Firefighter cleared of rape on appeal | Good result, but he should never have been convicted in the first trial when there's no evidence that sex even took place

Solid-Perspective98 · 2021-11-09T04:26:21+00:00

“Secondly, it necessarily increased the likelihood that the DNA had been innocently transferred at some time within the 12 hours preceding the complainant’s examination. This was what was described as a secondary transfer.

“In this context, it is to be recalled that the complainant would have picked up traces of the applicant’s DNA when physically dragging or ‘frog marching’ him out of the apartment shortly after 3.00am.”

DNA is transferred into the vaginal canal via frog marching? Is this even remotely a reasonable hypothesis? Sounds to me like a deliberate and malicious framing attempt.

shortman162cm · 2021-11-09T03:44:22+00:00

if he is clear it means it was a false accusation

so was the woman also charged ?

WingsofSky · 2021-11-09T13:37:20+00:00

But a woman said it happened and women don't lie ever! lol