~ archived since 2018 ~

Feminist argues that extreme poverty and homelessness are female issues. Gets schooled.

February 4, 2019
post image

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/MensRights.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Feminist argues that extreme poverty and homelessness are female issues. Gets schooled.
Author TheSpaceDuck
Upvotes 726
Comments 64
Date February 4, 2019 11:02 PM UTC (4 years ago)
Subreddit /r/MensRights
Archive Link
Original Link
Red Pill terms in post

[–]throwawaylifespan 95 points96 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like Hillary's "women are the primary victims of war.".

[–]Drekalo 22 points23 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Women are the primary victim of Male problems.

[–]throwawaylifespan 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Domestic violence between lesbian couples is at a much greater level than between heterosexual couples.

(Or did I just assume their gender?! /s)

[–]Shnoiper 18 points19 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Women may lose their fathers, husbands, or sons but men lose their lives, Karen.

[–]throwawaylifespan 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

My wife was called Karen; <adds another red flag to pile I already ignored>

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I had forgotten about that.

Thank God that wench didn’t win.

[–]throwawaylifespan 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It's a sad indictment of America that those two, Hillary and Donald, were officially the best qualified representatives from the sample space of 330 million. SMH.

Have an upvote.

[–]Krak_Nihilus 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

There are tons of far more qualified people than both of them, but it's not qualifications that get you votes and it's not qualifications that even get you in the race.

[–]Hirudin 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

wELL YOU See... A woman can be victimized repeatedly during a war. A man can only get killed once. Therefore women have it worse.

  • Feminists, probably.

[–]throwawaylifespan 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I believe in reincarnation, though.

[–]turpin23 19 points20 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Because only women have kids /s

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women just assume that the children are their property. Probably because that's how the Family Courts nearly always rule.

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Where can I read the rest of the conversation?

[–]Rorschach_And_Prozac 27 points28 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

You've read it all. Do you think the original person is going to respond with reasoned arguments and sources on why women have always been the primary victims of war? I mean poverty?

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Well then, if we have seen it all. May as well provide a link.

[–]UnexplainedShadowban 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

That would be doxxing and/or brigading. Alternatively, admit that screenshots of conversations are low effort content and either easily faked, or conveniently missing any potential of a rebuttal and thus hilariously one sided and self-serving.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

These screenshots are like made up conversations and have little value. I don't see how showing publicly available information is doxxing.

[–]UnexplainedShadowban 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

You asked for a link. I assumed you were asking for a link to the social media post this is a screenshot of.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's correct.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

If its like most other FB discussions of course they are, with something about you don't understand because of your male/white privilege

[–]Rorschach_And_Prozac 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"It's not my job to educate you"

[–]bresra2500 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I wish I had half of the population ready to blindly defend me at a moments notice simply out of habit..... Jesus christ these cunts have no idea how good they have it. She just made living for free and not being homeless sound bad........................ Only a woman could do that.

[–]PixelPete85 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I can't disagree with the statement 'women are more threatened by poverty'. They just aren't as likely to actually live in poverty, statistically.

[–]boringcarpets 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

women feel more threatened by poverty. as in its not a reality

[–]Sewblon 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

To be fair, women actually are more reluctant to leave their homes in the face of domestic abuse than men are. But most homeless women have young children in their custody So I don't buy that having to take care of Children is what stops women from leaving abusive homes and becoming homeless. Especially not with women with Children being less likely to be poor than lone men after you account for public and family assistance. (see first source).

[–]IronJohnMRA 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nice work, whoever you are...

[–]mensmod 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

"Someone said something I agree with, so that is 'schooling' their debate opponent."

This might be "schooled" if the responder actually provided evidence for their view. Instead, they just stated their view. It is about the weakest response possible. Its not much better than "Nuh uh".

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The responder provided well known and verified statistics to back up his argument. This was not an academic forum so links weren't necessary but the claims could be checked easily on google.

But the bigger question is why do you expect the responder to provide evidence but not the original poster? I thought mensrights was supposed to fight against double standards?

[–]TheSpaceDuck[S] 5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Statistics on homelessness, domestic violence and number of shelters and violent crime victimization are available everywhere though. How is that not evidence?

[–]mensmod -3 points-2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Feminists use different sources that give a different narrative. Statistics are manipulatable.

[–]TheSpaceDuck[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

That's why it's important to know your sources and how is the data obtained. For example, domestic violence statistics taken from police show a much lower number of men than domestic violence taken from surveying people. This is due to men reporting domestic violence less often and police ignoring it more often.

It's true that any statistic can be manipulated, even when the CDC discovered that every year a similar number of men and women are raped every year they heavily distorted by listing male victims with "made to penetrate" instead of "rape". However anyone is still free to compare the numbers of both categories and see through the manipulation.

Other statistics like number of violent crime victims by gender show a male majority even after being manipulated in favour of feminists (the aforementioned cases with rape and domestic violence statistics).

[–]mensmod -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

While I agree with you, that is irrelevant to the previous point.

The point is that the two people in the OPs image were stating opinions without backing them up. Thus, no one got "schooled", they simply had a disagreement.

This "youtube" tendency to say "OWNED" or "SCHOOLED" or "DESTROYED" whenever someone states a contrary opinion is ridiculous, childish and doesn't help anyone.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter