TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CMV: Women don't want to be treated like a person and a man doing so is counterproductive to both of their desires.

June 14, 2020
14 upvotes

[removed]

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate.

/r/PurplePillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title CMV: Women don't want to be treated like a person and a man doing so is counterproductive to both of their desires.
Author _Neon_Shadow_
Upvotes 14
Comments 69
Date June 14, 2020 9:28 PM UTC (3 years ago)
Subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/cmv-women-dont-want-to-be-treated-like-a-person.697565
https://theredarchive.com/post/697565
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/h925b4/cmv_women_dont_want_to_be_treated_like_a_person/
Comments

[–]rosephase 16 points17 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Your "hypothesis" requires you to not believe the only people who can tell you if it's true or not.

I enjoy being a sexual object to men I'm attracted to and have sex with. It's hot and lovely. But that is very different then wanting a dude I'm dating to make all my choices for me. That is creepy, controlling and completely against my deep need for personal autonomy.

I make my own choices in my life. I have no interest in having a romantic partner make them for me.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

You "hypothesis" requires you to not believe the only people who can tell you if it's true or not.

Ironic, eh?

I enjoy being a sexual object to men I'm attracted to and have sex with. It's hot and lovely. But that is very different then wanting a dude I'm dating to make all my choices for me. That is creepy, controlling and completely against my deep need for personal autonomy.

I can agree with that. I think it's a spectrum, some women are fine with it, others are not. Either way she's still submissive.

[–]rosephase 12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not so much "ironic" as a "bad argument".

I also like objectify my partners during sex. It's not about dom/sub dynamic.

[–]Silly_Field 14 points15 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

Leading someone is not ‘objectification’.

By this definition I’m objectifying my assistant because I tell her what her tasks at work are.

This whole post is such melodrama.

[–]Mulkvistee🌮🧃👻 13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The part they always leave out is that a woman who isn't damaged, abused, or mentally ill isn't an empty headed fuck doll that lives on cumshots and to stare adoringly at a man. To coexist with a woman's healthy sense of self preservation a man inclined to lead has to be sincerely happy with responsibility and know her goals and abilities well enough to make accurate decisions with her well-being in mind. Not typically skills in the toolbox of a guy just hoping someone will touch his pp.

[–]Smoogs2 2 points3 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

You are though right? I use my accountant as an object too. I don’t treat him as a human with his own desires outside of my tax needs.

[–]Silly_Field 7 points8 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

You just continue to demonstrate how well adjusted you are :)

[–]Smoogs2 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

Why would I treat my accountant any other way? I send him my tax stuff when it needs to be done.

[–]Silly_Field 4 points5 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Yes, sending someone your tax papers is ‘objectifying’ them.

The melodrama knows no end.

[–]Smoogs2 0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

Of course it is? I am merely using him as a tool to my own end without any consideration to his life outside of my own goals

I don’t think you understand what the word means?

[–]Silly_Field 2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Yes, I’m the one who doesn’t understand what the word means.

You are perfectly normal lol.

[–]Smoogs2 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

I only use my accountant for accountant purposes. I literally use him as a tool. It’s objectifying him to the definition

[–]Silly_Field 1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

If he told you he’d be late with your taxes for whatever reason you’d scream ‘but you’re just a tool to me!!! I objectify you!!!!’

So edgy.

[–]Smoogs2 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Why would I scream? I would just find another tool who would do what they are for.

Being a tool to my end doesn’t require me to scream at them you silly head.

When a tool breaks you just buy another tool. You’re not required to throw the broken tool across the room just because they are a tool? Your logic is pretty bad.

[–]cuckspaceBased tradcuck 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

By this definition I’m objectifying my assistant because I tell her what her tasks at work are.

Well yes, if she has no agency in it then you’re actually using her as a tool, i.e. an object.

[–]Silly_Field 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

She doesn’t have no agency just because I lead.

Similarly women do not have no agency just because men lead.

And what men consider ‘leading’ is often what my assistant does for me. Is she objectifying me because she plans my meetings and events for me?

I trust her judgement and have delegated that role to her. I guess I’m an object with no agency now!

[–]cuckspaceBased tradcuck -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Is she objectifying me because she plans my meetings and events for me?

No, that’s different and you know that. You also know that there are plenty of people who are basically tools doing jobs that could be performed by robots.

[–]Silly_Field 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Why?

The men I date are literally doing the same thing as my assistant the first few dates.

Organising places for me to go. Often restaurants.

Why are they ‘objectifying’ me by doing this task and she isn’t?

[–]FlavFal 8 points9 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

That's mostly sub women.

[–][deleted]  (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]churnthrowaway123456No Pill 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Most women aren't dom or sub.

[–]FlavFal 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

So?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

So I'm right?

[–]cuckspaceBased tradcuck 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

If they exist at all

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

*most women.

[–]hiyaimahuman 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I’m confused. Could you summarize what you meant?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

TL;DR: Women prefer being treated like objects under the right conditions.

[–]LillthOfBabylon 2 points3 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

So you think benevolent sexism is appropriate? NO. This is 2020, we don't play that shit.

This is a big mistake. Women have no problem with being used, but they want to be treated nicely in the process.

So she was asking for it?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh yeah, there is a word for it. Yes then, women love benevolent sexism, cmv.

[–]LillthOfBabylon 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You're not going to change your view if this is your view.

This is a big mistake. Women have no problem with being used, but they want to be treated nicely in the process.

A non-violent rapist is still a rapist. They just rationalize that they're the good guys because they didn't need to use their fists on their victims.

Basically: "I'm what you call a romantic type. I'll still rape you, but I'll stroke your head lovingly while doing it."

[–]CommanderOfTheDeathGoing The Way Of The Mandalore -1 points0 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Nobody cares which year it is.

[–]LillthOfBabylon 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

I know they'd rather it's the 50's and earlier, but that's not happening.

[–]CommanderOfTheDeathGoing The Way Of The Mandalore 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Nope. Noone wants to live in that shit hole time. Imagine beeing forced to provide for some plain jane and two little shitheads to get starfish sex once a year.

[–]LillthOfBabylon 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

. Noone wants to live in that shit hole time.

Considering how many guys here, in Incel groups, and in MGTOW groups, lament that women have rights, you're lying.

[–]CommanderOfTheDeathGoing The Way Of The Mandalore 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Nope. The amount of tradcucks is low, even in red pill circles. And especially in MGTOW.

MGTOW is the antidote of traditionalism. It completely rejects the notion of having a family and providing for a woman.

[–]LillthOfBabylon 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

MGTOW is the antidote of traditionalism.

Then why is Turd Flinging Monkey so popular in MGTOW and he constantly whines about women having rights and even made a video about teaching guys how to legally discriminate against women?

Don't play this game with me, you will lose.

The amount of tradcucks is low

Then why am I seeing constant obsessions over youth and fertility like religious creeps do? They just don't like rules being placed on men, but they have no problem with oppressive creepy ass rules placed on women.

[–]CommanderOfTheDeathGoing The Way Of The Mandalore 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't know what TFM says and I don't give a fuck. I don't watch his content.

What does wanting sexually attractive women does have to do with traditionalism? Non-sluts are always wanted, religion is completely irrelevant to that.

And there is no oppressive rule. There is noone stopping women from beeing sluts.

[–]LillthOfBabylon 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know what TFM says and I don't give a fuck.

Too bad! He's popular within MGTOW, whether you like it or not, and he talks about how women should have less rights.

If you don't like being associated with him, stop being MGTOW.

[–]Pola_Lita 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

This isn't CMV. This is "I want to trash women" disguised as CMV.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

That's your opinion (as wrong as it may be). Now, are you going to argue the point or continue crying?

[–]Pola_Lita 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There's nothing to argue. This isn't anyone's opinion, including yours.

[–]Troy016 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well yes because women want to belong to their desired man. Treating women like their a regular person means you don’t care or value them

[–]saladfingers4141 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Male lead relationships and female deference have been the norm for centuries and a lot of women still prefer that dynamic.

What you described isn’t objectification, you think women liking a man to plan a date is them wanting to be treated as sub human? Learn what words mean before you write a big dramatic post about it.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

You might want to work on your reading comprehension first because I most definitely did not say that or insinuate it.

[–]saladfingers4141 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

What do you think objectify means exactly?

[–]kiwii_x 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

finally, he gets it

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You're wrong.

Source: am woman.

That should be enough to say, frankly, but I would point out that the majority of women manage to make our own decisions just fine on our own, because we're adults.

If you have problems with getting a woman to plan stuff, to be honest the reason is probably that she's either not that into you and doesn't find the effort worthwhile, OR that when she does those things, you react in a way that make her feel unappreciated if not denigrated for her efforts, which again makes it not worthwhile.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't see how this is desirable for a long-term relationship.

My mother is the breadwinner for my immediate family. Whenever she decides to take a new, higher-salary job and move halfway across the country my dad follows. Her earning potential is higher, he knows this, and he chooses to support her moves because it makes sense for their financial goals.

I already have an idea of where I want to live and what I want to do with my life. If a man thinks my goals are irrelevant and should take a backseat to his then we're both wasting our time.

These are the kinds of things you have to take into consideration when talking about wanting to be treated as "objects." A man who actually cares about his SO's goals and compromises to accommodate them is treating her like a person, a man who doesn't is straying into object territory.

[–]DubsPackage 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

There is an old manosphere saying : "Women want a polite thug."

Women want to know that you are smart enough and dark triad enough to use them for your own purpose.

That makes them feel that you're not a wimp, that you're a results-oriented person.

BUT

In that process they want to be treated well and have their own needs met.

So #1 is you have to get your needs met before her, otherwise you're a weak man and she will despise you for being weak.

#2 is she wants to have her needs met (security, warmth, emotionally present, etc etc.)

Goes along with "Have the options to cheat but never will."

Women will sometimes compromise on #2 but never on #1, if you treat her needs as more important than your own, she will lose interest and be out the door.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Excellent TRP truth right here.

[–]OXOzymandiasBig Sexy -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There is an old manosphere saying : "Women want a polite thug."

fuck that smart lol

[–]Mrs_DrgreeNow Accepting Simp Applications[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (8 children) | Copy Link

Removed for low effort.

[–]Sultmaker_9000 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

One day you will approve of something.

[–]Mrs_DrgreeNow Accepting Simp Applications -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Seems unlikely.

[–][deleted]  (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Mrs_DrgreeNow Accepting Simp Applications[M] -1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Don't troll

[–][deleted]  (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Mrs_DrgreeNow Accepting Simp Applications[M] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Calling someone sad is being intentionally inflammatory. If you have any further questions, please feel free to take it to modmail.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Mrs_DrgreeNow Accepting Simp Applications[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah keep doubling down, that will help

[–]nicestnicer 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

nice

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

nice

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Mrs_DrgreeNow Accepting Simp Applications[M] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Automod please

[–]OttoVonBismark71 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

now what?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

WUT?

For one, people are not 1-size-fits-all, I am a guy, and just like I don't agree with generalizations about guys as in all guys are the same, generalizations about women, as in all woman fits the same "something" are - by their own definition - wrong.

"treating a woman like an object"? What planet are you from? Doesn't matter how much I disagree with someone, they are humans, not object. Sure I am dominant in sex, and there might be some "scenes" where consensually I might treat a woman as an object, with her explicit consent and willing participation. But that's in a certain context and in private; and my experience is that the best women who really and truly enjoy being objectified in sex, are the ones who are highly accomplished in life, highly educated, and smart AF.

Women virtue signal about being treated like a person, but this is all an act. Those same women want to be lead and dominated in a relationship, put in their place, and have decisions made for them. Inside of a relationship with someone they love, they prefer being treated as if they have no agency.

I am not saying that this is 100% wrong, but it's not 100% right either. Making life black and while, or treating a person as either or is very narrowminded and . . . will lead to disaster.

Whenever women are treated as a person with agency, they immediately hate it.

Same as above.

This is my hypothesis. CMV.

I don't need to, and this is why:

  1. You're not open to have your view changed, and... that's OK. Really
  2. There's something called "Reality", and Reality is really wonderful, it's the ultimate teacher and feedback mechanism. So ... have your eyes and ears open: is this worldview working for you? And - most importantly - when it's not working for you as intended, do you go back to the drafting table and revise your hypothesis? Or do you complain, blaming the world and the people involved that they are not acting the way they are supposed to?

[–]AutoModerator[M] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]AutoModerator[M] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hi OP,

You've chosen to identify your thread as a CMV. As such you are expected to actively engage in your own thread with a mind open to being changed. PPD has guidelines for what that involves.

OPs author must genuinely hold the position and you must be open to having your view challenged.

An unwillingness to have your view challenged may be inferred from one or several of the following:

  • Asking few or no genuine questions;

  • Seeming more interested in arguing or convincing others than understanding opposing views;

  • Ignoring the main point of a comment, especially to point out some minor inconsistency;

  • Refusing to make concessions that an alternate view has merit;

  • Focusing only on the weaker arguments;

  • Explicit statements of an intent to change the other posters’ minds; or

  • Only having discussions with users who agree with your position.

Failure to keep to this higher standard (we only apply to CMV OPs) may result in deletion of the whole thread.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]Sultmaker_9000 -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes true. But sadly most women are too masculinised today with a head full of rubbish and try to be equal. Which is like trying to play a chess with 2 kings, whilst theoretically possible it will almost always lead to failure.

Despite women getting everything they have waned via the feminist demands in the workplace, and (equality everywhere) women consistently report they are more and more miserable with each passing decade.... because it is not their natural biology.

I have only ever had relationships with women that I can keep in their natural subservient feminine frame, when I am absolutely on point with my masculine frame; the doe eyes and love you can get from those women is a different level.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter