Note: my question is not a criticism of FDS. Nor am I defending TRP. I am honestly curious to read a thread like the one I'm describing, but I'm unable to find it.

If you look at TRP, some of the advice centers around a theory of what women find attractive. The prototypical advice, "lift" exists because TRP believes that women find fit, muscular men attractive. So you lift weights, and that makes you more attractive to women.

It does not matter if you disagree that women find that attractive

I'm not here defending TRP. I'm noting that such theories exist. "Women find fit, muscular men attractive" - TRP believes that and if you disagree, that's irrelevant

It does not matter if you disagree with other parts of TRP

I'm not here defending TRP. If you want to say "they also say to use dread game which is immoral!!" then you're going off topic. "Other things" are irrelevant. TRP has a theory of what women find attractive. That's the only reason I reference TRP.

My question is: does FDS have a similar theory about high-value men, and what they would find attractive? If so, can you point me to a thread where they've discussed it.

Specifically, I want to see where they've made a statement like, "women find fit, muscular men attractive." Their statement would be, "high-value men are attracted to women who _______ "