Saw a comment on TRP saying that women cuck men "lineraly." As in, they ride the CC, get all the "fun" out of their system early by passing over other men, then they turn to those men later to lock them down.

Or they ride the CC, DEBILERATELY hide that they did it (like 99% of women do), and try to act like a prude to these same men or a "born" again virgin.

But in essence because women have it easier to be sexually "fulfilled" on the "front end" (15-26) some men won't be sexually fulfilled until the "back end" (25+). So their imperative is to lock down a man AFTER they've had their fun, WHILE or BEFORE the man gets HIS fun in.

I always found it interesting how promiscuous women who dated me would get upset that "all I wanted to do was fuck other hoes" but....that's all they did before they met me? Like damn hypocritical much? πŸ˜‚

Then it becomes an ultimatum pretty much. Either date her to keep the sex coming (even though other men didn't have to go through this) or let that shit go. So you could lie and misdirect to keep the gravy train coming or cut your loses (again, something other men didn't have to do) and pretty much turn you into a "cuck" by paying more upfront than what another man got for considerably less.

Only way to "counter" this is to string her along to get the most out of her, and have your cake and eat it too since that's what she did too.

I don't feel one way or another about this but it makes sense to me.