrible, but at least people might have a little light into how the world works instead of fables.

Educated people have less babies, because it turns out that having a bunch of babies you can't afford is retarded. There's no reason to do it.

The only reason fertility rates matter is to prop up government schemes dreamed up by retards too stupid to make a scheme that doesn't require the population to double every generation to pay for it.

[–]Vaxel006 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I probably won't be alive to see how the welfare state collapses. Which is a goddamn shame. It will happen regardless of who replaces the native population, educating women has the same result no matter where and when it's tried.

At least I got to see how women fare in a crisis and it's hilarious. Also, expected.

[–]banned_by_cucks[S,🍰] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I actually don't disagree at all. I think TFM makes a lot of bad assumptions in that current first world countries even need the population sizes they do to maintain society in the future.

[–]roflcopt0rz_returns2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The problem is right now the "wrong" people are the ones having all the kids.

The people who are having the kids are like the 3rd world mooslims, illegal immigrants, and people in poverty. Stupid people, terrorists, criminals, etc. are the ones having children. Children raised in this environment are more likely to grow up stupid, terrorists, criminals, etc.

The middle class are barely having any kids, which are the people you actually need to be having kids. They're the ones who can provide more stable environments for raising kids, not to mention are more likely to actually be smart and such.

What happens is that if you continue on this trajectory you're going to bring down the overall level of the species (the shitty poor stupid people will more likely produce lower quality offsprings than middle class people) and will eventually cause the demise of your civilization.

What you need to do is have a fertility rate high enough where you don't require importing in these shitty useless 3rd world shithole immigrants.

[–]lestratege0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

UBI doesn't need experimentation, because logically it won't work. But whatever.

Whose logic?

[–]DangZagnut2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

General logic and math.

UBI is like Covid-19 right now, and having to spend trillions every single year while there is not productivity.

And they know it's a lie, that's why every single UBI test and example isn't anything like UBI.

It's just communism pushed with a new name, which doesn't work, which is entirely marketed, and "tested" using fake tests that don't even test what they're claiming it does. They only discuss the positives and never the negatives.

[–]lestratege-2 points-1 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Your comment doesn't address anything about universal basic income.

Also you seem to think that money and productivity is the same or that one perfectly reflects the other. Newsflash: productivity and money are not the same, hence productivity and income are not the same. Let's not confuse heat and temperature.

[–]trancedj2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Please elaborate on how ubi differs from socialism / communism.

[–]lestratege-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Communism is about the common property of the means of production. UBI does not address the same thing. It can leave the means of production in private hands, it just guarantees a basic income.

It's what happens already in many countries with all the different sorts of welfare handouts, food tickets, etc.

[–]mgtow4ever0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

you have no clue what you are talking about which means you have never lived in a "Socialist" system.

[–]lestratege-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I am overwhelmed by the power of your argument.

[–]mgtow4ever0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Communist logic.. Oh wait it all collapsed.

[–]roflcopt0rz_returns0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Educated women have less children, but not just because "having too many babies you can't afford is retarded." Educated women have less children because when you spend the majority of your fertility window studying in college, then going to work and starting a career, before you even begin to think about having children, the majority of your fertility window is gone and you physically only have time for 1-2 kids.

The actual real solution to poverty would be more capitalism and more soft patriarchy, and less government hand outs, less diversity quotas, less welfare, etc. A lot of construction workers don't even finish college and a booming economy will tend to have a lot of men doing said construction work for example.

[–]Bitcoin_Bastard0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

to prop up government schemes dreamed up by retards too stupid to make a scheme that doesn't require the population to double every generation to pay for it.

Bitcoin fixes this. Maybe.

[–]DangZagnut0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

How? bitcoin doesn't help government schemes. The schemes are dreamed up by very low IQ people that just make a lot of assumptions about how things work. Like assuming population doubling will create more taxpayers no matter what to pay for the lack of the existing people.

It's almost like government schemes shouldn't exist in the first place.

[–]Bitcoin_Bastard1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

How?

I haven't got a clue lol. It's just a meme.

100% agree Govt schemes are killing the economy. I don't need persuading I'm a right wing libertarian 😀

[–]Psychoalphadisco0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't think you need to be religious to not use protection.

[–]DangZagnut0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

No, but they're not actually preaching using protection as evil.

[–]HiveMindKing3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Educated women have the illusion that they are competing with men, blind to the fact that they have been shielded from true competition their entire life.

Why are there separate chess leagues if women are equal, where are the squads of pro gamer girl teams winning events. The only way women can compete is by bending men to their will and turning them into tools and stools that they use to prop themselves up.

[–]istira_balegina2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yea, let me donate to the half of society that lives five years longer and outnumbers the other half 3:2 in higher education.

That makes sense.

[–]TheTastelessBatman1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Jack: I am supporting wahmen can I sniff your puss puss, please? *woof woof* LMFAO.

[–]mgtow4ever1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

What are the existential threats.. Please do tell. Everyone tells me there is these things yet they cannot name them.

[–]ramblin_man__0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m glad I’m not the only one who thought of this as well.

[–]ThrowawayGhostGuy10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Boys must suffer for “balance.”

[–]DankMemer9_110 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

fat feminist brainwashed fucks will study gender studies to whine more about not getting free stuffs or become onlyfan whores

[–]Mashfikur0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

There is a symbiosis between feminism and corporation, where corporations encourages women to go to work and build up their career.

Corporations does not give a shit about women's rights, they just do it to lower the price of goods and service. As many young women are indoctrinated to pursue expensive (or worthless) degrees in which they have very little interest. Many of them realising years later about their mistakes, and at that point is too late.

For example the jobs which are historically dominated by men's (stem) are extremely expensive (for corporations). By introducing and pushing women to pursue those careers, corporations cut their expenses.

Another example, being a lawyer during 30-40-50s was incredibly lucrative, as the field was completely dominated by males. After the second wave feminism, the job market was flooded by women and more people were competing for the same job.

That's why back then only the man of the house worked, and everything was smooth. Nowadays, both partners has to work to stay afloat.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2022. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter