Ok, let me start off by saying - I don’t personally believe in post wall, 80/20 or any of that. This CMV is purely based on a logical conclusion one can’t deny based on the definitions given here.

I think it’s safe to say when PPD men speak on 80/20 they are speaking on young women in their prime. According to comments here post wall is what happens when the women in their prime practice 80/20 ride the ‘cock carosel’ and don’t pick. Post wall is the punishment. Therefore this age group is inconsequential.

Ok so a woman who is 18-29 is highly sought after by men aged 18 - death. This woman is desired because she is youthful, has a low N count, low baggage and not bitter. There are explanations given here. This is the ideal woman for men 18-death.

Let’s say a PPD angel sits a 23 year old down and says “Stacy, you only have a few years before your desirability disappears so you need to pick a husband while you’re still desirable, here are the men to pick from.”

In that pool, logically, based on what’s stated here, there are men from 18 broke and ugly to 40 handsome and rich. And every variation in between.

Those are her options.

QUESTION 1: How does she choose without being picky? Men have created the dynamic where they’re all trying to date her so not only why but how would she pay attention to the bottom 80% there are way too many options at the top.

QUESTION 2: If her options are an average 23 year old who is kind nice and a good guy and a 30 year old who spent years making himself a viable option. Who should she choose? Who should lose in this type of race?

I assume the answer would be ideally all women should choose a husband when she’s in her prime.

Ok fair.

Are older men not creating a skewed dynamic by using their resources to outcompete? Are they not throwing a wrench in this natural order?

My conclusion is men created the monster that is 80/20. CMV.