DID WE READ THE SAME ARTICLE? "Miss Piper survived a rape and acid attack in 2008 which left her facially disfigured. A copy of the book was discovered by police in Leong's room, the court was told. "
Two sentances?! Dude, you are off the deep end. And it's clear the only reason the article brought it up was to show were the ex-girlfriend got the idea from.
So I agree with the person above. Let go man. Let go.
This is less about mens rights, or lack there of, and more about just some evil bitch and her psycho ex doing something awful to someone. Men do things like this to women all the time as well, sometimes people need to be locked up, and that's irrelevant. Mens rights aren't about pointing out when a single woman does something shitty, or about women being shitty at all, it's about men being treated fairly in a society that is becoming more and more against them.
But that doesn't mean she isn't also guilty of a separate crime.
And that will have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The only evidence that the article offers is that she owns a book by someone once attacked with acid. Not exactly a smoking gun.
I never made a complaint. I stated facts. I stated that the ex-boyfriend is responsible for his actions, and that a hitman is responsible for his or her own actions. I never stated that the person who hired the hitman or who "persuaded" a hitman through other means is innocent.
Now are you done fighting with the strawman arguments? Take care.
[–][deleted] 25 points26 points27 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]the_unseen_one 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]MagCrush points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
DID WE READ THE SAME ARTICLE? "Miss Piper survived a rape and acid attack in 2008 which left her facially disfigured. A copy of the book was discovered by police in Leong's room, the court was told. "
Two sentances?! Dude, you are off the deep end. And it's clear the only reason the article brought it up was to show were the ex-girlfriend got the idea from.
So I agree with the person above. Let go man. Let go.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]MagCrush points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
You're right. They should have completely ignores the book that could be evidence against the ex-girlfriend. /facepalm
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]MagCrush points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Nope, they didn't. Have a good day.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]bmfj666 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
This is less about mens rights, or lack there of, and more about just some evil bitch and her psycho ex doing something awful to someone. Men do things like this to women all the time as well, sometimes people need to be locked up, and that's irrelevant. Mens rights aren't about pointing out when a single woman does something shitty, or about women being shitty at all, it's about men being treated fairly in a society that is becoming more and more against them.
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]JohnKimble111[S] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Secretly_psycho 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thrway_1000 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NolanHarlow 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]7hunderpants 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lashb1ade -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]AndaliteBandit points [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link
Unless she persuaded him with threats of bodily harm, he is responsible for his actions.
[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+]AndaliteBandit points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Yes, that hitman would still be responsible for his or her actions, regardless if they're BFF with their cilent.
[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]AndaliteBandit points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
And that will have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The only evidence that the article offers is that she owns a book by someone once attacked with acid. Not exactly a smoking gun.
[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]AndaliteBandit points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
I never made a complaint. I stated facts. I stated that the ex-boyfriend is responsible for his actions, and that a hitman is responsible for his or her own actions. I never stated that the person who hired the hitman or who "persuaded" a hitman through other means is innocent.
Now are you done fighting with the strawman arguments? Take care.
[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -10 points-9 points-8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]JohnKimble111[S] 9 points10 points11 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link