The right to redress grievances is fundamental to democracy. That right should apply to everyone regardless of gender, race, national origin, religion, or whatever. That's why the hostility toward men exercising this right is so baffling. Maybe you've witnessed unfairness in the family court system. Maybe your brother, your dad, or your uncle committed suicide and you want to prevent others from experiencing that same fate. Maybe you want divorce laws improved so that a man doesn't get financially destroyed via divorce.

What blows my mind is that so many people, and it's not just women, are so uncomfortable with men redressing these grievances. Most of them don't even address the points made, but instead use the “misogyny” straw man. Most democratic republics like the United States guarantee the right to redress grievances. Why are so many people offended by the notion of a man exercising that right? Whenever we do that, they make shit up about us. One of the most egregious ones I saw was that women's studies professor who was interviewed about the Red Pill movie. She had not even seen the movie and it showed. She concocted the notion that men's rights activists were claiming they had the right to rape women if those women failed to comply to the alleged right to have sex with them. The absurdity of that claim is nearly incomprehensible. No one anywhere in the film made any claim even remotely like that, nor have I ever met anyone with that kind of psychopathic idea.

In a nutshell, the feminist reaction to men's rights is usually: 1. Ignore all arguments made, don't address anything with logic. 2. Accuse the man of misogyny or use some other straw man; use other bigoted language such as “mansplaining.”

I'm still waiting for any feminist anywhere to actually use logic and reason in talking about men's issues.