TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Q4MEN: How long would you draw out a relationship if you didn't know you wanted to marry her?

September 4, 2018
4 upvotes

As stated above.

You're dating a girl, at least 2-3 years. You're not sure you want to marry her, but it's not a clear cut no.

How long would you give the relationship before you knew the answer? What would it take for you to come to a final decision?

Would you break up with her if you finally figured out the answer was no? Or would you just draw out the relationship simply for convenience?

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate.

/r/PurplePillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Q4MEN: How long would you draw out a relationship if you didn't know you wanted to marry her?
Author vanBeethovenLudwig
Upvotes 4
Comments 65
Date September 4, 2018 6:39 AM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/q4men-how-long-would-you-draw-out-a-relationship.260938
https://theredarchive.com/post/260938
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/9ct58m/q4men_how_long_would_you_draw_out_a_relationship/
Comments

[–]reluctantly_red8 points9 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

If you don't know within this time frame you're never going to know. After more than two years what new information do you think is going to come your way?

[–]yaseedog will hunt4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I was unsure for longer than this and still ended up married. Sometimes it's not about new info, it's about working through your own crap

[–]decoy88Black Male in London0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

feels a bit bias coming from 3 weeks guy

[–]petrichordiummidsommar pill9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I personally want to wait until the honeymoon period is very clearly over. I want to see what her baseline partnered libido is and how sexually generous she is in a relationship. I want to see how she keeps her physique in that context too. That’s quite important. Way too many people are fascinating and fit when single and just immediately turn into slugs in a relationship.

Basically I want to see how well she takes the natural decline in the butterflies period and what kind of PARTNER she is. All of that can take YEARS. For me, it is not a light decision and i would rather not get married than marry poorly.

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

So... Seven years?

[–]wtknightGen X Slacker5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If I'm not feeling completely in love with someone, then I'll end it. I'm not afraid of being alone like other people are, and sex is not so important to me that I'll fake a relationship just to have it.

[–]GayLubeOilTrue Red Pill6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Sounds like your gunna find out how long he draws it out for, the hard way.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd take it as a sign I'm just not that into her and or marriage. And so should she. At that point you break up.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I dunno, it depends on what's happening at the time and where we both are. If she didn't bring it up, I'd be happy to keep going as is. I think if she really wants to get married then she needs to put her cards on the table and then I would start to think about it . I wouldn't be too keen on stringing along someone who for sure wants marriage, when I wasn't sure as I wouldnt wanna waste their time. On the other hand, if she didn't ask then she wouldn't get .

[–]EchoZeroElevenPursuing Answers to Unknown Questions2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You’re dating a girl, at least 2-3 years

Lol if I don’t see it between 6 months - 1 year, I’m not marrying that person.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I know A LOT of men who get stuck in these relationships and are too scared to break it off so end up in awful marriages.

[–]Gravel_RoadsJust a Pill5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I was with a girl for 8 years before we decided we weren't gonna get married. The break-up was pretty amicable once it was figured out for sure.

[–]AlanHalworthPurple Pill / BP++1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

When I was dating, I decided I would limit it to 2 years. If we couldn't get engaged by then, it meant we were wasting each other's time. I told a girl about this limit, and as the 2 year mark came closer, she became somewhat distressed about it. I told her okay, forget about that limit. But we ended up breaking up before 2 years. And it was probably a good thing, because the relationship wasn't working out. I think 2 years is actually a decent limit (at least for me). I always knew well before then.

[–]OppenheimersGuiltPurple Relativist1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

So I'm a bit weird, but I guess part of that can be attributed to growing up in Europe from a traditional south american family.

DISCLAIMER: THIS IS ONLY ACCORDING TO MY OWN PERSONAL VALUE SYSTEM.

SECOND DISCLAIMER: Everyone is free to do what they want - this is simply my own take on this.

For me the end-goal of an LTR is to marry, have a family, the whole shebang. I tend to know right away as well if the person click on a level that could let that be a possibility. If so, I'll approach us in terms of an LTR, I won't be casual with that person as the way I am, I will catch feelings.

On the other hand, if I don't feel that way I will from the very start be clear, this is not serious and we are just having fun. I don't like leading people on.

For context, I've had about 20 sexual partners, but I've only ever had 2 girlfriends. One lasted 5 years, long-distance Europe/USA. The other lasted 2 years.

I never got the whole "oh we've been fucking for a while and I somewhat like you - girlfriend?". It kind of takes value away from that when you throw the label at anyone.

To finish, since I have had the "Fuck yes" feeling about a person, I know if I'm not feeling that way, I probably never will.

[–]Faulkner891 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

After two-three years you would know if you wanted to marry that person.

[–]Whodunnit88Survivied Purge Week 20181 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

For the rest of my life. Because I don't want to marry.

[–]YaAmar2 points3 points  (30 children) | Copy Link

Marriage is oppressive for women, it kills off their options with men, it forces them to deal with one man at the same time, the man that has grown complacent and boring, overweight and annoying, and women end up being maids and they're expected to be always ready and eager for sex, while the husband can't be bothered to romance or to flirt with his wife.

First, confounding the view of marriage as the female heaven and haven is the fact that marriage actually appears to benefit men more than it does women. Research has shown that the "marriage benefits"—the increases in health, wealth, and happiness that are often associated with the status—go disproportionately to men. Married men are better off than single men. Married women, on the other hand, are not better off than unmarried women.

Second, in contrast to the myth that marriage is a woman’s ultimate and sacred fulfillment is the reality that roughly two-thirds of divorces are initiated by women. This is true not only for the young and hip: A recent AARP survey of 1147 men and women ages 40-79 who experienced a divorce in their 40s, 50s, or 60s, found that 66% of women said they initiated the split.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/insight-therapy/201510/is-marriage-worth-the-trouble-women

It's part of what has been called the "paradox of declining female happiness."

Women have more rights and opportunities than they have had in decades and yet they are less happy than ever in both absolute terms and relative to men.

Marriage is part of why.

Heterosexual marriage is an unequal institution. Women on average do more of the unpaid and undervalued work of households, they work more each day, and they are more aware of this inequality than their husbands. They are more likely to sacrifice their individual leisure and career goals for marriage.

https://www.businessinsider.com/society-should-stop-pretending-marriage-makes-women-so-happy-2017-1

Marriage is only good for gold-diggers. For the rest of the women, they'll be far happier being single, not living with a man, and not having a committed relationship, but sadly women are still socialized and raised by the still-too-much-patrhiachal society of the western world to believe that they themselves want to get married and have children, when all of that is nothing more than social constructs built by men to make sure they all get some pussy, and gain access to reproduction.

Considering that I'm dating someone, is because I care about that girl - No, I know I wouldn't want to get married because marriage is very much anti-female happiness, and I want women to be free and to enjoy their lives, and they can't get that if they're shackled to one guy.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie12 points13 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Marriage is oppressive for women

Some women require that kind of security. They need it as much as men need pussy. Don't know about the projecting mental gymnastics you are trying to pull off but it's really weird to watch.

A lot of women aren't ever happy about shit so its better to be single for those women because they are so easily disappointed due to being impossible to please. Women wanted all the freedom and chose to do all the guy shit as well as the woman shit. Not many guys wanted nor did they sign up to do all the girl shit she can't do because she's busy doing guy shit.

Where do you live?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

So you see studies citing women en masse aren't happy with marriage and your conclusion isn't "Modern marriage is subpar in providing women what they want" but instead "The majority of half the world's population is just spontaneously bitter and unable to be satisfied by anything while the other half of the population are all doe eyed little boys at heart".

"projecting" if I ever saw it.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, in the endeavor to be more equal, I think a lot of women didn't realize it was going to be equal responsibility as well. I find it weird that most of the I'm not happy in my marriage seems to be about having more dishes than they'd like.

If 'domestic burdens' is labeled as adulting by doing the dishes and cleaning I'd say you got an impossible to please woman that owns a perfectly functional dishwasher. And I doubt she's sacrificing her career. Most women work these days.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

It feels like you really aren't approaching this in good faith. The whole point is that modern marriage still isn't equal. Domestic burden is labeled as adulting for you and your husband because his job apparently prevents him from doing the dishes himself. Domestic burden means sharing equal or near equal financial burden with your husband while carrying much more of the housework and childrearing.

If you think that's incorrect and men do as much domestic unpaid work as women do then fine, source your facts and argue your point, but just sitting there and making massive conjecture about how most women are actually spoiled and can't handle equality with no evidence to back that up is not productive.

[–]whichbladeNA Paler Shade of Purple1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm pretty sure the heavier domestic burden falls on whoever is in the house more frequently.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It should be, but it's not. Every relevant study shows that while women have eagerly and en masse jumped into the workforce to help support their families, men have been much slower in sharing home duties like cleaning, shopping, and child care.

[–]YaAmar0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

Not really, no. Women don't need marriage at all. They want to have babies, but that's because they are too weak to control their baby rabies, and they know that they have a better chance of rearing their hellspawn to adulthood by having an extra paycheck, but that's easy to solve.

Make it possible for women to raise a child on her own, make it easy for them like it is for Swedish women to do so without getting married, and the marriage rates will drop abysmally. Beautiful.

What mental gymnastics? There are plenty of studies that strongly suggest women don't need marriage and that they aren't happy in marriages. What sort of mental gymnastics are you trying to do trying to make yourself feel important because you have the ''commitment'' that women are fabled to need more than human beings need water to survive?

I live in the land where the majority of women and men are thin and fit and pretty and hypergamy is as common as natural hair is on Donald Trump's hairline.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie8 points9 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Women don't need marriage at all. They want to have babies

Where do you think the source of shit tests and comfort tests come from? They want to know they aren't going to be fucking abandoned and you aren't weak enough to be curb stomped; especially when they are having babies.

Why do you think MRP says NO DREAD while their wives are pregnant?

Why do you think they branch swing? You know line up one dude before getting rid of the other?

Why do you think women tend to seek out and keep beta providers and beta orbiters?

Why do you think women have a very strong need to be socially accepted?

Why do you think women with absent fathers are so nuts; brimming with anxiety.

If you are red pill, you suck at doing homework. How old are you and where do you live?

[–]PhucCheet 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

If you are red pill

Bro, you suck at doing your homework.

  • Said "patriarchal" in a negative way
  • Comparing Sweden as an ideal
  • Casual Trump joke
  • advocates being cucked to put female happiness first

Does that sound red pill or SJW?

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Its hard to wrap my mind around a guy who's anti marriage...but he's anti marriage on behalf of women everywhere. Well, except gold diggers. Really fucking strange.

What the fuck am I looking at here? YaMar is the kind of shit I see weird men on redpillwomen say. Advocating women be plates to men and other really dumb shit.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

None of those point suggest women aren't worse off marriage. All they do is suggest women benefit from having men (and other people) around, which is obvious. Any endeavour in life benefits from being supported by more than one person.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

None of those point suggest women aren't worse off marriage.

Define better off then. This is why I say women need security. How they wish to define and get is up to them.

Otherwise we then start talking about some side issue about lazy fat husbands and wife beaters to make a point that wasn't even part of the initial statement that women need security like men need pussy.

Because then it just dissolves into a all inclusive and very ambiguous statement like this -

Any endeavour in life benefits from being supported by more than one person.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well the study cited above seems to define better off as having an increase in "health", "wealth" and reported "happiness".

YaAmar has argued that:

Married women must suppress their hypergamy/promiscuity

Married men en masse grow "complacent... boring, overweight and annoying

Women end up carrying a much greater domestic burden (cooking, cleaning, sacrificing goals/career) than men while still carrying a near equal financial burden

Complacency in men kills women's sex lives since the female libido is reactive not proactive

I don't agree with all (/any) of these but your comment doesn't seem to really address them. You point out that women shit test, branch swing, keep orbiters and look for social acceptance but those are simply women looking for support from their community and a quality mate. The argument isn't that women don't seek good mates, or that women don't want a quality mate, but that marriage harms women in the long run.

A good mate/support and the institution of marriage are not inherently one and the same. Women can have male support in their lives without getting married. Women can shit test/branch swing (ie look for a quality mate) due to biological/psychological drives even if long term marriage harms them, the male praying mantis searches for a mate even though not mating would grant him a longer life...

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Define better off then. This is why I say women need security. How they wish to define and get is up to them.

Statistics show that women are happier, wealthier, and healthier staying single and focusing on their own financial security and fostering active social lives with friends. That's security.

Of course that's not to say that all women should pursue this lifestyle. Everyone is different.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Stats also shows that people withought children are happier for the same reasons.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not men.

Married men with children are the happiest, healthiest, wealthiest, and longest lived. There's a dip in reported happiness for all parents when their children are teenagers (lol), but all studies show that marriage and family add to men's health and happiness, while married mothers are either equally or less happy and healthy than single childless women.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

As much as I may not necessarily agree with everything (/anything) in this comment, it's pretty abysmal that none of the comments below it really countered the cited studies and just referred back to abstract RP hypotheses as if they're gospel and name calling.

[–]YaAmar2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

oh, that's the classic PPD approach to debate. They either call the person a troll, start making personal insults, or they outright just ignore the person and fall back to RP terms and nonsense.

[–]gasparddelanuit2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Studies saying that men benefit from marriage are propaganda and have been exposed as such.

Marriage and Happiness: 18 Long-Term Studies. Getting married does not make you happier.

Single Men Have Good Hearts. Why singles have something to get pumped about.

Also, if marriage is so bad for women, they should stop demanding that men marry them. I'm sure that men would welcome this change. It's the women who drive the marriage industry, not men.

[–]YaAmar1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Like I said, the reason why women demand marriage is because this dumb society socializes and raises women to want marriage. If women were taught from birth that it's perfectly natural and healthy to be part of a high value man's harem, they wouldn't want to take part of this abomination of nature that marriage and monogamy is.

[–]gasparddelanuit1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Like I said, the reason why women demand marriage is because this dumb society socializes and raises women to want marriage. If women were taught from birth that it's perfectly natural and healthy to be part of a high value man's harem, they wouldn't want to take part of this abomination of nature that marriage and monogamy is.

This may be true for some women, but for most their egos would be too big to relegate themselves to the role of a harem member, in a free society. Feminists or any woman who wanted women to have equal or superior standing to men would not have it.

Also, this is not just about socialisation. Marriage offers women the easiest legal path to a man's resources or resources in general if the man happens to be wealthier than them. It provides women with a workhorse, which gives them more flexibility in the choices that they can make and a sense of security.

[–]whichbladeNA Paler Shade of Purple0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Are you suggesting that jealousy and mate guarding is learned?

[–]YaAmar0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women mate guard men of high genetic quality, when other women are ovulating and around their men, as women can sense/feel when a woman is ovulating, but for the most part, considering most men are pretty shit, women don't care about mate-guarding or jealously because they can easily trade in for a new low quality boyfriend or husband.

Women instinctively guard their sexual partners from other women who are ovulating

https://qz.com/596331/women-know-when-others-are-ovulating-and-guard-their-partners-from-fertile-threats/

That's why beautiful girls are usually kicked out from their group of friends. Envy, jealously that these girls are getting all or most of the male attention, especially from the hot guys women want, and they're afraid their boyfriends will fuck those ovulating hunnie bunnies.

[–]PhucCheet 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

That's only true in the last few decades, because the government now throws free money and opportunities at women. Without handouts and other people willing to pay for them, unmarried women aren't necessarily better off. Historically marriage benefitted women and unmarried women had much worse outcomes, which is why mothers tried so hard to marry off their daughters young.

Single mothers especially would be much worse off without handouts (welfare, alimony, child support). They only have increased wealth and happiness because someone else is paying the bills without them having to give back anything in return (in a marriage, some reciprocation would be expected). What man or woman wouldn't be happier if they could receive free things without having to share or reciprocate?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Women who don't (plan to) marry create careers instead. You're entire comment relies on the assumption that an unmarried woman will receive more money from the government than a married woman would receive from her husbands excess income, which is just absurd. If unmarried women do have more money it's because they create careers instead of families.

> What man or woman wouldn't be happier if they could receive free things without having to share or reciprocate?

Well idk about you but I'd still be happier reciprocating as long as the net benefit was greater than if I didn't reciprocate.

[–]DrippyskippyMonk0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Marriage is oppressive for women, it kills off their options with men, it forces them to deal with one man at the same time, the man that has grown complacent and boring, overweight and annoying and women end up being maids and they're expected to be always ready and eager for sex,

Based on this logic, then marriage is also oppressive for men, because men have to deal with a lot of the same issues. You don't think women become overweight or have high expectations for men in marriage? The saying is "happy wife, happy life", you don't think men are expected to bend over backwards to try to make their wife happy? Society has expectations for men as well and generally if a marriage fails the man is most likely to be held responsible (which is typical for many areas in life).

Second, in contrast to the myth that marriage is a woman’s ultimate and sacred fulfillment is the reality that roughly two-thirds of divorces are initiated by women.

This is more of a great argument for not getting married as a man. Why get married when she is statistically more likely to quit and take your children, house and money. Its especially worse if you're a man who makes a high income.

Women have more rights and opportunities than they have had in decades and yet they are less happy than ever in both absolute terms and relative to men.

Marriage is part of why.

This doesn't make much sense to me because if anything, marriage has become much better for women (no fault divorce, Domestic violence taken seriously). Women are no longer trapped in marriage and compared with decades ago, people take domestic violence a lot more seriously (when the victim is a female anyway). How do you come up with the conclusion that marriage is part of the reason why women aren't as happy, when marriage has improved (in terms of the law) for women?

Women on average do more of the unpaid and undervalued work of households, they work more each day, and they are more aware of this inequality than their husbands.

I would agree that women do a lot of the household chores, but the chores have become easier and easier for women over the years. Thanks to inventions like the dishwasher, washing machine and the microwave. Lets not forget the contribution that men make. They aren't often seen as chores, but are still important (fixing things around the house, mowing the lawn). In terms of the "they work more each day", if you're referring to paid work, its false. If your talking about both paid and unpaid work, its relatively debatable due to the differing opinions of what constitutes "work". As I stated, many men don't get credited for doing chores outside the home.

They are more likely to sacrifice their individual leisure and career goals for marriage.

This is marriage 101 when you have kids. Both women and men have to make sacrifices. Instead of the guy being able to spend his money on a boat, nice sports car or a trip to Europe, instead he is spending it on his kids. Instead of a wife being able to come home and relax after a day of work, she has to take care of her kids. When you choose to have kids, you have to realize that you have to make sacrifices for them. Maybe not everyone is intelligent enough to realize this. I will agree that men typically don't have to sacrifice their career for their kids, but that is because it is an enforced gender role and he needs to continue to make good money and work more hours to support his family.

they'll be far happier being single, not living with a man, and not having a committed relationship

This is your opinion, but in this scenario this tells me that the woman didn't have kids. Which make my opinion different than yours. Granted, different women want different things, but most of them want kids. The day that she hits menopause and is still single and childless is the day she writes a blog post about where have all the good men gone.

[–]YaAmar0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Based on this logic, then marriage is also oppressive for men, because men have to deal with a lot of the same issues. You don't think women become overweight or have high expectations for men in marriage? The saying is "happy wife, happy life", you don't think men are expected to bend over backwards to try to make their wife happy? Society has expectations for men as well and generally if a marriage fails the man is most likely to be held responsible (which is

Marriage is not oppresive for men. Men are reported to be far healthier, have far more money, and have far more sex than their single counterparts, also they get to live 10 years more than their unmarried friends, which means they can fuck more.

Marriage is not worth it. It’s not worth the financial sacrifices, the lost sexual opportunities, and the lack of freedom. All in all, it’s a ball and chain — of little benefit to any man interested in pursuing happiness and well-being. This is the view that we’ve encountered from many young men of late.

It's like me saying that I would never fuck Jennifer Lopez because eww she's so old and YAYYY early 20s women rockkkkkkk. Why? Because Jennifer Lopez doesn't want me. If she wanted me I'd be PAYING HER to let me sleep with her.

But it turns out that the sacrifices pay for themselves and more. Contrary to the view that marriage is just a ball and chain for guys, the benefits are substantial. Marriage offers substantial returns on men’s investments in money, sex, and health.

First, let’s consider money. Marriage has a transformative effect on men’s finances. After marrying, men typically work harder, smarter, and more successfully. They are less likely to be fired. And they make about $16,000 more than their single peers with otherwise similar backgrounds. In general, marriage seems to increase the earning power of men on the order of 10 to 24 percent.

This is what scholars call men’s “marriage premium.”

Research suggests that men who get and stay married live almost ten years longer than their unmarried peers.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/02/marriage-benefits-men-financial-health-sex-divorce-caveat/

You don't think women become overweight or have high expectations for men in marriage? The saying is "happy wife, happy life", you don't think men are expected to bend over backwards to try to make their wife happy? Society has expectations for men as well and generally if a marriage fails the man is most likely to be held responsible (which is typical for many areas in life).

The reason why women who let themselves go and become overweight and naggy is because they lack respect for their husbands. My mother is 60 years old. She's 90lbs. Still takes care of her physical looks, hair done every week, nails, perfume, clothes, she cooks, she gave my father 6 children, and she's always pursuing my father. Why?

He lifts 5 times a week since he was 15, he's confident and strong and masculine, he takes care of my mother and of his family, and every emergency, drama, problem, and difficulty? He solved it. He didn't complain or ask people what to do. He just solved everything.

When a man is a Man, women are going to react accordingly and treat him like a man.

So yes, when a marriage fails, it's the man's fault for the breakdown of the marriage. He wasn't man enough, and that's on him.

This is more of a great argument for not getting married as a man. Why get married when she is statistically more likely to quit and take your children, house and money. Its especially worse if you're a man who makes a high income.

It's more of an argument for man-children to not get married. As you take a look at the men in the Millenium generation, they are anxious and nervous, they suffer from panic attacks, they don't go to college or drop out, they're addicted to weed, video games and porn, where even 19 year old dudes can't get a hard on with their 19 year old naked girlfriends, smh.

Men who have something worthwhile going on for them, they get married and they stay married.

I would agree that women do a lot of the household chores, but the chores have become easier and easier for women over the years. Thanks to inventions like the dishwasher, washing machine and the microwave. Lets not forget the contribution that men make. They aren't often seen as chores, but are still important (fixing things around the house, mowing the lawn). In terms of the "they work more each day", if you're referring to paid work, its false. If your talking about both paid and unpaid work, its relatively debatable due to the differing opinions of what constitutes "work". As I stated, many men don't get credited for doing chores outside the home.

Nah, the fact that washing machines and dishwashers exist doesn't really make housekeeping such an easy life. Women still have to always be on hyper alert to make sure the babies/kids are safe and well, they need to make sure the food is good, they gotta make sure the fridge is full, they gotta clean and wash, and dry, and that all entails extensive body movements that can easily tire out a woman. Taking care of babies, washing, changing diapers, giving attention and affection.

Stay at home wives have a complicated, hard life. They don't push a blanket around and then sit down and watch Oprah.

This is your opinion, but in this scenario this tells me that the woman didn't have kids. Which make my opinion different than yours. Granted, different women want different things, but most of them want kids. The day that she hits menopause and is still single and childless is the day she writes a blog post about where have all the good men gone.

That's because the men she met weren't good enough. There's way too many duds out there.

[–]DrippyskippyMonk0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Marriage is not oppresive for men. Men are reported to be far healthier, have far more money, and have far more sex than their single counterparts, also they get to live 10 years more than their unmarried friends, which means they can fuck more.

Why did you bother quoting my paragraph when you didn't address my point at all with this response? Its interesting that you just made another post about the typical PPD user "They either call the person a troll, start making personal insults, or they outright just ignore the person" and yet here you are with my very first point in my very first paragraph ignoring my point. I told you that men and women deal with the same exact issues that you made in your original point, and then you just repeated something else that you said that had nothing to do with my point. You're highlighting beneficial things that men get out of marriage while only highlighting the negatives that women get out of marriage. What I"m telling you, is that men and women have to deal with a lot of the same issues yet it is only oppressive for women in your opinion. That is some bad logic fyi.

I'm not entirely sure that you know how debates work. You seem to be pulling quotes from an article in order to counter my points, when those quotes have nothing to do with the points that I made. I'll try to address some of your points (because I'm a good guy), but most of it isn't relevant to my points.

First, let’s consider money. Marriage has a transformative effect on men’s finances. After marrying, men typically work harder, smarter, and more successfully.

This touches on the point I made about male gender roles. When men get married, they have more incentive to work harder/more hours and get more money because they have a family to take care of. Its interesting to me that it seems you agree with rigid male gender roles in marriage, but you strike me as a person who believes that rigid female gender roles in marriage are part of the patriarchy. Don't you think that is hypocritical?

So yes, when a marriage fails, it's the man's fault for the breakdown of the marriage. He wasn't man enough, and that's on him.

This seems like another typical feminist response. "We want all of the freedoms and rights that men have, but if things go to shit we will bat our eyes and say I had no control of the situation because I'm a weak and defenseless woman who holds no responsibility".

I have to say you have successfully made me not sure where to go from here. Lets recap. You presented some data (which I'm primarily not disagreeing with) that made some conclusions with glaring holes in them (that marriage is bad for women and good for men). I disagreed with those conclusions and made counter points (marriage has disadvantages and requires sacrifices from both genders). Then you respond with random quotes, anecdotes (about your mom) and overall missing the point of my posts. So my overall conclusion is, I wasted my time debating with someone who either doesn't know how to, or can't come up with counter points to my points because he lost the argument. Not sure which one happened.

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Good luck to any nonchildfree woman with this program. Single mother by choice? 😂

[–]gasparddelanuit0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I would be clear the moment it came up that I was not interested in marriage. I wouldn't see it in terms of trying to draw anything out. She would know where I stood, so if she stayed it would be her responsibility.

[–]Naebany0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

If I told her upfront that I don't want to marry and I'd be happy in ltr then I wouldn't draw out a relationship. I'd just be in it indefinitely. If she's not ok with it she can break it up.

[–]CrestfallenWolf0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

All marriage is a no

[–]BadgerwithaPickaxe0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Talked to her about it and then come up with an ending date if she’s not cool with being lazy about breaking up. It’s the hardest thing to do but from experience it just gets harder the more you wait.

[–]thoth5431Purple Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

If I were looking for marriage, I wouldn't reach two years of dating someone if I was unsure. I firmly believe that "happy" love is the most minor of considerations for long-term relationships. I want to see quality of character, how she handles hard times, what her worldview is, how honest she is with me. And it's never taken me that long to figure out.

In my mind, it's the same thing as consent. If it's not an emphatic yes, then it's a no, because you're looking for someone to enter into a lifelong contract with. I need to be certain she can uphold her end of the deal.

And yes, I would break up with her soon after I figured out the answer was no. There's no sense in wasting either of our time.

Though, I don't ever intend to get married, anyway.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I dont want to marry anyone, so forever I guess

Gf wants to marry me, I suppose we will see what happens

[–]hammerhauntsbread pill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

0 days, some hours

[–]PhotosyntheticChad0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I never want to get married, so indefinitely is my answer.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

How long would you give the relationship before you knew the answer?

There's no hard set answer to this really. As for me I would let the relationship run its course.

What would it take for you to come to a final decision?

Besides seeing that the woman I am dating isn't worth marrying?

Or would you just draw out the relationship simply for convenience?

I would "draw" it out as dating someone doesn't mean you are looking to get married. Lots of people cohabitate now relationship wise and I see nothing wrong with that.

[–]MMDTwomen, try to use your brain-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I'll just chill and ride the wave until I get bored. If she wants to break up with me find someone else to marry her she can do. If I want to see others I will do.

[–]lurflyDevil's Advocate2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If you were in this situation and she asked you if you guys had a serious future together, would you tell her you weren’t going to marry her or just kinda be like “I don’t really know”?

Just curious.

[–]MMDTwomen, try to use your brain1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd just be honest and say whatever I'm feeling. Whether that's being unsure if I'll marry her or knowing I definitely won't. She can do with that information whatever she likes. I'm not gonna be an asshole and lie to her so she keeps wasting her good years on me.

[–]AutoModeratorMarried to MRS_DRgree[M] -1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]azngirl76893 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Just leave. He should know by 2-3 years. Don’t waste your time. If a man wants to propose, he will. You won’t have to beg him or talk to him about it. He will just do it.

[–]Million-SunsMarriage is obsolete-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

That obsession with marriage that many women have is clearly unhealthy. As if marriage was a magical formula that would solve their problems. The divorce rate speaks for itself.

The OP seemed subconsciously entitled to commitment and marriage. Where does that come from, I wonder.

Is this a sect?

[–]azngirl76891 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The divorce rate you're citing is from decade's ago. Unless you want to link what you're really referencing?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

As long as I was getting what I wanted.

[–]blackedoutfastRed Pill Man-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

if everything is going well and she isn't being weird about wanting to get married, then it could last indefinitely.

[–]RedPill-BlackLotusRed Pill Man-2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Why on earth would you get married if you are red pill aware?

What do men get from marriage that they can't get in abundance being single.

What's the upside for men?

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter