Do we know that evidence is unnecessary? It's pointless arguing about this case because we don't know much at all about the situation, other than that this person thought a guy's interactions with his neighbour children were potentially dangerous and so reported it.
I don't think it's an assumption so much as it is an implication by the person tweeting. You can only fit so much text in there, especially if you want people to read it. Given OP's replies here I'm happy to assume that they and implicitly the original tweeter did their due diligence.
[–]BeneficialBlock[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]1up_for_life 227 points228 points229 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Imnotmrabut[S] 108 points109 points110 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SOwED 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Imnotmrabut[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]C4ndlejack 45 points46 points47 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]SqueaksBCOD 36 points37 points38 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bestoftherest222 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Imnotmrabut[S] -8 points-7 points-6 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]C4ndlejack 18 points19 points20 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Koalachan 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Imnotmrabut[S] -24 points-23 points-22 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]paragonofcynicism 13 points14 points15 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Chronoguy 19 points20 points21 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Reino550 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Imnotmrabut[S] -3 points-2 points-1 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]paragonofcynicism 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]FightingUrukHai 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SOwED 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Imnotmrabut[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]nelsonblaha 56 points57 points58 points (26 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 64 points65 points66 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]the_wychu 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Imnotmrabut[S] -97 points-96 points-95 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[–]nelsonblaha 62 points63 points64 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[+]VegetableConfection1 points [recovered] (16 children) | Copy Link
It is, but if you're concerned then alerting someone who's equipped to make sure the kids are safe is the right thing to do.
I agree that sometimes men are unfairly targeted with accusations like these, but that doesn't mean that every accusation is unfair.
[–]brokedown 11 points12 points13 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]sunblocks 11 points12 points13 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]brokedown 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]VegetableConfection1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Do we know that evidence is unnecessary? It's pointless arguing about this case because we don't know much at all about the situation, other than that this person thought a guy's interactions with his neighbour children were potentially dangerous and so reported it.
[–]sunblocks 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HalfysReddit 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]VegetableConfection1 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
They obviously had a reason for thinking they were being groomed.
[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]VegetableConfection 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]VegetableConfection 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]nelsonblaha 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Daemonicus 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]VegetableConfection 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]grandmasbroach 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+]Imnotmrabut[S] -7 points-6 points-5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]grandmasbroach 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Imnotmrabut[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PanderjitSingh_k 48 points49 points50 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Imnotmrabut[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kaazsssz 26 points27 points28 points (68 children) | Copy Link
[–]PanderjitSingh_k 22 points23 points24 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]kaazsssz 10 points11 points12 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]pacmatt27 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]kaazsssz 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]pacmatt27 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]xsnyder 5 points6 points7 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]pacmatt27 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]pacmatt27 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]-manatease 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]pacmatt27 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]corezon 4 points5 points6 points (56 children) | Copy Link
[–]chadwickofwv 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]corezon 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kaazsssz 0 points1 point2 points (26 children) | Copy Link
[–]corezon 8 points9 points10 points (25 children) | Copy Link
[–]kaazsssz 4 points5 points6 points (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]corezon 6 points7 points8 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]tmone 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kaazsssz -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]zaphas86 -1 points0 points1 point (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]corezon 6 points7 points8 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]zaphas86 -3 points-2 points-1 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]corezon 8 points9 points10 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]tmone 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]zaphas86 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]tmone 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]chadwickofwv -3 points-2 points-1 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]corezon 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DignifiedAlpaca -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]orcscorper 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]chadwickofwv 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]marauderp -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]corezon 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PanderjitSingh_k 0 points1 point2 points (26 children) | Copy Link
[–]corezon 9 points10 points11 points (25 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mackowatosc 1 point2 points3 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]corezon 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mackowatosc 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]corezon 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mackowatosc 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]corezon 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]shockingnews213 2 points3 points4 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]tmone 2 points3 points4 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]shockingnews213 0 points1 point2 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]tmone 1 point2 points3 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]shockingnews213 0 points1 point2 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]tmone 1 point2 points3 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]IronJohnMRA 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dontpet 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]xfritz5375 9 points10 points11 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 29 points30 points31 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Imnotmrabut[S] 8 points9 points10 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]xfritz5375 -3 points-2 points-1 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+]VegetableConfection1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
I don't think it's an assumption so much as it is an implication by the person tweeting. You can only fit so much text in there, especially if you want people to read it. Given OP's replies here I'm happy to assume that they and implicitly the original tweeter did their due diligence.
[–]xfritz5375 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]VegetableConfection 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Imnotmrabut[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link