TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Swiss Man Identifies as a Woman to Retire Early

February 14, 2022
1198 upvotes

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/MensRights.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Swiss Man Identifies as a Woman to Retire Early
Author TheSpaceDuck
Upvotes 1198
Comments 221
Date February 14, 2022 5:32 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit /r/MensRights
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/swiss-man-identifies-as-a-woman-to-retire-early.1102354
https://theredarchive.com/post/1102354
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ssg7vw/swiss_man_identifies_as_a_woman_to_retire_early/
Comments

[–]carolinacasper 362 points363 points  (56 children) | Copy Link

Why is retirement age related to gender at all in Switzerland?

[–]quijote3000 78 points79 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Most of the countries in the world have early retirement for women. Not a single country in the world has a retirement age sooner for men than women

[–]Timely-Sheepherder-1 4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I think Turkmenistan has earlier retirement for men

[–]quijote3000 38 points39 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

One country in the world that doesn't support the patriarchy /s

Nan. The retirement age in Turkmenistan is currently 62 for men and 57 for women

[–]satellite779 226 points227 points  (21 children) | Copy Link

FYI, many countries have different retirement ages for men and women, it's not a Swiss thing: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retirement_age

[–]carolinacasper 93 points94 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

Holy, crow I did not know this was a thing! Thanks for the link.

[–]MGTOW_and_Bitcoin 70 points71 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I think in Great Britain women are able to retire 7 years earlier I hope you guys get the idea and do this as well

[–]andejoh 70 points71 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

It used to be that, but they equalized it a couple years ago. Women have been throwing a fit ever since.

[–]Rhum-runner 25 points26 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Except go into any retirement home and realize 60-80% of the inhabitants are women.

[–]illithoid 25 points26 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Don't women tend to live longer than men? Wouldn't this literally be an example of survivorship bias?

[–]PrinceVirginya 12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They do on average

I imagine its because men generally work more in more dangerous and stressful environments, which would shorten your life a touch

So its funny woman had a earlier retifement at all, it should have been equal as it is

[–]heyyy-kiddo 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Considering how welfare is used and that most men die way before women you are right in some extent.

Some old men might be on the streets though and others left the city for a less expensive life in the suburbs.

Idk how much your average man has in retirement from a middle income job and if he's divorced.

[–]z3bru 15 points16 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

So not only did they retire earlier, but they also got to live longer. Got it, fuck men in every way.

[–]Quirky_Wrongdoer_872 -2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Generally though women become the primary carers for the men in their lives until the men pass, and then the women are on their own

[–]z3bru 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

So? How does that affect the issue that men not only die sooner, but also retire later.

[–]Scasne 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yups, also did a quick gander and a stay at home parent with a child under 12 that your claiming child benefits for are able to claim towards their required number of years of National Insurance contribution so again gender equal.

[–]PrinceVirginya -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Id be annoyed if my retirement age was raised, even if by a year. Although it is equal atleast

Should have lowered it for men instead, Would have been both equal and a nice benifit. I doubt most men would complain about any earlier retirement

[–]Dunc0ne 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Retire seven years earlier.. live seven years longer.. it's like puberty didn't even happen. 😂

[–]Typhooni 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I am soon identifying as a woman myself.

[–]MGTOW_and_Bitcoin 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You go girlfriend!!!!! I hope every man decides to do this I know I would think about it

[–]heyyy-kiddo 7 points8 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Did you really not know this?

My dad told me when I turned 18....funny how you are fucked from the beginning.

If you have a decent country you may retire at 60-65 or something.

You'd get like 10 years of retirement then die at 75.

[–]PrinceVirginya 6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Its sad honestly thats how we have been raised to live

Im trying my best to save up, invest and reach financial freedom as i get older, but its difficult as hell

[–]Dunc0ne 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Like chattle.🐮

[–]heyyy-kiddo 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Big Capitalism does not want that , that's why it's hard as hell.

Imagine getting paid what you work for and not paying ultra high income taxes to the state.

I feel like profits should be taxed way more than jobs , but right now you have really small taxes on profits and company stuff and huge ones for workers.

[–]WikiMobileLinkBot 18 points19 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Desktop version of /u/satellite779's link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retirement_age


[opt out] Beep Boop. Downvote to delete

[–]EpicHajsownik 91 points92 points  (25 children) | Copy Link

It comes from the idea, that women have to take care of kids, or something like this. Its the thing in Poland. Yet no one cares about the fact, that having kids isnt forced in here, you can be single and still get early retirement age

[–]Soda_BoBomb 52 points53 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

But women live longer

[–]EpicHajsownik 56 points57 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

yeah. No one is gonna care about it even tho it creates a situation, where in poland an average woman benefits by 50k pln from this system, while a typical man loses 50k pln.

So its not just retirement age problem, but also a problem of losing huge portion of money in favor of a woman

[–]OldEgalitarianMRA 20 points21 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's the reason. And the government knows it.

[–]ohisama 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Is that social security that is paid by the government?

[–]McFeely_Smackup[🍰] 82 points83 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

retirement age women aren't having kids.

[–]EpicHajsownik 6 points7 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

it cause the had them in the pasttime, and they had spent less time on paying taxes for retirement, cause they were not working when taking care of kids.

Still having kids, and taking care of them is your own choice, and you should be just concious of this, and not just want a lower retirement age. Especially just cause you are a woman, who doesnt even have to have kids

[–]McFeely_Smackup[🍰] 62 points63 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

it cause the had them in the pasttime, and they had spent less time on paying taxes for retirement, cause they were not working when taking care of kids.

that still makes no sense to justify early retirement. there's no logical connection there.

[–]EpicHajsownik 7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

you're right. Retirement age shouldnt be dependend on gender, or neither of an amount of kids, they have

[–]McFeely_Smackup[🍰] 8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

to be clear, I'm not demanding YOU explain it. I just don't think there's a logical explanation possible.

retirement age should be based on the number of years a person works. But since they'll never go for that, it should be objectively equal for everyone.

[–]EpicHajsownik 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I've just said an argument that our Polish prime minister said. Yes its a stupid reason for it, that why i believe in an equal retirement age.

And explanations like this are just sexist

[–]caity1111 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women live, on average, much longer than men as well. So it doesn't make sense on that front either.

[–]DworkinPill 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Is society having children a choice?

[–]Typhooni 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes.

[–]PrinceVirginya 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think in part of having kids is what bothers me the most

Some people outright have children to get benifits on welfare, its pretty sad but alot of people do it and its not unheard of

Arguably alot of these parents arent even capable of caring for their kids and shouldnt have them in the first place

[–]MGTOW_and_Bitcoin 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Sounds like a lame excuse

[–]EpicHajsownik 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

cause it is. No one likes it besides fans of our current government, which there are none in the public debate (poland)

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That idea falls on its face when you realize few in any women are having kids in their mid to late 40s and still having to take care of them into their 60s.

[–]lasciate 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It comes from the idea, that women have to take care of kids

Source? If this is solely, specifically what you believe the Polish reasoning to be, please provide a source saying that was the reasoning when the discrepancy was introduced.

[–]ohisama 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Should be grandkids by retirement age.

[–]dath_bane 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because wifes are often younger than their husbands, the (all male) parliament decided (I think in the 60s or 50s), to make their retirement age two years lower, so they can retire more or less at the same time. some years ago they lowered it to just one year and now the parliament wants to abolish it completely. In fall we'll have an election about it. Feminists and the misguided part of the left will fail terribly.

[–]Nk-O 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because we're misnadrist.

[–]Shot-Ad8191 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because some Eunuch men think pussy rules.

[–]StarZax 186 points187 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Imagine having a shorter life expectancy but also the need to work longer to retire

But you know, men have lower life expectancy because they are reckless, that's it :)

[–]Arian51 16 points17 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn’t say reckless since men are more likely to work dangerous jobs and often are the working one in a relationship in some of the biggest countries like india or china so therefore more likely to die during commute and job. Unless your being sarcastic in which case I just woke up…

[–]my-blood 14 points15 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah I think they're being sarcastic

[–]Arian51 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nevermind then

[–]StarZax 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Those are obvious reasons yes, I was being a bit sarcastic. Obviously working dangerous jobs and stuff isn't being reckless. It was just a generalization from what we can sometimes hear (at least I did), people that are sometimes saying that men die more from car crashes, alcoohol, they are being too reckless or shit like that

[–]Important_Ad736 11 points12 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

I definitely think it’s mostly biological, most female animals live longer than the males too

[–]StarZax 5 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I don't exactly know which species but I guess that's because most males will have to fight and hunt ? Which isn't exactly what I'll call being « reckless »

Of course my post was just a simplist generalisation from what we can hear sometimes, you get the point, there are reasons why men have lower life expectancy but it's not always something that shouldn't be fixed

[–]Important_Ad736 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Well I mean female animals can hunt too, apart from when they’re pregnant (I guess the stress of the male from having to protect and provide for the female and offspring might be a factor.) Lionesses do a lot of hunting. There’s a theory that bodies that can carry offspring are just wired to last longer - apply this to humans and our extension to life because of healthcare etc has us living a lot longer but women still outliving men by a bit. Estrogen is thought to be regenerative whereas testosterone can have the opposite effect, it decreases the ability of the immune system to fight off illness, makes a person more irritable (stress is not good for health) etc. Also having two X chromosomes instead of 1 x and a y like a man is thought to be more beneficial at fighting off infections & cancer. So there’s other factors than biological but the biological definitely can’t be underestimated

[–]StarZax 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I'm absolutely not denying biological factors and women will still probably outlive men by a tiny margin, that's not « biological discrimination » or anything like that. I just don't think that's enough to justify why we are missing that many years, we are so far behind women in terms of mental health, that's already something that needs to be improved. I don't even care too much about life expectancy, I just want people to have better mental health overall and men just happen to be particularly involved

[–]Important_Ad736 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Do you think some of that’s to do with how men are taught to deal with emotions? My brother and dad used to laugh at me sometimes when I cried and the only time I’ve known my dad to cry was when he locked himself in a room after his friend died because he didn’t want anyone to see him crying. Always baffled me how they saw crying as a sign of weakness instead of just a way to release emotions - always wondered where that way of thinking comes from

[–]StarZax 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think that plays a pretty big part yeah, tho at least with the people around my age I've found that a lot more people would be "okay" with that, more than what I suspected, the thing is that very few know how to deal with other people releasing their emotions and prefer to avoid that (and as a guy who's pretty open about his feelings, at least way more than people I know, that's very hard to get through when people do that) It's only about education and harmful gender roles that teaches men that they should all be about protection and not show emotional weakness, but that's impossible to do all the time and any man eventually break. My father is like that too, I've heard he hide to cry when he heard some news I don't want to share here, he's very "traditionalist", I find the correlation pretty obvious, now I'm not an expert so I can't confirm if there is causation but if I had to guess I'd say very probably. Young people tend to be more and more progressive in my opinion, but I think that "men's rights" still isn't mainstream enough as it is viewed as just a backlash movement or something, by both men and women. But men around my age are starting to understand little by little that traditional gender roles does not fit them, therefore even if I would like it to be faster, men's rights will eventually stop being something viewed as only a conservative thing since men will eventually free themselves from their gender role just like women did.

So yeah, in short, I think this way of thinking comes from what's expected in a man, from most women and most other men, and that's what we usually call the "traditional gender role" which in the end, can be harmful and a lot of the time actually is imho, but it's bound to disappear one day

Sorry for the long post btw, I might have digressed a bit, I would make it more concise but it's not practical on mobile

[–]BaconCatBug 98 points99 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

And just like that, every single male has a way to avoid being enslaved via conscription.

[–]RedPillAlphaBigCock 102 points103 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Why ON EARTH can women retire earlier when they are living longer ? It should be the other way around if anything . But to keep it simple : it should be equal

[–]throwaway3569387340 32 points33 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

It's so all those female construction workers, fisher"persons", and coal miners don't have to take physical risks into old age.

/s just in case.

[–]GNU_Yorker 18 points19 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

will more men take advantage of this?

One year of not having to work and paid benefits at an age where it's abundantly clear that our time on this earth is precious and limited? I'd be first in line.

[–]HipEvilMidget 14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"Will people change their gender to avoid serving in the military? Probably."

[–]EpicHajsownik 105 points106 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

This is the reason why I approve for a legal gender change with no need for surgery/ psychologist opinion. With it you can actually have equal rights for both genders, and every unequal right will be unworthy, cause you will be able to just change your gender.

No wonder terfs hate this, when men can actually have equal rights with it

[–]Malkor 18 points19 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

To be "fair" there are a lot of things terfs... dislike...

as women in Switzerland can retire one year earlier than men

Not sure why there's even a difference at all if that's the case. Also, Switzerland is Neutral? Is the training mostly for domestic deployments/disasters?

[–]EpicHajsownik 14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

it was 2 years before, but they changed it. now its not that bad, but still its a privilege.
I would actually care more about male only conscription, which can be resolved by this

[–]Sperm40mmSprintChamp 6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Also, Switzerland is Neutral? Is the training mostly for domestic deployments/disasters?

Famous quote: Switzerland doesn't have an army, Switzerland is an army.

The country is almost impossible to invade as well (Until about a decade or so ago they had every single road way into the country lined with explosives to cut off a land invasion. They also have at least one, if not dozens, of hangers in mountain faces and no one even knows where they are, so an air invasion would have no clue where the resistance would come from), they stopped giving rifles and uniforms to go home with in 2008 because no one will really fuck with them for a variety for reasons including how hard it is and a ton of countries really like banking with them.

[–]nikooo777 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

they stopped giving rifles and uniforms to go home with in 2008

that's false. I did my service post 2008 and have both.

They stopped issuing pocket ammunition with it, that's it. (you can still buy it privately just fine)

[–]Sperm40mmSprintChamp 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

For what it's worth, I pulled that bit off swissinfo.ch

[–]nikooo777 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm surprised they got it wrong. If you link it to me I can try to have them correct it

[–]OldEgalitarianMRA 43 points44 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Does a male to female transexual have to register for the draft in the US?

[–]EpicHajsownik 46 points47 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

sadly yes. I doubt that the "progressive" government would allow men to escape their fate even if they transition

[–]Dikki93 9 points10 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

What about female to male then?

[–]EpicHajsownik 8 points9 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

doesnt have to register

[–]Throwawayingaccount 8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Incorrect.

IT's actually a HUGE pain for anyone who transitions to male over the age of 27, as they're now a man who has NOT registered for selective service, and MOST systems are not equipped to handle that.

[–]Sperm40mmSprintChamp 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's 26. You have up until your 26th birthday.

[–]regularcomments 25 points26 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I would do the same if my Life expectancy is shorter but society expects I have to work more years.

[–]criolle 23 points24 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

The article mentions that he “paid the fine to become a woman.” I'm waiting for feminists to cite this as P-R-O-O-F that: “It costs more to be female!”

[–]upsidedownbackwards 20 points21 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

“It costs more to be female!”

Maybe they shouldn't be spending so much on being female? Maybe they could chill on the disposable clothing cycle to help with the microplastic situation?

https://www.inc.com/amy-nelson/women-drive-majority-of-consumer-purchasing-its-time-to-meet-their-needs.html

[–]Soft_Leather_Couch 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No, they’ll say that because he was fined for transitioning to a woman that it’s proof the government hates women and wants to make them illegal and turn them into breeding stock.

Or whatever those mental gymnastic psychos would come up with.

[–]mikesteane 25 points26 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Are we going to see women identifying as men to benefit from all that male privilege? No? Women must be so honest not to take advantage of such an opportunity. Or maybe said privilege doesn't actually exist.

[–]WhereProgressIsMade 13 points14 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I’ve heard about a book I think it was titled “Self-made Man”. It was an autobiography from a woman who either transitioned as a man or dressed and tried to act like one. She/he was disappointed the expected male privilege never materialized.

[–]heyyy-kiddo 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

She dressed up as a man. She basically saw how your average dad or middle aged man lives his life with bad and good sides.

[–]bigbird1333 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly, well said

[–]Frosty-Gate-8094 -1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

The 'male privilege' feminists complain about is biological..

Men are simply taller stronger, more competitive and have more stamina than women.
Most importantly, men don't get pregnant, which takes away productive years from woman's life.

A lot of things that feminists complain, like men dating younger women, earnings gap, more men in political and economically powerful positions, simply comes down to this...

They can never be eliminated. Feminists know it. That's why they are demanding it.
Diverting society's resources into a never ending sinkhole, instead of addressing male issues like gender-biased laws and paternity frauds.
(Coz the latter are correctable. Feminists do not want it. They want subjugation of men)

[–]heyyy-kiddo 8 points9 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I'd argue getting pregnant now is a huge benefit on a personal level.

You have zero downsides job wise, you get money to raise the child, it's kind of guaranteed you won't need to strain too much to make a decent living if the guy that knocked you up has at least some assets on his name.

Also you get social credit from the society no matter if the child was raised OK or not.....you popped one out and now you are a "full time mom".

It's a good means to pressure your mate into marriage or in other matters too....it's a servant ownership deed.

[–]Frosty-Gate-8094 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Ya.. True.. But all these benefits mean that you have less income (or you deliberately keep your income low to be eligible to such benefits)..

It will reflects in the gender- pay gap and less women being in higher positions in the companies...

Because being lower in hierarchy benefits women.
Being lower in hierarchy actually harms men.

No wonder, men try to compete and rise through the ranks.
Once we reach the top, these same feminists call it 'patriarchy'.

The reason more men are at the top is because men have no incentive to stay at the bottom.
Women instead can get welfare, or marry a rich guy or get pregnant by a rich guy.

Its not that all women opt for these easy routes, but even if 20-25% do it, you will get a pay-gap, as well as other gaps that feminists cry about.

And its impossible to eliminate. Coz you cannot stop women from being gold-diggers and men from being simps..

That's why I call it never-ending sinkhole.

[–]heyyy-kiddo 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women have a lot of income streams and better job access anyway.

Also i heard some big firms promote women to higher positions anyway , even if they are on maternity leave for years.

You basically have "work experience" on your CV while you play with Timmy.

AFAIK you also have a secured job on top of it, so job security is assured and implied.

[–]0mnica 19 points20 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I am now a woman, my preferred pronouns are he/him. Respect my authoritay!

[–]GodBirb 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Why tf are there so many countries with older retirement ages for men when it’s a known fact that women live longer??

[–]qtyapa 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Isnt lifespan for men lower than that of women? Even in death they dont stop sucking our blood.

[–]2340859764059860598 16 points17 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm happy for this strong and beautiful woman.

[–]iforgotkeyboard 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

more beatuful than 90% of rаdfеm community, that's for sure

[–]jarmbur 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Genius! Nice loophole in the system. One of the silver linings of all the recent identity politics nonsense.

[–]SabrielRaziel 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

LMAO modern problems require modern solutions

[–]Anih1list 13 points14 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Well then, that's a nice way for men to circumvent misandrist laws. All thanks to the LGBT+ movement!

[–]CryingMadGirl 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thsi is how you beat the system lol

[–]CasualSmurf 48 points49 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

If you identify as woman does your employer start paying you less?

Edit: should have included the /s

[–]40moreyears 32 points33 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes. And everyone starts being mean to you and holding you back…🙄

[–]OldEgalitarianMRA 18 points19 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

And when they look at you all they think of is having sex with you.

[–]heyyy-kiddo 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is a perk not a downside....

/s

[–]the_one_demiurge 12 points13 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

If anything the retirement age for women should be older. They live longer.

[–]PrinceVirginya 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah, from an equity stand point it makes sense

Tbh, id be happy if they lowered male retirement to the same as female retirement rather than raise it for woman

Benificial for men, while being "equal"

[–]the_one_demiurge 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It becomes a cost issue then. It should be set where they want it, but not sex referenced at all.

[–]GreatGrizzly 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Is there any reason why countries pay retirement to women before men?

Its pretty well established that men live shorter lifespans then women. There for it would make more sense to pay out to men at a younger age.

I see no logical or economical reason to pay out to women sooner other then women being "worth more" than men.

[–]IllustriousPiano7300 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Will people change their gender to avoid serving in the military

Lets see it happening. Prove their bullshit.

If they want equality, it should be both ways.

[–]VictoriaNightingale 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you saying that "they" want only men to sevre in the military? I am personally against conscription and stuff like that for everyone.

[–]blechmeister666 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

man (born XY) by the name of Luzerner Zeitung

good article.

luzerner zeitung is a newspaper. zeitung = newspaper, luzern = lucerne

[–]danielm316 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

And some people still say that men are privileged and women are oppressed.

I just can't belive it.

[–]Unable_Ad_1363 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Big dick move

[–]Magical-Hummus 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Godspeed, brother.. I mean sister.

[–]carolinacasper 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I saw a VICE YouTube video that said the North Korean traffic directing girls retirement age is 25.

[–]kyogre_destroyer 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

bro wtf 💀💀

[–]kyogre_destroyer -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

and yes i used emojis downvote me

[–]criolle 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The article mentions that he “paid the fine to become a woman.” I'm waiting for feminists to cite this as P-R-O-O-F that: “It cost more to be female!”

[–]Aimander 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wokism need to be eradicated from the surface of this planet

Whatever the cost

[–]fuckmylighterisdead -4 points-3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yikes, the moderation is strong on this post. Can’t say shit here except agreeing apparently 🙄 lest you hurt someone’s feelings lmao

[–]heyyy-kiddo 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Idk, unless you broke some threat rules or Reddit ToS you should be able to comment & post here.

You might get down voted , but you should be able to comment.

Are you sure it was not Reddit at it again with their crappy app?

Worst case pm me your comment and post it here too and I'll try to post about the moderation rules in hopes we'd get a look at what exact rule your comment violated.

I probably won't agree with you , but you should be able to express your views in comments as long as you respect sub rules.

[–]fuckmylighterisdead 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nope they deleted at least 20 other comments off this post, not just mine.

[–]R67H 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Unpopular opinion: WGAF? Dude's working a known exploit. If Switzerland want's to let this happen, it's their prerogative. If anything, more men do this, maybe they'll reconsider their sexist policies.

[–]aigars2 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder do they include such a misandrist law into their fake wage gap concept.

[–]RedDragon777 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wtf lmao. Men live shorter lives…

[–]PrinceVirginya 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Giga brain

Forreal though, i wish all countries had am equal retirement age for sex

But instead of raising it for woman, lower it for men to be the same as womans (I dont think i could see any guy complaining about earlier retirement!)

[–]KINGSPAZT1K 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Should be the other way around because we live less and train for war

[–]springy 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

His name was Luzerner Zeitung? I doubt it. That's the name of a local german language newspaper in Swiss town of Lucerne.

[–]DutchOnionKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

What a total legend.

[–]bfte2 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Played the system well....

[–]Smuggred -5 points-4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

another fake transgender to put a good name to all of the real disphoric people

[–]Fearless-File-3625 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Who is a fake transgender and who is a real transgender is not for you to determine. After reading this, any sane person should be more concerned with men not getting basic human rights in Switzerland and not about the authenticity of his transgenderness.

[–]Smuggred -2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

he is not transgender.. he is a man who uses "being trans" as a bypass.. these are the type of people who rape women in bathrooms and claim they are trans but haven't even gone to therapy to be diagnosed with gender disphoria

[–]Fearless-File-3625 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

We have no way of knowing if he is a fake trans or someone who was questioning his gender identity and finally decided to convert after learning about these sexist laws in Switzerland. We can't tell if he got diagnosed with gender dysphoria or not, maybe he did or maybe he didn't.

Even if he is fake trans, there is big difference between acting trans to get basic human rights and acting trans to commit heinous crimes. You have no right or evidence to group him in the latter category.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter