TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Promiscuous women love to shame men for not wanting them. Instead, they should accept that they are undesirable.

November 26, 2018
32 upvotes

Today's post is brought to you by this post in relationship advice.

TL;DR: OP discovers his perfect, innocent, virgin, girlfriend is instead a lying, manipulative, slut. He finds pics of her online with multiple guys and subsequently breaks up with her. The comment section is a warzone of guys congratulating him and women shaming him.

Women know how men feel about sex: they know men won't commit to slutty women, and they know men find slutty women repulsive. Naturally, this is a problem for them. Women want to be sluts -- not be judged for it -- and lock down a quality partner. This will almost never happen, so in an effort to maximize their hypergamy, slut shaming was born. Instead of choosing between being an attractive partner and having fun, they want both.

Slut shaming puts the onus on men to accept a female-centric view of sex, promiscuity, and relationships. Any attempts to disagree is seen as hostile, misogynistic, and morally reprehensible. This is essentially women shifting the blame for their behavior.

So I say, there's nothing wrong with being a slut. It's wrong to be a slut and expect men to want you, however. As I said, women know how men feel about sex, this effectively puts them at a crossroads:

  1. Be somewhat tame and mostly have sex in monogamous relationships. Thus, be seen as a high value potential wife and partner. Or...

  2. Be a sexual being and fuck any and every guy she wants. Be seen as a slut and low value potential wife and partner.

Women who opt for the latter should accept that they are undesirable and not slut shame men who don't want them, because they knew ahead of time how men would perceive them.

In other words, if you decide to be a slut, embrace it. But do not try to force others to.

Thoughts?

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate.

/r/PurplePillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Promiscuous women love to shame men for not wanting them. Instead, they should accept that they are undesirable.
Author _Neon_Shadow_
Upvotes 32
Comments 313
Date November 26, 2018 6:38 PM UTC (4 years ago)
Subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/promiscuous-women-love-to-shame-men-for-not.258864
https://theredarchive.com/post/258864
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/a0m35a/promiscuous_women_love_to_shame_men_for_not/
Red Pill terms in post
Comments

[–]PPD-Angel[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children) | Copy Link

This post is making an affirmative claim and will be retagged as a CMV. All top level comments must challenge the OP's view.

[–][deleted] 52 points53 points  (60 children) | Copy Link

Ironically, I've only ever been called a "slut" or a "whore" by men I've sexually rejected.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS5 points6 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Well, why insult women who sleep with you? Kinda self-defeating.

I for my part can safely say that I've never slut shamed women to their face (regardless of whether they rejected me or not), but that doesn't equal me not considering some of them sluts (also regardless of whether they slept with me or not).

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Do you think it's likely that a normal, emotionally stable man will throw a random temper tantrum? Or is it more likely a pattern of abnormal behavior?

These dudes aren't normal, they are impaired. Usually very easy to weed out.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Do you think it's likely that a normal, emotionally stable man will throw a random temper tantrum? Or is it more likely a pattern of abnormal behavior?

The former, with the caveat that maturity is the prerequisite of "emotional stability". I can see a normal guy who - despite being pretty good with women overall - still can't deal with rejection and gets into the face of a woman who didn't respond positively to his advances; but that normal guy is probably around 20 at best. If he persists in his immaturity beyond that age - and it's not as if guys with a lack of self control aged 30 and more didn't exist - you're free to revoke his "normal" card.

Guys who are notoriously unsuccessful with women on the other hand (I guess it's those you are talking about) and who are more likely to act out (also because rejection is a much more frustrating experience for them) are practically stifled in their personal growth and their maturing process by default.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

So you agree that these guys are probably pretty easy to spot, due to poor social skills?

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

The latter yes, though it's more likely that they become depressed than act out.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

That's exactly what I mean. The guys that throw fits almost always seem "off" from the start.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Except that it's not just the forever alone rejects who can't deal with rejection, as I said. There are also guys who are hotheads who can't deal with rejection.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hotheads are also pretty easy to spot

[–]DandDsuckatwriting 1 points [recovered]  (23 children) | Copy Link

I mean, do you expect the men you haven't rejected to ruin their chances by calling you a slut?

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It's pretty easy to spot the usual suspects, generally.

"you are the most magnificent creature I have ever laid eyes upon! Please allow me the pleasure of your company over dinner"-red flag

"Hey can I take you to coffee sometime?"-probably fine

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Less attractive guys often try too hard -- makes them even more unattractive.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑-1 points0 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

Then why do men expect slutty women to be honest about their past when it could ruin their chances at getting commitment?

[–]BleuBird185 points6 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

The idea that a person stops feeling attracted to another human because they have a sexual history is stupid.

People can have whatever parameters they want, but those parameters and beliefs are subject to judgment. The way twerps describe female 'value' in terms of sexuality is stupid. Humans do not depreciate or increase in value every time they have sex.

Any person that's made insecure by the knowledge that the person they are with is hot and has been desired by people prior to their arrival needs to grow the fuck up.

It's amazing that twerps feel entitled to dictate how women are valuable, when they spend the majority of their existence being unable to function as socially normal humans.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

It's amazing that twerps feel entitled to dictate how women are valuable, when they spend the majority of their existence being unable to function as socially normal humans.

And they do, indeed, pay the price for it. They don't get dates. They don't get sex. They keep getting rejected. We, however, limit criticism to women's undesirable traits to anonymous online forums because sticking your neck out and criticising women's sexual choices is a big no-no. However, shitting all over nice guys and unattractive men as if they were sex pests is perfectly fine.

The idea that a person stops feeling attracted to another human because they have a sexual history is stupid.

Not so much the sexual history that's the issue but rather the ole bait and switch. Men feel like they're being conned and are usually lied to by women who didn't require commitment before, now insisting he pays a higher price that other men didn't have to pay. If sex was a theme park ride and everyone paid a dollar to ride, you'd be angry that they're charging you 100 dollars for what is usually an inferior experience.

People can have whatever parameters they want, but those parameters and beliefs are subject to judgment.

And thus your parameters can be judged too. Claiming it's stupid is in itself, stupid, when women have no qualms with judging men the way they do. Would you gladly do the same work someone else does but for half the salary? Even if you enjoyed your job, the poorer compensation would indeed be a problem and you'd look for alternative employment as soon as possible.

The sluttiness itself is not the problem, but the lack of honesty, the poor quality sex and the entitled attitude do not encourage men to stick around. There are consequences for slutting it up in her youth. If indeed she felt no shame, she should be forthcoming while they were dating. But women hide this shit from men then want to play the victim when the truth comes out because society should accept them without them having to take responsibility for their actions. Sluts are great for the sex they offer but they're not prime LTR material. Just as men are not entitled to sex from even these women, these women are not entitled to commitment from men.

If she was a slut, she should have been honest. If she gave previous guys enthusiastic, kinky sex, she should offer the man she claims she loves and wants to commit to for the rest of her life the same or better. Why wouldn't you want to give your partner the best, most mindblowing sex you can? Why wouldn't you be honest with someone you like? Why even date the sort of man who isn't okay with your past?

[–]BleuBird184 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

You really just said "women aren't criticized" for their sexual choices... Yes we are. We are judged by everyone, and a lot of people have expectations based on those judgments.

Whether it's as an easy lay, frigid bitch, or ugly. Women are used to being evaluated, judged, and told to be polite, or speak up - but not too loud, just get over it, stop being hysterical, don't cry.

Why do twerps have this Disney delusion that all women just float through life without ever having real problems?

Every woman has dealt with judgment by peers, media, and adults from a very young age. We learn to deal with it in different ways.

For some that means a total rejection of all the bullshit. Which is why you get fat and proud, and pro body hair women.

For some, they just do their best to excel and look feminine.

Twerps want their issues and stories to be taken seriously, yet they make it impossible for otherwise sympathetic and supportive humans to give a shit because the baseline philosophy requires an assumption that women lie, their pain is exaggerated or out right fabricated, and they can't be trusted. At the same time twerps say men are inherently amazing and selfless, but the evullll womyns have taken away your manly man power.

You want YOUR struggles and pain to be recognized while encouraging each other to ignore what women say, and mock their pain.

If someone is entitled (wanting things beyond what they deserve) then don't date them. This fiction that women want to only fuck Rockstar is not accurate. Uggly average and hot people, all with flaws and issues, somehow manage to navigate dating without the need to reduce half the population to "lying sluts".

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Very very well said!

[–]BleuBird181 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Thanks, I'm new, but your comments, along with spacewhiskey's regularly stand out and are always a welcomed sight.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Aw thank you BleuBird ♥️

And welcome to PPD!

[–]wtffellification0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Your sexual past doesn't make me insecure or intimidated, it just makes me wanna steer clear of disease, basically. From the most basic biological standpoint, it can definitely be an actual repellant

Also, your sexual past does not dictate how valuable you are as a human being, obviously; it might very well, however, dictate your value as a prospect in the dating market

[–]BleuBird180 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

> Also, your sexual past does not dictate how valuable you are as a human being, obviously; it might very well, however, dictate your value as a prospect in the dating market

Either one is bad, but don't pretend that 'it's just a dating preference' when you have an entire group that labels women as 'losing value over time, and with every cock she encounters'. It's not "this is what I like", it's an entire group having hateful and angry conversations about women that *dare* to have sex, writing off an entire gender as slutty, worthless, and manipulative. It's not 'just' "I want someone with a short sexual history" when men say that "whores trick men into marriage" and that "whores" are worthless garbage. These same *men* that call all women whores, are *also* trying to fuck everything in sight....yet that's somehow 'okay' because they have dicks.

You do know that responsible, sexually active adults practice safe sex and get tested regularly right?

I've never encountered a woman that was *worried* about a man's sexual history...she just wanted to know that he was clean. Which is what everyone should be doing anyway.

[–]wtffellification0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

call all women

writing off an entire gender

not all women, not the entire gender

[–]BleuBird180 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

....It's not acceptable to call women (all or some) 'whores'. It's still horrible and wrong.

A racist can't claim to be NON racist by 'clarifying' "Well, only some folks are (racial slur)" like that magically makes it acceptable.

[–]wtffellification0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Actually I can't remember the last time I said "Whore"

[–]DandDsuckatwriting 1 points [recovered]  (5 children) | Copy Link

The same reason you expect anyone to be honest about anything: Because you expect them to be a decent human being.

You can make the exact same argument about anything. Cheating, debt, criminal record, STDs, having a stalker, etc. Just because it would be advantageous to lie about it doesn't make it okay to do so, and if you told men "Why do you expect a woman to be honest about her affair if it could ruin her chances with you?" people will think you are insane.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑5 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

People also think it’s insane for you to hide and lie about your true perception of a woman. If you truly think she’s a slut, it denotes a poor impression of her and a lower likelihood of committing to her. And men know this, which is why they don’t say it so that it doesn’t ruin their chances of getting the noncommittal sex that they want. The same way women will lie about their past, so it doesn’t ruin her chances of commitment with him. Not sure why men expect women to be honest and ‘decent’ when most of them (men) aren’t.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 19931 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

well said.

[–]DandDsuckatwriting 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm confused what your point is. Women lying about their past is okay because men lie about their preferences? I don't think two wrongs make a right.

Most men will actually tell you that they don't want to commit to you. It just usually takes a euphemistic form, like "I'm not looking for anything serious", or "Let's not put a label on it". Admittedly, yeah, they don't just outright say "I just want to have sex with you but never commit", but it's usually pretty obvious.

Now, if you want to argue that women should be told "Figure out his intentions before you sleep with him" just like men should be told "Figure out her past before you commit to her", then I completely agree. Just because people should be honest and decent, doesn't mean you can blindly trust them to be.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Women lying about their past is okay because men lie about their preferences? I don't think two wrongs make a right.

Yet, for whatever reason you implied that it’s silly for the other commenter to expect that men would be honest about their preferences and true perception of a woman. Apparently, the phrase “two wrongs don’t make a right” only applies when women are doing the kind of wrong that men have been doing. When men are doing the same ‘wrong’, other men like you are suddenly silent and you no longer hear that phrase. You even go as far as making snarky comments to women by asking them why they think they should expect otherwise from men. Kinda stinks of hypocrisy.

Most men will actually tell you that they don't want to commit to you.

Yes, but the point is that a lot of them would say it after they’ve gotten the sex that they want. If men want to play that game, then I don’t see why they’re upset about finding out about her past after they’ve already committed to her.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Right? Dunno what she expected.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Classic Nice Guys TM

[–]WhatIsTheMeaningHere1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Do you think some of the men you sexually accepted would have had that reaction if you had rejected them?

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Unlikely. Most dudes don't have meltdowns when rejected, and the ones that do almost always have red flags ahead of tine that lead to the rejection in the first place (like approaching in public, flooding with messages, over excitement, etc)

[–]jax006Wants to bang ~20% of PPD chicks4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

like approaching in public

Lol wtf?

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes. Men who panhandle for attention in the streets are generally not the most stable group.

[–]jax006Wants to bang ~20% of PPD chicks-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Men who panhandle for attention in the streets

Well I guess If that's what you specifically mean by "approach in public" then fair enough

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's exactly the same thing as begging for change.

[–]adool4441 point2 points  (20 children) | Copy Link

Really? I feel like this is a shaming tactic women use.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

I have never been called a slut by a woman, outside of purely friendly teasing. The "women are awful to each other" meme is not reality. It's a revenge fantasy.

[–]adool4440 points1 point  (18 children) | Copy Link

Sorry, the shaming I'm talking about is depicting any guy who calls you a slut as an angry guy who was rejected or can't get laid in general.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

It's extremely common for men to have temper tantrums and lash out with insults when rejected. Not a shaming tactic, actual reality.

[–]adool4442 points3 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

Implying the majority of slut shamers are these guys is not true though. Plenty of sexually successful men dislike sluts.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Most men don't care enough about n count to even ask.

And not wanting to date sluts =/= slut shamer. It's pretty easy to have a personal preference without having meltdowns about it. Most people manage just fine.

The vast majority of "slut shaming" is just sour grapes.

[–]adool4441 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

They do if they are thinking about the girl seriously.

Fair enough. The phrase "i date sluts but would never marry one" is seen as slut shaming by sluts themselves.

I think sour grapes is your version of revenge fantasy.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

This gets brought up all the time here. There are a bunch of threads about it, and pretty much every woman says that they have never or very rarely been asked about their n counts. Ive dated a lot, been proposed to twice, and have had several longterm relationships. Never once have I been asked. Most women say the same.

I'll reiterate that the only times I've been called a slut, it's been by men who want to fuck me that I reject. Obviously their opinions are lower than meaningless to me.

[–]adool4441 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

No man will ask but they care. I've never asked any girl, my current gf and an ex told me themselves because they wanted to know mine.

That's your personal experience. No one would say it to your face but some men will avoid dating you.

[–]the-4th-survivor0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

They care, they just don't ask out of fear of what they'll hear or because they don't want to offend. I guarantee that just about any guy would be heartbroken to find out that a woman he loves had been ploughed by a few dozen men before she met him. They might not outwardly slut shame a woman, but they'll avoid committing to a slutty woman or a woman they think is slutty.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

So it's never brough up, doesn't effect most women's ability to date and marry, but they should give a shit.....why?

[–]the-4th-survivor0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

It does affect women though because men who are looking for an LTR or marriage will avoid women who give off slutty vibes even if they don't outwardly shame them.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 19930 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

that's wierd. how can sexually successful male sluts hate the women they have sex with? the so called "prudes" would never sleep with them unless promissed marriage which is not what those guys want so why hate the women who made them successful?

[–]adool4440 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

They don't hate them. They are just bad marriage material.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 19930 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

male sluts arent marriage material either.

[–]adool4441 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Don't marry them then.

[–]happycheese86No Pill27 points28 points  (41 children) | Copy Link

How are these women fucking every man in sight if men think they are gross? Men are hypocrites.

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing5 points6 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

In defense of PPD men they are up front about it.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Honesty is best bruv.

[–]Freethetreees0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Not to the faces of the sluts they want to fuck

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Maybe some are.

[–]Freethetreees0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

BEFORE they have sex? Doubtful. Men lie about how they feel about sluts and commitment and how they view a specific woman all the time, all for their dicks.

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

A couple of guys here claim they do.

[–]Freethetreees0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Good for them, I guess

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 17 points18 points  (30 children) | Copy Link

Because sluts are good for fun, and bad for commitment. What men value in a warm hole vs. a partner is completely different.

[–]happycheese86No Pill1 point2 points  (29 children) | Copy Link

But if women tried to say the same about men and how to avoid the abusive and slutty ones?

[–]hammerhauntsbread pill12 points13 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

That would be smart if women followed that advice.

[–]happycheese86No Pill1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Hardest lesson to learn: You can't live other people's lives for them and you can't make their choices for them. Sex is fun, I get as much of it as I can. I've been as slutty as I can be and will never slut shame any gender. I'm in an open relationship of 9 years and couldn't be happier (relationship wise) Are we just weirdos? 32F/38M btw.

[–]hammerhauntsbread pill11 points12 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You are weirdos

[–]happycheese86No Pill-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well I guess I don't want to be normal, it's infinitely more fun than being uptight and prudish.

[–]wtffellification0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

being normal and being uptight and prudish are not mutually inclusive. just as being un-normal and being interesting

[–]WhiteningMcClean2 points3 points  (22 children) | Copy Link

Because it doesn't jell with what women actually value. Most women prefer a man with more sexual experience, not only because it's better for her pleasure, but because it reaffirms that other women find her choice of partner appealing.

[–]nevomintoarcePurple Pill Woman4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Only if the other women are what we consider quality. If I found out that a guy got his experience through bar sluts and landwjales I'd be disgusted.

[–]WhiteningMcClean0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s fair

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Women prefers guys like Tim Tebow. Highly desired, but doesn't act on it all the time. Tim may or not be virgin, but he's no slut.

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Honestly yeah. I'm not into Tebow himself (too religious for my tastes), but an attractive guy who isn't an indiscriminate sex beast is most appealing.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel you. I was raised religious, but I'm not into anymore. I do want a guy that is not slutty and has a low count. It's fine that he likes to get freaky, but with 100s of partners? No thx!

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

Women prefers guys like Tim Tebow.

Women's parents prefer guys like this -- actual women not so much.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Debatable. Think when women are thinking about settling down they want a guy that's good at sexting, but not a slut.

[–]reluctantly_red1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Does anyone over 17 actually engage in sexting?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

I meant good at sex and yeah grown adults still does it.

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Of course women want a guy who is good at sex. However, most don't care much about how many woman a guy has slept with.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Bleeech. You can have him all to yourself.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I was talking about his actions, not necessary his looks.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Bleeech

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

No they don't. Most women either don't care or prefer non promiscuous men.

[–]WhiteningMcClean3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There are limits, sure, but this is not true. There’s a sweet spot of sexual experience where a guy knows what he’s doing but isn’t sticking his dick in anything that moves. That said, being a virgin is more of a death sentence than being a man whore.

[–]SerpentCypher2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Most women would take a guy that has slept with 50 women over a guy that has slept with 0. Women love men that lots of other women desire, being a virgin is a death sentence for a man, being a slut isn't.

Of course a guy with a notch count of 50+ isn't ideal and most women like men in the 10-20 range, but men with 50+ partners aren't a turnoff for most women. Most men would feel sick if his gf told her she has had 50 dicks inside her.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 19930 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

women prefer men who have more sexual experience within their previous LTRs, not male sluts.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's fine. She's the one that has to live with him. Not me.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

The same way some women go for toxic, destructive men. Hypocrisy is inherent to being human.

[–]happycheese86No Pill8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Let me guess, you're not one of those toxic men and virgins should be lining up to date you.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The opposite, actually. That's how I know wink

[–]LSTW123418 points19 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

I am a promiscuous woman who does not shame men who don’t want me and who does not lie about my sexual history. AMA.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Can you teach a class or something

[–]LifterofThingsDelicate Feminine Flower2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Let's form a posse!

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

A pussy posse?

[–]LSTW12344 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

A pusse?

[–]LifterofThingsDelicate Feminine Flower1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm in.

[–]Million-SunsMarriage is obsolete0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Do you still expect commitment though?

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑10 points11 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Why wouldn’t she? Promiscuous women don’t have that much trouble finding commitment. Their partners are usually similarly promiscuous men, but those men also usually tend to be more attractive anyway.

It’s the shut-in virgins that have trouble even being social enough to meet anyone.

[–]BleuBird1814 points15 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Twerps can't stand it when regular people behave contrary to their biases. They work so hard to twist every story to fit their their convoluted and fucked up ideas about how men and women interact.

[–]Million-SunsMarriage is obsolete0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

First of all, I am not a twerp.

Secondly, I find it curious that people who are not really monogamous or serial monogamous still somehow expect to fit in a monogamous model, here commitment from one man/woman towards them.

I don't see that working at all, on the grounds of fundamental incompatibility.

[–]BleuBird185 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know what you are, but asking a promiscuous woman "do you still expect commitment?" is a pretty fucked question.

it implies rp alignment - as in, partner count has an effect on whether a woman SHOULD get commitment.

People uninterested in monogamy should avoid it. There are many types of relationships.

I was saying this a lot yesterday (which I don't expect you to know): people that cannot keep their word and remain monogamous, should stick to poly or casual sex.

[–]SkookumTreeRomantic relationships aren't necessary for happiness!1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There are female counterparts to these awkward dudes and they do just as badly.

[–]SmurfESmurferson31 points32 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

The problem here isn't that this girl is a slut. It's that she was a bonafide sex worker - someone who had multiple partners, who made money helping men get off - who then lied about being a virgin

That sort of lying and manipulation is borderline sociopathic

That OP would be an idiot if he didn't dump her

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

True.

[–]SkookumTreeRomantic relationships aren't necessary for happiness!4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

She is a liar and a fraud. A lie like this indicates she is pretty untrustworthy. It’s like a guy saying he’s been with one other woman when he has fucked half the town.

[–]larrythetomato0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think that the extent of the lying is the bad part, there is a difference between "I have done some stuff with a couple guys" and "I'm a totally innocent virgin, (shh...except that time when I blew 2 guys at once, and also took off my clothes for money, and the other time...)"

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

YUP. This girl is several fries short of a Happy Meal, and on a very different planet than a garden-variety slut who never said she was a virgin, but never felt the need to detail every past lay she'd had to her new guy.

[–]TedescheMRA6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm having trouble finding all the comments shaming the OP. Are they all at the bottom? I came across, like, one comment calling OP a hypocrite for liking porn, but not liking that his girlfriend was making porn, which is obviously stupid, but that was one comment, and all the responses were like, "are you serious? fuck off."

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I was surprised as well. In fact, I was almost under the impression that this thread was brigaded by some man-centric sub because it was so uncharacteristically (for reddit standards) critical of sluts and slutiness - way beyond "okay, what OP's ex did was shitty".

Then some dolt from SRS linked it, and there the I met the sentiment that men who watch porn have forfeited their right not to date a sex worker - and thought "yeah, that's more like what I expected".

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah, the ones I found were downvoted to Hell.

[–]TedescheMRA2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Mrm. Alright, I mean, dicks gonna be dicks, dude. The good thing is that the fact that they were so heavily downvoted means the vast majority of users dislike those comments, so they really only represent a loud minority.

As such, I'm not really seeing the shaming of the OP you said was going on. I've seen plenty of threads in r/relationships that shame men for stupid shit and exhibit the usual hypocrisy when it comes from men's vs. women's issues, but this thread was fairly okay. Pretty hard to defend the girlfriend when she just straight-up lied.

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (82 children) | Copy Link

Women should lie and pretend they have never seen a penis before because that's what men reward.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

It really boggles my mind that all women don't just go ahead and do this. Maybe they do?

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't because I don't want a man who wants a madonna or has a weird purity fetish.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's fair. One should signal for true acceptance, not acceptance of an altered reality. I think that's one of the most important signs of a person who has matured relationshipwise...wanting someone to accept who you are rather than accept a tailored avatar meant to please another's tastes

[–]wtffellification1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok but there's a fine line between wanting a 'pure madonna' and just not wanting a slut

[–]mistresswhat5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't because a fixation on purity is a red flag for a lot of issues and a sure sign that the person is incompatible with me. I go the opposite way and am maybe too open about it because I want to scare off the uptight ones.

[–]SkookumTreeRomantic relationships aren't necessary for happiness!4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Scaring off the uptight ones is a good thing. If you have fucked half the town you probably don’t want to get with a virgin as you probably have very different views on sex and love.

[–]LoseMoneyAllWeek0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The uptight ones normally come from well off families and they themselves have bright futures

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Makes sense. Why live a lie with someone who doesn't accept

[–]toronto87 1 points [recovered]  (5 children) | Copy Link

They all do to some extent

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Which begs the quesrion--is it even worth asking if you know there's no way to get at the underlying reality? All you're really gaining is insight into the image of herself she wants to present to you at the time you ask

[–]toronto87 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't bother asking, I just assume.

If she's on tinder, she's been railed by tinder fuckbois. If she's been through a western university, she's had her share of drunken hookups she forgot. If she did a Europe trip, she totally got her brains fucked out in the gym washroom at the dorm in Nice by some some australian lad.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If she's been through a western university, she's had her share of drunken hookups she forgot. If she did a Europe trip, she totally got her brains fucked out in the gym washroom at the dorm

I guess you never meet religious women, or nerds.

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I dunno, man, some guys are a bit turned on by the thought of their girlfriend as a sexy seductress...and then there's the cougar/cub crowd...

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

In case you're serious: Most men may be idiots, but they're not that stupid.

I've met my fair share of women, and after a certain age, virgins are so uncommon that only those who are off in a way remain. Convincingly pretending to be a virgin must be quite tedious because you have to avoid giving off the impression that you're normal.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

a certain age

18 lol

[–]hammerhauntsbread pill0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Maybe they do?

they do

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Shit I would.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's why you lie back 😂

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (39 children) | Copy Link

That's exactly what OPs girlfriend did. That's probably the optimal thing to do. But it's highly unlikely to be successful.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Why is it highly unlikely to be successful? No one knows stuff unless you tell them or you have mutual friends. Maybe it would be difficult to hide if you've lived in the same small town all your life, but most people change towns for school or work.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] -1 points0 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Because guys vet their wives and nothing stays hidden forever. I'm not saying it never happens, but yeah, you get the idea.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Things absolutely stay hidden forever. For every one thing you find out about, 100 things stay hidden.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

I disagree but this isn't something we can exactly quantify and prove. From my personal experience, when men or women try to hide things in a relationship, it usually explodes in their face.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Survivorship bias. You don't see the stuff that remains hidden so you don't enter it into your calculations.

Think about your own life. Do you think you would be incapable of hiding something you did ten years ago?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Do you have any facts to support your hypothesis and numbers you tossed out?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

No. Just look at your own life. If you and I started dating, how hard would it be for you to hide the fact that you got a bj from Becky in high school?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

That isn't a valid indicator. Its irrelevant.

[–]Thswherizat3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

He said survivorship bias, which does apply to this situation. If you can think about any embarrassing moment in your past that you don't actively share with people you are proving his statement. Everyone has skeletons in the closet, people only care if it will effect them in the future.

[–]LoseMoneyAllWeek0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I always live under the assumption their is always sin somewhere

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's a good assumption. No one is innocent.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

guys vet their wives

Lmao! 😂

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Also that relationship post is 90% certain to be fake.

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing5 points6 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Relationships often has thematic posts. The dude who found out his GF/wife slept with more people than he thought and the way he finds out is always bullshit, it is usually finding a rad sex video where she bangs a bunch of people, or they go to a wedding/homecoming and her friends "confess" that she was a slut in college. My favourites are the ones where one parent wants to send a gay child to "conversion camp" in the wilderness and the other parent is not so sure.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Men are so weird.

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Very. I think it is amusing that TRP says women people are children because most of the time I am here I feel like I am stuck in a room with eight year old boys.

[–]Cho_AssmilkArrogant RP S.O.B.7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women post fakes where her BF is doing something that's toxic male behavior and all the feminists show up in droves to be trolled. Same difference. People on reddit get off on posting ridiculous shit and having others believe it.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I’m confused : do you think the posts are completely fake or just the way the guy finds out about them?

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

The two topics I hit on many of those are fake.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

So the entire post is just made up?

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I do not know for sure.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I concur. The real content is in the comments.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Probably. But the responses aren't.

[–]SerpentCypher0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol, say most of the shit on /r/niceguys is fake (which it is) and you get downvoted to oblivion. But anything involving men talking about bad /manipulative women is almost always fake. I know the primary dogma on PPD is Man bad, Woman good, but this is all getting a bit ridiculous.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are manipulative. They do bad things all the time. They are the worst! This post is still fake.

[–]damaskrose 1 points [recovered]  (8 children) | Copy Link

It's extremely likely to be successful as long as you don't have pics/videos floating around. Unless you live in a small town, he'll probably never see or meet another of your previous conquests. If he does, it'll be your word against theirs.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I live in a major city and it's still pretty easy.

[–]damaskrose 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

How would you find out?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sherlock Holmes

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Idk how it is for white people but being a Latino from LA I could tell you for a fact that a woman's slutty past will never be kept secret.

All latino hoods are (loosely) affiliated and you meet people from all over, names go around and pasts become exposed.

If you try to find out about a girls past you can asap just by asking around. Even if you don't try you will eventually anyway as word goes around.

But like I said I'm only talking about Latinos idk how it is for white people.

[–]damaskrose 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

I know nothing about my best friends' sex lives let alone random acquaintances.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Men talk to each other about the women they bang. When a woman goes around everyone knows about it.

[–]SkookumTreeRomantic relationships aren't necessary for happiness!0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Okay, so you meet a Latina from rural Colorado, or from upstate NY. How do you learn what she’s been up to?

[–]kandyapplezborn in '91 👸 💅1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

its actually super easy lol

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

What, pretending that you're a virgin? I call bullshit on that one.

[–]Million-SunsMarriage is obsolete1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because lies are the foundation of a healthy relationship...

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. It’s funny that men assume that they’re owed the truth when most of the time, they reward the lie. There’s no benefit in her telling him about her sexual past esp if he’s the type to get hung up on it.

Tbh, most men nowadays don’t even ask and the few that do, are usually just weird, sexually frustrated virgins or low n’s themselves. So they ask from a position of insecurity. Usually if a man is happy with her and how she currently is with him, most men don’t ask and just move on. Ignorance is bliss.

[–]happycheese86No Pill1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This. What reason do we have to be truthful to you (in a casual sex relationship) when men openly slutshame us?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

No, if men had a consistent sex experience they wouldn't slut shame.

Men who slut shame are often men who cannot get laid (because of looks or social awkwardness or illness).

And here's the thing, a man who is a virgin or has low n count doesn't want his life-long partner to have ridden 30+ dicks at 30.

[–]SkookumTreeRomantic relationships aren't necessary for happiness!4 points5 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

I don’t think that guys want to fuck half the town and then settle down with a chaste virgin.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

Nope but if guys had similar partner numbers to women (say around 2-5 by 23) LTRs would last longer and there would be less FOMO overall.

As it is right now, a third of men have 1-2 partners and are expected to wife up women with at least 10-20 partners.

[–]SkookumTreeRomantic relationships aren't necessary for happiness!4 points5 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Look at the CDC data. This is horseshit.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

what's horseshit?

21% of men (the chads) have 15+ sex partners

10% of women have 15+ sex partners. yeah women tend to fuck fewer men, mostly the same few men.

women also underreport their n count

There's a lot of cherrypicked data there to make men out as hypersexual swine and women as innocent fairies.

The same CDC data says there are more virgin men than virgin women by a larger margin that isn't explained by the existence of 0.05% more men than women in the 15-44 age bracket.

So women have slightly fewer partners but they mostly tend to fuck the same top 20% of guys.

Men have slightly more % partners because they pay prostitutes (among the 10% of women with 15+ partners)

So 20% of men get most of the female love and attention while < 10% of women get paid for having sex with ~60% of men.

[–]DandDsuckatwriting 1 points [recovered]  (3 children) | Copy Link

Men and women can't have different average partner counts*. It's a mathematical impossibility. They vary in the distribution, but not in the mean.

*A very slight difference can exist due to slight differences in numbers of men and women, but assuming 50-50 split, the average must be exactly equal.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Take 10 men and 10 women, all the women fuck 2 of the men.

Each of the 2 men will have 10 partners. The average partner count for the women will be 2.

The other 8 men remain virgins. The average will also be 2.

Yeah, same averages, different distributions, nothing to do with what I wrote.

Besides it doesn't help the other 8 men that "the average partner count is 2". In fact that's bullshit since only 2 of the men are having all the sex.

[–]DandDsuckatwriting 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

I pointed it out because you stated:

So women have slightly fewer partners

Men have slightly more % partners

Which is just mathematically impossible. I'm not actually disagreeing with your overall point about distribution.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

EDIT: yeah I made a mistake in my calculations before...
Damn, I'm tired. Averages don't work like that.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

So you are saying women should be more slutty in order to stop slut shaming? I doubt that would work as intended.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Nope. if women were more slutty they'd just fuck the top 10-20% of the guys more often.

We could discuss this, but the takeaway is that there is no solution.

Women are slowly becoming more promiscuous than men and while the top 20% guys don't actually get 80% of women (because OLD statistics are not reality even if they reflect it) they still get 60% of women.

And many of the remaining 40% women will often rather stay single if they can't get a guy with "fuckboy" looks and "gentleman" personality.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

20% of the women are pursued by 80% of the guys, so I think it evens out to be about the same.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Unless you're refering to age, that's incorrect.

I would be highly surprises if the average girl (mostly regardless of looks) who finishes HS hasn't had a relationship, and even those who didn't had guys volunteering. That doesn't necessarily mean that the guys in question loved the girl to death and that she was his first choice, but they were willing to date her and also actively approached her.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The Pareto principle applies both ways, that's how it works. It also fits with the data, which RPillers and incels consistently ignore. Most of the sex is being had by a very promiscuous 20% and that applies to both men and women.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Ironically, the guys that are most successful with women tended to slut shame the most, from my experience.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah fuckboys are on average more misogynist than MRA, MGTOW and incels altogether.

But it's OK, because he's good looking.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Pretty much. I've said this before, but my best friend is a stereotypical Chad and he contributed to my acceptance of TRP greatly, just from observing him. Pre-TRP I was 100% a feminist and he was everything women claimed to hate, and incredibly misogynistic. Despite this, they still fucked him, and afterwards he'd call them sluts and go back to his baby mother. They absolutely couldn't get enough of him.

[–]happycheese86No Pill-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

So what you're saying is women need to ask how much mileage on that dick (masturbation) before deciding if they want to be with someone? because we all know your dick gets smaller the more you use it from rubbing layers of skin off. /s. There's no reason to carfax a vagina, there's no difference no matter how much sex a woman as had unless she's overstretched it from huge toys or some shit. And I'm sure there's men out there that would be into that.

People that complain about not having enough sex are usually the most prudish. don't be such an uptight carfaxxer and play the numbers. I regularly have gangbangs with my husband with people you would probably call incels from looking at them, but they know what they are doing in bed and know how to relax and have fun.

what world are you living in that a 30 year old has only had 30 partners? sounds like someone is just jealous they don't have what it takes to find love in this world.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

So what you're saying is women need to ask how much mileage on that dick (masturbation) before deciding if they want to be with someone?

That would be... something. :D

There's no reason to carfax a vagina, there's no difference no matter how much sex a woman as had unless she's overstretched it from huge toys or some shit. And I'm sure there's men out there that would be into that.

Well it's more about bonding. There are men out there who're into the Slaton sisters.
So, I'm sure there are men into ANYTHING if it involves a human blob of flesh labeled as "female".

what world are you living in that a 30 year old has only had 30 partners?

While I'm pretty sure many women understate their partner count, most sex surveys indicate an average of 7-10 partners for the average 30 year old person.

sounds like someone is just jealous they don't have what it takes to find love in this world.

Oh yeah, I'm so jealous! I've given up on dating long ago so I could care less, but I admit it's fun debating this shit here.

[–]nevomintoarcePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men already have a number of partners directly proportional to your age and hotness level laid out in their head.

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer12 points13 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

You are creating a false dichotomy that doesn't exist in real life. IRL, you give a man the best sex he's ever had, and he's not going to GAF what you did in the past, as long as you keep that shit comin'!

[–]SkookumTreeRomantic relationships aren't necessary for happiness!4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

And as long as it’s not too outrageous or makes him look bad. Consider a very religious 25 year old virgin dude. Quite attractive, football quarterback in college and has a six figure job. He waits until engagement to have sex...then finds out his fiancée was a prostitute, stripper, and cam girl.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Quite frankly, I doubt that this guy wants to date a non-virgin. He may ultimately end up dating one, but I would be surprised if that's his goal.

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. This guy wouldn't end up in bed with me in the first place, so ... a non-starter.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 7 points8 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

If he's just fucking her? Sure. You're right, he won't GAF. If he's planning to marry her? He cares.

[–]storffish15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

hookups turn into relationships all the time. in the real world guys don't have these sorts of extreme purity hangups and women don't have gangbangs that would make a pornstar blush in their pasts. everyone has a past, sure, but 99% of the time it's 2 or 3 terrible post-breakup drunken hookups and maybe a relationship or two. nobody's having amazing pornstar sex during one night stands, they're fumbling around nauseously trying to get rid of the spins. but a lot of times you wake up, laugh about it, and end up getting to know and like her.

all this "what I want in a warm hole" talk I hear around here sounds like virginal chest beating to me.

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer8 points9 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I have been married four times. They don't care. LOL

[–]hammerhauntsbread pill5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Clearly you haven't been married to the highest quality partners.

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ehh, they were OK! The first was a typical starter marriage -- kids just out of school -- so neither of us had the proverbial pot or window. #2 was a pillar of the community, a very solid, well-respected guy. One of the reasons I married him was because everyone in that small town knew him and no one had a bad word to say about him. #3 was a little flaky, I guess. Very intelligent and charming but never quite lived up to his potential. #4 was the only one who was wealthy, although he had started out working-class and thus was insufferably bourgeois, lol. Were they rocket scientists or brain surgeons? No, but they weren't criminals or bikers or drug addicts, either. They were regular guys. :-)

[–]passepar2t8 points9 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm usually not the first person to agree with AtlasBShruggin but dude, who gives a fuck about women's shaming language? If you hate sluts, avoid sluts, don't apologize and ignore their prattling.

[–]fatalcharm3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The thing that bothers me is that men can be sluts too, and women do think that way about men. It is incredibly sexist to hear the word "slut" and immediately think that it must be woman. I got once got called out for making a comment about how "my ex(boyfriend) slutty behaviour has turned me off for good" and got called out for being a sexist pig. Uh, no. You are the sexist one for assuming that only women can be sluts.

[–]passepar2t-2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

lol, men can be promiscuous but "slut" carries a distinctly female connotation

[–]mistresswhat9 points10 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Men in general aren't nearly as fixated on purity as men here think they are. Like it's really not going to matter that much as long as you filter out conservative men, and even some of those are going to appreciate a freak regardless of what they might say when they're trying to one-up their buddies about the virginity of their future wife.

Men who are too fixated on purity are undesirable and should accept it instead of whining. No one's making you marry a slut, but yes, you're kinda uptight and displaying loads of red flags and people are going to judge you for it. If you're not keeping yourself pure for your future wife you're a hypocrite, and again, you should accept that people are going to judge you for it.

What you really want is to scream into the void about how gross the sluts are and not face any consequences for it. Interesting.

[–]SkookumTreeRomantic relationships aren't necessary for happiness!4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, if you are not into casual sex and have had maybe two partners at 25, someone with 50 probably has a different attitude towards sex, love, and risk than you do. There is a case to be made for wanting to know how your partner approaches these things.

[–]ThisIsJustATr1buteHas what plants crave3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s ironic that OPs linked post has an example of a man who wants a woman to be promiscuous. The boss. Even if the story is fake, there are lots of guys like that, weird that OP speaks for all men.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Men in general aren't nearly as fixated on purity as men here think they are.

Lol ... ok, if that's what you think.

Men who are too fixated on purity are undesirable and should accept it instead of whining.

Only to slutty women.

No one's making you marry a slut, but yes, you're kinda uptight and displaying loads of red flags and people are going to judge you for it.

Doubt it. Plenty of guys are married and have a similar outlook. And honestly, who gives a fuck what anyone thinks?

If you're not keeping yourself pure for your future wife you're a hypocrite, and again, you should accept that people are going to judge you for it.

True.

What you really want is to scream into the void about how gross the sluts are and not face any consequences for it. Interesting.

You're saying it like this hasn't been the norm for all of human existence. Also, there should be no consequences for slut shaming. Women shame men all the time and we just have to suck it up. So either accept being a slut or stop bitching.

[–]catemlBlue Pill Woman1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Only to slutty women.

I am a woman who is most definitely not slutty, and I find them undesirable and whiney.

Because its irrational (she has somehow been 'spoiled' by past sexual experiences, with no logical or evidence based reason for believing that other than that they have happily swallowed some puritanical Judaeo-Christian sexist bullshit and refuse to let join the rest of the world in letting go of it) and pathetic (because let the fuck go). I find things irrational and pathetic not because I feel the need to shame them for not wanting me, since if anything its an idea that would/would've always make me more desirable. But because when things are irrational and pathetic, I find them irrational and pathetic.

It's like people who constantly seem to feel jealousy over wealth or social standing, and do harmful things to attain it. Its negative bullshit that just gets in the way of them and others enjoying life. It's a personal failing.

[–]Million-SunsMarriage is obsolete2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men in general aren't nearly as fixated on purity as men here think they are

True. But they are fixated about whether or not she lied about it. Trust is the foundation of the relationship.

Secondly, it's about sexual compatibility too.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men in general aren't nearly as fixated on purity as men here think they are

There's a lot of wiggle room between "wanting a virgin" and "being 100% indifferent towards everything".

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

/thread

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men in general aren't nearly as fixated on purity as men here think they are. L

So men don't know what men want? #BELIEVEMEN

it's really not going to matter that much as long as you filter out conservative men, and even some of those are going to appreciate a freak regardless of what they might say when they're trying to one-up their buddies about the virginity of their future wife.

Its the image . Even men who try to play along with "it's ok you fucked a lot"....are they really able to stomach the image of the other guys their partner has slept with? Some people pretend to in order to make things work or to fit in with society or whatever.

Men who are too fixated on purity are undesirable and should accept it instead of whining.

Accept what, exactly?

No one's making you marry a slut, but yes, you're kinda uptight and displaying loads of red flags and people are going to judge you for it.

So all judging is acceptable. Slut-shaming is acceptable, and so is slut-shaming-shaming, and so is slut-shaming-shaming-shaming.

If you're not keeping yourself pure for your future wife you're a hypocrite

So no one should ever expect from a partner what they don't offer themselves? Accordingly, fat women who want to be with fit men are hypocrites right? Get real--we're all hypocrites. At least men are willing to admit to being hypocrites, while women deny it to the grave.

What you really want is to scream into the void about how gross the sluts are and not face any consequences for it. Interesting.

Everyone likes pleasure, and jealousy of others having more access to pleasure is perfectly natural (the feeling that there should be tradeoffs or whatever) . In fact it's the entire basis of our consumerist society.

[–]openoids2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are always sure where the baby comes from. Not men. You can call them uptight, but you don't share those concerns, in the same way. Funny to hear an advocate of promiscuity mentioning "red flags." True...The men who don't keep themselves pure but expect this from their partners ARE hypocrites just as women who call men "losers" for not having a lucrative occupation, while offering little more than a warm body, are too.

[–]darudeboysandstormSoup on the stove, bread rising, apple pie0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Are there really any consequences?

[–]mistresswhat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, he's here whining about being shamed so clearly he perceives that as a consequence.

[–]tannamel3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Statistically, women who have been with many men are more likely to get divorced, feel unfulfilled in future “adult” relationships, and have communication issues. Obviously, it’s not like that for every woman. But I do think that promiscuity is promoted in our culture when it shouldn’t be, for both genders.

Mainly, it shouldn’t be acceptable because you’re at a higher risk for catching and spreading STD’s. Some turn into cancer, warts, or infertility so clearly that isn’t great. It also can lead to unwanted pregnancies and that’s a whole mess most people don’t wanna deal with when it’s unplanned.

I’m not gonna say promiscuous women or men are ALWAYS undesirable, but I believe they prima facie are undesirable. If I found out my current boyfriend had been with 15+ people and didn’t bother to tell me, I would honestly be grossed out and leave them.

[–]trettles7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

From my observation, men don't care about sluttiness if a woman is highly attractive. The more attractive, the less her past seems to matter. That is on average. I get that some conservative extremists have different views, and that's ok. There's something out there for everyone.

I think what's really undesirable is the way men like the OP treat women. That kind of mindset is sure to turn off anyone. I hope you are open and honest to women about your views on this. Or do you hide them to come across as more palatable, like the women lying about how many partners they've had?

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

From my observation, men don't care about sluttiness if a woman is highly attractive.

No, they're just more willing to tolerate it. Hot and attainable women are a rare commodity, even if they've changed hands a few more often than you would want to.

[–]adool4441 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

She's not yours, it's just your turn.

[–]krishnoo5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

women want to monopolize the social space of acceptability because they feel like men have been ruling it for all this time while refusing any qualifications for patriarchy

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Holy shit, this is such a profound and inciteful comment! I never even considered this. You're a genius. This is honestly why I post, to find nuggets of gold like this.

[–]krishnoo0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah if you want more inciteful comments, use your feminist literature for toilet paper, they attract great nuggets!

[–]Thswherizat2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

It seems really clear to me that the OP in that post has a very strong claim to end the relationship - based on the lack of honest and true communication between them. But that is completely separate from the issue you are describing, and I don't think it frames your argument effectively.

If I have a girlfriend who says she used to be a camgirl and has been around the block and then she turns out to be a virgin who was just trying to impress me, I'm going to be just as upset that she lied as if the situation was the other way around. Trust is absolutely central to a good relationship and lack of trust would always end a relationship for me.

What your argument lacks for me is any specifics as to why this is apparently only an issue for women. Why is a woman sleeping with more partners undesirable? You have no support for this statement. Your "crossroads" is a false dilemma, a woman can have a few flings and then decide that's not for her, or else have relationships but maybe has had a hookup or two. I think that it is reasonable to not be keen on your significant other's previous sexual partners. I doubt my girlfriend is keen on the idea of me having slept with other women.

You make a lot of claims about men not wanting to commit to slutty women and so on so forth. I think that if you are trying to date a woman who is intent on playing the field you're in for a bad time, but that's likely more because you want the control of a monogamous relationship and she might not.

I feel that the aspect of your view that needs to be changed is twofold:

1) That women who aren't virgins are somehow less desirable which is backed up by no facts nor logic,

2) That a woman has two choices, either to be a virgin or a slut, and that others get to make that distinction for her.

[–]whatyoucallaflip 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

  1. That women who aren't virgins are somehow less desirable which is backed up by no facts nor logic,

Images of your woman sleeping with lots of other dudes. For people who have susceptibility to that and wish to avoid that, higher number of partners is indeed undesirable.

  1. That a woman has two choices, either to be a virgin or a slut, and that others get to make that distinction for her.

Others make all our distinctions for us. Fat or thin. Tall or short. Rich or poor. They're all arbitrary matters of perspective and change with context. That's life.

[–]Thswherizat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

1) Barring some fetishes, everyone is uncomfortable with the thought of your partner with their exes. Sometimes it's purely for the romantic aspects and often it's also for the sexual thing. This is not specific to gender, and neither are the impacts.

2) You're kidding, right? My complaint is with the binary he attempted to create which doesn't exist. Yours doesn't either: Fat, thin, athletic, beanpole, muscular, dad-bod are all very common body descriptions. Most humans fit in 'average height' which is why the average exists. A man at 5'11 isn't tall, but he's also not short. I'm not arguing labels don't exist, I'm saying that there's more than two distinctions and the OP's argument relies on that.

[–]jazztaprazzta2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I just want to say that I completely agree with your point of view. That's all.

Sluts are good for fun, but I'd avoid getting into a relationship with one.

Ironically, my first girlfriend (we were our firsts) became a mega-slut after we broke up and recently complained that she couldn't find a quality man to commit to her.

[–]kandyapplezborn in '91 👸 💅5 points6 points  (20 children) | Copy Link

do promiscuous women "love" doing that? for the most part i think they are too busy out being whores and living life to go around "shaming" people for not being into them, they have enough penis on their plate so to speak.

most of these discussions about promiscuous women are between two camps: A. undersexed, undersocialized men with misogyny issues and B. liberal feminist serial monogamist women who support whores on principle but have probably been with the same dude for a decade

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

A. undersexed, undersocialized men with misogyny issues and B. liberal feminist serial monogamist women who support whores on principle but have probably been with the same dude for a decade

C. Adequately sexed men fed up with the double standards when it comes to having standards E.g., women's standards are a-okay (height, money, whatever) but men's standards are worthy of shame and derision (low number of partners, not fat, whatever)

[–]kandyapplezborn in '91 👸 💅7 points8 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

women's standards are a-okay (height, money, whatever)

according to who? men don't feel these standards are a-okay considering how much you all moan and cry about them

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

If women can moan and cry about men's standards why can't men moan and cry about women's standards?

[–]kandyapplezborn in '91 👸 💅4 points5 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

they can, and do, so are you tired of both men and women having a double standards? because you only mentioned women's.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

I am, but look at what I was responding to, my post was responding to your list of groups concerned with female chastity--it would be a nonsequitur there.

Furthermore, I'm not ashamed to admit that while I resent both double standards, I care more about double standards that impact me. I think everyone should be able to admit that. It's certainly true.

[–]kandyapplezborn in '91 👸 💅2 points3 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

so what solutions do you have to the problem of double standards? that everyone should be allowed their standards, or no one should be allowed their standards? i don't get what you're taking issue with exactly

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

My solution is everyone should just accept that people want what they want. Neither men nor women should be shamed in the popular discourse for having unreasonable standards....but currently only men are.

[–]kandyapplezborn in '91 👸 💅2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

shamed in the popular discourse for having unreasonable standards....but currently only men are

false, as i've just said and you agreed that men shame women for their standards as well

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

In the dark corners of the internet. Not on the and publications

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

I'm taking issue with popular views/media making women's double standards more acceptable. Women's fat acceptance is all in, but women can also judge by height and that's all good too, to offer one example. And no, a post in theredpill is not the same degree of societal acceptance as 10 million Yahoo articles a day. The double standards are morally equivalent but the prevailing messaging excuses women's double standards standards while demonizing that of men.

[–]kandyapplezborn in '91 👸 💅2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Women's fat acceptance is all in

among liberal women, true, everyone else, no

there is no popular discourse promoting fat acceptance that isn't accompanied by the reverse. the ceo of victoria's secret just came as being against the use of plus sized models

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Now what public movement of even a fragment the size of the women's one is advocating for plus size male models?

[–]SkookumTreeRomantic relationships aren't necessary for happiness!0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Don’t forget C. The whores themselves, in alliance with B. We have had a sex worker or two here before.

[–]darudeboysandstormSoup on the stove, bread rising, apple pie0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

most of these discussions about promiscuous women are between two camps: A. undersexed, undersocialized men with misogyny issues and B. liberal feminist serial monogamist women who support whores on principle but have probably been with the same dude for a decade

This is what makes these threads so funny though.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

This will almost never happen, so in an effort to maximize their hypergamy, slut shaming was born.

"Slut shaming" was born as form of birth control, not by women to maximize hypergamy. Your 14 year old daughter becoming pregnant and the guy running off could destroy you as a father and patriarch when your family already lives on breadcrumbs a day.

Thoughts?

Typical female entitlement. Women believe they deserve special non-judgmental or "the past is the past" treatment. "The past is the past" is only reserved for women regarding promiscuity and nothing else. Literally no person or establishment on the planet operates under this rule in anything else. Banks certainly don't.

[–]Thswherizat0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

The birth control for a struggling family concept is interesting, I'd never pictured it that way before. Have you come across any articles or anything that traces that concern through history? I'd be interested to read them.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

https://www.amazon.com/The-Economic-Approach-Human-Behavior/dp/0226041123

The economic way of thinking prompts us to consider the preferences, endowments, and trade-offs that shape our decisions in the face of our unlimited wants and limited means. Decisions about sex — in all of its pleasure, danger, and emotion — are no less subject to these constraints. Although rarely framed as such, in many ways, the evolutionary exchange of semen and security for womb space and childcare constitutes one of humanity’s earliest, and perhaps most essential, economic spheres.

Sex is a female resource. While both genders certainly enjoy and depend on the act, natural constraints on female sexuality create scarcity — and value. The high costs of female fertility — in terms of time, mental and physical health, and opportunities forgone — impel women to act as suppliers in the sexual market. Male sexuality, on the other hand, is ubiquitous and cheap. What’s more, men tend to place a higher value on sexual gratification than do women. Men, therefore, comprise the demand for sex.

Even if a woman of yesterday managed to net a suitable husband, the spectre of wandering eyes and brazen temptresses haunted housewives. As such, there is a strong incentive for women to restrict competition, price-cutting, and client-stealing in the sexual mating market. Slut-shaming, prohibitions against paid sex work, censorship of pornographic images, and gender segregation are all tools that restrict supply in the sexual market.

A sexually promiscuous daughter would ruin the patriarch of a family - especially when he was poor. And nearly everyone was poor. Shaming your daughter into chastity while awaiting dowry from a suitor to prove he was capable was the only way to ensure your daughter's and husband's reproductive responsibility didn't become your responsibility.

[–]Thswherizat0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Awesome! I'll read this over my lunch break, thanks!

[–]Freethetreees4 points5 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

What are you madonna-whore complex dudes gonna do when literally EVERY woman is promiscuous? I can't wait for that day. Until then, I lie my ass off and pretend I'm an innocent girl who's only seen a couple* dicks ;)

[–]happycheese86No Pill2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Honestly outside of like Amish in the US, it's already like that. Men just can't handle it when they realize how much more fun we're having being sluts and they could join in if they weren't so fucking uptight.

Why not lie? As far as I'm concerned it's medical information and no one deserves to know it, no one gets to carfax my vagina.

[–]Freethetreees1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Totally agree! They’re not entitled to my medical history.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

What are you madonna-whore complex dudes gonna do when literally EVERY woman is promiscuous?

It'll never happen. Only the kind of people who

Lie my ass off and pretend I'm an innocent girl who's only seen a couple* dicks ;)

think it will happen.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Nothing. We just fuck you and find someone younger.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑7 points8 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Lol. No you don’t. Sluts get wifed up all the time. Most women that get married are in their late 20’s. And by late 20’s, most women have seen a decent number of dicks. The “younger” women aren’t marrying and certainly don’t want old farts.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

What are you even talking about?

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

The younger women you want, 👏 do 👏not👏want👏you👏.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Which is a lie. A lot of my attractive female friends are being fucked and financed by older men. Women liking older men is nothing new, it has been this way forever. So you're either trolling or seriously delusional.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m doing neither.

The younger women that are with older men are using them for money (i.e ‘financed’). Wanting someone for money is not the same as desire. The old men are free to delude themselves into believing that they’re attractive enough to be wanted by younger women, but it doesn’t change the facts.

[–]happycheese86No Pill3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

And men wonder why we need things like alimony and child support.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You don't. You need better judgment.

[–]happycheese86No Pill4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Why? Men are gunna do what they are gunna do, go for the greener grass. We need social nets to make sure we aren't left behind financially. You're asking us to be mind readers and find one dude while we are virgins to spend the rest of our life with that will never leave us? You're living in a fairy tale. Legal inequality is there because there's not biological equality and probably never will be.

This happens on the flip side too, women leave and have to pay child support if the guy is raising the kid. If the man supported the wife while she worked she will pay him alimony. Adultery from either side is an offense in NY that I know of.

there's a reason men don't like the direction the world is going and it's because they know they are even more replaceable than their 50 yr old wife for a younger model. they can't keep harems of young women and spit out kids left and right with no consequences anymore. they can't take any woman they want, women have rights now. We're literally living in a Jim Crow eque era where women have rights but still looked down on for perceived slights against those not benefiting from our sexual enlightenment. Laws left and right for no other purpose than to remind women they are second class citizens, sluts, whores, because they are doing exactly what men have been doing for ages.

You're not afraid women have bad judgement and it screws up your chances at a virgin bride, you're mad that we get to have more fun than you.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Why? Men are gunna do what they are gunna do, go for the greener grass. We need social nets to make sure we aren't left behind financially. You're asking us to be mind readers and find one dude while we are virgins to spend the rest of our life with that will never leave us? You're living in a fairy tale. Legal inequality is there because there's not biological equality and probably never will be.

If women were good at selecting for commitment there would be no need for huge safety nets. Some, yes, but not a lot. If you dont want to be left behind financially, improve yourself and career. I'm only asking you to exercise common sense, not be mind readers or virgin goddesses. But I guess that's asking the same thing.

there's a reason men don't like the direction the world is going and it's because they know they are even more replaceable than their 50 yr old wife for a younger model.

At no point in history, did men NOT know this. Men are the disposable sex. This is nothing new. Men don't like the way the world is going because they are getting the short end of the stick and expected to be grateful for it.

You're not afraid women have bad judgement

Yes, because I know they do.

and it screws up your chances at a virgin bride

I don't want a virgin bride.

you're mad that we get to have more fun than you.

Nah, I want women to have fun, because by extension, men have fun. I don't hate sluts, I love them in fact! The best sex I ever had was with a slut.

[–]darudeboysandstormSoup on the stove, bread rising, apple pie0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

What you can't work?

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The standard to what constitutes a whore merely shifts.

[–]wtffellification0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Until then

If that day comes (it doesn't, but ok) you'll be too old to matter if you're innocent or not

[–]Million-SunsMarriage is obsolete0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

It is already happening. What high quality men do? They keep having sex, but refuse to commit. Even when baby-trapped.

And even that is less frequent, since more and more men opt for vasectomies.

Hoes =/= housewives.

[–]Freethetreees0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Every Madonna is also a whore and every whore a housewife. They are equal, men just like to pretend there’s a huge difference between them. In reality, all women are both Madonna and whore simultaneously with no issue.

[–]olivethedoge1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Here's my question. If a woman enjoys sex , participates in sex often and appreciates quality sexual experiences, why would you as a man automatically assume that she would not be satisfied in a monogamous relationship with you?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

For one, promiscuous women are statistically the worst partners. They have the highest rates of divorce. Two, you know the old adage: cant turn a hoe into a housewife. If she loves sex that much, there's a pretty good chance one person will not satisfy her, so she will look for others during the relationship. Three, if she did value monogamous relationships, she would have found and stayed in one long before me. Sleeping around indicates that she does not.

[–]olivethedoge0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

That doesn't answer my question and it also isn't true. I googled your unsubstantiated claim and it turns out that the women with the lowest divorce rate had between 3 and 9 sexual partners. https://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiXuK_mn4ffAhXrRt8KHar3CukQzPwBegQIARAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.psychologytoday.com%2Fca%2Fblog%2Fthe-new-resilience%2F201606%2Fdo-women-more-premarital-partners-get-divorced-less&psig=AOvVaw07xfYV4JYH6PLa-J5-U_6D&ust=1544049779759800

Also a series of monogamous partners are still monogamous partners.

So again, if a woman enjoys sex and appreciates good sex, why would you assume that she would not be satisfied in a relationship with you?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] -1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I mean you literally just proved my point. Low n count women make better partners.

[–]olivethedoge0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure what part you misunderstand here but I'm guessing you didnt read the link at the very least. Women who had had at least 9 partners had lower divorce rates than those who had had one or two.

Also you still didn't answer the question.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] -1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You're cherry picking info. This study says the same thing, but women with 10+ partners are the most likely to divorce. More partners also led to less happy marriages. So if you want a good relationship, aim for someone with 1 or 3-9 partners. Even if she was satisfied with a relationship with me, I wouldn't be with her, so leaving is fine. Everyone enjoys sex, but that doesn't compel everyone to fuck dozens of people.

[–]olivethedoge1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm not. It's the same study , 3 to 9 partners . Women with less than three ad higher divorce rates than those with one or two which is what I've said three times now and you still didnt answer the question. Also it's just one study, it refers to divorce statistics only and not faithfulness and does not factor innor correct for the behaviour of the male partner.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I answered the question dude. I'm not assuming she won't be satisfied. I won't be satisfied. Our morals on sex don't align, so we are incompatible. The more partners she has, the less likely we are to have a happy marriage. If promiscuous women were satisfied in their marriage, they wouldn't have the highest divorce rate.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑4 points5 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Lol why should promiscuous women accept that they’re undesirable? Because some rando guy on PPD is aghast at the ‘injustice’ of a man wifing up a promiscuous woman? Lol! Hate to break it to you bud, but no one cares about your feelings. And people will always pursue what’s best for them, no matter what they’ve done in the past. Sluts get wifed up all the time.

If it benefits the woman to lie about it, then she should lie. Most of the time, it works much better than baring out all of your sexual history to the guy. Men lie all the time about money/career or their interest in pursuing a relationship, all in order to get sex. Besides, nowadays, most men don’t even ask and it’s always weird when one does. And women don’t lie and say they’re virgins, they usually just reduce the actual number.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Lol why should promiscuous women accept that they’re undesirable? Because some rando guy on PPD is aghast at the ‘injustice’ of a man wifing up a promiscuous woman? Lol! Hate to break it to you bud, but no one cares about your feelings. And people will always pursue what’s best for them, no matter what they’ve done in the past. Sluts get wifed up all the time.

This is simply a discussion on sexual dynamics, not a dick, so stop taking it so hard. I dont care if anyone agrees or disagrees with a random guy on the internet. The point is to spark a discussion.

If it benefits the woman to lie about it, then she should lie. Most of the time, it works much better than baring out all of your sexual history to the guy. Men lie all the time about money/career or their interest in pursuing a relationship, all in order to get sex. Besides, nowadays, most men don’t even ask and it’s always weird when one does. And women don’t lie and say they’re virgins, they usually just reduce the actual number.

That's because most guys are aware of the reality nowadays, its automatically assumed she's been ran through. So there's no need to ask. The rule is to multiply by 3.

[–]Pastiricawe're all sluts1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The rule is to multiply by 3.

I wonder where the number 3 came from. Is it based on some sort of quantifiable data or is it just some random number one guy thought up when he discovered the real number of his woman's past guys?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I haven't the slightest. I doubt there's any real science behind it, just a rule of thumb. Because men know women lie, so it was created to assume the worst.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

This is simply a discussion on sexual dynamics, not a dick, so stop taking it so hard.

Lmao! Haven’t heard that one in a while. What are you? 50?

I dont care if anyone agrees or disagrees with a random guy on the internet. The point is to spark a discussion.

You’re making assumptions about what promiscuous women should and should not accept. These are women that exist in real life and as such their actual real life behavior is what you’re referring to. Promiscuous women do not have to accept that they’re ‘undesirable’ just because some men that they’ll probably never meet think that they should.

That's because most guys are aware of the reality nowadays, its automatically assumed she's been ran through. So there's no need to ask. The rule is to multiply by 3.

Good! Then they should continue to do so. Hasn’t significantly changed the ability of women to get commitment, so men are free to say and assume what they want. Talk is cheap, it’s the actions we care about. As long as women, promiscuous or not, are still eventually getting the commitment they want, men are free to bitch about her n count all they want.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You’re making assumptions about what promiscuous women should and should not accept. These are women that exist in real life and as such their actual real life behavior is what you’re referring to.

So? Fuck them?

Promiscuous women do not have to accept that they’re ‘undesirable’ just because some men that they’ll probably never meet think that they should.

Duh, Sherlock. No shit. I don't expect women to see this post and go, "I now see the error of my ways! Now I can correct them!" You need to chill or get a hobby, you're taking this random post more serious than the person who wrote it. Jesus.

Good! Then they should continue to do so. Hasn’t significantly changed the ability of women to get commitment, so men are free to say and assume what they want. Talk is cheap, it’s the actions we care about. As long as women, promiscuous or not, are still eventually getting the commitment they want, men are free to bitch about her n count all they want.

You're taking this way harder than every woman here. Is it because you're a slut and upset it hits too close to home? That's the whole point, they arent getting commitment.

Now run along and bother someone else, you're dismissed.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m so glad to see that you accept that the things you say are ultimately irrelevant and that you yourself and your opinions aren’t relevant enough to change anything.

How am I taking it harder than every woman here? Because I point out that your opinion isn’t relevant enough to actually affect anything? Lol okay.

I suspect that your chronic sexual frustration and life of brutal rejections from women has a lot more to do with your obsession with what sluts should and should not be doing, than anything else. And the fact that sluts are doing and getting a lot more than you believe they should be getting is hurting you and making you bitter af.

Have fun bitching about women all you want. The sluts will continue to get commitment. And no one cares whether or not your feelings are affected. Sorry.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Bullshit men won't commit to slutty women. An ex whore or even one that's still going strong has 100s of male options desperate to wife her up. Women need not worry about their past. Only seems like men need to be concerned about their own past.

[–]NOTSM3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

After two months in the relationship, we began to get sexual and she shared that she had never had sex before (neither had I)

The problem here isn’t that promiscuous women are inherently undesirable, the problem comes from from two distinct issues. One being that little Mrs. I love filming gangbangs here made him wait two months the fuck, don’t be a slut for other men but a pride for your boyfriend. The second being that she repeatedly lo d to and attempted to manipulate her boyfriend.

If she had been sexual from the start and fucked her man like the pornstar she apparently is she’s have no problem finding a man willing to commit to her. Instead she lied to a sexual inexperienced man and treated him like a second class citizen in bed

[–]Whodunnit88Survivied Purge Week 20181 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

A promiscuous women can still be desirable. However to do that she has to present herself truthfully to her partner. She can't claim she's a virgin like OP's ex when there are pictures of her having sex.

Of course OP could be writing fiction.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed.

[–]admiral_snugglebutt1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

What about when men want to be sluts but not judged by women? Women are just looking for the same social allowances men already have.

Slutty women aren't undesirable because of some physical, material difference between them and prude women. It's all socially constructed. Men say "oh, it's just my reptile brain, it's icky". Reptile brain is just another word for "feelings I don't plan to work on or acknowledge".

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

What about when men want to be sluts but not judged by women?

What about it? Then start judging them.

Women are just looking for the same social allowances men already have.

Understandable.

Slutty women aren't undesirable because of some physical, material difference between them and prude women. It's all socially constructed.

Agree.

Men say "oh, it's just my reptile brain, it's icky". Reptile brain is just another word for "feelings I don't plan to work on or acknowledge".

Disagree. Men can never be sure they are the father. This truth leads to slutty women being less desirable. Even if men wanted to work on and acknowledge these feelings, it would most likely make them more jaded towards women.

[–]admiral_snugglebutt0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Then start judging them.

That's the wrong direction! If we move the needle the other direction, everyone gets more sex :)

Men can never be sure they are the father. This truth leads to slutty women being less desirable.

This might have been true at one point but A) paternity tests B) women have control over their own reproduction - who you make babies with is a hugely important choice and they can control that if they want and C) Consensual non-monogamy or partial monogamy is a thing. My partner and I were both sluttin' it up before we started dating. Now we are romantically monogamous but still have threesomes (and moresomes) to scratch that itch occasionally. Obviously, we use condoms.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes, but consider this: for all of human history, this has been true until this infinitesimal moment. I'd say it's pretty ingrained into male psychology and nature, and it will not change anytime soon. But even disregarding that, promiscuous partners are high risk. Investing in them increases your chances of being hurt, cheated on, and used. No one wants that.

[–]admiral_snugglebutt0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's unfortunate that it's been true, but it's not true anymore and that's great! I'm not saying it will change overnight, but we owe it to ourselves to try to change it.

promiscuous partners are high risk

Some, maybe. But someone who's never been able to have a relationship of any kind could be their own kind of red flag. Some people of all kinds are shitty. Women date slutty men, and sometimes it goes just fine. Sometimes they date prudish men and it goes terribly.

Slutting it up and dating said sluts is not and will never be for everyone. But I think there are people who are against it because that is actually how they naturally feel, and I think there are people who are against it because they are socially indoctrinated to be against it and they would actually be just fine being a little more open (these are my thoughts on monogamy broadly as well). I think the human condition is a better one when we tamp down on the social impositions and let people sort it out for themselves.

Consider this example: in the 1950s, it was traditional for men to be dominant and women to be submissive. This was a largely unquestioned social more. People who didn't fit that mold were squished into it, and people who did fit the mold just dealt with it fitting kind of ok and couldn't explore the boundaries and what did/didn't fit for them, they couldn't adjust it to make them happy because they couldn't see it was happening at all.

Now, statistically, most men are still more dominant and most women are still more submissive. But the difference is huge, and the difference is that it's an examined choice. Many women still arrive at the idea that they want to be spanked in the bedroom. But they can work that out with their partners on mutually satisfying terms and find something that's the best fit for those unique individuals. And moreover, the people who want to completely subvert those traditional categories (like men and women who are into femdom) have an opportunity to find happiness as well.

Some people will still choose not to date sluts. But I think the more we can do with unnecessary social baggage attached to the statement, the more we improve our overall well-being.

[–]adool4440 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

1- How many years have you been together?

2- I assume you don't want kids?

You are basically what I don't want in a relationship. I do want a picket fence and kids and a backyard. I don't want to cheat on my wife or her to cheat on me. I say this as a guy who is currently dating an "ex slut". Some people are for fucking, some are for marriage.

[–]admiral_snugglebutt0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

It's fine for you to not want that, but in general, I think we should work to destigmatize that choice, because it works just fine for some people. And right now, people like yourself who want to date "ex sluts" can end up feeling judged for it, so they don't so it even when it would make them happy.

[–]adool4440 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

people like yourself who want to date "ex sluts"

I don't want to date "ex sluts". No one does. I'm fucking her but I'm not serious about her.

[–]AutoModeratorMarried to MRS_DRgree[M] 0 points1 point  (15 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]petrichordiummidsommar pill4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

These women about whom i howl gross toxic shit into the void should just sit there and take it and not say anything back! They should simply accept my opinion of them as disgusting!

(That’s actually a rational response but sometimes it’s just too tempting to hit that keyboard).

Also, Neon Shadow was a legit good name. It sounds like a Chromatics song or something. Pity.

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing5 points6 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

I am never going to understand this batshit crazy insistence that once you do a thing in a relationship you owe the next relationship the exact same thing for the rest of eternity. I tried liver as a kid, I did not like it and now unless we have the apocalypse and the only thing left is herds of roaming liver then I will eat it to survive although I think there will be bigger problems in play.

[–]headchefboyardeeGood Faith Answerer0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

To me, it begs questions about the difference between guy the previous guy and me. Like lets say anal is off the table for me but the ex became accustomed to it. What was it that kept you from saying no to him that I'm lacking? I totally believe in a woman's right to take things off the menu, and I also believe in a man's right to not agree to hang around in that circumstance.

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with that if you are not getting what you want out of a relationship leave.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

People change their minds all the time. Maybe anal became painful or she felt like she really wasn’t getting much out of it at the end of the day.

Do you think it’s justified for a woman to leave a man that took his ex on an expensive trip around Europe but refuses to do the same for her?

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Maybe it’s because you suck at anal

[–]headchefboyardeeGood Faith Answerer0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

So in this context, why wouldn't she go find someone who would be a better fit sexually?

[–]happycheese86No Pill2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There's more to adult relationship than anal. Also look into the prep work needed for that shit. It's not fun.

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

/s

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

This is one of those things that will probably never be understood by the opposite sex. Like men not understanding "her past is in the past" or child birth.

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

No it is this weird relentless idea that out of some abstract sense of "fairness" everybody should just repeat the same relationship patterns.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nobody is saying that though.

[–]Million-SunsMarriage is obsolete0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

That was not the issue there. The issue is that she lied.

I don't care if her n-count is high or low. I care that she lies about it and takes me for a fool. How can you trust that person moving forward?

[–]icarebot0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I care

[–]darudeboysandstormSoup on the stove, bread rising, apple pie0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Misogynistic-bot

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Self serving bias... a quite strong bias for women and men alike. Slut-shaming is but a concept from self serving women about self-serving men.

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's kind of ridiculous that you chose that story to supposedly make this point. That wasn't a story about a guy who found out his girlfriend had had a few ONS's back in the day and decided it made her undesirable. It wasn't a story about a guy who hooked up with a woman but didn't want to date her because she put out too easily (IMO, both those situations are dickish, and you haven't really addressed them).

No, this was a story about a guy finding out his girlfriend was a brazen liar with an entire Louis Vuitton luggage set of emotional baggage and potentially life-ruining revenge porn on the internet. That is SO WILDLY outside the purview of normal dating behavior for sluts, prudes, virgins, or anyone else that extrapolating on it is just stupid. Of course he was right to leave her if he couldn't deal with that kind of crazy. Fuck's sake.

[–]tickledpic 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

Grow up child

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Be civil.

[–]Mr_White119811Hugh Mungus0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Its the lying I disagree with.

Ive known women with some pasts that some guys would call "slutty". Ive known women who have had pasts involving ddrugs and other things.

But they are honest about it.

If a woman lies however, then no, I don't trust her.

I think the issue however is that there are some guys who will b ethe opposite of me, they would rather buy the lies and bullshit and deny the truth.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh come on, you know full well what the problem is: Men's so called "insecurities".

Be a sexual being and fuck any and every guy she wants

  1. Be a sexual being and fuck the top 20% of men in her area while consistently rejecting every other guy.
  2. Move to new place once the clock hits and put on an innocent act to attract an inexperienced but socially and financially secure man. Who you wouldn't have dated in your early 20s.
  3. Act surprised when he discovers you were promiscuous and took it in every position and hole from hot men, but he only gets once-a-month starfish sex.
  4. Bitch around that he left you for being duplicitous and self-serving.

BONUS ROUND: I didn't even read the original post before writing this and I was right :P

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter