Male disposability in action: woman slashes bouncer's face with a broken glass, walks free with no jail time

haberstachery · 2017-02-17T14:35:05+00:00

Video check. Hospital visit check. Televised Report check. She reached for a glass with intent to use it as a weapon to inflict great injury or potential injury on another. Do the time.

Firecracker048 · 2017-02-17T16:25:56+00:00

Come on, she has a family! We can't keep her away from her family even though she tried to take someone else away from theirs

FeierInMeinHose · 2017-02-17T15:23:19+00:00

I don't get how you plead guilty to something like this and don't at least get some community service along with a fine. $3000 AUD isn't even that much, considering the average income in Australia.

Mallago · 2017-02-17T18:40:39+00:00

This is why society's "never hit a woman" trope is so dangerous women like this believe there is no consequence to violence against men. They just get away with it everytime they try.

But this is exactly what feminists calling for no prison for women want.

2017-02-17T18:48:02+00:00

I was in a bar one night. One middle aged hefty lady came up to me and all of a sudden she ripped off my spectacles and walked away. I complained to police and all they did was laugh it off and told me forget it and get a new one from Specsavers. This is UK I'm talking about.

RedshiftOnPandy · 2017-02-17T18:53:49+00:00

I don't know how she got away with this, it's horrible. It's extremely awful to have scars on your face, it's a very big reminder every time you look at the mirror and hoping people don't notice. It takes YEARS to feel comfortable again and that's while still avoiding photos taken. Source: I have scars on my lips and nose

PJteleman · 2017-02-17T16:59:37+00:00

Another outrageous example of Female privilege. When does it stop?

solseeking · 2017-02-17T20:48:39+00:00

Can you fucking imagine the outrage and jail time if a guy cut a womans face?

jonnytechno · 2017-02-17T18:42:11+00:00

Oh the patriarchy!

TeutonicTwit · 2017-02-17T16:44:17+00:00

Growing up I always heard the phrase "string him up by his balls" so it's fair-play to "string her up by her boobs!" Women getting away-with-it just because they are women is disgusting. Do the crime ... pay the time.

TheDongerNeedsFood · 2017-02-17T18:23:24+00:00

Good news everyone!! You can now slash people in the face with an edged weapon and not go to prison for it!!

MaybeItsJustMike · 2017-02-17T16:33:37+00:00

Can i get a link to this story please?

UpperLeftyOne · 2017-02-17T21:05:35+00:00

What is the normal penalty for this assault in Perth?

Edit:Office of the Director of Public Prosecution for Western Australia, Comparative Sentencing Tables

I don't know about this case in particular but what I'm seeing is that actual jail time is meted out to criminals with extensive and violent records.

Proteus_Marius · 2017-02-17T17:47:52+00:00

Does the judge have full discretion on sentence physical assault with intent to cause harm, or was a requirement over looked?

Edit: I spell bad

pandaSmore · 2017-02-17T17:02:53+00:00

In America non-violent offenders go to jail and in Australia this women walks free.

URSUSAMERICAN · 2017-02-17T15:02:20+00:00

That's because women are children. They rarely face consequences and will always have someone else to bail them out.

cabe565 · 2017-02-17T21:10:32+00:00

This makes me LIVID.

binrobinro · 2017-02-17T21:10:45+00:00

If I did that in america I'd likely get assault with a deadly weapon.

eletheros · 2017-02-17T19:11:59+00:00

This is the result of prosecutorial ability to create golden plea deals. It doesn't matter if any other part of the system is biased against men/for women (although many other parts are) the prosecutor as a single individual can let somebody off easy, or come down hard, on anybody simply by offering easy plea deals or piling on with extra charges.

UpperLeftyOne · 2017-02-17T23:20:59+00:00

Okay, here's an advertisement for lawyers in Perth that spells out the maximum penalties for Assault Occasioning Bodily Harm (which is what she was charged with): some attorney's website because I can't find the actual criminal code.

According to WA Law for the charge of Assault Occasioning Bodily Harm (AOBH),If the offence is dealt with in the District Court, the maximum penalty is imprisonment for 5 years. .... If the matter is dealt with in the Magistrate’s Court; the maximum penalty is 2 years and a $24,000 fine. ...

So that's the maximum penalty for what she was charged with.

To put this in perspective, here are some examples of people who were charged with AOBH, their sentencing and circumstances:

The appellant was the front seat passenger in a car that drove up and parked outside the victim’s house. The appellant demanded $150 from the victim, through the open car window. The victim stated that he did not have any money. The appellant pointed a double-barrelled shotgun at the victim at very close range, through the open car window. He demanded the victim give all property he was carrying. The victim complied. The appellant then stated “Bring the $150 in cash to [a stated address] within the hour, or I’ll blow your fucking head off”. Ct 2 40 minutes later, the victim attended the stated address with two others, to give the appellant $100. The appellant aimed the shotgun at the victim and then pressed the barrels of the shotgun against his head. The appellant demanded an additional $300 from the victim and made similar threats as earlier.The victims left and reported the incidents to police. Section 32 Notice The second victim is the mother of the appellant’s 10-mth-old son. In attempt to gain entry to the victim’s house, the appellant caused substantial damage to the garage door (ch 1). The appellant gained entry through a window and, in the presence of their son, repeatedly punched and kicked the second victim’s mother (ch 2). The appellant then punched the second victim in the face while she was carrying their son (ch 3). On another date, the appellant drove a car with number plates that were not issued for that car (ch 4). A glass pipe containing traces of methyl was found in the car (ch 5)

For the AOBH portion of his charges, he got 10 months.

Here is another:

The appellant and co-offender, Winmar, were highly intoxicated.The appellant and Winmar were in an aggressive mood and approached the victim’s group. A staredown ensued between Winmar and the victim. Winmar took up a boxing stance and the victim tried to calm the situation down. A fistfight broke out and each landed blows on the other. The appellant punched the victim in the back of the head from behind, causing a cut to his chin. The victim fell to the ground and lapsed in and out of consciousness. The appellant and Winmar kicked and stomped on the victim’s upper body and head. The victim received 11 stitched to his chin and sustained a concussion, scalp haematomas, black eye, facial swelling and bruising and soreness to his upper body and neck area. Cts 2-3 The appellant and Winmar then came across the second victim. The victim attempted to avoid the appellant and Winmar. The appellant and Winmar corralled the victim. The appellant punched the victim’s left eye with substantial force, knocking him to the ground. The appellant and Winmar punched and kicked him while on the ground. The victim got to his feet and ran away, leaving his mobile on the ground. Railway police later found the mobile in the appellant’s pocket. The victim sustained a black eye, facial bruising and swelling, grazing and abrasions to his knees and hands and extensive bruising to his inner left thigh.

For the AOBH portion of his charges: 1 year in prison. A violent criminal history is noted.

And this one seems particularly relevant:

The appellant was at a hardware store. He had arranged to collect a hire vehicle from the store but when he arrived he was told it was not available. An argument ensued between the appellant and staff members. The appellant left the store angry and frustrated. The victim was a 17 year old employee of the store. The victim followed the appellant out of the store. The appellant and victim argued in the carpark as they walked to where the appellant had parked his motorcycle. The appellant punched the victim to the face, causing a broking nose, three broken teeth and cuts. The appellant remained at the scene.

No jail time - 7 months suspended. No fine mentioned either.

jaib9 · 2017-02-17T18:48:04+00:00

I was in a bar one night. One middle aged hefty lady came up to me and all of a sudden she ripped off my spectacles and walked away. I complained to police and all they did was laugh it off and told me forget it and get a new one from Specsavers. This is UK I'm talking about.

JFMX1996 · 2017-02-17T21:51:16+00:00

Where is the justice?

ThePigmanAgain · 2017-02-17T22:17:15+00:00

Let's hope she runs into the next Ivan Millat. And then there's the judge. What an utter cunt he/she must be.

TejrnarG · 2017-02-18T00:49:53+00:00

Unbelievable! A scratch in a car's finish can be fixed with 3000 $, yes. But an incredibly brutal attack with a shattered glass in the face of a man??

DarkReaver1337 · 2017-02-18T02:27:04+00:00

She rapes your face? You rape her in civil court!

djab1 · 2017-02-18T04:05:08+00:00

Wonder what happens if he slashes her in the face now.

EricAllonde · 2017-02-18T06:57:28+00:00

So let me get this straight. She almost stabs his eye out with a champagne glass so now she owes the government $3,000AUD? Not even the man she attacked, the government gets that money. WHAT?!

WillMeatLover · 2017-02-18T10:39:19+00:00

$3000 fine? No prison time? For an assault with a deadly weapon? In Australia you can be fined over $14,000 and 1 year in prison just for being found in POSSESSION of a knife (which can be completely benign, like a Swiss army knife). You can bet if a man had attacked a female security guard he wouldn't be getting away with a $3000 fine.

http://www.police.vic.gov.au/content.asp?document_id=26793

futureruins · 2017-02-17T23:03:05+00:00

I fail to see how this is different than a man throwing acid in a woman's face. If I were that dude, I'd want to start plotting the long revenge and fuck that asshole's life up in every way possible.

NetPotionNr9 · 2017-02-17T17:20:31+00:00

I doubt it's "male disposability" as much as it's general Liberal mental rot that negates responsibility the higher up the victim hierarchy you are of that sick mental disorder.

GetaPoas · 2017-02-17T17:23:03+00:00

To be fair bouncers are thugs and overstep bounds as security officers like all the fucking time. They are literally the muscle of seedy often fronts for drug and other illegal trade so I'm not all that upset about this. A snake ate a rat.

darngooddogs · 2017-02-17T19:43:45+00:00

I don't want to get banned, but those cuts are pretty superficial. When THAT guy starts talking about seeing the scars I have to laugh. A man would only get a fine in this case, after spending the night in jail. If she gutted him like a fish and got off(and lets be clear, she probably would)that would be one thing, but this is really reaching. There are many real cases to shine a light on, why this?

topkekforpresident · 2017-02-17T17:53:50+00:00

You guys are a bunch of freaks!

Title	Male disposability in action: woman slashes bouncer's face with a broken glass, walks free with no jail time
Author	EricAllonde
Upvotes	3365
Comments	299
Date	February 17, 2017 1:12 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5um14y/male_disposability_in_action_woman_slashes/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/male-disposability-in-action-woman-slashes.931758 https://theredarchive.com/post/931758