TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CMV: Despite what any sexual strategy says, men search for an intellectual equal in their partner

August 20, 2018
29 upvotes

Basic sexual strategy for men to commit is: Woman has to be physically attractive, fun and enjoyable to be in the company of, able to contribute her domestic skills to running a household together, and respect his leadership and abilities as a man.

However, men tend to pedestalize women who are their intellectual equals.

Men need to have a fervent interest in a woman to continually return to her - otherwise she is just a pretty vagina - and this interest comes in the form of respecting her abilities as well. I have continually seen men praise women for taking charge, making jokes and being successful. Her success (in addition to her physical) IS attractive to him.

The only downside is when a man searches for his intellectual equal, it will backlash onto him because SHE will search for a man of higher intellectual status than her, and to his dismay, she leaves him. Additional repercussions include him forgetting to treat her like a woman (giving her tingles) because he respects her intelligence so much, he treats her like an equal, like a man, that she does not feel desirable around him.

Men would actually prefer to be with a woman who can keep up with him intellectually and through her accomplishments. Men DO NOT want a woman who is just pleasant and pretty company, despite what his ego may be aroused by.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate.

/r/PurplePillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title CMV: Despite what any sexual strategy says, men search for an intellectual equal in their partner
Author vanBeethovenLudwig
Upvotes 29
Comments 221
Date August 20, 2018 1:25 PM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/cmv-despite-what-any-sexual-strategy-says-men.261098
https://theredarchive.com/post/261098
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/98tk15/cmv_despite_what_any_sexual_strategy_says_men/
Red Pill terms in post
Comments

[–]KerPop42Neo was trans23 points24 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Using this study: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C33&as_vis=1&q=relative+intelligence+dating&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&p=&u=%23p%3D5UrNryUbZCkJ

It looks like men are attracted to women more intelligent than them in theory, but when actually meeting someone that is more intelligent, tend to react negatively to being shown up.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm assuming this study is the one you mean(you just linked the search term):

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=2982538701903317733&hl=en&as_sdt=0,33&as_vis=1

The experiments specifically relate to being outperformed on a test. They lack external validity. A way more accurate way to test this would simply be to have a bunch of undergrads complete intelligence tests, and then set up blind speed dates and have them rate chemistry afterwards. Or the other way around to avoid demand characteristics. They also should have had another control condition where the woman outperformed the man on a randomized outcome to see if what they're measuring really isn't just the effect of not winning in something there and then.

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Okay somebody actually studied this? I thought this was common lore passed down from the mammoth hunters.

[–]KerPop42Neo was trans3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

When in doubt, Google Scholar. Though you have to keep in mind that most of these studies are done on undergrad psychology/sociology students, so it might not be widely applicable.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Uh Google Scholar links to published work from journals.

[–]sltkr 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

Which study? You are linking to a search results page.

[–]KerPop42Neo was trans2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh, really? Sorry. On my browser it redirects to the paper. The title is, "(Psychological) Distance Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: Effects of Psychological Distance and Relative Intelligence on Men’s Attraction to Women" and while the link goes to a pay wall, you can download the pdf.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

react more negatively to being shown up

Well, ya. Who doesn’t?

[–]KerPop42Neo was trans2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, it depends on what you're looking for. If someone's smarter than you, you're dating up in that department, and you won't have to take care of them by explaining things, etc. You've more than doubled the total intelligence you can use to solve your problems. On the other hand, it could hurt your pride.

[–]yaseedog will hunt1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

women lol (well, some of them). That's the narrative: guy show off his impressive knowledge or skills, girl oohs and ahs and flatters his ego

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew32 points33 points  (82 children) | Copy Link

men generally want a woman whos smart enough to understand what HE wants to talk about, women mistake this for men being interested in their retarded pop feminist and pop leftist opinions

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing24 points25 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Millions of women have perfected the art of pretending to give a shit about metal detecting for great treasures, or the wood working shop.

[–]concacanca26 points27 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

All of the things that men are interested in and you went for metal detectors lmao.

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing14 points15 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Um. A few of my friend's spouse are into that. Most men do not have interesting or unique hobbies I mean I know somebody will pop up here and say they have a sideline and a giant garage with a forge and they make medieval weapons and sell them on the manly part of Etsy. But it is not particularly difficult to allow a man the delusion that he is superior because his IQ might or might not be 4.2 points higher or he has a retard hobby that he created his own sub reddit for. Laydee humans been doing that one forever.

[–]concacanca2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

I feel like most women will do better just pretending to have an interest in whatever the popular sports are in their country tbh.

Do you hang out with civil war re-enactors or something?

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing9 points10 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I live in the South half the assholes I know are "civil war" re-enactors it is just an excuse to wear gross clothes and get away from the wife. It is like hunting and a few other things. Metal detecting is actually aimed at basic Bros. The good thing about feigning an interest in a sport is you can leave the room for long periods of time and just pop in and cheer when something happens as long as the sport Bros are not coming to your house to eat shitty food and drink shitty beer and sit on your couch then most women are cool with it. Women just don't want their husband's semi literate and unhygienic friends parking in their living room for hours. One of my friends solved this problem by creating a fire pit and some other cool things in her backyard nice grill, outdoor fridge and cheap bar set up, so when her BF's friends show up they all sit outside and she can ignore them if she wants and there is a grill outside so he can cook for them and they aren't running through her kitchen like three year olds asking for refills

[–]reluctantly_red3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

live in the South half the assholes I know are "civil war" re-enactors

Note to self -- do not move to the South.

[–]SkrattGoddess1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Lol at the sports friends!!! My mom can't stand a nasty group of men watching sports! Beer flying everywhere when they talk. She avoids the man caves at parties.

I want a football husband so I can make snacks and pretend to watch the game xD Like go Patriots! That Super Bowl food is the best. I have like 500 recipes on my Pinterest for if I get a sports husband. That way I'll have an excuse to make hot wings and chips. They're so cute.

But that's hilarious that she built a whole outside area XD That sounds like my mom. She can't stand them. She always sends the guys to a different room and loses it when they come back asking for stuff.

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I actually like some sports football is just not my jam. I will go see our local college team play with my laydee friends once in a while but I can't get too jazzy about TV football.

[–]SkrattGoddess0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Me neider.

[–]aretournerPPD = mimophant party0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

One of my friends solved this problem by creating a fire pit and some other cool things in her backyard nice grill, outdoor fridge and cheap bar set up

I recently spent some time with friends at their new house in the country. They're getting some hens and there was much discussion of hen psychology and what specific objects to provide in their environment so as to keep them happy and occupied with natural hen-y behaviours. What you just said reminded me exactly of that convo, except instead of balls of tangled up willow branches, perches and dust baths it's a firepit and a backyard grill. I love it. And your friend doesn't even have to worry about those husbands getting eaten by foxes!

[–]SkrattGoddess0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL, dang! You are digging in!

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I feel smart for having always known no girl ever gave two shits about my shitty bands and I feel nice for texting them it’s 100% fine to leave the “party” consisting of me and 5 dudes listening to vinyl records and talking about bands when she has work tomorrow

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Never come between a man and his vinyl.

[–]reluctantly_red2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't understand this obsession with hobbies (on both sides). I'm attracted to women who do objectively interesting things in their primary role (usually their career).

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Okay so that is what works for you then.

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷7 points8 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

leftists

LOL. Yeah cause men listen to Ann Coulter and Tomi Lahren because....???

[–]CookieMan0Interested Third Party2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Some people are stupid.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew2 points3 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

because they have masculine worldviews men appreciate

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷13 points14 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs18 points19 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

TIL "Blatant Lies and Hate" are part of a masculine worldview.

[–]VermiciousKnidzzBlue Pill Man4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

i've noticed that traditionally masculine men tend to be conservative, and conservative men tend to watch shitty fake news programs

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs13 points14 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

They tend to be conservative because they're afraid and insecure. That's why all the right-wing broadcasts feature either gorgeous blonde women telling them what they want to hear, or big giant fat blowhards YELLING FRANTICALLY ABOUT THE THINGS THEY WANT TO HEAR!

Sex sells, but fear keeps asses in the seats.

[–]NalkaNalkayou call it virtue, I call it cowardice1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Then why is the leftist news exactly the same? Same over the top rhetoric, same feermongering, (Trump is hitler, trump wants to lock up the trangenders etc)

Funny how the left is perfectly fine with lies hate and feermongering as long as they support the left.

The media is a trashfire in general and has been getting steadily worse as people self segregate into their own ideological bubbles and watch the media that panders to their own views.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

well, yeh

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

why is that funny

[–]SkrattGoddess-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Toni Lahren is a fool! That girl is a liberal!!

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

She’s a mouthpiece with DDs

[–]SkrattGoddess1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

She's foolish.

Didn't know her tits were that big though.

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh I don’t know for sure, I was just exaggerating. 😂

[–]SkrattGoddess0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lel x)

[–]whitetrashcarlselfish ghost4 points5 points  (39 children) | Copy Link

Yup I want a girl who is smart enough to understand the shit I’m saying to her and not look at me confused, but she also needs to be dumb enough that she looks at me in awe and wonder when I make a point. Basically she needs to be smart but not as smart as me

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew9 points10 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

yes thats what men like, also smart enough to make smart enough sons

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷2 points3 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Can I ask you a serious question without you getting offended? How come your personal life is the exact opposite of everything you preach here?

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

I dont "preach" anything, i DESCRIBE general male and female nature. Thats like if i was saying "well, the US is a christian country" and you said "oh yeh? Then how come you're jewish"

everything in my relationship can be described in RP terms, you just dont know enough about it.

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

I mean it’s not just the way you talk about your marriage. But OK.

[–]aznphenix0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Wait, now i"m confused what you're referring to.

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Just that RP women generally preach subservience, chastity and femininity and this particular RP woman IIRC is the sole breadwinner, admits to being slutty in her younger days and acts anything but soft and feminine here.

[–]aznphenix0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

RPW doesn't preach chastity iirc. Atlas has never been a proponent of chastity in anglosphere dating either for that matter, even if RPW does. And she's submissive to her man - which is what RP/RPW says, she just isn't submissive to anyone else.

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Ok

anglosphere dating

??

[–]reluctantly_red4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

she also needs to be dumb enough that she looks at me in awe and wonder when I make a point.

No! That actually gets old real fast. I want her to challenge me. I like a good argument.

And I want to have the smartest kids possible. :)

[–]whitetrashcarlselfish ghost0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I disagree , there are people who can keep up with me in argument but who’ll rarely win. I really prefer a dynamic where i will win most of the time if it comes down to it. As far as I can tell women seem to prefer that too

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

So you play the short game if you still counting each arguement you win.

[–]darla102 points3 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

A woman who knows how to cultivate the 'awe and wonder' response (even when it's not warranted) is no dummy.

[–]whitetrashcarlselfish ghost1 point2 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

Right I don’t want to date an idiot I want to date someone slightly less intelligent than me, who is impressed by me

[–]darla105 points6 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

or someone who is smart enough to let you think she's slightly less intelligent. That way you get your man ego tingles. That's true love.

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

If she smart enough he don't never find out she is smarter.

[–]kandyapplezborn in '91 👸 💅3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

in my experience, you can't suppress it forever

[–]darla101 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If she loves him enough.

[–]whitetrashcarlselfish ghost1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

In my experience it isn’t really that hard to look at a person’s personality and accomplishments and roughly tell how smart they are

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I just like letting folks unfold .

[–]whitetrashcarlselfish ghost0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

Nah I prefer dating women who are slightly less intelligent than me. I’ve only seriously dated one girl who was smarter than me and it got old fast

The idea that someone is going to play dumb and act dumber than they are to feed my ego— I think it would be pretty transparent and the incongruity would show through in time

[–]darla104 points5 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Women have been ‘playing dumb’ and stroking men’s egos since the beginning of time.

[–]whitetrashcarlselfish ghost1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

It’s like you’re arguing that every woman is smarter than she appears

[–]Nodoxxintoxin3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

So you finally caught on to the game, lol

[–]whitetrashcarlselfish ghost1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

“I’m so smart that my achievements really reflect those of a less intelligent person. But really I coulda done better if I’d wanted. I just didn’t apply myself bc I wanted people around me to feel smarter”

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You get a "B" fo that one.

[–]Ithinkthatsthepoint0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Maybe they should achieving more.

One example the financial investment works only cares how smart you are and it’s reflected in your commission check

[–]darla100 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

A lot of them prefer being full time moms.

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

So she needs to be dumb enough to think you’re smart. Got it.

JK

[–]whitetrashcarlselfish ghost1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

lol yea in a way that’s wxactly how it is!

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs3 points4 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

What if you're genuinely interested in pop feminism and pop leftism as part of a well-rounded understanding of the current climate?

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

then you are not the common "Man" that women meet and date. what if any exception to any generalization? nothing. thats what if

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Eh. I've found being uncommon to be an asset rather than a liability.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

no doubt, there are circles where im sure its a huge asset. but like"nawalt", you dont represent the most common men most women are going to be encountering in dating, any or than i represent the common woman

[–]mwait1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Well rounded lol

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Reading things with which you don’t necessarily agree is important to combat ignorance and avoid building straw men.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Read the culture of critique

[–]lucky_beast0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That only works if you're reading those things with an open mind, which from your other comments in here it's clear you're not.

avoid building straw men

The absolute irony of you typing this.

[–]crackrocksteady7 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

You're much dumber than you think you are

Dunning Kruger is the worst

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Be Civil.

[–]SlashCo800 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not necessarily, I'm not that self-absorbed that I only want to talk about stuff I'm into without caring about her interests. I just want a woman who's smart, but not a smartass. That actually describes most of my gfs so far. :)

[–]NalkaNalkayou call it virtue, I call it cowardice10 points11 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

When men say they want a smart women they generally are not talking about IQ. What they really mean is a woman who they can have a conversation with that is not about the kids or when they are going to have dinner with the Joneses.

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

And when those men have something to talk about besides grilling, sports and sex, I’m sure they’ll find interesting and intelligent women who want to talk to them.

[–]NalkaNalkayou call it virtue, I call it cowardice2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

There are just as many basic dicks as basic bitches

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep

[–]reluctantly_red5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

This all makes perfect sense. Including the part about forgetting to treat her like a woman -- which is something I'm making a conscious effort to do this time (smart women like being objectified too).

[–]vanBeethovenLudwigroses are red, feminists are blue[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Men still need to remember to tease her, show his dominance, make her feel desirable, all without being a condescending asshole. That takes social smarts and not money/status/career.

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree -- with the proviso that its much easier for a guy to show dominance if he has "money/status/career."

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

Basic sexual strategy for men to commit is: Woman has to be physically attractive, fun and enjoyable to be in the company of, able to contribute her domestic skills to running a household together, and respect his leadership and abilities as a man.

I don't know about you but the only real thing that seen to be unquestionable that man marry is that the woman has to satisfy his sexual needs. All else seens a exaggeration that would partake less than 30% of men in marrying age. Like, I prefer a woman who does not cook as I (a certified cook) can cook way better than most women and I hate when others cook unlike my tastes. The only food made by woman I would accept every day was made for my (dead) grandmother. Yes, I am that picky. My mother does not know how to cook that good either.

men tend to pedestalize women who are their intellectual equals.

Why would they? I don't, nor i've met many of those. They like a intellectually equal woman, but it is not like they put them into a pedestal to marry specifically. They just think "nice, good talking partner" this kind of woman would be one of the rare cases you would find a man feiendzoning a woman, in the case she is not attractive.

Men need to have a fervent interest in a woman to continually return to her - otherwise she is just a pretty vagina - and this interest comes in the form of respecting her abilities as well. I have continually seen men praise women for taking charge, making jokes and being successful. Her success (in addition to her physical) IS attractive to him.

Those men are after the "pretty vagina" not her intellectual achievements my friend. I never witnessed this happening to my class supervisor, which is an extremely inteligent and extremely fat woman.

The only downside is when a man searches for his intellectual equal, it will backlash onto him because SHE will search for a man of higher intellectual status than her, and to his dismay, she leaves him. Additional repercussions include him forgetting to treat her like a woman (giving her tingles) because he respects her intelligence so much, he treats her like an equal, like a man, that she does not feel desirable around him.

That I can agree, if a man looks for an equal, he will not find as the woman will always look for a superior.

And I do think what you call a man treating a woman like a man is just men who think she is not beautiful enough so he likes her as a friend (see above, the rare friendzoned woman)

Men would actually prefer to be with a woman who can keep up with him intellectually and through her accomplishments.

Of course they would. Men have many preferences but they follow almost none. If she is not at least a bit attractive, why marry? Stay as friends or colleagues, its way easier. Men can stay without talking for months (I've experienced 3 months complete silence) but we cannot stay without sexual interest. Our bodies will not let us.

Men DO NOT want a woman who is just pleasant and pretty company, despite what his ego may be aroused by

Yes. Normally, to marriage they want more. But she has to be at least pleasant and pretty. If she has intellectual skills too is of great value, but those above are requirements. (At least the sexually interesting part)

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷1 point2 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

I don't know about you but the only real thing that seen to be unquestionable that man marry is that the woman has to satisfy his sexual needs.

Virgin whore is a still thing. There are still men marrying the good girl and accepting boring or no sex for the false comfort of believing their low sex drive wife won’t cheat on them. How do you explain that?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

Why men want low sex drive women.

Mostly trauma, fear and consistency. All men experienced at least a woman they loved to cheat on them. I would argue that from my male friends the average is around 5. This leaves deep scars (and stds) and put many of their lives in disarray not only sexually but as a whole. Some men then start prefering the low drive women to guarantee a steady supply of sex that will not turn into another scar.

I can't say I share this preference, I have a pretty high sex drive, but I understand the bases of such belief.

Some say it is imprinted in our genes to like innocent and young things too but to me makes not much sense. I want to protect the innocent things, not exactly fuck them, but this may account to something too in some cases.

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷0 points1 point  (15 children) | Copy Link

But you said before men want a woman who satisfies their sexual needs. How does a low sex drive woman “supply a steady stream of sex?” I assume you’ve never been married to a low sex drive woman. This is why I don’t feel bad for a lot of the guys on dead bedrooms. Their insecurity led to them chose a woman they weren’t matched with sexually and then they want to act like a victim.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (14 children) | Copy Link

How does a low sex drive woman “supply a steady stream of sex?”

Because the high sex drive partner will choose another partner and let you alone with your problems, and maybe wasting vast resources difficulting to get another sexual partner. Did you never had a high sexual drive partner?

I assume you’ve never been married to a low sex drive woman.

I never been married, correct. I have had low sex drive girlfriends tho.

Their insecurity led to them chose a woman they weren’t matched with sexually and then they want to act like a victim.

Yes, their fear led them to a lesser of 2 evils. I consider marriage to be way too overrated. But some men cannot see that, what can I do? They are victims of their choices.

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷0 points1 point  (13 children) | Copy Link

Um, no. I’m high sex drive. So is Mr Blu. Never cheated on him once in 16 years.

You all act like cheating isn’t something you can control.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (12 children) | Copy Link

You all act like cheating isn’t something you can control.

Of course you can control, thats exactly what those people are doing.

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

You can control your own action. A cheater is just shitty person with poor impulse control. I know you all like to believe your angel was lef astray by Chad but the reality is she’s a slut who didn’t care enough to be faithful. She would have cheated with anyone because hats what cheaters do. All of the spergy theories and calculations about N counts and keeping her away for other men is just so you can feel likr you have control over a situation you know deep down you have no control over.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

You can control your own action.

What do you think changing who you marry to is? It is an action. Thats exactly what they are doing. Choosing women who are less prone to cheat.

you have no control over.

Didn't you just say you can control it in the post above? You can or you can't. Choose one.

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

Ok. I’m saying that a woman or man who cheats chooses to cheat. They are responsible for their own actions and it was a choice they willingly made. Unless someone held a gun to their head.

You can do whatever you want but in the end people have free will and you cannot control someone else action. No amount of sperging over n counts and searching for a virgin bride or keeping her away from Chads is going to guarantee she’ll be faithful. Only she can make that choice.

You get it?

[–]ItsOverBoyosLDARKeep calm and get cucked by Chad12 points13 points  (41 children) | Copy Link

Disagree. Most men just want a woman who is reasonably attractive and pleasant to be around. They can have intellectual conversations with friends, acquaintances and co-workers. In my experience, men actually prefer having deep conversations and debates with other men because they don't feel like they are constantly on the edge of offending their interlocutor especially regarding more controversial topics. For many men it's not really high on their check-list when it comes to finding a mate.

[–]belletaco8 points9 points  (29 children) | Copy Link

What do you do with your partner when you're at home or on dates if her only trait is "pleasant to be around"? What do you talk about?

[–]concacanca5 points6 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

This is weird to me. My wife has 3 degrees and you know what we talk about most often? Cooking and places in the world we want to visit. Yes we can get into more intellectual fare and thats nice but for the most part its just as easy to talk to a hairdresser about that kinda stuff.

[–]GridReXXit be like that12 points13 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

My wife has 3 degrees and you know what we talk about most often? Cooking and places in the world we want to visit.

Right but i imagine she's a smart woman and thus not annoyingly dense.

Women who aren't smart don't simply "talk about cooking and places to visit." They're oftentimes frustratingly dimwitted to be around longterm.

Same for men.

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Reality TV, designer labels and shopping

[–]belletaco4 points5 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like you talk about your common interests, which is pretty normal. I can't imagine many couples sit around discussing things pertaining to their degrees, doesn't mean you want to marry someone stupid who can't hold a conversation as OP is suggesting.

[–]GridReXXit be like that9 points10 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. If his wife weren’t intelligent I imagine he wouldn’t enjoy the manner in which she and he casually discuss cooking and travel.

Him: Let’s go to Uruguay babe

Her: eww I don’t want to go to Africa

Him: it’s South America

Her: but I hate Mexicans

Him: 😪

[–]belletaco2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I don’t think they understand that there is a normal middle ground between a complete idiot and someone who discusses mathmatical engineering or whatever these nerds are into

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't have to be engineering or anything like that. It can be something very simple:

Him: picks up flour and some vegetables We can make home-made quesadillas!

Her: Ooooh I like that. But then we need to go to the store and buy tortillas

Him: .....No, I mean we can make the tortillas from scratch, why do you think I held up the flour?

Her: Aaaah! But we still need to buy the sauce though

Him: ....why do you think I picked out those vegetables?

Intelligence is simply the speed of one's cognition. Typically if someone who is very intelligent is speaking to someone less intelligent, the less intelligent person will often "Drop out" and fail to understand the narrative of what the intelligent person is saying. Additionally, they also may be unable to take in everything the more intelligent person is saying, like in the example above. They're just slower.

[–]belletaco0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

That was my point

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh, I misread you then.

[–]belletaco0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

All good! :)

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Intelligence doesn't necessarily mean you talk about intellectual stuff. It means you have a similar speed of reasoning and pattern recognition. When you talk to someone who's less intelligent, they will routinely not be able to follow your logic no matter what subject you're talking about. This would actually be very apparent when you're discussing things that involve planning and multiple variables, such as travelling and cooking.

[–]321PK 1 points [recovered]  (5 children) | Copy Link

Omg. Agree. Do we have to be constantly delving into the mysteries of the universe??? Can we not just veg and laugh at stand up?

[–]concacanca1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. I'm betting most couples spend the majority of their time together watching Netflix.

[–]ayeayefitlikeBlueish-Purple Pill Woman1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

So much this.

My OH has a graduate degree (top of his class) and works designing and troubleshooting high voltage electrical systems, and I have two master's degrees and working on my PhD in neuroscience and genetics.

We barely ever get into any details about our work because at the end of the day it's work. We both use our brains all day every day, and we just want to chill out and enjoy each other's company when we get home, not feel we're still working.

If I want intellectual chitchat, I can ask other researcher students or postdocs out for drinks after work - our chill time is watching crap TV or playing infantile video games (and I mean, like Mariokart or something).

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

our chill time is watching crap TV or playing infantile video games

That sounds horrible -- but if it works for you.

[–]ayeayefitlikeBlueish-Purple Pill Woman1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It works for us and keeps us both sane.

Don’t get me wrong, we both love hiking and regularly bag Munro’s, and we like to travel and go to gigs and stuff. We don’t just watch crap TV. But after we’re both done putting in lots of hours of thinking every week, there’s something really relaxing about just letting your brain veg out.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

"Who's that? Why did they put him in jail?"

"Honey, they literally explained that in the previous scene."

"Ooooh... But who is the other guy?"

[–]ItsOverBoyosLDARKeep calm and get cucked by Chad1 point2 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

No idea. I don't date and wouldn't cohabitate with anyone, male or female. Most couples I know just talk about mundane shit like Netflix, recent news, their jobs and "stuff their friends said" chitchat. Hardly anything intellectually stimulating. Hell, I knew people who have barely read a book in their lives or seen a museum from the inside and they still manage to end up in relationships.

[–]belletaco11 points12 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

No idea. I don't date and wouldn't cohabitate with anyone, male or female.

Shocking. Someone who doesn't date claiming they know exactly what people want when seeking relationships.

As someone who is in a relationship and has been for almost a decade, I can tell you that intellectual conversation is incredibly important to sustaining any long term interest. What is intellectual and compelling is subjective couple to couple, but it's important. Netflix and chill is not going to get you through 50+ years of marriage.

Hell, I knew people who have barely read a book in their lives or seen a museum from the inside and they still manage to end up in relationships.

Probably with people who also are not into books or museums.

[–]ItsOverBoyosLDARKeep calm and get cucked by Chad2 points3 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Shocking. Someone who doesn't date claiming they know exactly what people want when seeking relationships.

Yes. It's called listening and observing. Maybe you should try it out sometime.

[–]belletaco8 points9 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

You have no real world experience, listening and observing is not going to cut it when you have no idea how a relationship actually works.

[–]ItsOverBoyosLDARKeep calm and get cucked by Chad1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Don't make me laugh. Most people are not in relationships due to love, intellectualism or some other idealistic nonsense. They settle for each other because they are afraid of ending up alone, are worried they can't find anyone better, are pressured into settling down and starting a family or they take advantage of each other in one way or another (beta buxing for somewhat consistent access to pussy). Fundamental incompatibility breeds resentment, bitterness and dead beadrooms.

[–]belletaco5 points6 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

If you want to be alone and avoid people and connections, do you, but there's no need to project your nonsense on to other people.

Fundamental incompatibility breeds resentment, bitterness and dead beadrooms.

Yes, it does, so don't date someone you are incompatible with.

[–]ItsOverBoyosLDARKeep calm and get cucked by Chad1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I am not projecting anything. How delusional can you be to deny that those are very valid reasons why people decide to form relationships?

[–]Gravel_RoadsJust a Pill5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean... you’re like a fish explaining to a bird that it only flies because it’s afraid of the ground, because you overhear someone say birds don’t like the ground.

If you are not engaging in deep, intellectual conversations with people, obviously you’re not going to hear their deeper, more intellectual feelings about their partners. What people say about their partners in public is rarely the whole sum of their thoughts.

ie At work, I mostly only talk about my partner’s cats - A person at work might interpret this to mean I only date him for his cats, and don’t love him as a person. But I assure you, there’s more emotion there. I just don’t randomly talk about it in public with people I don’t know very well.

[–]belletaco3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

very valid reasons

Aka the reasons you made up in your head to fit your own narrative.

How delusional are you that you think you know everything about relationships based on occasionally listening to people talk about them?

[–]vanBeethovenLudwigroses are red, feminists are blue[S] 4 points5 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Your argument is valid and theoretically makes sense, but that's not what I've seen in real life. I've seen men AND women feel like "flirting" is talking about work or intellectual debates or "learning" from each other (asking questions about hobbies or work). But in the end it's not sexually attractive to either sex.

Women want to feel desirable and sexy from their man, and unfortunately when men pedestalize women and think that hitting on her is treating her like an intellectual equal (which he internally respects and admires), he's contradicting her sexual attraction to him in the end.

Men LOVE to respect and admire smart and successful women but they should never treat her like an intellectual equal. Men SHOULD seek intellectual equality with other men for fulfillment. The problem is that men THINK they want a brutally successful woman as a life partner because he respects her, but as mentioned, she either leaves him due to hypergamy, or he's not making her feel desirable.

[–]reluctantly_red3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Women want to feel desirable and sexy from their man, and unfortunately when men pedestalize women and think that hitting on her is treating her like an intellectual equal (which he internally respects and admires), he's contradicting her sexual attraction to him in the end.

This is true but can be overcome. I was on the road all last week and when I got to my GF's place on Saturday I made sure the next 24 hours was visceral not intellectual. Its possible to both respect a woman's intellect and regularly objectify her.

[–]aretournerPPD = mimophant party0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Its possible to both respect a woman's intellect and regularly objectify her.

Yes.

[–]aretournerPPD = mimophant party3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Men LOVE to respect and admire smart and successful women

You're getting a lot of pushback on this (predictably) but I actually agree that men are into smart women more than this sub is willing to admit (#notallmen ofc).

they should never treat her like an intellectual equal.

I disagree with this, though. Although i think maybe I know what you're getting at? Not being treated like an intellectual equal (by a man who is my intellectual equal, that is - I wouldn't get buttmad at Famous Genius X for not treating me as his equal) is actually a huge turn-off. Why? Because it speaks to insecurity and/or not-smartness. Either he's too insecure to accept that a woman is his intellectual equal, or he's too stupid to recognize it. Being talked down to intellectually (again, by my equal or someone dumber than me) is an instant write-off. Instant.

That said, I think I understand your point re: you can't be awed/worshipful all the time because you're impressed with her smarts. That's true. This is one area where I actually agree that men and women are diffffferent. Men like 'awed and worshipful' in a partner more than women do. They'd get sick of it 100% of the time, and women don't want it 0% of the time, but men want it more than women for sure.

I believe it's entirely possible to make a smart woman your bitch. But I do think it first requires a man who fully understands that making a woman his bitch isn't really an intellectual endeavor. I might even go so far as to say that smart women specifically love men who can do this.

[–]vanBeethovenLudwigroses are red, feminists are blue[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I believe it's entirely possible to make a smart woman your bitch. But I do think it first requires a man who fully understands that making a woman his bitch isn't really an intellectual endeavor. I might even go so far as to say that smart women specifically love men who can do this.

EXACTLY. Smart men who can encourage smart women to flourish yet still prove their dominance over them, not in terms of academic endeavors or intellectual debates, but in terms of getting her to show submission to her while still being the smart woman she is....that's a very rare type of man.

I disagree with this, though. Although i think maybe I know what you're getting at? Not being treated like an intellectual equal

I guess I meant that he doesn't have to talk down condescendingly to her, but just that 1) he can't expect her to understand EVERYTHING that he understands. Men can't seek their exact intellectual equal in their women. For instance, I'm a musician but my ex-boyfriend was a civil engineer, and he thought it was sexy to try to "teach me" about his craft. Relationships shouldn't be based on collegiate interactions.

So basically in that former relationship, he expected and was searching for a girl he could "talk shop" to, instead it back lashed: 1) I was turned off because he was NOT making me feel desirable by trying to treat me like his equal, and 2) he also lacked satisfaction in his intellectual endeavors.

[–]ItsOverBoyosLDARKeep calm and get cucked by Chad0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, it doesn't do anything to make her ovaries tingle or make her want to hop on his cock. It just isn't a good strategy to evoke sexual desire in her. His beta qualities might make her eventually settle down with him but she'll never lust after him and might even end up cheating on him. Branch swinging is a thing after all.

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol. You know what most men in their 20s talk about? Sports, sex and video games. You know what most men in their 30s talk about? Sports, sex and video games. Ever hung around a group of middle aged couples? Rivering conversation from the men about their new lawnmower and grilling techniques.

Hilarious that men here think they’re somehow more interesting and their chatter is more intellectual than women’s. LMAO

[–]cactusnoodle3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's funny because that's actually the same reason me and a lot of my female friends don't like debating with men. I usually (unless it's a well-adjusted man) get anxious or frustrated because I feel like the guy is about to punch a hole in the wall after the argument goes on for a while. If not angry, they do the amused half-smile thing as if to say "You're wrong, but I'm just humoring you, sweetheart" while arguing facts that are PROVEN to be 100% wrong! That level of conviction is just...Gahh.

Btw, I don't know where people get the idea that logic and emotion aren't equally important. It's almost as if the people who believe that pure logic == superior intelligence don't know how to handle basic negative feelings in a healthy way.

[–]OfSpock3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Disagree, that sounds like a guy of average intelligence looking for a wife of average intelligence. Smart men prefer smart women.

[–]kandyapplezborn in '91 👸 💅2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

most men are of average intelligence themselves so of course thats what most men want. intelligent accomplished men are different

[–]vanBeethovenLudwigroses are red, feminists are blue[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Most men just want a woman who is reasonably attractive and pleasant to be around.

You are correct in this, however what I've observed is that men will chase after a woman who IS successful AND can be pleasant to be around, mostly because she obviously has her shit together. Then what happens is her success inspires his need to also be just as successful. Time after time I've seen men show off their girlfriends, to introduce her as per her career and success. He is excited to have an "equal" life partner.

Then what happens is she may leave him, because since he has praised her success so often and idolizes her status, and he is so in awe of her that he allows her to flourish in her career...that she eventually out-statuses him. During this period he may forget that he still has to treat her like a woman (make her feel desirable) and not always yearn to excitedly talk about intellectual subjects. She then starts feeling undesirable, because in the end, women still want to be dominated by men in order to feel tingles.

After this, men then accept that they have to settle for a woman who isn't as intelligent, isn't an equal career partner, and settle for a woman who is simply attractive and fun to be around. He accepts that unless he enough game to always keep her submitting to him (read: she won't leave him) the he'll have to settle for a woman who isn't as intelligent.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

If the RP goal is to get with 18yr olds for LTR's or marriage and the guy is successful at it, no amount of book smarts is going to make up for lack of life experience. And really, people can dry hump the theory or process, but what does anyone do this for? To find a partner that will "challenge" them right into a relationship of mundane work, a job you get to come home to and maybe have a laugh or sex if the planets align? Even if it makes me a simple bitch that isn't using her degree, I'm happy with fun and enjoyment because I don't believe in an afterlife. I'd rather laugh and make memories worth having than try to constantly be an intellectual equal or continually judge if I'm being too manly for my man's fragile ego. In any case our professions are wildly different, I care about as much about deep security as he cares about the two tenths off a switch leap not being horizontal. And we're free to do that while still acknowledging and supporting each others success. But we can still have long conversations about the stuff we actually like and what interests us on a human level rather than a professional one or long boring games of one upping each other about esoteric topics.

[–]aretournerPPD = mimophant party4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I'd rather laugh and make memories worth having than try to constantly be an intellectual equal or continually judge if I'm being too manly for my man's fragile ego.

Why does this sub look at things this way? As if conversation between two intelligent people is necessarily some nightmarish game of one-upmanship? Surely two intelligent people hanging out/talking doesn't somehow preclude laughter or making good memories?

a human level rather than a professional one or long boring games of one upping each other about esoteric topics

In my experience genuinely smart people don't have these conversations. What you're describing seems a lot more like - well, like PPD, for example, where instead of a lot of smart people having interesting conversation you've got a lot of average intelligence people desperately trying to convince themselves/others that they're smarter than they are.

Intellectual dick measuring contests are never fun, and they're very rarely about intellect.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Why does this sub look at things this way? As if conversation between two intelligent people is necessarily some nightmarish game of one-upmanship? Surely two intelligent people hanging out/talking doesn't somehow preclude laughter or making good memories?

Obviously not all intelligent people are contrarian cunts, but that's usually when they're talking about an interest they're enthusiastic about which is a whole different vibe. Collaborative, curious, insightful. Not some robotic judgment of fuckability and gene spreading potential. And there are people like that, just waiting to replace a word you use with a synonym and congratulate themselves on their superior cognitive skills.

In my experience genuinely smart people don't have these conversations. What you're describing seems a lot more like - well, like PPD, for example, where instead of a lot of smart people having interesting conversation you've got a lot of average intelligence people desperately trying to convince themselves/others that they're smarter than they are.

It wasn't that deep to me, reddit isn't where I go for considerate contemplation of things that matter. It's more of a free for all WWE style thought flinging.

Intellectual dick measuring contests are never fun, and they're very rarely about intellect.

Agreed

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Why does this sub look at things this way? As if conversation between two intelligent people is necessarily some nightmarish game of one-upmanship? Surely two intelligent people hanging out/talking doesn't somehow preclude laughter or making good memories?

This! People with vast frames of reference are a lot more interesting and usually funnier, IMO.

[–]WhatIsTheMeaningHere-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I'm happy with fun and enjoyment because I don't believe in an afterlife. I'd rather laugh and make memories worth having

If you don't believe in an afterlife what good is making memories? You'll just die and forget them all. I don't believe in an afterlife either and thoughts like these make me really depressed. I think about how I may as well just die now since all my progress in this life will be deleted.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Words are hard right now. Just had a minor surgery and I'm high af on a post op pain pill. Considering the nature of the post I didn't want to ignore it because I'll probably forget about it once I pass out. I see the limited time as a reason to make everything count. I don't feel like a prisoner of circumstance, so while I can I'll shape my world to something pleasing for as long as possible. I'm not sure how to convince you to be something other than depressed about the thought of making the most out of the time you have, but if those feelings are really on top of you I sincerely hope you get some therapy. I mean that in the very nicest way an internet stranger can.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

User name checks out

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The solution? Create something of last value or make the world a better place in some way while you're here.

[–]321PK 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

Oh so I need to stop giving men IQ tests? Is that why they ghost me???

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

IQ tests?

Great idea -- I should try this!

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Back in the day, when the game Trivial Pursuit was a thing, I found it very handy. Not only would it give me an idea as to a date's level of intelligence, I'd also get to find out how they reacted to being beaten by a girl. LOL

[–]blackedoutfastRed Pill Man3 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Men would actually prefer to be with a woman who can keep up with him intellectually and through her accomplishments.

a lot of men think they want a very intelligent woman, but they're mostly nerdy betas who don't have a lot of experience with women. these guys don't understand that there is a big difference between "intellectual / intelligent" and "nerdy"

these guys struggle on the rare times they socially interact with normal "Stacy" type girls. if the guy isn't awkwardly shy and quiet around these girls, he is semi-autistically droning on about boring nerd subjects. eventually the girl gets bored or weirded out.

but when these guys semi-autistically drone on about boring nerd topics with their nerdy male friends, the interaction goes well. this leads them to (incorrectly) believe that if they could only find an intelligent woman who is their intellectual equal, their social interactions with her would be as engaging and successful as the conversations with their nerdy friends.

the problem is that the cool nerdy chick that these guys want doesn't exist.

as part of my job, i regularly interact with lots of very intelligent women - scientists, engineers, lawyers, etc. NONE of them are the cool nerdy perfect intellectual woman that these guys are looking for.

legitimately intelligent women fall into one of two categories - some of them ARE clearly very intelligent. but they're also extremely weird and probably on the autism spectrum, even more so than your typical nerdy beta guy. these girls can definitely nerd out and talk about their field of expertise, but that's all. if you try to talk with them with normal nerd culture shit like monty python or videya games or whatever, the convo will fall apart. also they are almost always extremely unattractive, like 0-4 on a 10 point scale.

the rest of the intelligent women are basically just Stacies who do nerdy stuff at work. they do chemistry or whatever for their job, but when they're not working they're just like every other normal girl. they like going out dancing in clubs and having brunch with their friends and talking about celebrities and taking selfies for social media. they're simply not interested in nerdy subjects.

there's also another issue that some women have figured out how many nerdy male guys desperately want one of these imaginary cool nerdy chick, and they start acting like a cool nerdy chick as a way to lure in potential orbiters. there are a lot of female e-celebs who do think like stream video games on twitch and dress up in cosplay and other nerdy shit for this exact reason.

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Yah chicks are not "acting nerdy"to "get" nerdy guys, are you planetary? Hot chicks will accept nerd orbitors as a consequences of being hot but they are not going to do stuff to attract them. Hahahahahahaha. Not happening. No in the old days before nerd culture was super mainstream the few girls who liked some nerd shit were mocked and spat on far more than now they just were into it on the down low, now they can just be open about it.

The science bitches with PHDs are not weird as you say they they aren't bored by mainstream culture because they are too weird to enjoy it, Monty Python is pretty much boy culture. In fact, it is the ultimate eight year old boy culture only eight year old boys would have a rabbit rip a knight's throat out. They just are not into your boy nerd culture they have their own shit they find interesting and some random talking about Monty Python and quoting it as if nobody has ever done that before har har is likely boring the crap out of the science bitches.

[–]blackedoutfastRed Pill Man1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hot chicks will accept nerd orbitors as a consequences of being hot but they are not going to do stuff to attract them. Hahahahahahaha. Not happening.

it's not the very hottest girls who do this. it's the girls who aren't quite hot enough to become c-celebs with millions of followers just from showing their ass on instagram. so instead they pretend to be the cool nerdy gamer girl and go to comic-con and stream videya games on twitch or whatever. you can't really believe every one of those e-thots is actually doing all that nerd shit because they're personally interested it. they're doing it for attention and validation.

Monty Python is pretty much boy culture

i agree with you and mentioned Monty Python for that exact reason. it's not "intelligent" or "intellectual" it's just stupid surreal nerd boy bullshit and all normal people cringe whenever some spergy nerd starts quoting that shit in public.

but a LOT of the nerdy beta dudes who pedestalize "intelligent women" also believe that nerdy boy culture like monty python IS part of being intelligent. because most of their intelligent male friends are also into nerdy boy culture.

they say they want an intelligent woman, but what they're really after is a woman who is into nerdy boy culture shit like monty python. they're just making an incorrect assumption that an intelligent woman would laugh with them and appreciate how well they have memorized that fucking parrot joke.

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I thought everybody liked Monty Python!

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I do. I do not think it shows any deeper intellectualism though.

[–]whitetrashcarlselfish ghost2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think that your second category has lots of genuinely intelligent women. I don’t think they’re as averse to nerdy subjects as you think tho, girls I date always end up wanting to play dnd if they know me for a while. most of them also like to read books

[–]SkookumTreeRomantic relationships aren't necessary for happiness!2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think your first category are a little more socially skilled and a little more attractive than you say. They’re not bridge trolls. They often don’t give a rat’s ass about their appearance, but they are not hideous either.

[–]darla104 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women who rub their intelligence in their husbands' faces via constant oneupmanship or intellectual jujitsu are effing idiots. Men do want their intellectual equals but women need to cultivate the 'awe response' or they'll turn themselves off.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here3 points4 points  (54 children) | Copy Link

I think men want women who are complimentary to what he is good at and smart enough to carry a conversation about what he enjoys. Can you imagine a gf always peeping over your shoulder while you engage in your favorite hobby saying "wrong, wrong, you're doing that wrong, I would do it a different way." That would get pretty annoying in my opinion.

I think men want women who are complimentary to their own skill set.

However, men tend to pedestalize women who are their intellectual equals.

Men tend to pedestalize women who are cute and quirky. They love the manic pixie dream girl fantasy. A woman who makes him see the subtle beauty in life. She may be intellectually stimulating but it is the complimentary aspect of her feminine approach that he ultimately falls in love with. Basically, seeking complimentary intellectual capacity (what men tend to do) cannot be described as seeking your intellectual equal, in my opinion.

[–]belletaco5 points6 points  (51 children) | Copy Link

They love the manic pixie dream girl fantasy.

The actual worst

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing10 points11 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

If women sought their intellectual equal there would be even less reproduction of the species than now, I mean I understand all the men here in PPD have an IQ of 500 and make six figures one year out of high school because they invented an app on their lunch break but for all of the carping about basic bitches starbucking and Instagramming their toes basic menz is pretty damn dumb.

[–]SkrattGoddess0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

DANG! Where's the Red??

You are going in!

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

basic menz is pretty damn dumb.

People in general are pretty dumb. If people were smart my entire family would be unemployed (no dumb criminals for me to defend, no dumb parents for my daughter to deal with, no dumb patients with preventable illnesses for my son to dispense drugs to).

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here0 points1 point  (45 children) | Copy Link

They're cute.

[–]belletaco5 points6 points  (44 children) | Copy Link

They don't exist irl though.. In film, they're written solely to help the man achieve his purpose. Basically, a human devoid of any personality, dreams or goals of their own and just there to be whimsical and make him feel alive again (typically). You're not going to find any living human person that meets that criteria.

[–]Yezdigerd0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Mmh they do. I always thought that thing about "written soley to help the man achieve his purpose" is a strong mischaracterization of the manic pixie dream girl. Virtually all women have some interest in rearranging a man's life to make him "better" "happier", ostentatiously for his sake, but in practice quite often to satisfy their own egos.

If you take the archetype MPDG Catherine Hepburn's Susan Vance the story rotates wholly around her, she is spoiled rotten and does whatever she fancy, decides she wants Cary Grant whether he likes it or not , that she through her mad cap antics manage to penetrate the archeologist's reserve to open up and love her is the conclusion of the story not the characters "purpose". Cary Grant is the reward for her "efforts".

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here-2 points-1 points  (42 children) | Copy Link

I disagree. Many women in real life exist solely to help the man achieve his purpose (to the man's perspective). To act like this archetype and trope exists only in film is a simplistic understanding of life and storytelling. MPDG exist in movies with a male protagonist and typically told from his perspective.

whimsical and make him feel alive again. You're not going to find any living human person that meets that criteria.

Lies. Whimsical cute women regularly make men feel alive again.

[–]belletaco8 points9 points  (41 children) | Copy Link

I disagree. Many women in real life exist solely to help the man achieve his purpose (to the man's perspective).

What??

Whimsical cute women regularly make men feel alive again.

I never said they didn't. Whimsical women exist, obviously. That isn't their only personality trait and their reason for existence isn't to make you feel that way.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here-2 points-1 points  (39 children) | Copy Link

What??

Many men see women as a means to achieve his purpose in life. These MPDG stories are told from the male perspective. These women absolutely exist in real life because men project this fantasy onto the women.

That isn't their only personality trait and their reason for existence isn't to make you feel that way.

The reason for their existence outside the man's perspective is irrelevant. To the man and to the perspective of the main protagonist (same thing), she exists solely to help the man achieve his purpose in life. These women absolutely exist in real life because men absolutely project this fantasy onto women.

What is "real" to the main character is simply what motivates him through life. If he believes and acts in a way that makes the MPDG real, then she is real.

[–]belletaco6 points7 points  (38 children) | Copy Link

But you're still just projecting a fantasy, so she doesn't exist outside of your head and now you are ignoring the very real parts of her in order to get what you want.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here2 points3 points  (37 children) | Copy Link

But you're still just projecting a fantasy

A fantasy that makes the man feel alive again due a woman making him see the subtle beauty of life. That doesn't make the woman fake nor the fantasy not real.

now you are ignoring the very real parts of her in order to get what you want.

I agree it's often ridiculous and objectifying, but that is not the point. So is the female sex fantasy of taming the wild beast. That doesn't make it any less real though.

[–]belletaco9 points10 points  (36 children) | Copy Link

That doesn't make it any less real though.

Yes it does because by definition fantasy is not reality.

[–]SkookumTreeRomantic relationships aren't necessary for happiness!-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. I know a couple women like that. They are spontaneous and fun loving.

[–]vanBeethovenLudwigroses are red, feminists are blue[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think men want women who are complimentary to what he is good at and smart enough to carry a conversation about what he enjoys. Can you imagine a gf always peeping over your shoulder while you engage in your favorite hobby saying "wrong, wrong, you're doing that wrong, I would do it a different way." That would get pretty annoying in my opinion.

Of course. Men learn eventually they should find a woman who is complementary, not someone he can "talk shop" to.

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

They love the manic pixie dream girl fantasy.

Yes, very much so!

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

My fiancee was motivated, dedicated, fun to be around, and lovely, but so, SO dumb. The relationship ended shortly after we moved in together and I learned she couldn't hold up her end of the conversation. I couldn't get through a few of my own thoughts without having to backtrack and explain fairly simple concepts.

I don't necessarily need my partner to be "smart" in the traditional sense. Just a general awareness of current events and the world around her would be plenty.

[–]analt223No Pill2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men want their equals yes, the difference is men are more willing to be like "fuck it, shes good enough" than women are with men. Thus there is plenty of evidence that while men might want more than looks, such as similar income, similar intelligence, etc. We are more willing to love, tolerate, w/e.

This is most likely because men don't get their bodies altered during sex, women's do (and yes birth control exists, doesn't change the psychology of sex though).

[–]Transmigratory2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Being hot is still key for may men. If a woman is hot AND smart, then she'll be picked over a woman who is hot. Though, don't fool yourself into thinking that a man would pick a smart woman over a hot woman if the former wasn't hot.

IIRC there was a study that contained results depicting this exact thing.

[–]LUClENSociology of Sex &Courtship2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not true. I've wanted a woman smarter than me since I read men with more intelligent partners are happier.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (22 children) | Copy Link

Here is the only sexual strategy that matters...

  1. Be good looking.

  2. Don't be not good looking.

/thread

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer0 points1 point  (21 children) | Copy Link

In high school, I dated a guy who was extremely handsome, but dumb. Within two weeks, I never wanted to see him again! No amount of good looks could make up for the lack of cranial activity. Now, I don't know how common this is, but I suspect men are more willing to put up with good-looking idiots than are women.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (20 children) | Copy Link

But what drew you to him?

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer0 points1 point  (19 children) | Copy Link

He pursued me so I figured why not? And gave it a shot. And quickly bailed, having learned an important life lesson early.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

Have you dated a manlet though

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer0 points1 point  (17 children) | Copy Link

Define "manlet."

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

Well just blurt out the shortest height you have dated.

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer1 point2 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Oh, not a problem then. I actually prefer men close to my own height. My partner is about a half-inch taller than I am. I'm 5'2".

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

I see.

Maybe he's a gigachad in the face though.

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer1 point2 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

He looks good to me! :-D

Seriously though ... we are both average-looking middle-aged people.

It cracks me up the way you kids seem to think that only young and beautiful/handsome people ever love and are loved in return.

[–]Whodunnit88Survivied Purge Week 20181 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I strongly feel that EQ is way way way more important than IQ in a relationship.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Don't hire fry cooks to be your CFO. WHEN RAISING A FAMILY.

because he respects her intelligence so much

Most men might be cordial or polite. Smart men wouldn't 'respect' women as a woman might conceptualize or feel about 'respect'.

You are discussing a beta that doesn't get it. He's projecting because HE wants HER to respect HIM.

Men would actually prefer to be with a woman who can keep up with him intellectually and through her accomplishments

Really? I'd settle for sweet and fun and receptive. I've never wanted a woman that can discuss abstract math or orbital mechanics or whatever nerdy shit I like.

despite what his ego may be aroused by

There we go. You think it's ego. Oi vay. See, women don't know how to be liked. They are so unpleasant, they think it's stroking his ego to be attractive to her man, mentally speaking. Holy shit

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Goddamn boy you must come on here to do your lady bone kill speeches so your wife does not have to hear it.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This is a CMV. How does this relate to my wife?

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No idea.

[–]AutoModeratorMarried to MRS_DRgree[M] 0 points1 point  (21 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing11 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It is crazy to me that everybody here thinks men are even having intellectual conversations with one another. Once you graduate from your over priced "small" university or your high commendable almost Ivy state university that still is not, nobody wants to here you drone about Hegel over beers, even the Bros don't give a fuck unless they are destined to be underpaid adjunct sessional professors teaching online shit the tenured crowd don't give a shit about.

[–]belletaco2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It is crazy to me that everybody here thinks men are even having intellectual conversations with one another

I thought that talked about "Grab her by the pussy" type stuff in with each other/ in locker rooms, now apparently it is intellectual conversation. I can't keep up.

[–]SocialistSamosaSoyboy Cuck12 points13 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

ITT: low self-esteem men who’s feelings get hurt when a woman is smarter than him

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

>socialist

>thinks he's smart

[–]SocialistSamosaSoyboy Cuck5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

>I didn’t claim to be smart

>reading comprehension

[–]mathlel 1 points [recovered]  (5 children) | Copy Link

Good thing you don't have to worry about it as a man as long as you are on the right side of the distribution

[–]SocialistSamosaSoyboy Cuck3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

There’s women smarter than most men, and there’s women less smart than most men. I don’t see what this has to do with anything.

[–]mathlel 1 points [recovered]  (3 children) | Copy Link

Men have a flatter bell curve. If you are a man and you are smart, its likely that you are pretty smart. The likelihood of a woman being as smart as this man isnt as high. Good news, smart men have nothing to worry about.

[–]SocialistSamosaSoyboy Cuck1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Good news, [men who aren’t self-conscious about their intellectual dick size] have nothing to worry about.

FTFY

Also the two studies from the wiki page on the subject mention significant variance in the top 1% or 2%. This is significant on a large scale, but it doesn’t mean if you’re a kinda smart guy just assume you’re smarter than women you talk to. Especially in the workplace where you’re interacting with those of a similar skillset to begin with.

[–]mathlel 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

Your point holds.

FTFY. I thank you for the compliment.

[–]SocialistSamosaSoyboy Cuck-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

K. I thank you for the downvotes.

[–]GridReXXit be like that3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Additional repercussions include him forgetting to treat her like a woman (giving her tingles) because he respects her intelligence so much, he treats her like an equal, like a man, that she does not feel desirable around him.

I have an amusing anecdote regarding this.

Many of my male friends view me as extremely competent and able to handle myself and it's what they like about me.

One of my friends has a crush on me and let's just say it's mutual.

We were at his house and he got my two female friends a plate of BBQ he cooked and a drink and didn't offer to get me either.

It's because my friends play up the "damsel" and "can't do anything for themselves" thing.

I brought it up to him a few days later and he hadn't realized he did it. He profusely apologized and took me on a date or whatever lol.

Anyway this was years ago, but it's why as a woman "who is able" I now play up the "damsel" thing more often. I prefer to be treated like a lady I realize. Or rather I don't appreciate guys I like rushing to help other women and not me. Ha!

[–]aretournerPPD = mimophant party2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Anyway this was years ago, but it's why as a woman "who is able" I now play up the "damsel" thing more often.

I do this too. Imo it's just social lubrication, although I'm sure there's some dude on here who thinks we're both manipulative bitches from hell now.

[–]GridReXXit be like that2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

although I'm sure there's some dude on here who thinks we're both manipulative bitches from hell now.

Welp! I'll be a manipulative bitch who gets her man to carry the groceries and bring her food because "ugh i just can't decide what to eat babe" lmao

It's called Girl GameTM.

[–]aretournerPPD = mimophant party1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It is girl game, and the worst part of it (for dudes like I'm talking about who would see this as evil and manipulative) is that the vast majority of men actually like it when we do this stuff. I've talked about this before. Men like feeling like men. Women like feeling like women. Even little things like bringing her food or a drink, there's still a teeny little momentary frisson of that enjoyable male-female tension.

[–]GridReXXit be like that2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

is that the vast majority of men actually like it when we do this stuff.

Absolutely! They prefer it. They like to feel useful and like their woman needs and depends on them.

It's why I'll never understand why so many men "bash" feminine communication styles like "up-speak" and "do you think" or "if that makes sense."

It's a form of communication that's collaborative and signals to the other person that you don't want your tone misconstrued as exerting dominance or misconstrued as telling them "my way or the high way." It makes people comfortable and at ease.

The moment women stop using the "up speak" or phrases like "i think" and "if that makes sense" men especially, and especially men with whom she's in a romantic relationship, get very uncomfortable and think she's "cold" or " a bitch" or "too masculine" or "too assertive" or "domineering" or "emasculating." The list of how how it makes men unnerved is vast lol.

Me: She's just speaking in a calm, measured tone.

Him: She's not soft! She's a bitch!

Me: o_o

[–]newName543456went volcel1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I suppose so, many of those pretty dumb girls are honestly getting annoying a couple minutes in the interaction and I sometimes "forget" why I even bothered in the first place.

[–]aretournerPPD = mimophant party0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I hate this sub and everyone who posts on it including myself and hope a flood washes us all away.

Also to the pathetic bloops deep inside Atlas' paper frame - get some self-respect. FFS.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Disturbing post, great flair

[–]aretournerPPD = mimophant party0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

:: carefully removes u/nodoxxintoxin's handsewn voodoo doll from collection of handsewn PPD voodoo dolls before tossing the rest into the bath ::

Don't worry, I don't really want us to be washed away in a flood of righteousness. Perhaps a light splashing in a shallow puddle?

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Could not possibly disagree more, have never ever seen any evidence of this ever and shocked anyone could come to this ridiculous conclusion

[–]wtknightGen X Slacker0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Sure, but intellectualism is way down the list in what men want from a quality partner, behind physical traits and a pleasant personality. Most men will prioritize the first two before the third. He’ll date a hot, nice dumb woman before he’ll date a smart but plain looking woman who isn’t happy and fun to be around.

[–]reluctantly_red5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

He’ll date a hot, nice dumb woman

Date sure -- but not anything long term.

[–]wtknightGen X Slacker0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I don’t know. My point is that a dumb, pleasant woman is more likely to be LTR’ed and eventually married than the plain, boring smart one, as I’m sure that some men who don’t find their intellectual equal get accustomed to an attractive, fun but dumb women who they are dating. On the other hand, the smart, plain, boring one can’t even get her foot in the door besides being fuckzoned if said guy has no other options. Most men prioritize looks and personality way more than OP seems to indicate. If a woman wants to attract a high quality man, she should be prioritizing these first two before the third, although intellect still has some importance, of course.

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I probably have unreasonable expectations -- my ideal would be a quirky MPDG with a graduate degree and cool job.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah, not really. Men usually get someone equal or less. But more times than not less. Ver rarely do I meet a couple where the woman is smarter

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Additional repercussions include him forgetting to treat her like a woman (giving her tingles) because he respects her intelligence so much, he treats her like an equal, like a man, that she does not feel desirable around him.

So having a man who -- I dunno -- condescends to me is supposed to turn me on? I don't think so. I'd sooner be treated as an equal, thanks. I'm not the type to bat my eyelashes and let some big, strong man 'help' me because it's easier than just doing something myself. I'll pull my weight, thanks.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter