How well recieved would this be?

I had an idea for kind of an experiment subreddit. Femenists can point the finger and say mens rights is bigotry because nobody thinks twice or does their research, and everybody hails femenism as this great totem of justice and truth (which we all know it isn't). We would be as naive as they are to assume that is impossible to find a common ground or that there aren't any good femenists who aren't insane, and i think when simply offering discourse doesn't work, the next step is a lighthearted challenge; "prove to others in a civil manner why you believe in your ideas."

But what if someone made a subreddit with a name nobody can make assumptions about, and you adveritised to both this subreddit and those like it, and some femenist subreddits to come to this new sub, and the concept of the sub, is that you post direct comparisons of male and female behavior, and each side can comment their stance on why each double standard is/isnt okay. All posts are serious, no jokes, rude comments, etc... Just "i think that a woman can do this, and men can't because..." , "i think a man can do this, and a woman can't because..." , "that is/isn't okay because...".

I think over time it could either fall apart entirely and thats just one more thing everybody can say "look how that went, Femenism/MRAs is unreasonable" or it could actually bridge a gap between us a little bit. What do you guys think?