TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Next time a feminist claims "we see men as predators because of patriarchy, not feminism" send them this.

January 15, 2021
405 upvotes

Not all men, but all sharks.

56 points110 commentssubmitted by olympereveFeminist ally to r/Feminism

There are currently 530 species of sharks. Of these 530 different species, only 10 species are potentially dangerous to humans. Let's focus on two species. The white shark often attacks man because he thinks it is a sea lion. It is literally not his fault, it's a simple misinterpretation. The tiger shark attacks everything that moves. And sometimes even what doesn't move. So it is not personal if it attacks a human.

You see, it's not their fault. Besides, they are only animals who respond to their primary instincts. Can you feel the sarcasm? Because if not, I'm telling you it is sarcasm.

In 2018, there were 100 shark attacks worldwide. Of these 100 attacks, 34 were the result of humans provocation who attempted to interact with them. (They were asking for it, aren't they?). Out of the 66 remaining spontaneous attacks, 4 people died. Over the decade 2009-2018, there has been an average of 7 deaths per year caused by shark attacks. Of this decade, no deaths have occurred in European waters.

Yet the fear of sharks is part of us. If someone shouts "SHARK" while swimming quietly on the beach of the Californian coast, everyone gets out of the water immediately and without hesitation.
This fear is therefore widely accepted. Without question, without mockery and without judgment. If someone living along Michigan's lakes tells you that he's afraid of sharks, chances are that you will answer "oh well, yes, I feel you it's scary".

In 2017, the UN estimates that 87,000 women have been killed because of their gender worldwide (30,000 by their partners). To date nearly 620 million women have been forcibly married. 200 million women have undergone genital mutilation. 15 million women have been raped. In France it is estimated that a woman is raped every 7 minutes.
The culprits? The men and the society they set up. Yet you know what they say to a woman who talks about men as predators? "Not all men are like that". But if it is accepted that we can be afraid of sharks and that sharks are designated as a dangerous predator for man when they only kill 7 humans per year.... Why would it be any different for the most dangerous female predator?

Because it suits you to tell yourself that YOU are not like the others. That because YOU haven't killed, you think you've never raped, you think you've never been violent with a woman, then that would justify not saying "all men". Yet you are a man. You belong to the gender that has been relentlessly preying on us for several millennia.
Yet you refuse to take responsibility for your gender and to make it change.

But you know, the day when men will no longer represent a threat to women, we will stop saying all men.

(Sorry for my poor skills in english writing, I'm french, bisous).

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/MensRights.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Next time a feminist claims "we see men as predators because of patriarchy, not feminism" send them this.
Author TheSpaceDuck
Upvotes 405
Comments 108
Date January 15, 2021 5:53 PM UTC (2 years ago)
Subreddit /r/MensRights
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/next-time-a-feminist-claims-we-see-men-as.835996
https://theredarchive.com/post/835996
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kxztay/next_time_a_feminist_claims_we_see_men_as/
Red Pill terms in post
Comments

[–]tenchineuro 90 points91 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

That because YOU haven't killed, you think you've never raped, you think you've never been violent with a woman,

You 'think you've never raped'?

I guess with near everything being rape today, there may be something to this.

You 'think you've never been violent with a woman'?

I guess you're one false DV accusation away from jail.

In 2017, the UN estimates that 87,000 women have been killed because of their gender worldwide

I think I see the problem. UN estimates. I think in the UN 87.34% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

EDIT: It's Shark Week at r|feminism.

[–]ralphswanson 15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

So unfortunate that the UN dilutes its purpose to wade into feminist nonsense like this.

[–]pepe_____- 8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This. Fucking. Part.

It triggered me so much, wtf does it even mean “you think you’ve never raped” bitch how tf can I rape without knowing it? Ooooh are you referring to women having sex with strangers, regretting and accusing them of rape? Is it?

Fuck this shit

[–]MeatSim64 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Preach my man! 👊

Thank God a woman I knew didn't all of a sudden come back in my life to accuse me of rape.

Sad that the times we live in where the man has to record the woman saying she gives consent to have sex without repercussions.

Then again this could be used against the man and the woman could say that she only gave consent under duress. SIGH You can't win. Only way to get laid is paying for it. Can't get that due to the martial law in Canada here. No wonder the male suicide rates are up so high here.

[–]LegendaryEmu1 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't even crack the top ten causes of death in nearly any country(that report stuff, anyway), and in the west, its way behind suicide, even for women.

[–]Mycroft033 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

87 or 99? Lmao

[–]ethaaaanl 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is ridiculous. I think I've never raped because I haven't. I'm not just living my life and then suddenly remember I'm actually a registered sex offender and have raped sixteen women.

[–]EmirikolWoker 219 points220 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

87,000 women have been killed because of their gender worldwide

1) how is it being determined that they were killed because of their gender? With that answer...

2) and how many men?

You belong to the gender that has been relentlessly preying on us for several millennia.

So does George Floyd, every gay man, and roughly half of the black, Jewish, Muslim, and indiginous populations. Is she laying the justification for a bigger, more thorough holocaust?

[–]My_G_Zaha 140 points141 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Are you trying to reason with a feminist with facts?? 😂

[–]EmirikolWoker 64 points65 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Oh goodness no. But if someone encounters this in the wild, they'll know the big weak-points in the argument.

Remember, if you're debating a feminist, do it in public, you're not trying to convince the feminist, that's extremely unlikely. You're trying to put their shoddy argument on display for the others watching, and show why it's shoddy.

[–]TAPriceCTR 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

you've been listening to Karen Straughan. :)

[–]Mycroft033 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

extremely unlikely

I think you give them too much credit and underestimate the power of ego roflmao

[–]TheSpaceDuck[S] 60 points61 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

One of the feminist dogmas is that "women are killed because they are women but men aren't killed because they are men". However men are killed at a much higher rate than women so if women are killed because they are women then it follows that an even greater number of men are killed because they are men or statistics would look much different.

Any instance of someone killing (or assaulting, mugging, etc.) a man where he wouldn't have done the same to a woman is an instance of a man being killed or attacked because he was a man.

Ironically the very same "men are predators" mentality they are trying to justify with that argument is the main cause of the reduced empathy people (both men and women) have towards men, which results in more men being attacked (and thus invalidating their claim).

[–]Rashidal1 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s simple

Feminists don’t understand basic maths.
Hell, a feminist said the reason men are killed at a larger rate than woman is because of the patriarchy.

This is what I call cognitive dissonance.

[–]apeironman 40 points41 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

And that "raped every 7 minutes"? That should be "a man is accused of rape every 7 minutes". The actual conviction rate is around 1500, if my online search skills are working.

But we all know, if a woman accuses a man of something, he must have done it. Fortunately, the courts ask for more evidence than just an accusation.

[–]Mycroft033 16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

if a woman accuses a man of something, he must have done it.

Oh yeah definitely. And don’t forget that when a man accuses a woman, it’s out of his own insecurities and immaturity. Because that’s how it is, because that’s how it always has been

[–]BurningOrangeHeaven 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, they are talking about france - they have rape gangs and goofy immigration policies that allowed tons of of immigrants in

[–]RedditsHardestMan 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Also half of her direct ancestors.

[–]TAPriceCTR 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

probably the same way they determine that michael brown and trayvon martin were killed for being black rather than for attacking, or that george floyd was killed for being black rather than BY OVERDOSING ON FENTYNIL. because they know if THEY kill, it would be because they hate the person, that must be the only reason anyone ever gets killed.

[–]primalsympathy 57 points58 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

But men are killed more because they are percieved as threats... because they are men.

[–]TheSpaceDuck[S] 38 points39 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

That and because of generally reduced empathy towards men, again because men are perceived as predators/violent.

[–]primalsympathy 23 points24 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup. This post literally dehumanizes men. It's so twisted and absurd. Falls kill many more people than sharks each year, and there is an innate fear of heights present in everybody. But I guess since Shark attacks are isolated incidents we should fear them equally? The fear of sharks is 100% irrational. Their post is saying everybody should fear the water because of Sharks alone, and not because of drowning or any other way to die at sea. By their own logic, 'women' should be feared more than men. Because 'women', the "humans" in this situation, actively search out sharks to kill them preemptively or for food. It's so dumb. Can't we just all be humans? Or all sharks?

[–]CaptSnap 43 points44 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The irony here is that this "all sharks are scary" paranoia is that it leads to a ton of unnecessary shark deaths every year. Some sharks are endangered now and for what? All because of that stupid irrational fear.

If your ideology creates fear that leads to hate then its the problem and youre the catlayst spreading it around ruining anything... like a shoe steeped in dog shit.

The ignorant twit couldnt have made a more fitting analogy.

[–]Bojack35 79 points80 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

It's the 'take responsibility for your gender' part I just cant understand.

We don't tell women to 'take responsibility for your gender' because women commit more child abuse.

The idea of telling anyone to take responsibility for your race/religion/etc. Is not acceptable.

Why is it only acceptable to tell men to take responsibility for other mens crimes but not any other group of people?

[–]tenchineuro 25 points26 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

We don't tell women to 'take responsibility for your gender' because women commit more child abuse.

I'd be happy if they would take responsibility for the movement they voluntarily join and take part in.

[–]Input_output_error 23 points24 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The idea of telling anyone to take responsibility for your race/religion/etc. Is not acceptable.

It is for people who believe in identity politics, the mental gymnastics are absolutely crazy. they believe that being a racist is bad, and according to them, somehow everyone they see are racist. But somehow they have this deluded idea that them classifying everyone by race and gender isn't racist or sexist.. Identity politics is a blight on society.

[–]Mycroft033 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because apparently to her men are responsible adults (and also horrendous unrelenting animals) and women are innocent angelic children who cannot be responsible

When you think about how the double standards of feminism demeans women, it’s almost funny. Almost.

[–]AskingToFeminists 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The idea of telling anyone to take responsibility for your race/religion/etc. Is not acceptable.

Actually, it can be reasonable to tell people to take responsibility for their religion. Religion is something you choose, not an immutable characteristic. If people who embrace the same ideology as you are doing bad things in the name of that ideology, then it is your responsibility to call those people out, to try to control them. Because you choose to be associated with them.

That's also why we are criticizing feminists, who are perfectly silent with regards to the various misandrist policies pushed by their leaders.

[–]TAPriceCTR 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

we can't even make women responsible for their own actions, much less the actions of other women.

[–]Jepekula 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

The idea of telling anyone to take responsibility for your race/religion is not acceptable

How do you mean? People tell me that all the damn time lmao.

[–]Bojack35 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well those people can go fuck themselves.

You know what I am saying- generally speaking few people hold a jew/christian/muslim etc. Responsible for the actions of other people who happen to have the same religion. Those that do are mostly condemned for such views. Same with race.

[–]Jepekula 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Obviously they can, but it is not a rare occurrence that people tell me I “support a pedophilic institution”, referring to the Roman Catholic Church. And I’m not Catholic.

Blaming people for actions of those in at best loosely related groups is in vogue these days.

[–]dannyboi1178 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s why white guilt is pitiful

[–]Lady-Lummox 52 points53 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

You belong to the gender that has been relentlessly preying on us for several millennia.

Feminists are thousands of years old. Confirmed.

[–]feltentragus 21 points22 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If feminists were millions of years old it would explain why their brains are in their asses.

[–]Mycroft033 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It doesn’t explain how they managed to survive without functioning brains though

[–]LegendaryEmu1 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ignore the Roman empire before christ that gave women the option to vote.

[–]Left_Earlobe 24 points25 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Dont you love being dehumanized and compared to an animal because of the actions of people completely unrelated to you.

[–]dannyboi1178 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Never heard a feminist once say that men aren’t disposable 👀

[–]NurturedByNature_0_0 20 points21 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Imagine telling Muslims to "take collective responsibility" for terrorist attacks, or illegal immigrants to "take responsibility" for crime committed by immigrants. If anybody said something like this applied to any other group it would be called "hate speech" and they would be cancelled.

It should not be at all socially acceptable to demonize and to tell males to feel guilt/shame for being male, and to take collective responsibility for a small number of rapists and abusers.

[–]windows_n_cheese 18 points19 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Every dangerous shark will attack when provoked. Its in their nature.

It's not in the nature of man to fuck every woman in revealing clothing they see on the streets. It doesnt make sense.

People are scared of sharks because they are dangerous if provoked. Dont be scared of men because some are. The linked post is not only sexist, suggesting men have an innate desire to rape, but also suggesting that all men should take responsibility for bad mens bad actions as if there arent bad women in the world.

[–]Input_output_error 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

People are scared of sharks because they are dangerous if provoked.

If people would just be chill and not provoke sharks there would hardly be a reason to fear them. I do not believe that the problem is the shark being dangerous, the bigger problem is people provoking it. The same thing holds true for all humans, if unprovoked they are generally speaking harmless. But provoke a human, no matter their gender, and you can have a shit storm raining on you in no time.

[–]windows_n_cheese 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The context was sharks and men. What I meant was, theres reason to be scared of a shark because of they are provoked, they WILL harm you. But if you provoke a man (i assume from the post 'provoking a man' would be 'wearing suggestive clothes' then it's not certain you will be attacked

[–]Input_output_error 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That is why i said that it isn't about being dangerous or not, it is about provoking. It's not about 'suggestive clothing' but rather being provocative. Poking a bee's nest is downright stupid and no one in their right mind would blame those bee's for stinging. But somehow people seem to think that people can't be provoked, and that's just plainly wrong.

[–]DonaldGrabbedMyKitty 11 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

That leaves the other 318,346 as men

[–]DonaldGrabbedMyKitty 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Just got banned for that comment and suggesting that we should not been inciting so much hatred and throwing all blame on men/women (whichever side of the argument you are). That we'd all benefit from accepting that life is hard for all.

🤣🤣 Very tolerant and open-minded of them

[–]Luchadorgreen 12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They’re comparing men to animals, now. What a fucked up human being. Everyone who upvoted her aren’t much better.

[–]justarandomtrol 11 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

One of the comments: "comparing men to sharks would be an insult to sharks"

[–]dannyboi1178 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

And one joking about how we’re much more violent yet the sharks are the ones being hunted and are becoming endangered

sigh

[–]Voidslan 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The Benchmark they set for fearing men because we murder more women every year than sharks applies to all humans. More women are murdered every year by women than by sharks. More children are murdered every year by their parents than by sharks. By their logic everybody should realistically be treated as a potential attacker. The gender bias is still on them.

[–]LegendaryEmu1 8 points9 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

A french feminist, thats a problem.

That because YOU haven't killed, you think you've never raped, you think you've never been violent with a woman, then that would justify not saying "all men". Yet you are a man. You belong to the gender that has been relentlessly preying on us for several millennia.Yet you refuse to take responsibility for your gender and to make it change.

Men are not a collective, not a hive mind. Some men prey on women being true does not mean it is appropriate to say all men prey on women. There are men who prey on women, there are men who prey on other men, there are women who prey on men, there are women who prey on women(if lesbian dv stats are anything to go by, its rampant for them). This is the fallacy of composition in full force(attributing something to all of a group based on a small part of it), not to mention assigning guilt for the broadest of associations.

I am sure they would lose their mind if there was suddenly a concerned effort telling women to take responsibility for the rampant(majority) of child murders committed by parents, essentially saying all women/mothers are child murderers or potential ones.

There are bad people. Regardless of gender, skin colour, race, religion, any consideration, in a group of any people, there are some who are bad, the smaller the group, the less likely that is.

Its taking away responsibility of individuals actions. Have i raped anyone? Hell no, the very thought is abhorrent to me. Would i stop a rape if i saw it? Yes. Doesn't matter the gender, doesn't matter, i will try to stop bad that happens within my sight. Its not a matter of thinking, I have not done it, period.

I refuse to accept guilt or responsibility for the crimes of a minority of 3.5 BILLION men, just as women shouldn't accept responsibility for the crimes that women in other countries do.

An unknown number of men are killed because of their gender(nobody keeps track), but in almost every crisis in history, men are killed, women survive.

The first EVER analysis of boys being forced into marriage was 115 million, done in 2019, we have no idea how accurate those numbers are because its the first, every single other analysis was solely women/girl based. Adult men are a completely unknown statistic.

The genital mutilation isn't always done by men, in fact a lot of women in africa(also known as the capital of it in the world) get it done for their daughters. Its part of their culture, meanwhile, circumcision has an estimated 1/3rd of the male population globally, but almost universal in muslim and jewish populations. Thats over 1 billion men.

An unknown number of men are raped, in many countries, it is impossible to rape a man, unless the attacker is a man. We know in the US that if you include 'made to penetrate'(ie a woman raping a man) combined with male on male rape its almost equal to women getting raped.

Not to mention in france, a woman who is subject to bondage(by choice or not) is legally raped. I tried looking up the actual numbers for france, but they wildly differ and are mostly based on surveys. the One woman raped every seven minutes is based on a 2012 report, but, actual police reports, only 1293. Now, the survey stuff said only 15% reported being raped, lets assume thats true. If they were all telling the truth, that puts the 'real' number at around 9000. Which is quite a few, but is a far cry from 75000.

The most up to date i can find was 2016, which had 62000 women(an average from 38000-86000). However, i'm pretty sure its total bunk as it also goes its conclusions and say majority happen before 15. That defies the stats the world over, that lists early twenties as the peak risk time for women, with the biggest range being 17-26, risk dropping dramatically after that. It also says 1.6% women have been raped/attempted to have been raped. Which, is a way to inflate statistics, i do not like that. I found all this in about ten minutes.

The culprits? The men and the society they set up.

Fuck off, women helped make society, women have helped run civilization since the dawn of it. The culprits are...the culprits. Whether because of psychological problems, culture, or weirdly enough, peer pressure, rapists rape. It is not exclusive to one gender, one race, one culture(although there are some that encourage it/don't care about it).

This is someone who believes whatever numbers she finds and excludes men as even being able to be victims. I'm a little surprised she didn't try and use the super weird scale i round that listed the rape rate in france as over 20%

Also shoutout to the comments section there, i guess they stopped banning people for dissent, because dang theres a lot of dissent, lot of women who recognise how dumb this is.

[–]AskingToFeminists 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Also shoutout to the comments section there, i guess they stopped banning people for dissent, because dang theres a lot of dissent, lot of women who recognise how dumb this is.

Well, I don't know, I could find 2 comments critical of the post, and plenty of "removed". The ones dehumanizing men stand strong, though.

[–]Lady-Lummox 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I went there a few hours ago and there were a few comments calling the op out. Went there just now though and they've all been deleted. The blatantly sexist comments (and post) are still up of course.

[–]LegendaryEmu1 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ah, damn, Guess i spoke too soon. I was reading them and was surprised and heartened at the thought and understanding i saw.

I saw dozens. Guess ye olde feminism rule, squash dissent, is in full force.

[–]TheSpaceDuck[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Not to mention in france, a woman who is subject to bondage(by choice or not) is legally raped.

Let me guess, that law does not apply for men does it?

[–]LegendaryEmu1 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Actually if i recall it isn't gender specific, it just says anyone, my french isn't that good though, but it didn't have any of the gendered language, and french has a lot. It just mentions 'constraint' during sex means rape, i get what they were going for, but it does make bondage rape.

[–]AskingToFeminists 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

No, it mentions "contrainte", which is different from "constraint". Those are what you would call a "false friend". Lot of English comes from French, but every so often, one word doesn't have the same meaning.

"la contrainte" in French, is kind of the opposite of consent. It is there to include things like blackmail.

If you willingly engage in bondage, then, there is no "contrainte".

Source : I'm French.

[–]fgyoysgaxt 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

To date [...] 200 million women have undergone genital mutilation.

This seems like a strange thing to say when there are more than half that many men suffering from genital mutilation in USA today.

To date how many men have been mutilated? Billions?

[–]DerScarpelo 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's the most pathetic comment section I've ever read, not only blind hatred for men defended by inane arguments but complete disdain for human life itself pathetic nihilism these people need help

[–]floriandeckard 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Those feminists and people they influenced act like a hive-mind colony. They don't even have basic logic system in their thought process. I have a hard time understanding how someone can write a wall of text like that? And it looks like that she believes in what she said. Wow. Everytime I read a feminist text, I feel like Hitler has been resurrected, and combined his powers with religious dogma. Religion of feminism.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because it suits you to tell yourself that YOU are not like the others. That because YOU haven't killed, you think you've never raped, you think you've never been violent with a woman, then that would justify not saying "all men". Yet you are a man. You belong to the gender that has been relentlessly preying on us for several millennia. Yet you refuse to take responsibility for your gender and to make it change.

Dude, that's straight up hate speech.

Replace "men" with "Jews" and the actions with anti-semetic stereotypes, then see how it reads.

Because it suits you to tell yourself that YOU are not like the other Jews. That because YOU haven't loan sharked, you think you're not greedy, you think you're not inherently dishonest and obsessed with money, then that would justify not saying "all Jews". Yet you are a Jew. You belong to the race that has been relentlessly preying on us for several millennia. Yet you refuse to take responsibility for your race and to make it change.

Stop generalising across entire demographics. There's no such thing as "men", as in an actual entity that acts in unison. It's just anyone with a dick. They're all individuals, all human beings.

Men do not rape. No, some rapists are men.

Men do not kill. No, some killers are men.

Men are not violent. No, some violent people are men.

Unfortunately, these pea brained bigots will never understand this. +40 upvoted in r/feminism, even surely after a lot of people here downvoted. Multiple awards. And people wonder why a lot of men have zero stomach for feminism.

[–]gamerush177 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wait so I THINK I’ve never raped and I THINK I’ve never been violent with a woman? Pretty sure I know what I’ve done and have not done. And why should I feel bad and why should it be my responsibility to fix those scumbag guys who do rape women? And why are you comparing a shark to a man by saying people being rightfully afraid of a shark (that can rip you to shreds if it wants) means you should be afraid of and hate all men because of a few bad ones?

[–]red_philosopher 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

About 2 BILLION men have had their genitals mutilated. . . A full factor of 10 compared to FGM. But hey, who's counting?

Men are overwhelmingly the targets for murder in nearly every mass killing on Earth. Kk.

Women commit .ore domestic violence than men do. By about a factor of 2.5:1 in non-reciprocally violent relationships (which is 50% of all violent relationships.)

Yah know, we don't even know how many men are raped or sexually assaulted by women, but most prudent estimations put women at about 50% of all sexual violence.

Boys are killed more by their mothers than girls are.

Mothers kill their children more often than men do.

[–]lestratege 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is textbook feminism.

Talk about societies that men build to pretend that women have no active roles in societies while they are the ones who educate children so as to remove women's responsibility: check.

Drum up threat and completely ignore the opposite: check. Her shark analogy is actually very on point. Dozens of humans are attacked by sharks every year and a few die. One hundred million sharks die at the hands of humans every year. But of course it's humans who should be afraid of sharks, not the other way around.

That user seems like a previous olympe who used to spam r/france and deleted her initial account because she raged that people refuted her claims all the time despite the simp mods fighting for her at every turn.

Her username is a reference to Olympe de Gouges, a woman who got guillotined during the French revolution. Feminists claim it's because she was the first feminist, but in fact it was because of her sympathy with the royalists.

Rewriting history and distorting facts, the feminist MO in full display.

[–]ralphswanson 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This a typical feminists narrative which belies the claim that feminism is about equality of the genders. The same feminists who bemoans that stereotypes about women are everywhere wants to create stereotype men like this. The feminists 'scholar' who claims 'women's studies' is needed dismisses Men's Rights as 'woman hating'. It is projection. It is so hypocritical. And it helps nobody save a few professional feminists who are paid by colleges for their foolish and hateful lies.

[–]jjs41 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You can tell this post is so ridiculous when so of the people on r/feminism have an issue with it

[–]michalus22 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I thought the moral of the story was to be afraid of only great white shark and tiger shark.

[–]connzerjeeass 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Society: "be scared of men because they rape people more" Someone: "be scared of poc because they commit more crime" Society: " you are evil and are racist"

I'm not defending racism here its just an example

[–]Mycroft033 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

And in the comments, she says that she’s comparing fears, not comparing men to sharks... because that would be insulting to the sharks

Shark feelings are more valuable to these people.

[–]HorrorFan1191 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I have made a stupid mistake, I thought that would be a reasonable post to send a feminist in an argument.

[–]AskingToFeminists 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

You thought it would be a good illustration of the inherent sexism in feminism, and she didn't see the issue?

[–]HorrorFan1191 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah

[–]driellma 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's mental illness, you can't concince me otherwise.

[–]real_smoky 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not all women, but all sharks.

There are currently 530 species of sharks. Of these 530 different species, only 10 species are potentially dangerous to humans. Let's focus on two species. The white shark often attacks man because he thinks it is a sea lion. It is literally not his fault, it's a simple misinterpretation. The tiger shark attacks everything that moves. And sometimes even what doesn't move. So it is not personal if it attacks a human.

You see, it's not their fault. Besides, they are only animals who respond to their primary instincts. Can you feel the sarcasm? Because if not, I'm telling you it is sarcasm.

In 2018, there were 100 shark attacks worldwide. Of these 100 attacks, 34 were the result of humans provocation who attempted to interact with them. (They were asking for it, aren't they?). Out of the 66 remaining spontaneous attacks, 4 people died. Over the decade 2009-2018, there has been an average of 7 deaths per year caused by shark attacks. Of this decade, no deaths have occurred in European waters.

Yet the fear of sharks is part of us. If someone shouts "SHARK" while swimming quietly on the beach of the Californian coast, everyone gets out of the water immediately and without hesitation.
This fear is therefore widely accepted. Without question, without mockery and without judgment. If someone living along Michigan's lakes tells you that he's afraid of sharks, chances are that you will answer "oh well, yes, I feel you it's scary".

For example, at least 6% of rape claims are false, the vast majority of rape claims are unknown whether they are true or false, the 6% figure does not include mistaken accusations where the accuser was raped but named the wrong defendant, the 6% figure only includes those cases where there is strong proof it was false, false rape claims often result in serious harm, even the ones that do not end in conviction, punishing false accusers does not mean that a genuine rape accuser would be prosecuted if they could not prove they were raped, false rape claims are 4x more common than false claims of other crimes, rape victims receive a lot of help, but false rape claim victims receive virtually none. When domestic violence-related suicides are combined with domestic violence homicides, the total numbers of domestic violence-related deaths are higher for males than females. Also, even if we just look at homicide alone, women are still the perpetrators in 1/3 of instances. It may be higher for women, but the male rate of being victimized by spousal homicide is not insignificant. And yet, across a wide range of jurisdictions the estimates are that mothers receive primary custody 68-88% of the time, fathers receive primary custody 8-14%, and equal residential custody is awarded in only 2-6% of the cases.
The culprits? The women and the society they set up. Yet you know what they say to a man who talks about women as predators? "Not all women are like that". But if it is accepted that we can be afraid of sharks and that sharks are designated as a dangerous predator for women when they only kill 7 humans per year.... Why would it be any different for the most dangerous male predator?

Because it suits you to tell yourself that YOU are not like the others. That because YOU haven't killed, you think you've never raped, you think you've never been violent with a man, abused him verbally and mentally, driven him to suicide, taken his house and child after a divorce, forced him to pay alimony for a child that is not his but instead of a different man with whom you have cheated, then that would justify not saying "all women". Yet you are a woman. You belong to the gender that has been relentlessly preying on us for several millennia.
Yet you refuse to take responsibility for your gender and to make it change.

But you know, the day when women will no longer represent a threat to men, we will stop saying all women.

Submitted to their sub, though I dub they will approve it. But I sent it as a response to the post you linked, so that's something.

[–]fatpieceofshite 4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

200 million women have had their genitals mutilated

Bruh what?! Zero chance that's true. Also, ever heard of circumcision?

[–]GoshLishLosh 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

That's completely true. FGM and female circumcision is a global issue

[–]ImcallsignBacon 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Maybe, but its nowhere near as bad, number wise as MGM. Thats like saying "2/5 suicides are female and we need to bring that number down"

[–]GoshLishLosh 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I didn't say what I did to make it into a competition. I simply stated that the claim of FGM not being in the hundreds of millions was incorrect.

I'm completely against male circumcision. It is a complete violation of your rights to your body if the man doesn't decide to get the procedure willingly when he is of age.

I find your analogy to be kind of ridiculous. FGM still absolutely needs to be eradicated just like male circumcision. So yes, the number does need to go down. The barbarism that goes into FGM is staggering and gruesome.

[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't say what I did to make it into a competition. I simply stated that the claim of FGM not being in the hundreds of millions was incorrect.

Where did you get your statistics?

[–]12golfcrew 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This reminds me of an ancient law, I think it was among some ancient Slavic nation, where each person was a representative of his own city. So if he went to another city and someone from his city committed a crime there, the man would be punished despite having done nothing beyond being from the same city as the true criminal.

This shit reminds me of that. According to feminism we are guilty just by having the same genitals as the minority of men who do commit those crimes. I would never dream of making an innocent woman feel guilty for abusing children, divorce rape, domestic abuse and paternity fraud just because some other women that she has zero connection with have done so.

[–]ShivasKratom3 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Blows my mind how they use the same logic “some Muslims are fine but we can’t let them in cuz some aren’t”

Same fucking reasoning.

[–]AskingToFeminists 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well... At least you can choose to be a Muslim or to no longer be a Muslim...

Not that it would be a good logic anyway, but this one is worse

[–]realbrit 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because it suits you to tell yourself that YOU are not like the others. That because YOU haven't killed, you think you've never raped, you think you've never been violent with a woman, then that would justify not saying "all men". Yet you are a man. You belong to the gender that has been relentlessly preying on us for several millennia. Yet you refuse to take responsibility for your gender and to make it change.

This is the biggest crock of shit I have seen come out of that sub to date.

If the OP of that is reading this I would just like to say the following:

The vast majority of men don't think they aren't guilty of these things.

They know they are not guilty. Furthermore they veiw men who are guilty with nothing but contempt and condemnation.

This post is the most exceptional example of sheltered ignorance and female entitlement I am yet to see oozing from the reddit cesspit that is r/feminism.

People who subscribe to this narrow way of thinking don't stand for equality.

[–]CableConscious5982 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Comment from the original poster: "comparing men to sharks is an insult to sharks"

[–]WVWWWWVWWWWVW 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Some poor guy got called a "pick me" because he agreed with her...

[–]4th-rate-duelist 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

87,000 women killed What does that have to do with the statistic? There’s no way to know if they where killed because of gender and there isn’t anything saying that they where killed by men?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Gee those dwarf lantern sharks do fucking scare me.

[–]Cartgr 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't really understand her point, can someone explain

[–]AskingToFeminists 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Her point is all men are bad because some men are bad. Not much worth understanding in it.

[–]Cartgr 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't get the whole some sharks are safe and some have to be provoked bit.

[–]DeeplyDisturbed1 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

87,000 women have been killed because of their gender

Uh yeah sparky, I am gonna need to see the proof of this. How about women who died because they just happened to be weaker than the perpetrator?

Also, how many MEN die because of their gender. Like in war and industrial accidents?

Be careful with language. It is very important.

[–]Denys_Picard 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Tiens? Le Canard de L'Espace, c'est mignon. Maintenant, passons aux choses sérieuses:

There is more to fear when talking of Sharks from those of Silicon Valley than those from our Oceans, they are responsible for more deaths, especially in the Shadow of the Digital Coup d'État that is the Covid crisis.

Further, when Men attack women, it's mostly because they misinterpret them for feminists...

One must always keep a vitriolic sense of humor when discussing Conspiracy Theories. Gros Becs!

[–]shankhisnun 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Just posted a comment and waiting for any response. In case it gets removed by a moderator:

As someone who supports women's rights, this is pretty shitty. Generalizing people like this is just plain absurd and creates more division in society.

A lot of boys and men call women "bitches" or "hoes' based on what they think or a few bad experiences. Using the logic from this, it'd be appropriate for them to call all women pieces of shit or not worthy of being intimate with.

African Americans commit high rates of crime in the US. Using the reasoning of this post, it would make sense to be afraid of all black people or assume every single one is dangerous, which just reinforces stereotypes and prejudice.

Since some people of Islam enacted the incident of 9/11, all Muslims must be terrorists!

A girl cheated on me? That means I shouldn't trust any women I come across or have relationships with!

I have a crush on a celebrity who is wealthy? I'll just expect all women to be able to buy so many expensive things and act classy.

But you know, the day when "women stop accusing men of false crimes" and "no longer represent a threat to men'

These types of beliefs just split people from feminism even further and increase the disliking towards it. People don't want to be associated with things they're not.

[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Just checked the post and there are a great many deleted comments. I did not see this one,

[–]ron_m_joe -4 points-3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That whole post was fine except for the "responsibility" part.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter