TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CMV: Not every relationship needs to last forever or end in marriage

January 19, 2021
15 upvotes

Many women seem to believe if a relationship doesn't end in marriage, its pointless. I think this is a shallow way of looking at it. If you meet someone you are compatible with and the relationship last for a few years and ends, that's perfectly fine. You met a nice person and enriched each other's lives, a net positive. I think its unhealthy that women go into relationships with this expectation, because they are setting themselves up for failure. Not every relationship will end with a ring. Instead, people should embrace short-term relationships and see them as necessary steps and great experiences.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate.

/r/PurplePillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title CMV: Not every relationship needs to last forever or end in marriage
Author _Neon_Shadow_
Upvotes 15
Comments 107
Date January 19, 2021 11:35 AM UTC (2 years ago)
Subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/cmv-not-every-relationship-needs-to-last-forever.737514
https://theredarchive.com/post/737514
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/l0i57y/cmv_not_every_relationship_needs_to_last_forever/
Comments

[–]TugalloisBloop, Bleep27 points28 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

No one here disagrees with your title or is going to bother to change that view.

However...

If you meet someone you are compatible with and the relationship last for a few years and ends, that's perfectly fine. You met a nice person and enriched each other's lives, a net positive.

This is not always true. You're older now. Maybe you are closer to the end of your childbearing years, maybe you spent a lot of money on relationship stuff that you could have spent on yourself, maybe you gave up on experiences (like studying abroad or taking a job offer in another city) for the sake of the relationship. Once you get to the point of a few years, people tend to have their lives quite enmeshed, which is not quite the same as enriched.

Instead, people should embrace short-term relationships and see them as necessary steps and great experiences.

People generally have several relationships before marriage and don't regret them too much, to be honest. Many even know they learned from them.

[–]Competitive_Pen22827 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree. When 18 year olds start dating they usually don't know yet what they are looking for in a partner and these first relationships are for learning.

[–]Icunvme6622 points23 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well from a nature/biological standpoint it is pointless. Guys have the luxury of thinking like this because we can’t get pregnant, don’t need protection and can produce our own resources. It makes sense for a woman to respond to the end of relationships the way they do because historically a guy not staying around put her(and any children) in a real vulnerable/dangerous position.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fair point, but in today's world, that's less of a problem with all the technology and protection we have.

[–][deleted] 40 points41 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Im a dude if that's helpful to the argument so heres my personal opinion, if I'm not interested in the possibility of marrying someone (i.e. I'm attracted to them and they don't have any obvious dealbreakers) then I'm not interested in dating them. I don't feel your necessarily wrong in saying that relationships don't need to last forever for you to have a good time but I just feel going in with the intention of at least not considering someone as a long term prospect until they prove otherwise as kind of pointless and just a waste of everyone's time. I dont string girls along for years because frankly, I dont have the desire to keep hooking up with someone and spending time with them if I'm really not into them.

[–]wekacuckPreparing to die a virgin.6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think the full seriousness is necessary. But if you have definitively ruled someone out, I agree you're just wasting your own time.

You could also be in a situation that's time limited and not ideal for seeking life-partners is unrealistic for other reasons (short term assigned overseas, etc).

[–]Atlas__B__ShrugginI AM AN INTROVERT9 points10 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

do you think women have biological time to have this attitude?

[–]cloudydays84No Pill Man2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If they don't want kids, Yes

If they want kids, Yes

If they want biological kids, Probably Not

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes.

[–]Sid_InsidiousMGTOW VolCel Mall Santa-5 points-4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. They do. But that's why they get into a rush, especially to get married, so they can have "post marriage" years to try and get back on the carousel.

It's better to be a 30-something divorcee than a 40-something divorcee, and the darlings know 50 is NOT the new 40. That's just something old cat ladies say.

[–]wtknightGen X Slacker8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not every relationship will end with a ring. Instead, people should embrace short-term relationships and see them as necessary steps and great experiences.

As necessary steps for what? A long-term relationship that ends in marriage? People who want a long-term relationship want it to end in marriage so that they can end their search, which takes a significant amount of work, and get on with the next stage of life, whether it is having kids or having dogs and traveling around the world with a beloved partner. When relationships are short-term, people have to start from step one over and over again.

[–]PrincessFKNPeachManlet Lover8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think its unhealthy that women go into relationships with this expectation, because they are setting themselves up for failure. Not every relationship will end with a ring.

It's not setting yourself up for failure if you know what you want and make it abundantly clear to your potential partner. Marriage and LTRs aren't Disney magic, they're a choice you have to commit to.

[–]athrowaway2832221 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. Marriage doesn’t have to be the point of all relationships or even LTRs but that has to be something discussed and communicated. In an LTR it usually is discussed anyways, because no one is a mind reader and every relationship has a different goal and focus.

[–]Atlas__B__ShrugginI AM AN INTROVERT16 points17 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

If you meet someone you are compatible with and the relationship last for a few years and ends, that's perfectly fine.

except its not.. its horrible and heartbreaking and painful. you just sound like someone whos never had a break up

[–]tiposkSerial divorce rapist0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sometimes people just grow apart. Compatibility doesn't mean attraction. Attraction might fade for both of you and if that happens, the break up isn't painful.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] -2 points-1 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I literally just broke up with my girlfriend a few days ago. You are being a bit overdramatic.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

So who are you trying to convince that not every relationship should last forever?

Us or yourself?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] -2 points-1 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Did your girlfriend share your philosophy?

Or did she consider the relationship with you pointless because you broke up?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Did your girlfriend share your philosophy?

She didn't want to get married but she took the ending harder than I expected.

Or did she consider the relationship with you pointless because you broke up?

Nah.

[–]_mwk13 points14 points  (25 children) | Copy Link

i agree with this :

Not every relationship will end with a ring. Instead, people should embrace short-term relationships and see them as necessary steps and great experiences.

i also agree with this :

if a relationship doesn't end in marriage, its pointless

women have a 15 years fertility window. staying multiple years with someone you don't want to marry or commit to if you want kids is a very risky game. it has few/no consequences in your early adulthood or if you dont want kids at all, but vetting the father of your children takes time and shared hardships that you can't really rush later on

so i disagree that it's an unhealthy expectation, i think it's a good mindset if you're looking for commitment

[–]the-red_woman-1 points0 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

25 year fertility window - age 15 to 40 on average

[–]relish5kBlue Pill Woman11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Biologically, yes. But it's in everyone's best interest to incentivize that window to open at age 25 rather than 15. good lord.

Functionally speaking, the window is 15 years.

[–]_mwk1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

well i wasn't counting teenage marriages tbh

[–]the-red_woman1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Teenage marriage is rare - teenage pregnancy certainly not rare

[–]_mwk2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

yes but my point is that they're accidents

[–]Sir_manalot1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

You do realize that it is not a on/off thing right?

[–]the-red_woman2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Well it is actually. It starts after the first period and ends at menopause. Pretty on/off to me

[–]Sir_manalot1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Not that simple.

Birth defects rise after a certain range, Difficultly of conceiving rises, etc.

[–]CatchPhrazeMaster Of Memeology4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

We've been over this. Its a curve sure but most most most women will conceive at 40 with no issues.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah but I'm pretty sure the rate of down syndrome increases with the mother's age.

[–]the-red_woman1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Down syndrome increases with the fathers age at a similar rate

[–]the-red_woman4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It depends on the woman. Early menopause is possible but it is an exception. 40 is fine for most women. I even had a kindergarten teacher who had her 3rd child at 48 years old - without IVF. An accident

[–]Clay_is0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

women have a 15 years fertility window. staying multiple years with someone you don't want to marry or commit to if you want kids is a very risky game. it has few/no consequences in your early adulthood or if you dont want kids at all, but vetting the father of your children takes time and shared hardships that you can't really rush later on

Are you admitting that women hit the wall as they get older

[–]catfishmasc3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you think women don't know about menopause?

[–]_mwk2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

if by "the wall" you mean they enter menopause and aren't fertile anymore

if by the wall you mean they disappear from the smp, then i disagree

[–]R3s0und3rPurple Pill Man-3 points-2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

You don't need to be legally married to have kids. I've heard of couples that had and we're successful families. It'll be fine as long as both parties are willing to remain together.

[–]_mwk3 points4 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

it's cool for people who are cool with it, but i don't want to be an unwed mother, that's the prime route to become a single mom with a weird baby daddy.

[–]battyryder-2 points-1 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

'Weird baby daddy ', pick better baby daddies then.

[–]_mwk1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

i...dont have a baby nor the baby daddy

[–]battyryder-2 points-1 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

That's cool, I'm just saying if you don't want a weird one, just vet them better. Not looking for a slap fight.

[–]_mwk1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

well that's what i said in my first comment ???

[–]battyryder-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Not expressly no.

[–]_mwk1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

yes very expressly so.

vetting the father of your children take time and shared hardships that can't really be rushed

[–]battyryder0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well then, we are in apparent agreement. Enjoy your evening.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I never wanted marriage or kids and decided after trying cohabitation a few times I didn’t want that, either, but I also don‘t do casual, for fun, or for right now. I tried sex when I wasn’t super into the person a few times and that wasn‘t me, either. That left me in the position of 1) placeholder for marriage-minded guy 2) clinger for forever bachelor type guy 3) something to chase and pine over for emotionally unavailable guy.

Having short term relationships without indefinite emotional investment is like having a pet goldfish. It will die and it will suck so why bother?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I mean, it doesn't have to suck.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It always sucks when a pet or romantic feelings die. cue Chet Baker

[–]SonicBackScratcherGreen Eyed Devil8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Time goes fast trust me as someone almost 50, its like "When the fuck did THIS happen?"

I've seen people do exactly what you said. Dated a year here, 2 years here, a few years here. Then they wake up late 30's with no relationships.

This is bad but not devastating for men who want a family, but its horrible for women who do. They are ready now and few guys who are the kind to stick around want to just meet and have kids right away. They want some time just together and for women that age the clock is ticking.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

There's more than one man out there who would have proposed within 2 years. After about 25+ years old, most men who ever propose will propose within 2 years. Compared to those man who will offer a LIFETIME of love and growth, your few years of short-term fun are relatively pointless. You're forgetting to factor in the opportunity cost of a committed man into your analysis of "net positive." If the relationship is exclusive, you must include the opportunity cost.

It's also a matter of perspective. To you, the type that probably isn't imagining marriage at all, it's just a few years of short-term fun. To the marriage-minded type, 3 years is very long-term and should be more than long enough. By 1 year or even 6 months of exclusive and frequent dating, I would say people already learn a lot from each other. So... what are you doing for the next 2 years of your 3-year situation? Having sex, risking unwed pregnancy, or God forbid even making major life moves together? Bad idea, boss. I'm actually struggling to see your side of it. What do you need 3 years of someone's life (and probably body) for if you're not sure they're marriage compatible? Don't you know you're supposed to decide within the first 1.5 to 2 years? That's about half the time of your hypothetical 3-year situation. After the initial time, you're not really learning much anymore. You're just staying with what's convenient for that last year or two. It's not a waste of time to have a 1-year relationship and see where it goes, but a 3-year relationship is different. It didn't have to take that long to learn and move on. I guess I understand that a bond of >1 year is hard to break if you don't have a deep, subjective drive to go find your lifetime partner. Women who prefer not to have 3-year situations are women who do have that subjective drive for more marriage. Their priority value system is not the same as yours. That's why you can't see it.

TL;DR: The experience can even be positive, but it's not a net positive if someone is dating for marriage. I don't recommend that women looking for marriage even entertain 3-year situations. If he "doesn't know yet," that's your answer.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Compared to those man who will offer a LIFETIME of love and growth, your few years of short-term fun are relatively pointless.

If a significant amount of men wanted to be lifetime partners, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Marriage is not appealing for many men. I disagree, a relationship can be short and amazing or long and awful. If you like short-term relationships, don't date someone looking for marriage, or be honest upfront and let them know.

[–]AnarchoNAPFuchsia Pill Woman3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Its pointless if your goal is to get married. Its not pointless if your goal is to fuck around. Telling someone they shouldn't have a goal that they have is futile.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Not saying you shouldn't have a goal, but people should put less emphasis on the finish line instead of the journey.

[–]AnarchoNAPFuchsia Pill Woman3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Should people put less emphasis on getting the job and more emphasis on the interview?

If your goal is to marry then relationships that end have negative value.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Probably. Then don't date people that want marriage, simple.

[–]GYN-k4H-Q3z-75B5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

The title of your post has little to do with what you write about. As a man, when I enter a relationship, marriage is not really on my mind. I am in a relationship because I like who I am with, not some government recognized contract. The goal of a relationship should be the relationship itself, what you have immediately in front of you. Not having that and instead following some kind of long-term scheme is unhealthy.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Same. Its about the person, not a piece of paper.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Right.

[–]goatismycopilotcatladycatladycatlady🐐🐐🐐🐐5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Depends on the goal. If the female humans wants children then for many marriage is it. Great arguement for hot women to date a bunch at once. If the relationship is about having fun and pleasant company then monogamy seems silly different folks bring different stuff to the table.

[–]RunsWlthScissors2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I agree with the sentiment here. I am thankful for everything I learned from being with my ex girlfriends good and bad. I think self-reflection and growth is the ultimate goal rather than needing a LTR or expecting a STR.

I also think that if you go in thinking this, this is all you’ll see it as. I think positivity and hope for the future from both sides is important to want to do all the hard things to make LTR actually last AND be good. Having experiences like you mentioned is important for having the clarity to know when it’s time to leave.

You learn a lot from past relationships, it’s up to the individual to take their lessons and apply them moving forward. Fear of leaving is real, but must be done if you ever want to have better or even just different. Doing it once makes it easier, and a new relationship is a good opportunity to set good dynamics from the start using what’s been learned.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Couldn't have said it better.

[–]JohnDoe9564Blue Pill Man4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This might be the case if women didn't have a narrow window to have kids.

Once the babies rabies kicks in, there's no going back

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm dating women in their early 20s and they have the same mentality as a woman in their 40s. They want commitment for life. I'm like, bro, you are too young for that. Chill and enjoy yourself. I can't imagine dating 30+ year olds if the young ones act like this already.

[–]Laytheblameonluck1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Many women seem to believe if a relationship doesn't end in marriage, its pointless

Really? I think men think this way much more than women. That's what "oneitis" is, and the whole argument that men love idealistically.

[–]rontc1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I've had a few FWBs, we all knew it was for sex only, this one woman lived about an hour away, she was 10 years older than me. I had never been to her house, but whenever she showed up at my house, I knew what was going down. Bragging no, just life. It happens.

[–]rontc0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Another girl, I knew her from grade school. After high school, we were regulars, both early 2os, or late teens. Once, she came to my shop where I was working, I closed up early. We did it in the back room and, I swear it was the hottest pussy, I have ever had. I thought she may have had the flu, In the summer, no. She was that turned on.

[–]BeruitBody491 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I’ve learned a lot from the relationships that I knew weren’t going to last, mostly what I liked/needed and what I didn’t like and what sorts of things were red flags. I think that’s a valuable thing for most people who have a couple or several relationships before marriage. I also have a lot of fond memories from past relationships that I definitely don’t regret making.

But, at some point, I think people just get tired of the chase and doing the work to get to know someone new time and time again, and it can be challenging to find a life partner to settle down with as you get older, as people tend to have more establishments, fewer desirable traits, and less flexibility(i.e. children, pets, a job that might prevent them from moving, declining looks, fertility, or health, more steadfast political and world views, time commitments, etc.). Plus, the earlier you find “the one,” the longer you have to spend with them and build your life together. So I think it’s up to each individual how much time they feel comfortable spending on trivial relationships, and at what point they should get serious about finding a life partner/potential spouse. Often times people find them without consciously searching for them. (I did :) )

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Excellent points. I agree. Speaking from experience, its hell doing the dating thing. But yeah, i getcha.

[–]KirthWGersen1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

It is a mistake both men and women make: the relationship escalator.

So many people go into every relationship imagining that it must follow a particular script: getting to know one another, having sex, falling in love, seeing each other with greater frequency, moving in together, buying a house, having children, getting married, living happily ever after.

They see any relationship that does not move on at any stage, or that goes back a stage or two, as a failure. This leads to anger, bitterness, despair, recriminations and the spoiling of the relationship.

The fact is, the overwhelming majority of relationships everyone has do not conform to this pattern. It is a fantasy, a dream, a search for the "one".

The worst part of all here is the destruction of relationship, the inability to keep the good parts of a relationship as it gets transformed into firm friendship or merely a nodding but affectionate acquaintance. This takes maturity, which most of us do not have.

A better approach is to be grateful and appreciative of a relationship for what it is/was. Not to have expectations, hopes perhaps, but not expectations. To see and accept yourself and the other person as you both are. And act and adapt accordingly.

That way life can be full of pleasant experiences that expand and enrich your life, whether they be one-night stands, a string of relationships, or an ever-changing LTR. No need for hurt; the occasional disappointment, yes. But constant growth and greater depth as life goes by.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Going with what you were saying on the relationship escalator, meaning first you meet someone, have sex, then fall in love. I always felt it was backwards. Shouldn't you fuck people you at least care about? I'm not saying you need to be married to get laid but I am saying I noticed people always bang people they dont even know. Which to me is confusing and kinda weird.

[–]nemporisso-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a behaviour you either get or you don't. Like watching baseball

[–]Gravel_RoadsJust a Pill1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Marriage wasn't an option for non-straight people until the last couple years, so for me, it's always just a fancy costume party people throw when they find a person they want an LTR with.

[–]Sid_InsidiousMGTOW VolCel Mall Santa1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, as usual what women say/believe and what they DO are two entirely different things.

All relationships with women (90% of them) are temporary. The ones involving cohabitation are just longer and more expensive. The ones involving marriage are longer, and more expensive, yet.

Women are serial monogamists and move from man to man, much like a parasite will change hosts once the juice sours or a fatter juicier host appears.

Red Pill correctly states "She's not yours, it's just your turn".

It really has nothing to do with relationship permanence. In her mind, only SHE decides whether the relationship will continue. It's "until death do us part or until I say so." If HE is the one who leaves, well he asshole.

Women know they need to move relationships along at a certain pace. Men dragging their feet interferes with the resource extraction plan of the typical female serial monogamist.

And she knows her shit is a depreciating asset.

[–]Lateralanouncer1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You think like a high value man. My last three female ltrs have asked me to marry them. I think In the back of my mind. I have the milk already and for whatever reason they don’t make the grade for that level of sacrifice.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks and amen.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]spacechicken1990big tiddy goth gf4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I don’t wanna marry and I’m happy just to spend time with nice ppl, nothing wrong with being happy alone either.

[–]Cybercunt2069xXxINCELFAGGOTxXx2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Some people think alone = miserable. IMO they are the miserable ones.

[–]8017350 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup.

[–]rft24aspiring tradwife0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

idk about anyone else, but mine does.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hi OP,

You've chosen to identify your thread as a CMV. As such you are expected to actively engage in your own thread with a mind open to being changed. PPD has guidelines for what that involves.

OPs author must genuinely hold the position and you must be open to having your view challenged.

An unwillingness to have your view challenged may be inferred from one or several of the following:

  • Asking few or no genuine questions;

  • Seeming more interested in arguing or convincing others than understanding opposing views;

  • Ignoring the main point of a comment, especially to point out some minor inconsistency;

  • Refusing to make concessions that an alternate view has merit;

  • Focusing only on the weaker arguments;

  • Explicit statements of an intent to change the other posters’ minds; or

  • Only having discussions with users who agree with your position.

Failure to keep to this higher standard (we only apply to CMV OPs) may result in deletion of the whole thread.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Wasn't this partly the reason for the Sexual Revolution and Feminism, so people didn't need to get married anymore.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Right? I've dipped my toe into hookup culture but a surprising amount of women are basically Buddhist monks. They don't want to be touched without the guarantee the relationship will go somewhere promising. I find it quite shocking. The sexual revolution didn't happen so you could be a prude.

[–]DREADC0RSAIRNo Pill | Just Dead Inside0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't, but there is no point in being formally exclusive if you do intend to stay that way

[–]rontc0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I was lucky to have a sister two grades below me. As some of her friends became my sex partners.

[–]IcarusKikiSusie homemaker0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It doesn’t but for a serious relationship I don’t want to waste my young years on a guy who’s gonna probably dump me down the road. The problem with this argument is that men have more fertile years than women

[–]cloudsongs_No Pill0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I disagree that people NEED to embrace short term relationships but I agree with you personally that not all relationships HAVE to be that long. When I say this, I mean this in general. I'd personally prefer to have a long relationship but I also don't think that the relationship was pointless. You learn from one another, you learn about yourself, you experience new things....etc. Even my shortest relationship taught me something about myself that I could take to the next one

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed.

[–]geyejoe7No Pill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm a man, and I think relationships are pointless without an eventual end in marriage.

I literally got engaged in my first relationship.

But hold on, that's because I never actually asked a girl to be my gf before my fiancée.

Why? Because I don't want to commit to s person that I don't think I could possibly marry one day. Because it's pointless.

My goal was to eventually find a girl to settle down with. I didn't wanna go through multiple women and have different experiences. I wanted one woman that I could love and that could love me.

If a relationship doesn't end in marriage, to me, it's pointless.

[–]GrandRub0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

marriage is an anachronistic thing and should be abolished... but its a great deal for every country out there.

[–]moneygang4life-2 points-1 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

No cuz i’m only ever comitting to a virgin so i think that if the first relationship a woman has doesnt last she is now ruined forever. Just my thoughts. Promiscuous women are not attractive even a little bit

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

...

[–]moneygang4life-2 points-1 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

Why should i commit my life to something someone else got for free? Unless they make more money than me i’d have to be an idiot to commit at that point.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Maybe they didn't get it for free. Maybe they had to invest time, energy, money, and emotion into it. So asking you to do the same is fair.

[–]moneygang4life-1 points0 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Ok but did they have to marry her? Why should i have to marry her? Why is she treating other men better than me?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Why are you trying so hard to be a victim? Just chill tf out and enjoy whoever you're with.

[–]moneygang4life1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Why is it fair that young women today get to recklessly fuck who they want and expect no consequences? Seriously how is that fair to men?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Bro you need therapy.

[–]moneygang4life0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

How am i wrong?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

What does being wrong have to do with needing therapy?

[–]moneygang4life0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

Im not happily just gonna eat up whatever bullshit women want to serve me on a silver platter. Im not a cuck, i am not dating a woman who has been with other men. Its gross, its shameful, its humiliating. I dont see why any guy would be ok with it

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Because those men aren't virgins.

[–]moneygang4life0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Are men and women the same?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Are you a virgin?

[–]rpool179-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

My guy why did you write this post. As a guy you can't even tell this line of thinking is much more beneficial to men then women. You can't be this dumb 😂

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Getting your dick wet > Marriage.

[–]rpool1790 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I know but we as men benefit more from that. And this sub seems to be more of an even split between men and women

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter