"Research finds that 97% of women in the UK have been sexually harassed". https://www.openaccessgovernment.org/97-of-women-in-the-uk/105940/?unapproved=243526&moderation-hash=25d4175c33593250d629f94170e831c1#comment-243526

In a me-too society that tells women that there’s a political benefit and privileges for them if they cooperate with the feminist ambition to regard normal communication as assault – if directed at them, while still regarded normal if done by them – out of 50 women and 50 men in that me-too society with same benign encounters in their individual past almost all women will report, “I was assaulted” and almost none of the men, giving a "97% of women assaulted by men". But when same criteria are used for both sexes, such that whatever these women were taught to regard as assault, is also counted as assault when done to the sampled men by women, numbers of abusive and abused individuals in both sexes toward and by the opposite sex are almost identical. And in a normal society where only true assaults are regarded as such, actual numbers drop by a factor of 10 to 20, and sexes-proportions remain similar, as shown in all the accumulating research data (see sources below).

And I want to ask you, if you were to conduct a survey in Nazi Germany asking Germans, “have you ever been harassed or assaulted by a Jew”, how many of Germans would you guess would come up as harassed or assaulted by Jews? About 97%? As much as you don’t want to face this, feminism has evolved into a hate movement and teaches women to regard benign communication that they engage in as well and just as frequently, as “assault”, by convincing women that they are the victims of an entire population of human beings and that endless privilege and absolute power are awaiting them should they cooperate with the feminist effort to present all men (yes, all) as being part of an evil force. To illustrate here is a quote of a twitter post endorsed by 1800 people: “I see the #NotAllMen bullshit has started… Not all bacteria is harmful but we still wash our hands to prevent harm against the ones that are.” I know of only one other political movement that compared humans to bacteria and described the treatment they should receive as washing one's hands.

Yes, this is how a hate movement looks like. Imagine the above twitter message being written about the very same population – men – but by an alt right extremist using the same words to refer to the very same people, only as “immigrants” instead of as "men" (these are the very same individuals that the feminist and the alt-right will be speaking of, same identity cards, same faces). Or by a Neo-Nazi referring this way to Jewish men, or by the KKK to black men. Just replace “men” in your titles with “immigrants” to see yourself in the mirror – “97% of women were harassed by immigrants”.

If you could reach such a figure from a group of women surveyed about encounters with immigrants, or blacks, what would be your conclusion? Will you conclude, as the alt-right racist would, that all women are in danger from immigrants and that immigrants are a particularly dangerous group of human beings? Or, will you conclude that your sampled women must have been exposed to the most systematic and heinous hate propaganda in almost unprecedented severity and scale – a scale that could only be reached, as history shows, with full endorsement and dissemination by regular media and governmental authorities? If presented with a survey showing “97% of women harassed by immigrants” you would correctly conclude that either the methodology was manipulated by a racist, or, that this is how a society driven by a hate movement looks like. What your surveys demonstrate is that they are taken in a society incited to hatred. By disseminating it you are participating in spreading hate. This places you on par with only one group in society: extremist racist alt-right.

Sources

https://lovists.com/2021/02/20/women-are-as-sexually-violent-as-men/

https://lovists.com/2021/04/26/some-feminist-readers-may-want-to-sit-before-continuing/