Feminism argues that this results from women being pressured into spending enough time with family, while men aren't pressured into prioritising spending time with their family over their work.
Bizarre how choice becomes pressure. Generally, men are pressured into working to support their family, while women have the choice of raising their child or working.
Because that's what the political elites are using as a wedge to divide our society into different factions, gay vs straight, male vs female, black/brown vs white, transgender vs normal (not using their bullshit made-up word for it). The old wedge of rich vs poor isn't as effective as it once was now that everyone has $1,000 phones, etc.
When they are able to get everyone bickering over petty little differences and imagined slights it makes it much easier for them to exert their power and prevent us from working on things that need to be addressed. It's basically a distraction to keep the current corrupt system in place. My opinion anyways.
Both are forms of pressure; no one (except maybe radical feminists) would deny that. The point is that this pressure is what causes the gender-pay gap and it is therefore not as simple as these authors make it out to be (i.e. it is all just 'a choice').
The point is, exactly as you say, that social pressures exist. There is a norm of men working hard and women being supportive. These norms, in part, drive the choices we make and, therefore, the pay gap.
I have no idea how you can say which group is choosing 'more freely', nor what that would have to do with changing the norms underlying both men's and women's roles. I am also not sure what 'rights' are being claimed.
I am saying that those features - that men are pressured to work and women to be flexible with the family - are in large ways socially constructed. And this is what drives the pay gap.
Both are unfair, to men and women. Men should be able to stay home, and women to support the family. Men should be able to chose family and women work.
Changing these norms is tough, but the fact that there is a huge amount of variation in the world tell us things can be done.
The idea that we make choices in a vacuum from from social and external pressure is the terrible one.
People have choice, but structured by norms and incentives. It doesn't diminish responsibility, but we also have a responsibility to think about those norms and change them if needs be.
It is exactly what you said. You said that assigning responsibility due to external pressure would be wrong. But clearly you are wrong: people's choices are always impacted by external pressure, and that can both explain and sometimes mitigate the choices.
I am saying that it is explains the choices. I am not making a claim about diminish responsibility: simply that it explains it. Then we have a duty to reduce pressure on both men and women.
The point of feminism is how cultural pressures affect men and women differently and the consequence of that. Feminists are addressing issues that are divided in gender by addressing cultural pressures that are divided by gender, they're not saying women have no agency. The affect society has on how you see yourself is severly underestimated. Take for instance increased rates of suicide in men vs women. The feminist approach is saying that this is because men are given extremely unhealthy cultural pressures in dealing with emotion. Sure men are responsible for their own actions, but a trend in one group vs another suggests an underlying issue that should be addressed with more than "you're responsible for your own actions."
No you're not comprehending what I'm saying. Its addressing a trend in one group vs the other by examining what the underlying cause is. It's not ignoring women having different interests, it's examining what is pushing them to have certain interests vs another.
No. If your looking for an actual conversation stop being a dumbass and actually read what I'm saying. Social pressure exists and exerts influence on humans. I also don't personally believe anyone is a fully rational being but that's besides the point. Look, men commit suicide more often, according to your understanding, we should just ignore that trend with, "well people have the choice, no point in asking why they choose what they choose." Ultimately it's just a passive and indifferent way of looking at things, a tool for people to say "oh well" and be done with it. Fine by me if you want to use it, but it doesn't do anything for society.
The "gender pay gap" (e.g., the claim that women make 77 cents on the dollar compared to men) was already "debunked" the moment someone pointed out that statistic did not take into account working hours, job titles, training or experience. It was a faulty hypothesis, presented as eternal truth.
Read the linked paper and you will see it demonstrates yet again what we already know. The feminist religion's theses are truly non-falsifiable in the eyes of its believers.
When I type it into Google, the primary definition of debunk is: "expose the falseness or hollowness of (a myth, idea, or belief)." This paper does that, even if you think contrary evidence exists.
The original hypothesis (the existence of a supposed gender pay gap) is non-falsifiable to its supporters. There is no evidence you could produce to the contrary that would change their beliefs. It's like the "God of the gaps" argument.
We could have a thousand papers like this one on different industries, with different data sets, and yet the religion of a "gender pay gap" would never be debunked to its believers.
Also, the study doesn't say how overtime is attributed. In my place of work, overtime is limited, and seniority will determine who gets to do it when two people want it. So if the same number of people of both sexes wanted it, but men had more seniority, they'd have it more often.
The Knesset Law Committee on Tuesday decided to postpone a vote on second and third reading of a bill to add the crime of rape by a woman to the statute book after women’s organizations warned that it would lead to a situation where women would be afraid to charge men with rape.
Mumbai-based women’s rights activist and lawyer Flavia Agnes believes that rather than helping any community, the law will leave the judiciary confused.
"I oppose the proposal to make rape laws gender neutral. There is physicality in the definition of rape, there is use of power and the victim has a stigma attached to her. If made gender-neutral, rape laws will not have the deterrence value and it will make it more complicated for judges in court,"
“Although consideration of male victims is within the scope of the legal statutes, it is important to restrict the term rape to instances where male victims were penetrated by offenders. It is inappropriate to consider as a rape victim a man who engages in unwanted sexual intercourse with a woman.”
do we seriously think that a female teacher sleeping with a male pupil is on a par with a male teacher sleeping with a girl pupil? I don't.
_ During the second wave feminism, feminist Kate Millett was a leading figure in the women's movement, a committee member of National Organization for Women and a spokesperson for the feminist movement following the success of her book Sexual Politics. Millett was also a pedo apologist
In an interview with Mark Blasius, Millett was sympathetic to the concept of intergenerational sex, describing age of consent laws as "very oppressive" to gay male youth in particular but repeatedly reminding the interviewer that the question cannot rest on the sexual access of older men or women to children but a rethinking of children's rights broadly understood. Millett added that "one of children's essential rights is to express themselves sexually, probably primarily with each other but with adults as well" and that "the sexual freedom of children is an important part of a sexual revolution ... if you don't change the social condition of children you still have an inescapable inequality".
Diane Davis, chair of the department of rhetoric at the University of Texas-Austin, who also signed the letter to the university supporting Professor Ronell, said she and her colleagues were particularly disturbed that, as they saw it, Mr. Reitman was using Title IX, a feminist tool, to take down a feminist.
Elliott's work in exposing the issue of child sexual abuse committed by women has also resulted in hostility from feminists. While compiling Female Sexual Abuse of Children, Elliott organised a conference in London concerning sexual abuse by women. After publishing the book, Elliott was subject to a "deluge" of hate mail from feminists.
I still am, because you just took random examples of a handful of women around to world to confirm your own bias, and that's not exactly proof of anything. Pretty pathetic, I really thought this sub could have something to offer at first
Having read the study I'm not really sure what your point is... It's part of an explanation that man are more likely to accept unplanned overtime which increases their overall $ pay, makes perfect sense to how this contributes to the difference in overall pay.
This study is especially important because of the field of work these employees are in. Unions have a tremendous amount of control on the employee pay rates. They are very clearly written out and negotiated not individually but instead by the working group (bus driver) meaning it would be very unlikely that man and women would have a pay gap. The study argues in this area the gap it exists because of personal choice.
You mean the ones that also are a study of a very limited group of people in one city, in one state, in one company? ahah No, I don't bother reading studies about 20 people in Massachusetts.
is that not a job? or does that job not count in your mind because it’s not something you would want to do?
You can't take that result and extrapolate it to any other business, so it explains why this company has a gender gap, nothing else.
and less holidays, less split shifts, and take more time off
They do their regular time just as much, so what you describe still falls under "over time", they do less overtime.
it explains how the « ga » » is just a result of people not understanding basic payrolls. th« « solut »on » is to work more. there is no gap. unless you think someone working less hours deserves a raise so they can take home the same as someone who works more hours i« a « pay gap »
I see you're not too familiar with the concept of cognitive bias lol The fact that it's not intended doesn't mean it doesn't exist, it just means you don't know it does. I work in HR, this is not "basic payroll" (which is accounting), it's human resources, huge difference. The gap is the fact that women earn less, don't try to gaslight that with nonsense. If they earn less because of specific policies enacted by the employer, even if signed into a collective agreement, it means that something could be done to mitigate its effects. And there are suggestions to mitigate the effects of the gender gap, right in the study in this post. The researcher not only confirms there's a gap, he gives solutions to close it, stating that it exists and that it needs solving.
You can't link a study and conclude that the researcher is both right and wrong in his findings, to confirm and deny the parts you like.
This is a misleading title. The study did not debunk the gender pay gap overall. It showed that one single business entity could explain its pay gap by employee choices. The concept that women make different career choices than men is already a known factor in the unadjusted wage gap, but it does nothing to explain the adjusted wage gap.
Well what do you want to believe? Concluding that because of a dumb comment from a random person that this sub hate women? Or concluding that you can't judge a whole sub because of a comment that is already downvoted?
No i'm not where do you get any of that from. I'm suggesting that you're claiming to get the whole picture of 84 pages from the fucking paragraph in the beginning. What jobs did the people do that were studied?
I didnt criticize anyone for factually incorrect statements, I said how did everyone read an 84 page document in less than an hour; you're actually a really stupid person who doesn't even read my one sentence correctly. Yet you're sitting here trying to tell me what I've said. I bet you live your life never understanding anything but pretending to be prophetic.
[+]someone-krill-me1 points [recovered] (324 children) | Copy Link
Feminism argues that this results from women being pressured into spending enough time with family, while men aren't pressured into prioritising spending time with their family over their work.
[+]NibblyPig1 points [recovered] (283 children) | Copy Link
Bizarre how choice becomes pressure. Generally, men are pressured into working to support their family, while women have the choice of raising their child or working.
[–]Ragnrok 245 points246 points247 points (136 children) | Copy Link
[–]MadTrini 145 points146 points147 points (36 children) | Copy Link
[+]Vaginalpuppetry1 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
Because that's what the political elites are using as a wedge to divide our society into different factions, gay vs straight, male vs female, black/brown vs white, transgender vs normal (not using their bullshit made-up word for it). The old wedge of rich vs poor isn't as effective as it once was now that everyone has $1,000 phones, etc.
When they are able to get everyone bickering over petty little differences and imagined slights it makes it much easier for them to exert their power and prevent us from working on things that need to be addressed. It's basically a distraction to keep the current corrupt system in place. My opinion anyways.
[–]mantrap2 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]jeegte12 -7 points-6 points-5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Vaginalpuppetry1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Nah. No council just the leftist party in every single Western country.
[–]gprime312 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Halafax 8 points9 points10 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[+]IllustriousGremlin1 points [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link
Counter-example: women's suffrage...
[–]EightPaws 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Halafax 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]IllustriousGremlin1 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
I don't know what that means.
[–]Halafax 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]IllustriousGremlin1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
My understanding is they aren't pushing for women to register for selective service because they are against selective service as a whole.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rostker_v._Goldberg
Looks like both the ACLU feminist task group and the National Organization for Women were involved.
[–]Cr0nq 53 points54 points55 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]123_Syzygy 45 points46 points47 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]jocq 19 points20 points21 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]jocq 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]the_unseen_one 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Planner_Hammish 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]IllustriousGremlin1 points [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link
The 'traditional family' is only about a century old.
[–]PUTINS_PORN_ACCOUNT 12 points13 points14 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheLegendaryTito 19 points20 points21 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]IllustriousGremlin1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Families used to be more intergenerational and grandparents would take care of the children.
[–]TheLegendaryTito 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dontpet 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]nebelhund 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]dontpet 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]nebelhund 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HardKase -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]healious 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ragnrok 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]uncleoce 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 7 points8 points9 points (81 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ragnrok 10 points11 points12 points (34 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 9 points10 points11 points (33 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ragnrok 6 points7 points8 points (28 children) | Copy Link
[–]bigbronze 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ragnrok 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]bigbronze 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 5 points6 points7 points (24 children) | Copy Link
[–]nikdahl 7 points8 points9 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 1 point2 points3 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]PrettyDecentSort 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ragnrok 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]shutterbuns 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ZerefGodslayer 6 points7 points8 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]ZerefGodslayer 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]ZerefGodslayer 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]ChiefBobKelso 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ChiefBobKelso 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mantrap2 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kaliwraith 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]kaliwraith 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shutterbuns 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hill1205 0 points1 point2 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup -1 points0 points1 point (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]hill1205 -1 points0 points1 point (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup -1 points0 points1 point (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]hill1205 0 points1 point2 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bibiloup 0 points1 point2 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]ShelSilverstain 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rowrza 0 points1 point2 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ragnrok 11 points12 points13 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]rowrza -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]mantrap2 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]rowrza -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]healious -1 points0 points1 point (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Planner_Hammish 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rowrza 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]healious 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]rowrza -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]healious 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]rowrza 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PeruvianRug 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Reverserer 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]NibblyPig 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Reverserer 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]anonoman925 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]Halafax 9 points10 points11 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]killcat 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Halafax 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]Halafax 4 points5 points6 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Halafax 1 point2 points3 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Halafax 1 point2 points3 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]NibblyPig 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ShelSilverstain 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]thedeliberative1 points [recovered] (118 children) | Copy Link
Both are forms of pressure; no one (except maybe radical feminists) would deny that. The point is that this pressure is what causes the gender-pay gap and it is therefore not as simple as these authors make it out to be (i.e. it is all just 'a choice').
[–]SirkovTheWanderer 55 points56 points57 points (104 children) | Copy Link
[+]thedeliberative1 points [recovered] (103 children) | Copy Link
Who said unanimous decision?
The point is, exactly as you say, that social pressures exist. There is a norm of men working hard and women being supportive. These norms, in part, drive the choices we make and, therefore, the pay gap.
[–]Saturnix 27 points28 points29 points (98 children) | Copy Link
[+]thedeliberative1 points [recovered] (97 children) | Copy Link
I have no idea how you can say which group is choosing 'more freely', nor what that would have to do with changing the norms underlying both men's and women's roles. I am also not sure what 'rights' are being claimed.
Could you try to clarify this?
[–]Saturnix 26 points27 points28 points (95 children) | Copy Link
[+]thedeliberative1 points [recovered] (94 children) | Copy Link
I am saying that those features - that men are pressured to work and women to be flexible with the family - are in large ways socially constructed. And this is what drives the pay gap.
Both are unfair, to men and women. Men should be able to stay home, and women to support the family. Men should be able to chose family and women work.
Changing these norms is tough, but the fact that there is a huge amount of variation in the world tell us things can be done.
[–]RampagingAardvark 18 points19 points20 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]AloysiusC 8 points9 points10 points (76 children) | Copy Link
[–]AKnightAlone 11 points12 points13 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]uncleoce -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[+]thedeliberative1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Yes, we structure it by impacting their incentives.
[–]uncleoce -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Korvar 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NibblyPig 17 points18 points19 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[+]thedeliberative1 points [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link
The idea that we make choices in a vacuum from from social and external pressure is the terrible one.
People have choice, but structured by norms and incentives. It doesn't diminish responsibility, but we also have a responsibility to think about those norms and change them if needs be.
[–]theessentialnexus 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]thedeliberative1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
That's clearly not the only way. We can also change rules, laws, policies, and other forms of incentive.
[–]theessentialnexus -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NibblyPig 9 points10 points11 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+]thedeliberative1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
It is exactly what you said. You said that assigning responsibility due to external pressure would be wrong. But clearly you are wrong: people's choices are always impacted by external pressure, and that can both explain and sometimes mitigate the choices.
I am saying that it is explains the choices. I am not making a claim about diminish responsibility: simply that it explains it. Then we have a duty to reduce pressure on both men and women.
[–]NibblyPig 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AKnightAlone 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]kevon87 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Flying_Toad 45 points46 points47 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]valenin 19 points20 points21 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PeruvianRug 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Planner_Hammish 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HOU-1836 -3 points-2 points-1 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Flying_Toad 13 points14 points15 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]HOU-1836 -5 points-4 points-3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Flying_Toad 7 points8 points9 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]HOU-1836 -6 points-5 points-4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Flying_Toad 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]HOU-1836 -3 points-2 points-1 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Halafax 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]uncleoce 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]biff64gc 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]apeironman 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Blergblarg2 9 points10 points11 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]ChristopherLove 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Blergblarg2 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]huoyuanjiaa 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DeathMind 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TracyMorganFreeman 0 points1 point2 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[+]someone-krill-me1 points [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link
The point of feminism is how cultural pressures affect men and women differently and the consequence of that. Feminists are addressing issues that are divided in gender by addressing cultural pressures that are divided by gender, they're not saying women have no agency. The affect society has on how you see yourself is severly underestimated. Take for instance increased rates of suicide in men vs women. The feminist approach is saying that this is because men are given extremely unhealthy cultural pressures in dealing with emotion. Sure men are responsible for their own actions, but a trend in one group vs another suggests an underlying issue that should be addressed with more than "you're responsible for your own actions."
[–]TracyMorganFreeman 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[+]someone-krill-me1 points [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link
No you're not comprehending what I'm saying. Its addressing a trend in one group vs the other by examining what the underlying cause is. It's not ignoring women having different interests, it's examining what is pushing them to have certain interests vs another.
[–]TracyMorganFreeman 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]someone-krill-me1 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
No you're a dumbass.l
[–]TracyMorganFreeman 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]someone-krill-me1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
No. If your looking for an actual conversation stop being a dumbass and actually read what I'm saying. Social pressure exists and exerts influence on humans. I also don't personally believe anyone is a fully rational being but that's besides the point. Look, men commit suicide more often, according to your understanding, we should just ignore that trend with, "well people have the choice, no point in asking why they choose what they choose." Ultimately it's just a passive and indifferent way of looking at things, a tool for people to say "oh well" and be done with it. Fine by me if you want to use it, but it doesn't do anything for society.
[–]TracyMorganFreeman 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]merton1111 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Thr0w4w4y757746 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]victorfiction -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FezoaStaler 60 points61 points62 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]s180316 138 points139 points140 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrowningInPussycats 32 points33 points34 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]againstmethod 51 points52 points53 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]feraxks 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]s180316 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]againstmethod 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tmone 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]dietrologo1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Headline leaves out details. News at 11.
The "gender pay gap" (e.g., the claim that women make 77 cents on the dollar compared to men) was already "debunked" the moment someone pointed out that statistic did not take into account working hours, job titles, training or experience. It was a faulty hypothesis, presented as eternal truth.
Read the linked paper and you will see it demonstrates yet again what we already know. The feminist religion's theses are truly non-falsifiable in the eyes of its believers.
[–]againstmethod 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]dietrologo1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
When I type it into Google, the primary definition of debunk is: "expose the falseness or hollowness of (a myth, idea, or belief)." This paper does that, even if you think contrary evidence exists.
The original hypothesis (the existence of a supposed gender pay gap) is non-falsifiable to its supporters. There is no evidence you could produce to the contrary that would change their beliefs. It's like the "God of the gaps" argument.
We could have a thousand papers like this one on different industries, with different data sets, and yet the religion of a "gender pay gap" would never be debunked to its believers.
See, for example, the Korn Ferry study: https://www.kornferry.com/institute/download/download/id/17733/aid/1246 ("gender pay gap" reduces to 1.6% when controlled only for "same level, company and function", but not to mention hours worked).
[–]againstmethod 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]StopTop 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ms4720 202 points203 points204 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]PastryWarrior 15 points16 points17 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]WaffleBattle 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DigitalisEdible 127 points128 points129 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]tpn86 22 points23 points24 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Halafax 27 points28 points29 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]the_unseen_one 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]tpn86 -33 points-32 points-31 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]ms4720 64 points65 points66 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]buddyciancy 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ms4720 34 points35 points36 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Temp237 -4 points-3 points-2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ms4720 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Temp237 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pubies 22 points23 points24 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ms4720 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bludgeoning 32 points33 points34 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Popovchu 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]theolat3 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]yDownvoted -1 points0 points1 point (9 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]yDownvoted 3 points4 points5 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]yDownvoted -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]yDownvoted 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]yDownvoted 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Wai-Sing 162 points163 points164 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Treacherous_Peach 83 points84 points85 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrowningInPussycats 20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]maznio 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]VicisSubsisto 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]benfranklinthedevil 30 points31 points32 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]patriot159 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]therapistofpenisland 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GuyWithTheStalker 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Blackfire12498 30 points31 points32 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]JaceLightning 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]expendablethoughts1 points [recovered] (26 children) | Copy Link
...in that very specific field lol
The answer is "they work less overtime".
Also, the study doesn't say how overtime is attributed. In my place of work, overtime is limited, and seniority will determine who gets to do it when two people want it. So if the same number of people of both sexes wanted it, but men had more seniority, they'd have it more often.
[–]Fuckoff555 6 points7 points8 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]AutoModerator[M] -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]expendablethoughts1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Did you see that post? ahah Yeah, I did post it there because it was saying the burden of proof in a crime involving rape should be reversed...
[+]Fuckoff5551 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Oh yeah? Now tell me if you still support feminism after you read this:
_ Feminists in Israel are against charging women with rape because then according to them, women would be afraid to charge men with rape.
_ Feminists in India oppose making rape laws gender neutral
_ Influential rape researcher and feminist Mary Koss; claims that male victims of female rapists aren’t real rape victims in radio interview
_ The feminist and journalist Barbara Ellen said in an article in the Guardian that a female teacher sleeping with a male pupil is not on a par with a male teacher sleeping with a girl pupil, and that the female teacher doesn't deserve prison.
_ During the second wave feminism, feminist Kate Millett was a leading figure in the women's movement, a committee member of National Organization for Women and a spokesperson for the feminist movement following the success of her book Sexual Politics. Millett was also a pedo apologist
_ Feminist Avital Ronell, a world-renowned female professor of German and Comparative Literature at New York University, was found responsible for sexually harassing a male former graduate student, Nimrod Reitman. So a group of scholars from around the world, including prominent feminists, sent a letter to N.Y.U. in defense of Professor Ronell. One of them even was disturbed cause according to her and her colleagues Mr. Reitman was using Title IX, a feminist tool, to take down a feminist.
_ Michele Elliott OBE is an author, psychologist, teacher and the founder and director of child protection charity Kidscape. Due to her work in exposing the issue of child sexual abuse committed by women, she was subject to a lot of hate and hostility from feminists
[+]expendablethoughts1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
I still am, because you just took random examples of a handful of women around to world to confirm your own bias, and that's not exactly proof of anything. Pretty pathetic, I really thought this sub could have something to offer at first
[+]SDSunDiego1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Having read the study I'm not really sure what your point is... It's part of an explanation that man are more likely to accept unplanned overtime which increases their overall $ pay, makes perfect sense to how this contributes to the difference in overall pay.
This study is especially important because of the field of work these employees are in. Unions have a tremendous amount of control on the employee pay rates. They are very clearly written out and negotiated not individually but instead by the working group (bus driver) meaning it would be very unlikely that man and women would have a pay gap. The study argues in this area the gap it exists because of personal choice.
[–]VicisSubsisto 3 points4 points5 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[+]expendablethoughts1 points [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link
May I refer you to the title of this post? "Debunked"
[–]VicisSubsisto 7 points8 points9 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]expendablethoughts1 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
So it's not debunked, it's validated
[–]VicisSubsisto 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]seeking101 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]expendablethoughts1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
That's the definition of a pay gap though. That's not r/mensrights definition™, but it's the actual definition used by researchers.
You know, as stated in the study linked in this post. Literally in the abstract on the first page. Jesus Christ this sub...
[–]seeking101 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]therapistofpenisland 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]expendablethoughts1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
You mean the ones that also are a study of a very limited group of people in one city, in one state, in one company? ahah No, I don't bother reading studies about 20 people in Massachusetts.
[–]seeking101 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]AutoModerator[M] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]seeking101 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]expendablethoughts1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
You can't take that result and extrapolate it to any other business, so it explains why this company has a gender gap, nothing else.
They do their regular time just as much, so what you describe still falls under "over time", they do less overtime.
I see you're not too familiar with the concept of cognitive bias lol The fact that it's not intended doesn't mean it doesn't exist, it just means you don't know it does. I work in HR, this is not "basic payroll" (which is accounting), it's human resources, huge difference. The gap is the fact that women earn less, don't try to gaslight that with nonsense. If they earn less because of specific policies enacted by the employer, even if signed into a collective agreement, it means that something could be done to mitigate its effects. And there are suggestions to mitigate the effects of the gender gap, right in the study in this post. The researcher not only confirms there's a gap, he gives solutions to close it, stating that it exists and that it needs solving.
You can't link a study and conclude that the researcher is both right and wrong in his findings, to confirm and deny the parts you like.
[–]seeking101 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]YarnFoodie 7 points8 points9 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[+]IllustriousGremlin1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Do you make more than men who took paternity leave?
[–]YarnFoodie 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]YarnFoodie 5 points6 points7 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]YarnFoodie 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NecroHexr 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]whistleridge 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]XenoX101 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rumblith 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kragshot 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SeaBiscuit1337 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]asdfgasdfg312 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shadowthrice 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]The_Frag_Man 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SergePower 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bootylove4185 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]chasemyers 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]something_new 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]chambertlo -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]againstmethod 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MotherAce 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ajhinius 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pixie_wrangler_ 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Npkiller34 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Taint_Washer1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
This is a misleading title. The study did not debunk the gender pay gap overall. It showed that one single business entity could explain its pay gap by employee choices. The concept that women make different career choices than men is already a known factor in the unadjusted wage gap, but it does nothing to explain the adjusted wage gap.
[–]nikdahl 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]IANVS 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]zZ_DunK_Zz 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PastryWarrior 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AnyTrust 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]upsidedownbackwards 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dexfagcasul 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ihadtotypesomething -2 points-1 points0 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[+]IllustriousGremlin1 points [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link
Is this sub about hating women or supporting men?
[+]Fuckoff5551 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
Well what do you want to believe? Concluding that because of a dumb comment from a random person that this sub hate women? Or concluding that you can't judge a whole sub because of a comment that is already downvoted?
[+]IllustriousGremlin1 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
It certainly wasn't a downvoted comment when I replied.
[+]Fuckoff5551 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Well now it is.
Also by the way, this may seems a little bit of topic, but I have a simple question. Do you support feminism?
[+]IllustriousGremlin1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
I support egalitarianism in all forms.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tommeee 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]njullpointer 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Snerfs1 points [recovered] (10 children) | Copy Link
How did all these people look through this entire study and including data in less than one hour?
[–]McFeely_Smackup -1 points0 points1 point (9 children) | Copy Link
[+]Snerfs1 points [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link
So reading the abstract gives you the full picture? You just admit to being a summary reader.
[–]McFeely_Smackup -1 points0 points1 point (7 children) | Copy Link
[+]Snerfs1 points [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link
No i'm not where do you get any of that from. I'm suggesting that you're claiming to get the whole picture of 84 pages from the fucking paragraph in the beginning. What jobs did the people do that were studied?
[–]McFeely_Smackup -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]Snerfs1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
I didnt criticize anyone for factually incorrect statements, I said how did everyone read an 84 page document in less than an hour; you're actually a really stupid person who doesn't even read my one sentence correctly. Yet you're sitting here trying to tell me what I've said. I bet you live your life never understanding anything but pretending to be prophetic.
[–]McFeely_Smackup 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zohso 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MelkorHimself 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]spacedogg 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]gfunk55 -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]wixie1016 -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]julian_96 -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]GYN-k4H-Q3z-75B -8 points-7 points-6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Therealmejiemperor -10 points-9 points-8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PumpkinAnarchy 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Brand_new_beach_hat -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]SrsSteel -13 points-12 points-11 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]nikdahl 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]XenaWarriorPinterest -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]upper_monkey_horny -38 points-37 points-36 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Joemanji84 26 points27 points28 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]timgfx 28 points29 points30 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Treacherous_Peach 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]l3v1athaN_ 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PeruvianRug 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Korinthe 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]XenoX101 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jlevy1126 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Stupidqstnsdoexist -13 points-12 points-11 points (0 children) | Copy Link