TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Over dramatization of men's actions in the workplace.

September 20, 2018
8 upvotes

I have a story to tell, and it's a bit of a sad story.

A friend's father is a very well respected teacher in the community. He is early 60's, very tall and burly kind of man. He is very friendly kind of Midwest guy who has a resonant, twangy, flamboyant way of talking. He shares his department with a woman who is late 30's.

In the past year, she accused him of "speaking to her in an aggressive, demeaning way" and "not agreeing with her opinions on the direction and goals of the department because she is a woman." The school asked him to resign after her allegations.

Women AND men: How should this situation have been fairly dealt with in the age of modern gender politics?

"If a man gets to make the final decision in the office, it's misogyny." "If a woman always gets her way, then men don't have a voice or opinion in the workplace."

Please discuss.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate.

/r/PurplePillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Over dramatization of men's actions in the workplace.
Author vanBeethovenLudwig
Upvotes 8
Comments 68
Date September 20, 2018 12:51 AM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/over-dramatization-of-mens-actions-in-the.260770
https://theredarchive.com/post/260770
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/9hash6/over_dramatization_of_mens_actions_in_the/
Comments

[–]Nodoxxintoxin15 points16 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I’m guessing there are three stories. His, hers and the truth.

Even on the face of it, his story sounds suspect. As he tells it, he would get angry, he would have temper tantrums and he would avoid her?

Yeah people play “the card”, race, gender .....People get away with it sometimes too.

I’m with Uncommon_Sense_12345, keep in mind that by his own admission he is not entirely blameless. If she is “a Broadway Star”, he also may have overestimated his value to the program relative to hers.

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

He's retirement zone. I think she threatened to quit or has an offer and the school is facing replacing her now and him in a few years anyway.

[–]aznphenix0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah i wish she didn't delete her comment.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Who knows based on the tiny bit of information you’ve given.

[–]hammerhauntsbread pill5 points6 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

How should this situation have been fairly dealt with in the age of modern gender politics?

I would need more details to judge.

[–]vanBeethovenLudwig 1 points [recovered]  (11 children) | Copy Link

They had a disagreement regarding teaching philosophy. Basically they would discuss/argue and whenever he got fed up with her opinions he would get a little angry. As far as I know he never insulted her, never called her names, never touched her in any way. He would basically have a temper tantrum - very emotionally defend his own opinions. So she accused him of "not taking her seriously" and played the "because I'm a woman" card.

She, on the other hand, is known to have a "big" kind of personality - former Broadway actress - naturally dramatic in her speech and actions. She has been known to yell at her students - in a "jokingly insulting way" - eg. "You guys suck!" "Don't you dare touch that equipment, it's worth more than you"

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

They had a disagreement regarding teaching philosophy. Basically they would discuss/argue and whenever he got fed up with her opinions he would get a little angry. As far as I know he never insulted her, never called her names, never touched her in any way. He would basically have a temper tantrum - very emotionally defend his own opinions. So she accused him of "not taking her seriously" and played the "because I'm a woman" card.

If he gets angry because they disagree then It sounds like he's the problem here so far tbh. Sounds very unprofessional.

He started to avoid her for a period of time because he didn't want to have the disagreements anymore, and she also started accusing him of being disrespectful by not interacting with her.

Angry and ignores her because he can't handle discussions that are natural to any workplace....

[–]SirNemesismary cucked joseph2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You mean she keeps seeking out confrontation and is upset that he doesn't indulge in her attempts to piss him off?

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

A professional discussion isn’t “attempts to piss you off” just because you throw a tantrum if someone disagrees with you.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They both sound like pain in the ass children. I have seen this in the schools where Mr. Upton has taught; a lot of school personnel seem to think that schools are magically exempt from normal workplace rules and everybody can just throw tantrums, fight with one another in front of the students, take action that affects the principal without giving him a heads up, and engage in any amount of other foolishness.

If I was their principal, I'd be sorely tempted to fire both of them.

[–]quotient_isPurple Pill1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

He would basically have a temper tantrum - very emotionally defend his own opinions.

A temper tantrum? That's a decent enough reason to be fired if it's a recurring problem. Professionals can't just wig out on each other over and over.

Do you know if the arguments they had directly impacted their day to day functions? Was she losing it at him, too?

[–]hammerhauntsbread pill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

In that situation it would be likely to rule in favor of the man

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

"big" kind of personality - former Broadway actress - naturally dramatic in her speech and actions. She has been known to yell at her students - in a "jokingly insulting way" - eg. "You guys suck!" "Don't you dare touch that equipment, it's worth more than you"

I've seen the term "big personality" bandied about when referring to sassy, brassy, assertive, hyperaggressive, masculinized "don't take no shit from no maaayyyunnn" women. "Yeah, she's really out there. She's got a 'big personality'." "Well, it's just her and her 'big personality'. She doesn't mean anything by it, really."

It's really just shorthand for "insufferable bitch", in my experience.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I seriously don't understand this whole "If a guy is assertive, he's a leader. If I'm assertive, I'm a bitch". Women have the entirety of yougogrrrlllzzz on their side and are praised for acting like a bitch.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't understand your comment. are you agreeing or disagreeing? ARe you expressing disagreement with women's complaints about being praised for acting like bitches?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm agreeing with you.

Whenever I hear a woman say she's just assertive, she's more than likely just an insufferable cunt. She's not a leader.

Men that are ass holes don't get flowery words to describe their ass holishness. They are just ass holes.

And, before the bloops say that "assertive" and "leader" are flowery words, no, they aren't. There is usually some overlap on the VENN diagram for those 2, but they aren't the same.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 19930 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

whenever he got fed up with her opinions he would get a little angry,
He would basically have a temper tantrum - very emotionally defend his own opinions

inappropriate. you are not supposed to involve your emotions at work unless its part of the job. he deserved it.

[–]LowCredditRead the sidecar6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The only answer to modern workplace issues is to get rid of the mentally ill and the predators. At sane companies, we single these women out for firing. We do the same for creeps. We keep only healthy people around and none of the crazy bullshit comes up, just the small bullshit. You have to be choosy with who you work for and who you hire now.

Unfortunately, your friend's father is fucked. I would suggest he find an attorney yesterday and get the largest settlement he can get. As a teacher, he probably also has access to a union representative to help guide the way. His tenure and career is over. The only thing left now is to get his pound of flesh.

[–]Gravel_RoadsJust a Pill4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Something smells rotten in Denmark. There was surely an investigation, wasn't there? You've mentioned that your friend admitted to having temper problems - No one's going to get fired for having a minor disagreement, but how we deal with friction and disagreements has a lot of bearing in the work place. If he's getting emotional and she's feeling targeted, she was well within her limits to make a complaint that he's hard to get along with. Just avoiding coworkers that you don't get along with isn't always possible when you have to actually cooperate with your coworkers in groups.

I'm not saying that it isn't entirely possible that she was also just some shrill troublemaker and that whatever their HR office was possibly just utterly failed at their job. People get failed by HR every day. I just don't know enough by what I've read to say anything other than it doesn't sound like he was without blame, but that it clearly ended up working out worse for him than for her.

[–]darksoldierkPurple Pill8 points9 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Nothing should have been done. He's worked as a teacher for decades, she's worked as a teacher for what? 4 - 5 years? They should have said to her "sometimes we don't get along with our co-workers, welcome to adulthood" and moved on.

The problem in the workplace is that women don't seem to understand that the workplace is not equivalent to her home. This is why as women became a bigger part of the workplace, the workplace has become less formal. I see corporate lawyers walking around wearing jeans and low-cut shirts, accountants walking around in track pants etc. This is what happens when companies aren't allowed to fire women for coming in late or leaving early even if the reason is that she had to drop off or pick up her kid from school. Women think they are in control of the workplace, and unfortunately, this is what happens when women get control or power. This is the equivalent of male workers touching women inappropriately, but no one will admit it.

I've been in a similar situation. Worked for 3 years at a job where I had to walk on eggshells all day long because of the one woman in the department, got accused of being sexist, aggressive, violent blah blah blah. I'll never forget that meeting with HR. I was so blindsided, I didn't know what to say, the only thing that came to mind was "hey, mind if I bring in some of the women I work with on a day to day and you can ask them if I've ever treated them differently because they are women while I go and get a cup of coffee".

[–]vanBeethovenLudwigroses are red, feminists are blue1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

The problem in the workplace is that women don't seem to understand that the workplace is not equivalent to her home. This is why as women became a bigger part of the workplace, the workplace has become less formal.

This makes total sense and I admit I've been a culprit of this. A male coworker privately told me I should dress less attractively because it's distracting to a lot of the other male colleagues (for one, I always cover my body to ankles and wrists, but apparently some bright colors, girly scarves, cute shoes, nice jewelry was already too distracting). So I sort of felt like I couldn't dress how I really wanted too, like I'm supposed to dress ugly (and feel ugly) in order to maintain a platonic working environment.

It felt like - I was appreciating my own beauty and expressing it but the men couldn't handle it - so whose fault is it? Mine for being a girly feminine woman, or the men for having biological sexual instincts?

[–]darksoldierkPurple Pill0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

It isn't about fault, it's about what's appropriate. A workplace is exactly that, a place of work. It isn't a place to show off your beauty or to express your non workplace related qualities. I play guitar, what do you think I keep a guitar in my office? Do you think I pick up a guitar at firm events? no, I don't, no one at work even knows I play, why? because that shit is not work related. I don't want it to be work related. Your looks aren't looks related, do you really want to be the employee who is known for her "colorful clothing"and beauty instead of her contributions and intelligence? Who cares if men can control their biological sexual instincts, that's not your problem, your problem is making sure that you stay professional in the workplace.

Professionalism and "looking pretty" don't usually go hand in hand. You don't have to look ugly, you have to look professional. Wear professional clothing. Look at what your male employees are wearing, are they wearing suits? Are they wearing dull boring colors? that's what you should be wearing. What, you don't think I'd love to show up to the office wearing that tight dress shirt that shows off my body and biceps? You don't think I like colors that aren't white, grey, blue, black, or some mild variation of those? I do. But I wear that shit when I go out to restaurants, when I go to club, when I'm on vacation. At work, I look good enough to not look like a child and I let my actual work speak for me. That's the problem with women, they know that their work can't be criticized and if it is, they scream sexism. That's why women can't be taken seriously and that's why most women aren't equal to women in the workplace, for this exact reason. It's a joke that everyone laughs at in the back of their heads, and women love being that joke.

[–]vanBeethovenLudwigroses are red, feminists are blue0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I understand, but I work in an artistic environment...I kind of laughed at your guitar comment because I'm a violinist and I keep a violin in my studio because it's my profession. All of our colleagues have musical instruments in their rooms!

But it's true about seeing what others are wearing. We are artists, so clothing is a huge part of our self expression. The men wear T shirts (one guy shows up in a pink polo shirt, another has a shirt that says "Social Media." Another even show his tattoos because he wears short sleeves. Women are covered for the most part, to ankles, wrists and no cleavage, but very fashionable, although nothing "loud." So I suppose it's just our environment. If the men are wearing T shirts, then the women should be allowed to wear scarves or adornments. My female boss wears bright blue trousers and bright blue/white flowery top with Birkenstock sandal, but she's obese so nobody is distracted by her bright colors. I'm not obese and I'm young, wear minimal makeup and do my hair, so people are distracted if I put on a nice silk scarf around my neck.

So in my case - appropriate or not?

In a more formal environment it's definitely not appropriate - law firms, or the hospital, for example.

[–]darksoldierkPurple Pill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, in your case it's appropriate, as long as it's still professional.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

The problem in the workplace is that women don't seem to understand that the workplace is not equivalent to her home.

This reminds me of that SJW chick who got into the face of the dean, telling him that universities were supposed to be "a home" where everyone should be made comfortable, not merely places of learning.

[–]the_calibre_cat4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Remember that one University president who went over to the safe space students that were occupying a building for like, three days, and told them that he a.) wasn't going to give any of their demands a moment of his time, and b.) they had thirty minutes to vacate the building and allow it to return to normal educational purposes or make peace with being arrested, charged, and potentially expelled?

Man. That was great.

[–]atlantic68Purple Shill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Its in their charters. You cant just go around calling people nigger as you please

[–]Eartherry2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I get why he would've gotten fired. It's not good for the school to have teachers talking down to other teachers regardless of their gender. Seniority gives one advantages when it comes to some things, it doesn't give them authority.

The fact that he was fired for the behavior however, is because the accuser is a woman. Women still have a harder time being taken seriously in the workplace. A man in the same position might not taken seriously or won't report it at all. Still, the behavior isn't ok, so something that would've gotten him fired anyway is being attributed to a gender issue only because a women are listened to (in the interest of not being sued).

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

How long have they worked together in the department?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

In the past year, she accused him of "speaking to her in an aggressive, demeaning way" and "not agreeing with her opinions on the direction and goals of the department because she is a woman."

Wouldnt they need some kind of evidence to charge him with this?

The school asked him to resign after her allegations.

He should refuse to resign and take it to court if he is being hard done by. Then, I'm very sure they'd need some hard kind of evidence to get rid of him or theyd face some kind of disciplinary action themselves.

[–]the_calibre_cat2 points3 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Wouldnt they need some kind of evidence to charge him with this?

I don't understand what you mean, how isn't a woman accusing someone evidence enough?

[–]atlantic68Purple Shill1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Think of it as payback for all the assaults that went unpunished

Dont semi assault someone and you got nothing to worry about

[–]SKNK_Monk1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Poe?

[–]WhatIsTheMeaningHere1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The view expressed above is very rare, and no one here is dumb enough to unironically believe in it.

[–]atlantic68Purple Shill0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

?

[–]SKNK_Monk1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I can't tell if you're serious or not. I'm wondering if I've run afoul of Poe's Law.

[–]atlantic68Purple Shill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Why would what ive said not make sense? Pendelum theory. Look it up

[–]ffbtawPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

semi-assault? wtf?

[–]atlantic68Purple Shill0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Go read any story about how innocent red pillers are after theyre accused.

If youre not a shitbag youll never get accused. Hence why im all for tarring and feathering the accused

[–]ffbtawPurple Pill Man-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If youre not a shitbag youll never get accused.

Tell that to Emmett Till. This is pure toxoplasma, you should be ashamed of yourself.

[–]atlantic68Purple Shill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Says the sheer lover

[–]mc0079Non-Red Pill1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You gave us a one sided slanted version of the situation with little detail. This is useless.

[–]EsauTheRed 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

>speaking to her in an aggressive, demeaning way

Pretty normal for a guy who gives a shit about what he is doing when dealing with incompetents

[–]AutoModeratorMarried to MRS_DRgree[M] 0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Kill them both

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

100% guarantee there is more to this story.

[–]SerpentCypher1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Man = wrong and bad. Woman = right and good.

Rinse and repeat that for basically any thread on this sub.

[–]atlantic68Purple Shill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

If theyre red pill guys probably true... theyre poorly educated

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Overdramatization or, you know, just don't be a creepy dude. Tons of guys manage to not make women uncomfortable while working with them. It's not hard to not be weirdo freak who doesn't stink up his work environment and making every women uncomfortable.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If half of the population doesn't think it's overdramatization, it's not over dramatization.

[–]abaxeron✴️Indian Programmer0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Women AND men: How should this situation have been fairly dealt with in the age of modern gender politics?

Segregation.

Seriously, there is nothing more about it. Men at large see that women don't contribute much to the workplace in terms of value; women excuse themselves by accusing men of misbehaving and disrupting their working process.

Put them apart and see who does better. It's the easiest way to see who is full of shit.

[–]ffbtawPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm becoming more and more onboard with gender segregated schooling by the day. At least until high school if not post-secondary.

[–]abaxeron✴️Indian Programmer1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

People who want co-ed or co-work are free to have it. The fight for female inclusivity is not (and never was) about creating mixed spaces; it was about destroying male spaces.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas-1 points0 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Ugh my dad is very very close to the teacher you described. I’ve worried about him because he just says nice friendly encouraging things to girls that in this day and age would seem “suspect” but he’s actually just a nice guy from a different time.

He also says very negative things about Islam lol

[–]atlantic68Purple Shill0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

So hes a pedo?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Fuck off.

You can be kind to underage women without wanting to fuck them.

[–]atlantic68Purple Shill0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

'Kind'

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Nice, friendly encouraging = kind

[–]atlantic68Purple Shill0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Creepy and unwanted

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Nope, just friendly and well intentioned encouragement from someone with a lifetime record of helping at risk youth make something of their lives ! Not in any way guilty of the slime nasty vicious people like you accuse him of to feel powerful and in control !

You are exactly the problem

[–]atlantic68Purple Shill0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

People who dont want kids diddled? Hes a creep just accept it

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nope you’re 100% wrong and you don’t care about the children, that’s just your pretense for attacking people

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm guessing you call the cops on guys sitting peacefully at the playground too, huh?

[–]atlantic68Purple Shill0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Alone with no kids? Ya youre a pedo!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I can't tell if you're trolling or serious...

[–]atlantic68Purple Shill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

90%of the time serious. Like now

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I've been accused of sexism from coworkers for treating women the same way I do men.

Basically if you criticize a mans work he will blame the work. If you criticize many women they will blame you and that your a man.

Similarly if you talk over a man or give a man a friendly insult they understand it as communication norms. Women may view this as mansplainig (lol) or being sexist.

Women and men are different. And yes you have to treat women with kid gloves or your ass is HR grass.

[–]vanBeethovenLudwigroses are red, feminists are blue0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I work in an environment with about 50/50 men/women. Private fine arts performance/education.

I agree it's tricky because of gender politics. I work very closely with a male colleague and I sense that he feels like he can't really assert his opinion because then it's "offensive" if my boss takes his view over mine. And my boss is also careful to ask ME what I want first because she's aware if she asks him first then it might seem misogynistic.

Also, he gets shafted in some ways - he has to take on more difficult tasks because I, as a woman, can't handle the pressure. But at the same time I take care of a lot of simple administrative tasks - organizing, typing, scheduling. OTOH I also sometimes get parents thinking I'm not as qualified because I'm a petite, sweet, attractive woman, and he has the more aggressive, competitive spirit.

And yes, sexual politics can be difficult. He treats me chivalrously and I appreciate it, but then when it comes to working together, we are trying to be friendly to each other but then emotional affairs or chemistry happens. He's clearly attracted to me and flirts with me - which I take no offense on - BUT it does complicate working relationships. When there's chemistry between a man and woman, most women will naturally be submissive, and men will feel the urge to take care of her. He would want to console me and solve my problems whenever we struggled in a project at work. I had to learn my own boundaries and not let him comfort me, not let him take me out to lunch, not talk about anything personal together.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter