I hear so many dudes in the manosphere go on about guys like tate and Patrice O’Neal and I’ve never seen any women attracted to them. They preach about how you need to put bitches in their place, women only respecting dominance and all this nonsense but in reality these are not the type of men women flock to at all.

It is my view that men like this spread blatant falsehoods on the intervener to young men. They might get away with acting on such falsehoods because they’re rich, but this doesn’t mean women are attracted to them

I believe they have to compensate with an overly alpha personality and internet status because women wouldn’t be attracted to them without those things. Inb4 “but tate pulled before the internet”. Yes but that was as a famous kick boxer

I personally believe manospherians vastly over complicate dating, and that all you need for success is to be moderately physically attractive and to have a good personality. (By good I mean confident charismatic and assertive).This will apply to all men who aren’t rich or famous

There’s a video of women on the internet rating self improvement YouTubers, including tate, and they all call Sneako attractive but say tate is a 3-4/10. I believe men shouldn’t listen to ppl who are obviously overcompensate because 1) you will probably never be rich enough to get away with acting like tate and 2) women are not attracted to neither the looks nor behavior of tate