Reddits latest fixation on "power imbalances" is not merely assumptive, it defeats the very purpose of relationships being freely consensual if they can't happen between "different" people.

People don't date their clones, women themselves seek stronger, taller, more successful men. They say that "pussy is not charity", that Peterson's idea of "enforced monogamy" is outrageous because it is trying to force "a balance of equity" on something as primal as mate selection. So aren't men in age-gaps relationships perfectly entitled say the same? -- that they have no obligation to turn down a romantic opportunity with a younger chick for what a 3rd party considers to be his career-life-eperience-stage-match proper?

Why do some feminists suddenly start sounding like mr.enforced monogamy here? -- rejecting free agency if favor of "egalitarian intervention" only that in this case the couples should be properly status-wealth-looks-age-n-count "matched".