What world do these idiots live in where they claim to be about "gender equality" yet bring horrendously sexist - Jame Lindsay calls this pseudo-reality - the made up world feminists have created for themselves

mhandanna · 2021-01-08T12:13:06+00:00

Lol women rulers started 27% more wars than male ones over a 500 year study period and went on more land grabs and expansions. Feminism is all about feelings not facts. Its fucking hilarious.

https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/history-says-that-female-leaders-are-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men/

This is also a good time to point this out too, women leaders and COVID - women leader actually did significantly worse, with higher death rates, despite false news stories with highly selective data:

This is a good example of ideologies corrupting research (the original paper saying women leaders did better) by using identity politics. And I thought I would post this here as its a good time to discuss something called Gamma Bias, which I am sure most people would not have heard of, and is useful to now when considering identity politics and SJW's as it explains a lot of they motivations.

SO....

The new report: (lol its not by dailymail, its a study, but im linking daily mail)

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-9102585/COVID-19-Countries-led-women-NOT-fared-significantly-better-pandemic.html?login#newcomment

The original claim (women leaders better handled pandemic which was falsely claimed by a study then cited bu UN, WEF, Times, Guardian, BBC, etc) was:

Entirely false to being with
Due to Gamma Bias

1) entirely false to being with

See here, not only did female leaders, but even higher female majority parliaments did worse:

See here, not only did female leaders do worse than male ones, but even higher female majority parliaments did worse: (correlation more women in parliament = worse outcomes)

In summary:

The median death per capita rate in female-led countries is 60.3 per million. The median death per capita rate in male-led countries is 17.8 per million (Mann-Whitney U test p-value 0.053).
The median death rate per capita in countries with national parliaments with at least 40% women is 59.7 per million. The median death rate per capita in countries with national parliaments with less than 40% women is 17.9 per million (Mann-Whitney U test p-value 0.048).

https://www.reddit.com/r/theydidthemath/comments/idz5ih/self_according_to_european_cdc_and_oxford/

To be clear, to me with a brain THAT IS NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE WOMEN... there are countless factors, but it makes it even more hilarious those agenda drive fake researchers tried to say women did better, when they literally did worse. And even if it was due to women as a class, that would still make no difference, as you aways judge individuals, not group identity.

The study saying otherwise was absurd in its logical gymnastics to try and paint a false picture:

https://www.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comments/ie5zng/fundamental_analysis_flaws_underlying_just_about/

2) The reason: due to Gamma bias (useful to know about SJWs)

https://malepsychology.org.uk/2018/12/04/why-are-there-so-many-disagreements-about-gender-issues-its-usually-down-to-gamma-bias/

Within the “celebration” cell, for example, the positive achievements of women are routinely celebrated as a gender issue. Within the same cell in the table, the positive actions and achievements of men are not similarly celebrated or gendered. For example, when a group of boys was recently rescued from dangerous underwater caves in Thailand, it was not reported as a gender issue or as a positive example of masculinity, despite the fact that all the rescuers were male.

In the “victimhood” cell, domestic violence against women, for example, is highlighted as a gender issue, whereas domestic violence against men is played down or completely ignored, despite the substantial numbers of male victims. When men make up the majority of victims (e.g. suicide, rough sleeping, deaths at work, addiction), the issues are not highlighted or portrayed as gender issues.

Within the “privilege” cell, male privileges are magnified in our media and politics as “patriarchy” whereas female privileges (for example relating to children and family life) are played down or ignored as gender issues.

The overall impact of gamma bias therefore, according to this hypothesis, is that masculinity is made to look significantly worse than it really is whilst simultaneously femininity is made to look significantly better than it really is.

What are the implications of the routine magnifying of the worst of men and minimising the worst of women? Well, for a start we might need to reconceptualise the ‘crisis of masculinity’ as a crisis in our attitudes towards men and masculinity.

Let’s make 2019 the year we wake up to the need to explore our conscious and unconscious biases against men. We hope that the concept of gamma bias and the gender distortion matrix will help people to think more clearly about gender issues.

Zeioth · 2021-01-08T16:49:03+00:00

I love the expression narcissistic people make when they are exposed.

prelude12342000 · 2021-01-08T19:05:11+00:00

women have more power than ever (city boards, CEO's, girl power, etc) and how are things going? poorly.

excess_inquisitivity · 2021-01-08T15:03:31+00:00

OMG this is SO much better when you figure out 1)it's not out of context and 2) it's actually reversed here from the original.

8:30

The same woman who says it's not about pushing men down said it in direct response to the question about women running the world, while standing on the 'strongly agree' line.

ZimbaZumba · 2021-01-09T15:41:32+00:00

The feminist woman has been caught up in a cult and is incapable of objective thought. Her notions of social engineering are naive beyond belief and have foundations of sand. Utopian and emotionally pleasing political visions are easy foisted on young, impressionable minds. History has shown us time and and time again they do not take into account the complexity of human condition and are disastrous. The university system has done this woman a disservice.

The other woman can think for herself. The number of women who partially agreed with the idea bothers me.