TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Q4W: Why do women care so much about male dating preferences?

December 9, 2018
95 upvotes

I've never seen such a visceral, antagonistic, reaction as when a man proclaims he doesn't want to date a slut. Women absolutely lose their shit. The way they react, you'd think he murdered someone. Evidently, this is the hill women want to die on.

My question is why? Why do you care so much? If you, personally, don't care, why do you think other women feel so passionately about this? Why can't women accept this? Why is this different from any other exclusionary dating preference? Why can't women say, "That's fair." And move on, instead they feel the need to berate, shame, and convince guys who feel this way.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate.

/r/PurplePillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Q4W: Why do women care so much about male dating preferences?
Author _Neon_Shadow_
Upvotes 95
Comments 469
Date December 9, 2018 8:06 PM UTC (4 years ago)
Subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/q4w-why-do-women-care-so-much-about-male-dating.258633
https://theredarchive.com/post/258633
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/a4o7cx/q4w_why_do_women_care_so_much_about_male_dating/
Comments

[–]iceicle999 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

That's just the way western society is. This is western culture 101. Women feel as though men are still trying to 'control' them by being tough with their preferences, but what women seem to not be able to understand is that men are allowed to have any preferences they want and no amount of feminism or shaming or whatever modern trash you want to spew will change that. Women base a lot of their lives off of the validation they receive from men on a social basis. When they do not get that validation, they get very offended. There is, you could say, a social bloc in the west comprised of all sorts of people (even self-described "traditionalists" who feel it's their job to keep men in line and to ensure that men validate women on a consistent basis. Those people are very annoying.

[–]peterlongc 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

You know the wrong traditionalists if you don't perceive them as wanting to keep both men and women in line

[–]iceicle999 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

The ones I've talked to and observed made it abundantly clear that men should shoulder all the burden and that modern feminism or whatever else you may call it is not going away and that we must support/tolerate it.

[–]peterlongc 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Were they men talking to an audience of men? Because people often tailor their arguments to their audience.

[–]KikiYuyuPurple Pill Woman48 points49 points  (32 children) | Copy Link

Lots of people, myself included, can't help take it personally when a preference excludes them. Some people handle it, some people take it as injustice and get pissy.

[–]Thounumber1Indian American STEM Bro47 points48 points  (28 children) | Copy Link

I think men tend to do this too unfortunately, especially with height/ethnicity kind of preferences

[–]jax006Red Pill Gives You Wings27 points28 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yea I fucking HATE the topic of height lol

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I hate it as well, and I say that as I tall person.

[–]werefuckinripper14 points15 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Or penis size preferences, don’t forget those

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

You can get surgery for that.

[–]werefuckinripper9 points10 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

All it takes is a google search to learn that that’s dangerous and it doesn’t even result in significant gains, so I can only assume you’re a troll

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Why because I posted a rebuttal?

[–]werefuckinripper 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

I take it back. You’re not a troll.

You’re just a jackass.

[–]LittleknownfactsVaguely Uncivil Comment[M] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Be civil.

[–]werefuckinripper0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Very well, you won’t see another uncivil comment from me.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You do know downvoting is against the rules right?

[–]Currycell9220 points21 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

I mean unlike slut behavior, height and ethnicity are not life choices.

[–]Thounumber1Indian American STEM Bro7 points8 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

That is true, but we can't really change people's preferences so

[–]Currycell9215 points16 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

We can't change preferences, but you can't really equate resentment/outrage towards both under this umbrella of preferences, right?

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑2 points3 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Why not?

Whether or not you were born with a trait doesn’t change the fact that people are allowed to have preferences regarding it. Any kind of outrage against people’s preferences is just weird.

[–]the_calibre_cat2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Right? That employer just prefers his employees don't be black, is all! Why you outraged?

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

So do you have a problem with men saying they don’t want sluts? Are you outraged by this news?

[–]the_calibre_cat3 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

No, I don't.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Exactly.

Then why bring up the black people example? You expect me to have an outrage about the preference of an employer not wanting to hire black people, yet you’re fine with the preference of men not wanting to date sluts. You’re being hypocritical here.

[–]xx-Rain_Maker-xx-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

We actually can. The preference for ethnicity is a social construct, not a genetically-embedded one. If you could suddenly change the socio-economic conditions of black and white people, and leave the physical traits the same. People would probably prefer dating black people instead of white. This is quite a common phenomenon, sadly, and you can easily observe it at refugee zones.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Isnt it already a trend to prefer non white men though? Or am I living under a rock? I've noticed black guys are pretty much most women's #1 sexual choice... but sexual isnt the same as romantic.

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm pretty sure you're completely wrong about this.

[–]wentzbeast110 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

L

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think this really sums it up. We don't like hearing what some person we find attractive has standards that exclude us from dating them. And your very much right on some handling it and others view it as injustice, as feminists and RPers/incels are prime example of this.

[–]catemlBlue Pill Woman0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

The thing is, this mentality absolutely doesn't exclude me, but I still hate it. Some men really seem to refuse to believe or struggle to understand that.

I don't take exception to this idea because it means they think my vagina is bad and impure. I don't care what they think about my vagina. I take exception to it because it is a bullshit notion based on a conscious or unconscious acceptance of the idea that men are somehow in ownership of women's sexuality and that female experience and enjoyment is a bad thing rather than a positive thing, as well as it being a cog in the wider gears of general sexist bullshit notions.

If it was just about the consensual sex that people who aren't me were having, it wouldn't matter in the slightest to me. But it's not just about sex. Just look at how the whole 'slut walk' thing isn't really about how much sex whoever is having, its about the assumptions about what how much sex someone does or doesn't have means they are treated as a person and the very real personal safety and life related dangers that are the fallout. It doesn't matter how much sex I've had if someone decides that the way I'm dressed means I'm a 'slut' and that I should therefore be treated 'how sluts should be treated'.

To be honest it kind of amazes me that so many men apparently still see every callout about the notion of 'sluts' as some feminist conspiracy to police their dick feelings. That perhaps asking them to examine the conditioning that has led to this bias in their feelings about women they could date is not always about 'I'm angry because you don't want to fuck me'.

[–]the_calibre_cat1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It has entirely less so do with you waiting sex and entirely more to do with "I don't want the shame, humiliation, and emasculation of being cheated on, therefore I will fuck, but not date, sluts." You're free to be a slut. Other people are allowed to judge those actions, and associate accordingly - I don't think sluts are bad people, but I'm not particularly interested in putting my feelings in their hands.

[–]meomeowmeoww 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Well you can phrase things nastily and people will respond nastily.

Eg. Long shorts make you look even shorter than you already are

Might get someone offended.

Eg2. I think shorter shorts will look better on you

Wont get anyone offended.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS21 points22 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well you can phrase things nastily and people will respond nastily.

While I think phrasing might play a role to a certain extent, considering how incredibly antagonistic most subreddits are when a woman's past turns out to be a dealbreaker for some guy, I doubt that this would change that much.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (23 children) | Copy Link

Usually a fair point, but do you think that a man gently describing what slutty behaviour is isn't seen in the same way as a 'race-realist?'

[–]bonersNlaughs6 points7 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Not every black guy with legs is able to run or every white guy with arms able to swim. But any woman of any race with a pussy is able to fuck. Contextually Its a false equivelant.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I think you misudnerstood, I wasn't as much equating race with sexuality I was making an analogy in which a man saying 'he doesn't want a wantom woman' in a culturally appropriate sentsitive way might be regarded as using 'dog-whistle' language.

Hence the comparison with race, but again, in this case only for the dog-whistle part and not for anything else really.

[–]imjgaltstill0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Your hamster wheel is spinning so fast its about to break the sound barrier

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I have no idea what you are even trying to get at here, but I am not interested cause you aren't giving off the impression that you can debate maturely. Good bye!

[–]imjgaltstill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Your snark combined with your left field analogy is giving off the impression you have purple or green hair and have topped the 350lb mark. This is not a debate. What you said was flat out wrong and you should be ashamed and silent.

[–]aznphenix2 points3 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Depends how it's said and who says it. If it's saying they don't want some of the slut tells (would prefer a girl who doesn't party, or I think sex is special and I'd like a partner that shares that viewpoint) people would be understanding, so long as their actions also match what they're looking for. A party guy or cad that says that i think people would side eye a lot.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

so long as their actions also match what they're looking for

I'd like to think it would work out that way as well, but people tend to have preconceptions about groups of people, like the group 'men.'

Maybe you yourself are intelligent enough to not fall into that trap, but from personal experience I know that most people aren't good at fighting their own biases and tend to double down when facing disagreement.

[–]aznphenix1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

a lot of it tends to be along the lines of what people may have experienced or heard others experience yes, it's how stereotypes appear. If they've encountered a lot of guys who would say things like that but then act the opposite, they'd probably be suspicious of 'men'.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

I agree, but it is a reason and not an excuse.

[–]aznphenix0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Sorry what does that mean in the context of this conversation?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

A reason is 'Y happened because of X.'

An excuse is 'Y happening because of X is a good thing that I agree with'

I'm saying that I understand the mechanics that give rise to stereotypes but I disagree with that stereotypes are in any way ok because of that.

[–]aznphenix0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

okay in what way? That we act according to the stereotypes we expect from people until we know more about them?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I said I don't think stereotypes are ok. Is that a controversial statement?

[–]poppy_bluAARP sent me a birthday card0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

🙄

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

What are you communicating here?

[–]poppy_bluAARP sent me a birthday card3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

race bating is tired and unoriginal

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Race-baiting?

I was only making the analogy for the 'dog-whistle' part because at the moment of typing I couldn't remember the word for dog whistle. I am not American so I do not have the same relationship to makign everythign a race thing.

Like seriously, the option that I might be 'race-baiting' in a way didn't even cross my mind. Y'all need to chill out and not get in dug-in mode the moment anyone might say anything that might be construed as being about race.

[–]poppy_bluAARP sent me a birthday card3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I am not American so I do not have the same relationship to makign everythign a race thing.

Fair enough.

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I am not American so I do not have the same relationship to makign everythign a race thing.

lemme tell you it's great, you should totally bring it to your country

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks but no thanks you guys are already exporting it, main reason why I will be happy when America will lose it's superpower status because then looking up to America (a failing state) will finally end.

[–]couldbemage1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's crystal clear what he's actually asking. Awkward wording and all.

[–]Ezreal38 points9 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

The first example is a lot more informative. But women don't want to hear the truth

[–]meomeowmeoww 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

women are mostly feelers after all

[–]CuddleLumpkin8 points9 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Yet it’s not women shooting up places because their fee fees were hurt.

[–]Currycell922 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They do try to commit suicide by overdosing on gem candies.

[–]NeedingAdvice860 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Except the Google office in Cali.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

YouTube office

[–]hammerhauntsbread pill1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

real answer: all shorts are trash

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Jorts are a crime against humanity.

[–]Cho_AssmilkArrogant RP S.O.B.0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

So I should just sweat my nuts off in jeans? Thats insanity! I basically wear shorts and a tank top from mid May to mid September.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ya try be in a hot climate and get back to me.

[–]DemonConsulting4" Dragon13 points14 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

People in general tend to feel judged/ attacked if you state a personal preference that excludes them and they tend to get defensive, either rejecting your assessment, attacking you in return, or excluding themselves from the negative statement. It is an assumed or sometimes even overt judgement of their character.

A popular example on reddit: a huge number of people losing their collective shits, if you make a statement against weed in any way, including a personal preference to not consume it your self and/or date/ hang out with people who do. Same goes for anything negative relating to videogames.

[–]weag5lmy mom says I'm special2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

People in general tend to feel judged/ attacked if you state a personal preference that excludes them and they tend to get defensive, either rejecting your assessment, attacking you in return, or excluding themselves from the negative statement.

No, only children do this.

[–]Seabears20060 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup, this is a childish reaction. Mature adults don't react that way.

[–]JSC07745 points46 points  (64 children) | Copy Link

I have a theory why some women get angry. I want to say upfront though that I do think a man should have high standards, he should stick to them and should not be shamed for having them. But...

The reason why women get angry is because men say they want a chaste woman, yet watch tons of porn (full of unchaste women) and fantasize about these women. Men will also bang as many unchaste women as they can and often will avoid chaste women because they're "not ready to settle down".

Women see this playing out before their eyes from a young age and some figure the only way to get a guy is to be unchaste. When they finally realize that men will look down on her for being that way, it's too late because she already gave up the goods. She then gets upset because she misunderstood what men say they want versus how they act.

In the end, being chaste woman gets you ignored or avoided and being an unchaste woman gets you used. Women can't really win in this world when it comes to dating and we're basically jacked around either way we go.

Best case scenario for all parties involved would be for women to be chaste, marry at a younger age and avoid divorce or adultery.

[–]foid4you10 points11 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

Honestly this is true, from a young age boys are told to play the field until they find that one girl they can bring home to their parents and family. If they find out a girl had a lot of sex in the past, most guys probably won't take her serious. I'm not saying all guys are this way. I'm saying that most guys don't want to think of how many other guys the girls have screwed, they don't want to think on how they measure up, they don't want to think and who was better, they don't want to think about if she is thinking about one of those guys during sex.

Standards are fine and understandable, but it starts to get creepy when the guy is in his late 30's+ and their "standard" is no longer realistic. Especially when it comes to women their own age (unless they are highly religious), and so they try to pursue the younger generation.

Then we have the other side of things where couples have been together since high school and want to see what else is out there "to get it or if their system" or "so they can see if they really want to be with you, so they want to try other experiences".

Everything depends on where you grow up, your culture, your peers, your family, and your morals (you don't have to be religious to have high morals). I say this because there are parts of the world where relationships are viewed after you establish yourself and where there are match makers where the family chooses the partner. There is this place where teenage girls are made "sex huts" so they can do who ever they want and the girl's family takes care of the kid because at least they know the child is blood related (the guy would be thefamily instead of taking care of a child they are not sure it is theirs).

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

It's never creepy to want to fuck hot young women. Where the fuck do you even get this?

Oh yeah! From those alphafux betabux women who want you to marry and slave away for sluts who've given away their best years.

That's creepy. Marrying a woman whose fucked a bunch of dudes is creepy.

It's better to stay single.

[–]foid4you10 points11 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I said it was creepy for guys in their late 30's+ to try to marry young girls. I guess I should of been specific and say 16-24, I will say my bad on that part. Most girls at that age don't even know what they want in life much less to settle down with someone who can be old enough to be their father, that is unless they actually do have an attraction to older men. It's just my own opinion, I'm not trying to shove it down anyone's throat.

If a guy wants a hot young girl as a wife, great for them, but it almost never works out in the long run. Hell my brother who was 30 had a 19 year old as his wife and now he's on divorce number 2, only lasted a year (the first divorce was with his high school sweet heart, together 7 years).

A girl giving her best years of her life? Hate to say it but depending on genetics, guys age worse than girls. Girls have fake up but what can guys do to look attractive to the younger girls that they want so much? I believe I've heard the term betabux before? Where the the guy can offer financial security to these young girls, but oops now the girl is called a gold digger! Because why else would she date an older man that can be her dad?

We have so many negative connotations when it comes to women, they are either sluts, gold diggers, liars (by using fake up), or roasties. Same for guys too! I hear betabux, cucks (man most of you really bastardized this term), soy boys, incels, and so on. In the end we judge online because no one has the guts to say it in front of each other's faces. Some people have so much rage they don't know how to properly use coping mechanisms to chill out.

This is my opinion, you are free to disagree, I honestly don't care one way or another. But life is unfair and unjust. I agree with you on one thing, it's best to stay single, though my reason might be different from yours.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I hate the "gave away her best years" argument... umm, what? I wasnt even in a relationship for 90% of my "best years" (nor was I having sex). I didnt get used up, I was just focusing on myself and my own happiness. It makes me wonder if men make these assumptions without knowing the girl.

And I agree - plenty of women age better than men their age do. I look younger than my bf and hes a couple years younger than me. My worry has never been my looks lol, I'll look young for a long time. It's more so if I want to have kids.. if I decide not to, my age literally means nothing.

[–]Aeiexgjhyoun_IIIPurple Pill Man2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No one who's not an incel calls women roasties.

[–]Aeiexgjhyoun_IIIPurple Pill Man-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

No one who's not an incel calls women roasties.

[–]foid4you1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You are right, I haven't heard it out of the Incel community, but at the same time I haven't heard the term "cucks" and "betabux" outside the pill communities and MGTOW.

Like I mentioned, people have bastardized the term "cuck" so bad, that even being nice to a gender you are attracted to, makes you a "cuck". That not establishing that you are an alpha in the relationship makes you a "cuck" or a "beta", even if the person isn't cheating on then.

I didn't even know these words until this year, when I started to pay attention to Reddit. It still baffles my mind that guys would bring other guys down by using these terms. Then again there will always be insecurity, jealousy, hate, and animosity towards those who have what we want... no matter the gender we are.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

It's never creepy to want to fuck hot young women.

Yes it is. That’s the definition of creepy.

[–]SkrattGoddess0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly! Even the way he worded it is ewwww.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 19930 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

not to worry. quality hot young women dont want a fossile like him. he can dream , though.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

It is 100% creepy if you're 35 and refuse to date women your own age... and only go for women under 25. Sorry not sorry.

Best of luck staying single forever because realistically no sane and desirable woman would want a man with your attitude.

[–]Djsmooth245[🍰] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Read this in a very calm voice please lol anyway, I don't think 'creepy' is exactly the term that fits the bill here. Creepy would have some sort of implication behind it and would have to steer towards the border of 'too young'. Maybe disturbing? Or weird? But I don't think it's Creepy to want to screw youngER women. Again....women. not girls. So say said man is 35ish and he only wants to date women in their early 20s or 25. I don't think that's creepy. Maybe a bit strange. But not creepy unless there is some sort of underlining fetish to be with an underage girl then yes that definitely classifies as creepy and also another term I'd rather not debate about. But just a casual man in his 30s who only finds younger women attractive? I mean, that sucks because there are plenty of beautiful women their own age, but a preference is indeed a preference. I think it starts to get a bit disturbing once they cap it off at 20 and below. Something is definitely off....maybe not wrong entirely but off. Have at it though. And I know it was said that an older man wanting to Marry someone that young is creepy. I still wouldn't agree but I'd say that person maybe of a younger mindset or emotionally immature. Not in a condescending way but in a very objective 'you are just emotionally underdeveloped' type of immature. Just my two cents

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 19930 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

exactly. you tore him a new one.

[–]SkrattGoddess0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Seems like the men are the angry ones in this thread xD She got wayyyyyy under YOUR skin!

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, yeah. You're up there being like "you're creepy for wanting to fuck beautiful women." Well, fuck you, I didn't choose to be born this way, but apparently every single heterosexual man is "creepy."

[–]HardNycDom10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Who the F are you to judge anyone for any reason ever? God? No! So STFU!

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Everything depends on where you grow up, your culture, your peers, your family, and your morals (you don't have to be religious to have high morals).

Some cultures are more cucked than others. Some cultures are fucking retarded.

I say don't let women tell you what's creepy. Those women don't go out and do the fucking work. They don't pursue men. Feminists lied about that. So fuck hot young 18yr old pussy, or live alone. Marriage is a trap for retards.

[–]foid4you2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah not gonna get into a conversation/debate with someone who thinks that their opinions are facts. If you don't like marriage then that is fine, it's not for you, we get it. But to bash other cultures and countries by calling them "cucks" just because you don't agree with their customs... Well I can only shake my head at what you say.

Keep talking though! Maybe someday you'll say something intelligent.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin13 points14 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Marry at a younger age and avoid divorce or adultery are statistically incompatible. Divorce rates are higher for younger women.

[–]JSC0776 points7 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Ok, but you can't complain about their "slut" status if marriage is delayed.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I’m a woman with a higher partner count that most, and I’m not complaining at all. Married 25 years and counting.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

did you vote for Abraham Lincoln (a republican) and march with the suffragettes?

[–]Nodoxxintoxin0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I’m the only one here older than you. I didn’t get married till 35 too, so do the math.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

When you're a widower I'll be all up in your oxygen tank at the old folks home.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Don’t go putting images of geriatric sex into the minds of these younguns. Some of them have plenty of problems already.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

divorce rates are higher for younger women

That's because they have more time and more options. And a lot of them haven't settled yet, they just like weddings. Of course a woman getting married in her 30s is less likely to get a divorce than an 18yr old.

Divorce rates are lowest for virgins.

Divorce is MUCH more likely if you had sex before you were 18.

Solution: stop encouraging children to date eachother.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The people marrying as virgins in the US are a very tiny subset. Last I saw was 3%? These are Orthodox Jews, Muslims and Amish for the most part http://waitingtillmarriage.org/4-cool-statistics-about-abstinence-in-the-usa/

They don’t divorce because it is not an option. Most tradcon’s in the US have higher divorce rates than atheists. Even Mormons and Southern Baptist

25% of all American adults have had at least one divorce

27% of born-again Christians have had at least one divorce

24% of all non-born-again Christians have been divorced

21% of atheists have been divorced

21% of Catholics and Lutherans have been divorced

24% of Mormons have been divorced

25% of mainstream Protestants have been divorced

29% of Baptists have been divorced

24% of nondenominational, independent Protestants have been divorced

27% of people in the South and Midwest have been divorced

26% of people in the West have been divorced

19% of people in the Northwest and Northeast have been divorced

Want to be married and not divorced? Be college educated, http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/12/04/education-and-marriage/

marry between the ages of 30 and 35,

”After five years of marriage, couples who married as teens have a 38% risk of divorce; those in their early twenties are also highly vulnerable (27%), but then there’s a strong decline for couples who marry between ages of 25 and 29 (14%) and ages 30 to 34 (10%)

don’t go into debt and be from the Northeast or Northwest

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Very true. Men are hypocrites when it comes to sex. I personally have no qualms avoiding guys who want to use women. My sexual boundaries have helped me avoid tons of shitty guys. I thank myself for having those standards! I'm way less jaded than most women I know are.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Most men don't want a chaste woman. I really don't know why you making such a generalization. Most men I wager more so don't want a woman that as racked up sex partners into the 100's sort of deal. Most men know and are acceptable with women having a couple of sex partners. And like women after a certain age men are going to find a virgin woman a turn off. The only men that want chaste women by and large are RP men.

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't even believe they do

[–]NeedingAdvice863 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well grandma always told my sister and her friends.....

"No guy is going to buy the cow when he is getting the milk for free"

My grandfather always said that you will be amazed at how all your parents\grandparents\uncles\aunt go from being imbeciles who don't get it to the some of the smartiest people in the world between the time that we go from 14 to 25. I suspect that 25 age is now up to 30 as it seems that kids are taking longer and longer to mature and understand.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 19931 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

women dont see themselves as a commodity, males do that to them. a woman wont feel as if she lost her "goods" to an unfitting male once he discards her, she will simply pick herself up and leave.

why should women care about males' preferences? it has never served them well. women should sleep with males they deem attractive and ignore the rest. that way no male will find himself a chaste doormat to abuse later on and he will have to settle for a woman who has been around and who is not ashamed of it.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Bull. Shit.

They want the guy fucking unchaste women BECAUSE these women fuck him.

chaste women get ignored

Virgin guys get ignored. Chaste women don't get ignored. They complain all the time about unwanted attention. Plus, chaste or unchaste women they never woo men. Men always have to make the first move and do all the work. Are you blind? Women don't pursue men.

the only way to get a guy is to be unchaste.

You can't "get" a guy. He isn't "yours." That's slavery.

Women can't really win in this world when it comes to dating and we're basically jacked around either way we go.

Being a slut can be fun, that's a win.

Being chaste and having a successful and fulfilling marriage is also a win.

[–]SkrattGoddess0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Really? Cause I'm chaste and men don't avoid me xD

[–]weag5lmy mom says I'm special0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I have a theory why some women get angry.

I have a theory too. They're idiot children who think you're calling them slutty.

[–]HardNycDom10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because most men are insecure hypocrites. They all beat off and fantasize about freaky sluts and love to bang them but can’t imagine having a relationship with them. Mainly because they think others will judge them.

But THAT dichotomy is a big part of why SO many married men cheat (beyond monogamy being an unnatural state of affairs).

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] -2 points-1 points  (27 children) | Copy Link

Are you being serious mate? There's a middle ground.

[–]JSC07713 points14 points  (26 children) | Copy Link

And what would that middle ground be exactly? It's all subjective opinion on what a slut is to men. I've read about some who think an n-count higher than 5 is too many.

But if men won't marry early, it forces a woman will try to have a LTR for who knows how long until he wants to settle down and get married. Most men don't want to do that and it ends up being a losing game for women because men aren't commitment oriented now days.

Lots of men want to have their cake an eat it too. They want their porn, a bunch of women when they feel like it, then a certain hot woman who will be a slut for them and no one else. Then if they don't want to marry or when they get tired of her, they move on. All she's left with is one more n-count notch to her name and no marriage to show for it.

Then when she tries to find a relationship that will end in marriage, she's told "sluts need not apply" when men normally go for sexually available women to start with.

You all are giving us mixed signals.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (24 children) | Copy Link

The middle ground is to not ride every new dick you come across. Find a boyfriend and ride his dick. If you have a few ONS, nobody cares. But if it's a habit or you have more ONS than relationships, you might be a slut. The guys saying 5+ are idiot incels, we all know that's unrealistic.

[–]JSC0775 points6 points  (23 children) | Copy Link

Ok, so according to this survey, most say having 7 lifetime partners is ideal and more than 14 is "too promiscuous". How long does the average relationship last now and how long do people normally wait to have sex when they are in one? Let's explore.

Most people in the dating pool are giving it up at 90 days or less. The average relationship lasts for about 9 10 18 months (and I'm being super generous there), so you can easily do the math. That's about 1.25 partners a year from 22 onward. If people marry around 27 years old and leave college with an average n-count of 3, that's easily 10 partners. Throw in a few ONS (which you so generously allowed for) and you've got close to twice the ideal for most people. And that's definitely not close to riding "every dick" you come across, but would still be labeled a "slut" by most men.

So again, men want to cake eat at women's expense and then shame them for it. I'm not excusing either gender's role in the situation. You asked why women get angry at being called a slut (which as you can see, is an easy bar to reach given the current dating climate) and I gave you my theory. It's a losing game for women no matter how you play it.

The best case would be for women to remain chaste and marry early. Since men won't do that, women are given the option to be ignored, used or have to take a chance that a man will even give them the title of "girlfriend" for longer than 9 months. Sounds like men have all the advantage and women none.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Exactly this!

I tried to stay a virgin until marriage. It was a hard wait. Men dont treat women as though they deserve respect. I lost my virginity to an absolute piece of shit and my only regret was not saving it for someone better (he treated me decently as a human but I deserved someone better than him). Thankfully I remained celibate until I met my next bf, and I've had long bouts of being totally celibate. I actually didnt have sex again for almost 2 years after that. It made dating so difficult for me. Most guys would try so hard to get in my pants, but me having standards made some of them stop trying. I didn't care though. If you expect sex with me so early on, you're not right for me. Unfortunately, this means 90% of men arent right for me.

Dating sucks for women like me. It's easy for women who "give it up" early, but then again it's not. Those women still run into problems related to their sexuality.

[–]foid4you0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Then there is the problem where the woman who want to wait for sex get persecuted by the guy's because it's not fair that the guy before him for sex but he didn't. My friend was seriously offended that his girlfriend wants him to wait, but isn't a virgin herself. I'm like "I thought you said you hate when girl's give it up so easily?", his response was "well yeah but I want to have sex eventually, why is it that all of a sudden she wants to wait when she gave it up to other guys before?"

Some people exchange sex for emotional security. The girl satisfies the guy, he gives her security that she wants. For girls who don't have sex right away there is always the "chase" to try to talking her into giving it up, sadly it gets old really fast after the honeymoon phase is over. Not to mention the flack they get from their friends if they ever find out that the guy still hasn't had any.

I like the 6th month rule when it comes to see, I understand that it may seem a while for those of you who are sexually active, but in 6 months you both get to know each other and see if you are a right fit, sex wouldn't be the whole focus of the relationship, and you can use this time to establish healthy boundaries. And the argument is "what if the sex is horrible? Geez people need to understand that as long as everyone is willing, sex can improve once you know each other's turn on points and communication.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah guys are hypocrites. They want it to be easy for them but not easy for other guys. That makes no sense. People develop patterns. Dont expect a selective woman if you expect her to not be selective with you.

I actually think women benefit more from having sex earlier... men are a lot worse at sex than women are, imo. A man's size has a lot to do with how much pleasure he can deliver (the potential of it), but his skill is a huge factor too. I think as a woman I'd rather know what I'm dealing with... whereas what I need to learn is way easier. I havent even slept around and I already naturally know how to make a guy finish pretty quickly.

[–]foid4you0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Guys don't need that long to finish quickly to begin with unless they either obsessed worth porn, their masturbate grip is too tight, or they like edging.

I guess the one advantage that early sex would an abstract advantage of is finding out of if the guy is willing to communicate and experiment do that way they can satisfy the girl. Don't get me wrong, a guy can easily finish a girl off after he has came, it mainly depends on if he has the energy to do so.

Everyone starts off somewhere, sex is like any other hobby, the more you practice, the better you get. It's just sad when we have girls not willing to communicate what turns them on or guys not caring if what they are doing is satisfying enough.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Meh plenty of guys have a hard time finishing or the women they're with dont do the job (either by not being aesthetically appealing or not being able to do stuff).

I'm comfortable vocalizing my preferences, but it's so funny how on reddit I've read men assume women who are comfortable with that are sluts... I've literally not slept around but I'm comfortable communicating my needs. Otherwise sex is pointless to me.

It makes me realize though the #1 thing men are insecure about is sex. Kinda sad.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If the goal is a successful happy marriage and a healthy nuclear family then marrying as a virgin is the best strategy.

[–]PhoenixMDL-1 points0 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

As it should be

[–]JSC0771 point2 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Hope you enjoy reaping the fruits of that advantage in the rapidly declining dating/marriage market in the West. I guess there's always foreign brides for you to consider after you all wreck the ones at home. Good luck!

[–]PhoenixMDL0 points1 point  (13 children) | Copy Link

Funny thing. They turn out new 18 year old girls every year.

No need to give two shits about some dried up mother of 5 (with a different daddy for each one).

[–]JSC0776 points7 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Yes, another funny thing is that new set of 18 year olds won't be going for the balding, middle aged perverts trying to get in their pants. Guess if the foreign brides don't work out, you can always go MGTOW.

[–]PhoenixMDL0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

They do when he drives a bmw and has a 9” cock. Next

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Most men don't want to do that and it ends up being a losing game for women because men aren't commitment oriented now days.

Why should we be? You also have to consider you women are also pricing themselves out of the market. You still playing by the traditional dating rules in dating up not down. Guess what you women are going to lose out when you refuse to date down. But again most women don't want to be the breadwinner they want the man to be all while women want their cake and eat it as well because feminism.

You all are giving us mixed signals.

Or you are reading too much into it and trying to apply a universal truth to all men. Much like you women, men aren't all the same. Some men do think having more than 5 partners is too much others like me think otherwise. But I am also over 30 so I expect any woman I date to have more than 5 partners.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe because they're using the word "sluts" to describe women who had sex with more than one person. Using that word strongly implies that the speaker cares so much about female sexual preferences.

[–]deadsandsushi2 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

I personally don't care. I think other women might find it hypocritical if the dude has a high N count and point that out. Pointing out hypocrisy doesn't mean men can't have preferences.

And let's not pretend their aren't dudes on here foaming at the mouth because a woman might have had casual sex in the past and now is getting married (the horror) or that a woman might not want to do a sex act she hated again (but chad tho).

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 13 points14 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

(but chad tho).

Lol can I steal this? I'm gonna use this everytime a girl doesn't agree with me. But Chad tho.

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug5 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

The sexes are different therefore it is not hypocritical to judge them by different standards. Modern society wants to deny the difference therefore they find hypocrisy where they should not.

[–]deadsandsushi2 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Individuals can judge exactly how they want.

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes, I see that you were likely speaking in a more limited way than I realized. I'm sorry if I misinterpreted you, the overall tone of this place has its effects..

[–][deleted] 42 points43 points  (29 children) | Copy Link

Why do men on PPD/elsewhere care so much about female dating preferences? The second a woman here claims to have an approach to dating/attraction different than the TRP-prescribed absolute-amoral-hypergamy, five guys lose their damn minds trying to convince both her and anyone who'll listen that she's as much, if not more, of a duplicitous branch-swinging hypocrite as any other woman.

That's a rhetorical question: people care about what other people think about them, and when people express and defend their dating preferences, they are implicitly making a statement about the attractiveness of others as well as about themselves. We police each others' desires because, as a eusocial species, we have a vested interest in society functioning 'properly', though the way we imagine a 'proper society' varies person to person.

Silly question to direct only to women. We all care, clearly, about the desires and rationale of others, or we wouldn't be here, arguing about literally this goddamned topic all goddamned day.

[–]KrispyMcSockingtonPillar of the community24 points25 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Silly question to direct only to women. We all care, clearly, about the desires and rationale of others, or we wouldn't be here, arguing about literally this goddamned topic all goddamned day.

The context is important here. Men are trying to convince women their standards are too high or unrealistic, which they often can be. While women are trying to convince men that their preferences are perfectly fine. When men see women's dating profiles say they want a 6ft plus tall guy who needs to be rich enough and 'man enough' to handle her poor behavior, they can't he quiet when these same women complain about the quality of men they attract.

These women are especially angry that higher quality men don't want them, especially if they were really slutty. So instead of taking responsibility, they project their shame onto men, who must now take the blame for not seeing her as worth more. Otherwise you wouldn't get those sad, angry, surprised women at r/datingoverthirty complaining that men don't want them. Women also receive emotional support because now dating is too hard and they're lonely. But they won't consider lowering their standards, the same shit they tell men to do.

See the problem? Men having standards screws with women's plans too much. Especially women who fucked around a lot. There is no celebration and support of male sexuality as there is for women's. Men must either take a shitty deal or face criticism for not wanting an overweight single mom. A lot of men don't care what others think and date who they choose, but when discussing the slut issue, women often aren't aware of their privileged positions and how their criticism of men's preferences is asking them to consider lowering the bar while women refuse to do so.

It's quite hypocritical.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

(desired gender) having standards screws (desiring gender)'s plans, is the gist of what you're saying, here. Men are upset when they feel they are not personally favored or are otherwise disadvantaged by a perceived 'double standard'. Women are upset when they feel they are not personally favored or are otherwise disadvantaged by a perceived 'double standard'.

Sounds like a human thing, not a woman thing.

[–]Omgits2018 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Are you fucking dense? It is absolutely 100% a woman thing. Stop trying to say it's not, bigot. Ugh ✋

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you have a reason to believe this over my account, or are you just here to downvote me? You're not making a very compelling case, but I guess it's legal to say words in whatever order you want.

[–]LittleknownfactsVaguely Uncivil Comment[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Be civil.

[–]KrispyMcSockingtonPillar of the community0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you remove the context, then yes.

However this is about the slut issue. Women ignore average to unattractive men and are angry when top quality men don't want them due to their past behaviour.

You could break down any chat in PPD to:

(desired gender) having standards screws (desiring gender)'s plans

But it neither addresses the issue nor discusses a solution. For example, the discussion on parental rights and financial abortion. That can be distilled to 'gender does x that other gender doesn't like', but it doesn't consider the causes, responsibility, or the ever changing social and cultural landscape.

[–]kandyapplezslow down lil baby you going pacino7 points8 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Men are trying to convince women their standards are too high or unrealistic, which they often can be.

the same is true if you swap the genders. who gets to decide what is "too high or unrealistic"? usually the people who the preference excludes, regardless of gender.

[–]KrispyMcSockingtonPillar of the community0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

the same is true if you swap the genders. who gets to decide what is "too high or unrealistic"? usually the people who the preference excludes, regardless of gender.

It's unrealistic when the people making the demands aren't getting what they want.

It's unrealistic when a gender considers most of the opposite gender below average, or below their attraction threshold.

It's unrealistic to expect the opposite gender to meet physical traits that are almost impossible to change without surgery (height).

It'a unrealistic to only desire a small subset of the population then complain about your mating prospects.

It's especially unrealistic to blame the opposite sex for failing to meet these criteria, to hold them responsible for your gender's unhappiness (especially in dating), then expecting to fix the problem by insulting them, their sexuality and their very nature.

It's unrealistic to expect the opposite gender to cater to your needs and desires, without compromise on your gender's part.

It's unrealistic to expect an entire gender to be willing to appeal to your gender's sexual strategy without pointing out hypocrisy and double standards.

Many of these things can be applied to men too, many of whom have been criticized for not doing enough to attract women. All men get reminded often about how they're failing womenkind. When men point out that women are also to blame for the current state of affairs, women just don't want to hear it because criticism of women = sexism.

Furthermore, men's standards for women tend to be far lower. Men are willing to sleep with and date a wider variety of women than women do men. When women's preferences exclude the majority of men, not only is it unrealistic but those men (the majority) are going to notice. If your argument is that only the excluded ones are going to complain, well, what do you do when the majority are part of that?

Or haven't you noticed that people are fucking less, men are checking out, there are more single moms, single women in their 30s are miserable and women are far unhappier today than they've been since the 1950s?

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Funny how the men here parrot the “women are unhappier statistic” yet conveniently forget the statistic about how single women are happier than married women. So no, single women in their 30’s are not miserable and the only people that are losing their shit about people fucking less, are men. Because men only care about statistics that benefit them and have to do with their own interests. Men are only “checking out” on reddit subs and forums where MGTOW men that probably never even had a chance with women throw tantrums about going their own way.

Men are willing to sleep with a wide variety of women, sure but they sure as hell are not willing to date (long term) a wide variety of them. It’s funny that men pat themselves on the back about being more “gracious” about willing to sleep with a wider pool of women when the truth is that it’s their solipsistic nature that makes them think that this means anything to most women. I wonder how the message that most women are willing to use a wide variety of men as an emotional tampon would be perceived by men.

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think women are unhappier. I think women have got it made, don't need men as much as men need women, and i was born into that world.

That just sucks, there's nothing good about that.

EDIT: unless you're a woman!

[–]kandyapplezslow down lil baby you going pacino2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Or haven't you noticed that people are fucking less, men are checking out, there are more single moms, single women in their 30s are miserable and women are far unhappier today than they've been since the 1950s?

no i haven't noticed that at all tbh

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

10/10 analysis sir.

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men change their behavior in the SMP though. Just gotta discard male romance and you're gtg.

[–]RRBeachFG213 points14 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

In my experience women care much more about what other people think than men do. I noticed this first with my mother and I have noticed it with a couple of my previous exes.

[–]frogsgoribbit7378 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Probably because our whole lives we are told to care. I remember when I was younger people would say things like "why don't you go brush your hair, people will think you're homeless" "don't do that or you'll never get a husband" "that isn't for ladies, go wear something else"

When everyone is constantly telling you that people care so much about what you do, you're gonna grow up to think it matters a lot more. It took me a long time to get comfortable enough with myself to stop caring so much about what people think of me, and still I find myself in that line of thinking sometimes.

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

A woman's reputation is far more flimsy, or you could say that it's far harder to repair, etc... it is natural that they would be more protective of it. Of course, many modern women are in denial regarding this fun fact.

[–]chloapsoap7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Almost upvoted you, and then I read the last line. No need to get petty. It’s hard to build bridges when you act like that :/

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I wasn't addressing anyone in particular or suggesting a particular proportion (majority, small minority, i don't know) of women. I have perceived women that I consider to be denying this, though I can believe you if you tell me that they all know it in their hearts. I apologize if I offended you, but I believe my words were appropriate for the environment.

edit: I appreciate the sentiment though and will try harder to speak more justly towards all involved

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

A woman's reputation is fare more flimsy

That's bullshit. It's almost impossible to damage a woman's reputation. Think of all the creepy shit women get away with. r/pussypass

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

1) Not a great sample size or sampling strategy to support the claim 'women care what people think more than men'.

2) OP, a man, seems to care what people think quite a lot, as do many of the men responding here.

3) Caring about what people think is an evolutionarily favorable attribute for a eusocial species.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think this a pretty bad comparison, TRP & PPD are literally about sexual strategy. Wtf else are you supposed to talk about?

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I offered one example of a gender-flipped parallel, here's another: men getting upset when women express a height preference, men getting upset when women express a preference for a person of similar or greater social status, men getting upset when women express a preference for women.

People get upset when they feel excluded or unfairly judged. That's a very normal human response, and it's not unevenly distributed by gender. It's a people thing, not a woman thing.

[–]tickledpic0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Wow, a reasonable answer. That's so rare in the mist all these whining virgin philosophers.

I like "sluts" because I think sex is beautiful and having lots of it is very enjoyable. What the fuck will I do with some prude who thinks kissing on the 1st date is sinnfull. Ain't nobody has time for that.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately your response is not so reasonable.

[–]tickledpic0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

How so?

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Here's a breakdown of your post;

Sassy intro comment leading to an Ad hominem closing response.

Followed by a personal opinion supported by a hyperbolic/exaggerated example, ending with a generalisation (though clearly that was for emphasis/tone).

So not the most reasonable response.

[–]tickledpic1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't see an ad hominem there. If you take hyperbolic description of a segment of an audience as fallacious, maybe. But that's your own take on it. It wasn't supporting an argument, so not an ad hominem.

Every opinion is personal. And I'm not exaggerating when I say that sex is very enjoyable activity. Maybe, for you it's not, so your opinion can't be trusted. Now, that's an example of ad hominem (obviously just an example, not my actual argument).

Also, if there is no sex in the first meetup, then I rarely pursue the relationship any further. So I'm not exaggerating about my opinion of prudes shying away from kissing too.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah ad hominem is strictly speaking, the wrong description (as I've found since looking up its definition) since you didn't direct your argument against a person specifically. I will say that using terms like "whining virgin philosophers" isn't helping you get your point across, though I like your wording.

Fallacious might have been the word i am looking for here. I didn't mean to imply that you are exaggerating when you said you won't be with what you consider a prude, that is your stance to take after all. But I did think you were making a point around the "If you don't want to date a slut, good luck finding a virgin" argument, just with a personal spin to it. Which is an exaggerated counter that people commonly use.

[–]kandyapplezslow down lil baby you going pacino11 points12 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

i don't think most women care about this though. women "lose their shit" about men not wanting to date sluts? in what universe because women call each other sluts for a reason

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Cuz once a hoe shes a hoe always. And hoes never close theyre open like hall ways.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

😂😂😂

[–]notreallymuchAlmost black pill4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women slutshame until they're they start being "sluts" themselves, then complain about slutshaming.

I've seen this pattern so many times...

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

in vs out group dynamics.

[–]washington_breadstixM'gtow1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

women "lose their shit" about men not wanting to date sluts?

I do think women on internet forums lose their shit at RP/manosphere types claiming that having more than like 3 previous partners makes a woman a slut. Many feminists/BPers appear to think that a woman needs to have sex-worker numbers before you even think about using her sexual past as a reason not to settle down with her.

There's also the fact that any woman over a certain attractiveness threshold is absolutely going to be able to find long-term male companionship whenever she wants it, no matter how much dick she's taken, so women in that league have no reason to care about men's collective opinion on the matter.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is basically it. The only “lose their shit” I see is women pointing out that even though that one particular man doesn’t like sluts, doesn’t really change anything. Because so many other men don’t care and most don’t even ask.

And when you point this out to the men here, they get upset and bitch, “you’re shaming me!” when we’re just pointing out facts. Sluts get wifed up all the time. Usually by similarly promiscuous men, but also by some less promiscuous men. The preferences of internet or reddit men is largely inconsequential.

[–]mega-unicorn5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Slut is a derogatory term, and you wonder why women take issue with being denigrated.

[–]poppy_bluAARP sent me a birthday card20 points21 points  (29 children) | Copy Link

It’s not women posting daily questions and cmvs on why sluts are are horrible. we don’t care and we’d be more than happy to move on other topics.

Tl;dr: stop trying to convince us, uh, I mean, stop talking about how much you hate sluts all the time and you’ll be surprised at how little attention this topic will get.

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

In my experience, no one throws around the word slut more hatefully than women (towards other women of course). But perhaps these young women are a different breed.

[–]poppy_bluAARP sent me a birthday card8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

OP was about women shaming men who do not want to date promiscuous women.

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fine, but you seemed to be overlooking something that might temper your animosity towards slut-shaming men. Women also do it. But you're right in general, people ideally would talk about it less.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 8 points9 points  (24 children) | Copy Link

I don't mean online or in this subreddit. I mean in real life too.

[–]poppy_bluAARP sent me a birthday card9 points10 points  (23 children) | Copy Link

No one does this in real life.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 8 points9 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Do you not go outside...or?

[–]poppy_bluAARP sent me a birthday card8 points9 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Are you in high school? Cause after high school, I can assure you that sluts does not make the list of conversation topics.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 4 points5 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Maybe not in female social settings but every guy I know talks about it when it comes up. It came up this week at my job, now that I think about it.

[–]poppy_bluAARP sent me a birthday card15 points16 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

So you just proved my point that it’s men obsessed with this topic not women. Thanks.

PS what job is that the men sit around talking about sluts? LOL

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

So you just proved my point that it’s men obsessed with this topic not women. Thanks.

I wouldn't consider it obsessed if it comes up once every blue moon. It wouldn't have even come up if it wasn't for me. I was trying to smash my coworker, so I asked my boys about her. They said she wasn't a slut or anything, she's in a comitted relationship. I just needed confirmation before I smashed her.

PS what job is that the men sit around talking about sluts? LOL

Gay male strippers.

[–]poppy_bluAARP sent me a birthday card3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Gay male strippers.

Explains a lot about you

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hey, thanks for the compliment.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I just needed confirmation before I smashed her.

These are the ramblings and terminology of 16yr old closed in virgin men. Jesus. That was just just bad.

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

This is very naive. Word of sluts cross city lines. "Oh yeah, the one that lives above XYZ bar? Everyone knows Lindy!"

[–]poppy_bluAARP sent me a birthday card1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

In bumblefuck Christian country maybe. In cities you have to be legendary to earn legendary status. We don’t play.

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Huh. Sluts in the city... Interesting.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Lol. Just the other day you an other bloops shamed men for not liking sluts.. Typical

[–]Barneysparky5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Why would that come up in conversation?

[–]poppy_bluAARP sent me a birthday card1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You saw me IRL? Wait are you that Starbucks barista who has a crush on me?

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

Because some twerp brought up not liking sluts. Again, men are the ones obsessed about it. We don’t care, because we know that most sluts are usually fine with dating prospects at the end of the day. Twerps like to fume at the mouth at that fact though.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

If you do not care then why do you respond at all? Of course you care.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Because this is a debate sub. Not sure what you’ve been doing here till now, but the rest of us typically respond to comments and posts. It’s the person that initially brings it up that cares the most i.e twerps. We just respond to it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

So you care to respond. Stop lying.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

To respond, yes. About the actual issue, no. Only twerps are throwing grand mal hissy fits about it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah it would be nice if it was true. Yet feminists get constantly triggered and respond right away. If you didn't care at all, you would skip those threads. Yet you argue and debate etc. It's all caring.

[–]openoids-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]poppy_bluAARP sent me a birthday card3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Um.... OP was about women shaming men for NOT wanting to date sluts.

I don’t think you actually understand what OP was getting at.

[–]VoidInvincibleFull Measure0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I love sluts. They don't care whether a man is 5'10 or 6'0 like other shallow women do.

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat19 points20 points  (38 children) | Copy Link

Because we hear SO MUCH about how to be "sexier" and how important it is we turn men on, and THEN you have the gall to say that women who SUCCEED at getting lots of men attracted to her are ALSO "unworthy" in some way? It just seems rude.

That, and plenty of guys act like any woman, no matter the age, who's had like four partners is a "slut."

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled12 points13 points  (23 children) | Copy Link

Being a slut and succeeding at being attractive aren't even remotely the same. Selling an HP laptop for $0 doesn't mean you've created a product as good as a Macbook even if you can ship more units.

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat9 points10 points  (22 children) | Copy Link

I would argue that most guys who are funny about "sluts" care as much about the style as raw numbers, if not more so.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy11 points12 points  (21 children) | Copy Link

Yep, 4 guys over a 3 day weekend is very different than 4 relationships. Same count different perception.

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yup.

Heck, I'd even argue that "I had a big, mixed-gender group of friends in college, and we all hooked up with each other at one point or another and laughed it off later" is an extremely different thing from "I banged a few people whose names I didn't fully remember over Spring Break at Cancun."

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I can see that nuance.

[–]happycheese86No Pill0 points1 point  (18 children) | Copy Link

Why? Vagina is in the same shape for you regardless. All this slut shaming and number crunching does is reinforce to women that they should lie to their partners if they want to be sexually empowered and enjoy themselves.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Call me old fashioned, I see a distinct difference between those two behaviors and it's not the shape of her vagina. Women can lie to their partners all they want and they could fuck a donkey on stage in front of a paying audience if that is what passes for empowerment nowadays, but don't be surprised if someone takes a pass on that behavior.

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

Because partner counts are a form of lifestyle inflation. Guys don't want to have to deal with a milliondickaire with a taste for the finest cocks.

[–]happycheese86No Pill-1 points0 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

So these guys don't want competition, the thing that got us where we are today? You're like a vegan, no matter how much better it is for the environment or certain health problems, no one is giving up the dick. We like dick. We have standards, sometimes we care about the guy attached to the dick, sometimes its worth committing to the dick. But you can have pretty high standards and still have a lot of fun. Which is more flattering, having a fine taste in dicks and choosing yours, or having no idea what a dick looks like and settling with you because you also don't have much experience? And if the guys do have more experience than the woman he's a hypocrite.

Aw I'm so sorry you don't want to deal with women that like sex, but if you were a woman would you want to deal with a dick that's worn down to a stub from all the masterbating or fucking guys do? That's how crazy you sound.

All the pristine, pure vaginas and dicks can start their own dating app and just save us the time of dealing with judgemental, jealous partners.

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Guys want wives that are awesome 🤷🏼‍♂️

A woman who you have to jump through hoops for is garbage. At that point there's a million sluts available without the headache of marriage.

You can always train a woman who is fresh. Many men prefer this, some don't care.

But either way, usually it's a recipe for a failed marriage.

[–]happycheese86No Pill2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Just like women, guys have options. They don't have to settle down if they don't want to, they don't have to have kids if they don't want to.

Grooming naive partners is a strategy, but I can't say it's a very moral one.

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

What is your point? You're just coming back to the same point. Men decide how they want to choose how to deal with women they are involved with.

If she seems well learned said man needs to gauge his comfort level going long. Most men choose to relegate these women to non serious prospects because it's risk laden.

Women on the whole seem to do the opposite. Women rarely invest in virgin men.

[–]throwinoutex-Red Pill, now Purple Man0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Women will lie regardless. They don't need to be incentivized to do that.

[–]happycheese86No Pill-2 points-1 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

People lie. Stop being sexist. The point is they are incentivized to do it by WHAT YOU ARE DOING RIGHT NOW. RP guys are the cause of their own misery.

[–]throwinoutex-Red Pill, now Purple Man1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

How is saying women lie precluding the idea that men lie too. A lot of people have this "women are wonderful" belief that women would be angelic if it wasn't for those damn men making them behave badly. The truth is women will do bad things regardless, and telling men they should have to modify their own behavior to hope for women to do the right thing is stupid. All that will do is get you taken advantage of. Women don't lie because "men bad", women lie because women lie.

[–]happycheese86No Pill-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

So if someone is robbing a bank, you might as well rob it too, because behaving well will get you robbed?

[–]throwinoutex-Red Pill, now Purple Man1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That is poor reading comprehension. I didn't say "men should lie because women lie", I said women will lie regardless of what men do. The more accurate analogy would be "people will try to rob you in a bad neighborhood regardless of whether you flash expensive stuff or not".

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

That's not what they should want.

[–]happycheese86No Pill0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Who are you to tell anyone what they want?

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

A human being. Who are you to tell me that I can't state my opinion?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 19 points20 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Because we hear SO MUCH about how to be "sexier" and how important it is we turn men on, and THEN you have the gall to say that women who SUCCEED at getting lots of men attracted to her are ALSO "unworthy" in some way? It just seems rude.

I think being sexy and being a slut are very different things.

That, and plenty of guys act like any woman, no matter the age, who's had like four partners is a "slut."

Those guys are idiots.

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat10 points11 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Those guys are idiots.

That's fair.

I think though, that you're giving the general population too much credit on "sexy vs slut"--I knew girls in high school who were considered "slutty" when they were VIRGINS, because they dressed flashy. The word is kind of a knee-jerk thing.

I think if guys said "I don't want to date a girl who isn't discriminating about sex" or something like that, most women wouldn't mind, at least so long as he wasn't doing the double-standard thing and gagging for casual sex with strangers himself.

[–]openoids1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You bring up an interesting point. I know this may sound archaic and old testament- If the default sentiment re/ female sexuality is that its primary mode is based on the virtue of mutual affection and the building block to creating family and society, then a slut is someone who has forsaken this and profits materially from it instead. Now she is wielding it as some sort of tool for personal gain. A virgin who's a dick tease is somewhat similar in the sense that they are advertising their wares for a sense of affirmation or even male favors at the "prospect" that men might get to bed her. It ties in with women hiding their estrus unlike other species where it is quite evident.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

in high school

I think 'those guys are idiots' applies to 80% of high school age children, so that is not a good argument to make for why it is ok women react so negatively, though I agree that it is an explanation.

so long as he wasn't doing the double-standard thing

I think we are getting to the core of it: women in general tend to think that men are all basically sluts themselves, they just do not get the chance to act on it.

I think that 'huh, maybe the guy is rather discriminating himself' there is just an immediate jump to 'that fucking hypocrite theoretical manslut.'

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat12 points13 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

women in general tend to think that men are all basically sluts themselves, they just do not get the chance to act on it.

I mean, y'all keep telling us that. Ever notice that when a religious guy says he doesn't want a very experienced woman, he generally doesn't get flak for it?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I mean, y'all keep telling us that.

We do? Idiots do maybe.

Ever notice that when a religious guy says he doesn't want a very experienced woman, he generally doesn't get flak for it?

He doesn't? So your advice is to convert to Christianity or Islam I guess? I do not think that is very practical nor ethical advice.

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

So your advice is to convert to Christianity or Islam I guess?

No, my advice is to single that you're discriminating since you don't have the obvious flag.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

to single that you're discriminating

Do you mean signal? How would one do that and avoid the accusation of using dog whistles?

Telling people who you are and them not believing it because of their own preconceptions on you or people in 'your' group is something I am familiar with in real life, so not just a theoretical question.

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I meant signal--sorry for the typo.

And this is an area where signals might be costly--things like not making a sexual move on a woman until you've been on a few dates and gotten to know each other a bit.

If you're looking for something quicker, expressing disdain for a male celebrity known for sleeping with lots of women might be a good one--say you're talking about basketball, work something into the conversation like "I know everyone thinks Wilt Chamberlain is so cool, but I always thought it was kind of gross how much he slept around. Like, he didn't even know those women, it's kind of nasty."

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You'd be wrong

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I hesitate to ask 'why' for two reasons:

  1. You are not giving of the vibe that you can handle disagreement without producing negativity.

  2. You probably aren't very good at expressing yourself because just flatly stating I am 'wrong' doesn't really communicate much in of itself. It is almost like you are just grunting in the negative really, that would be as informative. Can you even explain in words what part I am wrong about and additionally, do you have the balls to take in a position for yourself?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

They kind of do. Not so much flaming but questions designed to lead to a certain conclusion or to catch the OP into saying something that can be taken the wrong way (and it will get taken the wrong way).

[–]chloapsoap7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Those guys are idiots

Then it looks like we’re all in agreement

[–]PearsOfWrath 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Because they want to have their cake and eat it too.

And then you have men telling them this and it bothers them because they want to be prime marriage material while having rode the fuck out of the cock carousel. It sucks that they can't have both.

But some of the backlash has some merit. Like the whole 'shes not a virgin and therefore not marriage material' shit is weird, as is calling a girl with 5 n count a 'slut.'

[–]slavicgypsygirl2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I date a lot of different people, tell guys that right away but have the opposite problem of many being too possessive

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It would seem that you don't value yourself in the way that they do, for better or worse

[–]kkokk2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think there's something to be said here for hypersensitization.

I'd compare it to so called "white fragility", except with women. When a group never has to deal with a certain class of status insult, the sporadic occurrences of such insults drive a much larger reaction. Essentially hygiene hypothesis, but for sociopolitics.

Note that I said "certain class", because there are insults that are very common for both women and whites. However, being undesirable is a very rare insult for women, while being "incapable/dumb/ditzy/weak" is a common charge, and thus women are not particularly bothered by these.

[–]miss_meeseeks7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Even if I was a single virgin, I wouldn’t want to associate myself with anyone who spoke like that. If you said “I don’t want to date a woman who’s into casual sex.” I would think that’s fine and your personal preference. “I don’t want to date sluts.” Informs me on your general attitude towards women and sex. “Slut” is not a category of woman. It is an insult used to shame people (usually women) for enjoying casual sex. Casual sex is not a bad thing, just because it’s not YOUR thing. Sex and intimacy are very nuanced, and your entitled to have your sex exactly how you want with who you want (consented obviously) as am I.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Even if I was a single virgin, I wouldn’t want to associate myself with anyone who spoke like that.

That's why you think it, not say it.

“Slut” is not a category of woman.

It absolutely is.

It is an insult used to shame people (usually women) for enjoying casual sex. Casual sex is not a bad thing, just because it’s not YOUR thing. Sex and intimacy are very nuanced, and your entitled to have your sex exactly how you want with who you want (consented obviously) as am I.

Amen.

[–]syaarts4 points5 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

There's nothing wrong with males having a dating preference however I would say that the use of the word slut itself is the most probably offensive part. If you didn't already know slut, is a word generally used by men to dehumanize women and that's why we don't like it. There's a difference between saying that you prefer someone who is fairly inexperienced and hasn't had any (or much) sex and saying that you don't want to date a slut.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 7 points8 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Women dehumanize men all the time. You gotta take what you dish out.

[–]inhale_exhale_repeat2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

you have a lot of anger, are you a virgin?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. Unless you count the time my uncle played doctor with me.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

He is 😂

[–]syaarts2 points3 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

You can't just assume that everyone is a piece of shit and be rude???? idk what to tell you dude. Can I have an example???

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

?!?!?!

[–]syaarts2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah nah ignore that comment. I have migraine and have been dealing with dumb bitches irl and lowkey delirious. Have a good day.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Feel better.

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

You've got a chip on your shoulder friend

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

You right.

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

xo

you deserve a place to air your grievances and maybe I shouldn't have said anything. I don't really know my way around here yet.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You're fine. I encourage calling people out on their shit. If you feel I'm behaving like an asshat, by all means, say so. I dont think I have any grievances, I mostly just post to understand other people. But sometimes I have a cold and callous way of communicating, which leads people to believe I'm emotionally invested or mean, which isn't the case. I'm just terrible at considering other peoples feelings and expressing what I truly mean.

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's quite a challenge in an environment such as this. Thanks for the openness and consideration.

[–]LurkingLion260 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Why do women like being called a “slut” during sex but not while they’re not having it? I’ve heard women call other women slut in the derogatory way which seems very hypocritical.

[–]syaarts2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Why in the world am I supposed to explain to you that people have kinks and are turned on by different things. Like??????

Also on the point of women calling other women sluts is generally due to internalized misogyny for male figures from people around them. I don't think anyone should be calling another person in a derogatory way ever regardless of gender, etc.

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women dehumanize other women the most, then women dehumanize men, then man against man, then man against woman... That is the descending order.

Edit: but you're right, we shouldn't dehumanize anyone and it's impolite to call someone a promiscuous woman

[–]killallthenarcs6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't care if you don't want to date women who have had a lot of partners. I'm a low count women and if I was on the market again I would not be looking for a man whore. I also think most women don't care if a man prefers low count. Most women ARE pretty much low count. I'm pretty sure there's more 50 year old women out there who have had less than five partners than who have had more than five.

I do think you're ridiculous if you hold this viewpoint yet want to have a lot of partners yourself and don't think that could or should harm your chances with low count women. It is reasonable that someone who favors caution and cleanness in her sex life not want to take on the risks and ickiness of a man who has not made similar choices. It is reasonable that she will form a serious relationship reasonably young and not wait around single keeping her hymen intact for some 28 year old engineer with aspie tendencies to marry her once she's finished her degree and paid her degree off. Women don't want to waste their youth not fucking and that's fair enough.

I also think these sorts of opinions must be taken in the context of the decisions the man making this complaint has taken about building his own value and seeking a partner over the years. Obviously some strategies are just crap for ending up with a low count partner and if you've used these strategies then I don't see how your failure to plan should be seen as some sort of emergency for women-kind in general.

So to me that's the general gist of it... if you're whining about partner count you're probably asking for other people to put aside their needs for year after year in order to cater to your needs that you yourself could have made sure the marketplace catered for if you'd just bothered to think the situation through earlier. In terms of entitlement it is the equivalent of the single mother who wants to marry a doctor. You probably need to shut up.

[–]LLL3peat1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

To put it simply if the guy you like doesn't want you something is wrong with them for not wanting you. It's entitlement more or less from dairy tales and people telling her a prince will save her all her life.

People don't like rejection, men are used to it due to life and women usually aren't. There was a woman who became a man to write a book and same damn near wanted to kill herself.

Nora Vincent - self made man.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

To put it simply if the guy you like doesn't want you something is wrong with them for not wanting you.

Isn't it absolutely insane how they all believe this so earnestly? Like, holy shit, the solipsism.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Like many other posters, I don’t really care. If a girl banged 5 guys last week, I would tell my brother or male friend to be wary of emotional investment, she clearly isn’t in a place in her life to LTR, and potentially might be dealing with a bunch of issues.

If someone has a problem with my n count, which is apparently way higher than most around here, I wouldn’t want to date them anyway. My behavior was about standard for my social circle and those were the people I was most comfortable dating.

[–]NeedingAdvice861 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Depends on where you are actually....

In most communities, sluts have lower SMV in both men's and women's eyes....a ton of the warnings I have gotten about a girl being a slut has come from other women.

Women don't want sluts around their boyfriends and openly shun them in many cases...are very wary of their guys spending any time with or really interacting with them in most ways. Guys might bang on a drunken night but do not want to introduce to their friends that they were the one that LTRed up the girl who every other dude in the social group had fucked without even so much as a smoothie at the mall.

I still recall my introduction to my first real slut in moving to the ATL after college....joined a new social group which had big sand volleyball parties every Saturday and the 'slut' started talking to me as the new guy, I suppose. Well I was warned in that night and over the next couple of days by all the guys in the group along with their girlfriends and other girls, including her roommates that she was a slut of the first order. Eckkkk!

But then if everyone in your group is a slut then I guess that you never hear any of the other girls outing each other.

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because the definition of slut changes with each individual commenter here.

I do not have an issue with idea a man wants a low N woman for the purposes of reproduction. Personally I think player dudes are bad at monogamy . I like them many are super attractive but I would not have sex with or get into a relationship with them because women are interchangable.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I personally dont classify as a slut so I dont fully care. I dont want to date someone who's a slut, either. Having said that, in some people's eyes, having ONE partner makes you a slut (and in their POV I am one).

What bothers me is double standards. I do agree women get sex easier, but that isnt the point. You shouldnt expect a pure virgin when you're screwing around.

The other thing is, being turned off by a grown adult female having had one partner before you is unrealistic and it shows you have an unhealthy view of sex... I dont want to sign up for that.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

What bothers me is double standards. I do agree women get sex easier, but that isnt the point. You shouldnt expect a pure virgin when you're screwing around.

Why not? Should women not date up then, if they aren't socially, intellectually, financially, and aesthetically equal to their partners?

The other thing is, being turned off by a grown adult female having had one partner before you is unrealistic and it shows you have an unhealthy view of sex... I dont want to sign up for that.

Yeah, that's very unrealistic. Ignore the incels. When regular guys say this, they mean like 20+ or something.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol virgins are not common... I was a virgin until 3 years ago. When I talk to most people, I realize I'm very very uncommon. Even among "religious" people.

20+ is a lot in all fairness. I understand that. But then I am bothered by those types of guys going for girls like me, thinking they're entitled to someone selective.

[–]longacidrain1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I want a slutty boy. But as a slut I respect you don't want a slut and you should be honest about it because if you aren't it will cause issues.

As long as you don't try to push your views on others no one should care, but they will because the shoe fits.

Also not sure why sluts would be unfit for love, just gotta find someone you work well with.

[–]red__aaron1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because your “preferences” don’t exist in a vacuum. Using shame to control female sexuality has a long long history— women accused of promiscuity faced really harsh consequences, so I think it makes sense to move away from shaming sexuality.

Also, I really don’t get it, why do guys care about sexual history (not including cheating, I’m talking sleeping around where everyone is ok with it)? As long as you get a STI test and it comes back negative it really doesn’t affect you

[–]FlwrPowrWoman9 points10 points  (147 children) | Copy Link

I mean it is pretty messed up for men to be allowed to have as many one nightstands as they want and be praised and considered a "stud" by toxic masculinity. But if a woman does the same thing shes a "slut"? Do you not see the enormous sexism? Anger over sexism is completely understandable.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 18 points19 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I mean it is pretty messed up for men to be allowed to have as many one nightstands as they want and be praised and considered a "stud" by toxic masculinity.

Pause. Men are not praised by "toxic masculinity." They are praised by women for being studs. If women didn't reward this behavior it wouldn't exist.

But if a woman does the same thing shes a "slut"? Do you not see the enormous sexism?

No. There are millions of double standards that benefit women and you don't cry about those. Not wanting a promiscuous partner is not sexist.

[–]WhiteningMcClean7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

No. There are millions of double standards that benefit women and you don't cry about those. Not wanting a promiscuous partner is not sexist.

It's amazing to still see this argument. My idea of a high N count is more lenient than most on here, but there's a reason men are praised and women are shamed for sleeping around. 95+% of men can't passively be studs. It takes effort. If you're a woman who wants to get laid all you have to do is stay in adequate shape, throw on some makeup, go out somewhere, and say yes to the first guy who doesn't completely repulse you.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's still too much work. All they have to do is say yes when propositioned.

[–]Marino4KPurple with a splash of Red0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Personally, I don’t care if a female has slept around a little, we’re humans. I’m not going to call her a slut, now if her N count is like 50, I may reconsider possible dating potential based on other factors such as STDs, etc. still not a “slut”

However for dating, there are double standards. If a female says she wants a 6ft tall guy, his own place, decent job, etc. it’s ok. If a guy says he wants a woman in shape, everyone jumps his ass.

There are “preferences” and then there’s double standards.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (25 children) | Copy Link

I mean it is pretty messed up for men to be allowed to have as many one nightstands as they want and be praised and considered a "stud" by toxic masculinity.

And by women.

Women are repulsed by virgins and attracted by men that other women want. Women are incentivizing studs.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (23 children) | Copy Link

Women aren’t repulsed by virgins. We are repulsed by certain behaviors that a lot of virgins consistently display.

Women also aren’t “attracted to men that other women want”. We’re attracted to attractive men who other women want as a by-product of being attractive!

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 11 points12 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

I'm sorry but I gotta call bullshit on this. How do you figure this? Because every man on the planet has experienced the opposite.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

What has every man on the planet experienced exactly?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 3 points4 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Female solipsism

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Chill out, Descartes. How is that rebuttal to any of the points I made?

What exactly is bullshit about women being unattracted to unattractive behavior and attracted to attractive behavior?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 4 points5 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Nothing. But the idea that women aren't repulsed by virgins or like guys that other women like is bullshit. I've literally had women tell me so to my face.

Shit I've seen it first hand, my guy Chris used to hit on this chick 24/7. He hit on her Monday morning, he got a girlfriend Monday night, and Tuesday morning she suddenly admitted to loving him and wanting him. Even though yesterday she turned him down.

You guys are free to believe this stuff, but that doesn't make it true.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

But look at your own rationalization, man. Isn’t it equally possible that the girl realized she was about to lose him, so she confessed what she actually felt for him?

Also, your friend sounds young (getting a girlfriend usually doesn’t happen in the space of a few hours), so I’m assuming you’re young. People under 25 make really weird, emotionally-fueled, impulsive decisions. I don’t think you should use it as a basis for human nature.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 5 points6 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

But look at your own rationalization, man. Isn’t it equally possible that the girl realized she was about to lose him, so she confessed what she actually felt for him?

Doesn't that prove my point?

Also, your friend sounds young (getting a girlfriend usually doesn’t happen in the space of a few hours), so I’m assuming you’re young. People under 25 make really weird, emotionally-fueled, impulsive decisions. I don’t think you should use it as a basis for human nature.

He had been seeing the girl for months but they made it official that night. Everyone found out the next day. It wasn't a spur of the moment thing.

[–]Jackman12111 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

What behaviors do virgins display that non-virgins do not?

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Low confidence, pandering, awkward or desperate vibe, sends an overwhelming number of pointless texts, needy, agrees with everything, makes the girl feels she's on a pedestal.

[–]FlwrPowrWoman1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol clearly this man is here to tell us actual women what we "really" want.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Literally nothing you said disproves anything I said.

[–]xKalistoSAHM of Yurop0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Imo those ppl aren't repulsive because they are virgins but rather are virgins becase they are repulsive.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

toxic masculinity

Buzzwords are awesome, I like it if people immediately broadcast that you can safely ignore what they think they have to say

[–]JustForPPDChemistry > All18 points19 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Anger over sexism is completely understandable.

How often do you see "incel/virgin" to be used as an insult against women?

[–]chloapsoap6 points7 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

That is also sexist language. It’s the same coin, just the other side.

[–]oftheinfinite 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Literally no woman thinks this, and especially not the ones on PPD.

[–]chloapsoap2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

What does that have to do with anything though? It doesn’t make it less true. I’m a woman and I said it. I don’t know why you’re being combative if we agree

[–]oftheinfinite 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

There is no conviction behind this belief. Women just utter this in defense of TeamWoman, otherwise they all use incel/virgin with blatant indiscretion.

[–]chloapsoap0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

What the hell are you talking about?

otherwise they all use incel/virgin with blatant indiscretion.

I never shame people for being virgins. I literally just said I believe it’s sexist.

I don’t know how to respond when you accuse me of things I don’t do other than to tell you I don’t do those things. I’m not going to talk to you if you’re just here to make accusations

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

You, personally, might not do it. But a lot of women do.

[–]chloapsoap1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I don’t particularly care what many women do. I’m not going to argue how many women believe a certain thing with you. This is a boring conversation and completely irrelevant to my point, which you and this other guy seem happy to ignore

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Ah, yes, the classic female solipsistic response. That's fine. I didn't expect you to contribute anything worthwhile to the conversation anyway.

[–]FlwrPowrWoman-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

There's a reason it's called toxic masculinity. It's not only toxic to women, it's toxic to men as well and pushes the idea that men need to have sex to be considered decent people. There is literally nothing wrong with being a virgin. Being an incel who hates women though? That's a different story.

[–]JustForPPDChemistry > All6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There's a reason it's called toxic masculinity.

I'm fairly sure it's not enforced by men though. Dick size/virgin status/women-bedding potential are the three-to-go insults by women and any gynocentric organization.

[–]HonestyOverCivility15 points16 points  (67 children) | Copy Link

Getting laid as a women isn’t difficult, getting laid as a man is. Accordingly:

A key that can open any lock is a master key

A lock that can be opened by any key is a bad lock

[–]FlwrPowrWoman2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Getting laid with someone you're not attracted to isn't exactly something many or even most people want to do lmao. There isnt some magical key that unlocks all locks, in fact the key itself could be flawed, your assuming the lock is. It's a matter of perspective. Youre analogy is rather ridiculous.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

This stupid analogy assumes that a man is a key and a woman is a lock.

TRP also use an analogy of men being a container and women being water. That means that women go inside men. Therefore, what’s stopping women from being the key?

[–]kkokk2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This stupid analogy assumes that a man is a key and a woman is a lock.

But they are? Better analogy is that man is a key, and woman is a locked house.

If I gave you a key that could unlock any house, you'd be rich

If I gave you a house that could be unlocked by any key, you'd be burglarized everyday.

A man that impregnates 700 women has 700 children.

A woman that has sex with 700 men has one child. And pays for it with the trust of any potential provisioners from her mate pool.

[–]HonestyOverCivility13 points14 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Because women are the gatekeepers to sex not men, which is just another way of saying that women have a greater evolutionary incentive to be selective about who they sleep with. Reason being that 10,000 years ago, if a women got pregnant she was stuck with the burden of raising a child—the man on the other hand could just bail. Evolutionary, the end result is:

Men: quantity over quality

Women: quality over quantity

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Women don't have a "greater evolutionary incentive to be selective about who they sleep with", they have a greater incentive to be selective about who they get pregnant with.

Evo-psych has historically being biased to the model where men compete and women select. More contemporary views demonstrate that sex differences aren't as dramatic as what was once believed and that as we have biparental care through pair bonding, with men investing equally as parents, it's more likely humans choose mates mutually. Women compete based on signs of fertility just as much as men do on signs of traditional masculinity. Because men often invested in children, they evolved to be just as choosy; that's why men don't LTR "sluts".

[–]HonestyOverCivility8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You’re not wrong, but your assumption seems to be that we’ve evolved to the point of differentiation between sex for fun and sex for procreation, when we really haven’t. We have a much better control on it, but accidental pregnancies are still a huge percentage of all babies born. In fact women are most likely to engage in risky sexual behaviors when they’re most fertile (ovulation)

In regards to the second part, most theories fit the dynamic of maximizing the genetic fitness as well as provisioning when selecting partners. The means by which they do this varies, but generally amounts to being more selective than men

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, you're ignoring the fact that historically if a woman hops on a lot of cock one of them will kill the others, or her, or all of the above... maybe children she has from other men too. This isn't innocent, no harm no foul stuff

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman4 points5 points  (59 children) | Copy Link

Why is the man a key and a woman a lock?

[–]HonestyOverCivility10 points11 points  (24 children) | Copy Link

Because women are the gatekeepers to sex not men, which is just another way of saying that women have a greater evolutionary incentive to be selective about who they sleep with. Reason being that 10,000 years ago, if a women got pregnant she was stuck with the burden of raising a child—the man on the other hand could just bail. Evolutionary, the end result is:

Men: quantity over quality

Women: quality over quantity

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman3 points4 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

We have birth control now.

[–]HonestyOverCivility7 points8 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Birth control has been around for roughly 50 years. In the timescale of humanity it might as well have just been invented 5 min ago.

I’m sure you’ve heard people say that from an evolutionary standpoint we’re still 10,000 years in the past. Same issue here. Our evolutionary tendencies haven’t caught up to the realities of the modern world and they won’t for 1000’s of years

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

And what are these evolutionary tendencies ? That women are picky? The abundance of modern sluts should be an indication of changing tides and that there are women out there with the desire to have sex , now that the playing field has been leveled and sex is cheap for women as it is for men

[–]HonestyOverCivility8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If anything the sexual liberation of women has just given them the option to be more picky because they have more options and less consequences for deviant behavior

It’s simple supply and demand. Just ask any attractive women about her experience with tinder. At any given time she probably has hundreds of men interested in meeting (having sex) her. Conversely, your average man might have a few matches each week meaning he’s more inclined to take what he can get

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe that is the affect of online dating but back in my teenage years I didn't realize there was so many options and gave literally everyone a chance haha

[–]washington_breadstixM'gtow7 points8 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

The fact that birth control exists doesn't change our inner programming. A few decades of social change and one invention isn't going to undo millions of years of evolution.

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman2 points3 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

In what way? Since sex doesn't lead to pregnancy why does this biological argument even hold up?

[–]washington_breadstixM'gtow6 points7 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

The invention of birth control doesn't change the primitive lizard brain functions that make us want sex and dictate who we want to have it with. Due to birth control, sex may not lead to pregnancy in practice but the concept of reproduction is still going to determine how we evaluate potential partners.

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

I guess biology doesn't work the same for everyone since I didn't really "filter" prospects in my teenage years

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas4 points5 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Exceptions and outliers exist

[–]tallwheelManosphere Unificationist0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Based on this comment, I am pretty sure you are a bit confused about how evolution works.

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

how do you know specifically which aspects of human behaviour / motivation is nature and how much is nurture? I'm I supposed to believe God and his prophets hangout on this sub and know the truth of our existence, or do you all also realize most of what you say can very likely be full of crap and no one is able to know better either way?

[–]tallwheelManosphere Unificationist0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

LOL. You don't even understand where you are misunderstanding. I am not claiming here to know how anything specific about nature/nurture. The part you don't seem to understand is how traits are inherited over long periods of time. Thus, your point that birth control doesn't lead to pregnancy is irrelevant. Birth control is a recent development which has not yet had a chance to have any bearing on our evolution. But since you don't seem to understand how it is irrelevant, I will leave you to your stupidity.

[–]FlwrPowrWoman1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

citation needed?

[–]FlwrPowrWoman-2 points-1 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Thats insane. Youre assuming that all men want to have sex with all women all the time if women "are the gatekeepers" which couldnt be further from the truth. Guess what? It takes two to consent. Both are the gatekeepers.

[–]HonestyOverCivility2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Compare the average experience of a man on tinder vs the average experience for a women. Assume they’re both 6/10 attractiveness

Man: a few matches per week

Woman: dozens of matches per week

[–]TrumpCardStrategy2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women ITT: but my outlier experience and exceptions prove what you say is silly

Men ITT: That’s nice but I’m talking about average experiences across genders

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'll reconcile both of your points;

Woman is gate keeper. Man is door keeper.

[–]The3liGator13 points14 points  (33 children) | Copy Link

Because women are the gatekeepers of sex. They are the ones who decide which man is worthy of sex and who isn't. Men don't decide which women are worthy of sex.

[–]deadsandsushi2 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Men aren't commitment gatekeepers in 2018. Sorry to disappoint you.

[–]The3liGator0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Never claimed they are. Plenty of men will commit to whatever they can get.

[–]FlwrPowrWoman1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Thats insane. Youre assuming that all men want to have sex with all women all the time if women "are the gatekeepers" which couldnt be further from the truth. Guess what? It takes two to consent. Both are the gatekeepers.

[–]mwait5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh sweet summer child.

[–]The3liGator0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men are the ones who put in the effort.

80% of women only want the top 20% of men. That means that 80% of men have to find ways to impress women, and that 80% of women,only choose who is worthy.

They are the gatekeepers.

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman-2 points-1 points  (25 children) | Copy Link

This is a silly way of looking at this. Men do turn down women and there are women who aren't so picky. Why make some arbitrary distinction when clearly either way it's men's fault for being thirsty for sex

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men do turn down women and there are women who aren't so picky

And there are also 6' tall women and 5' tall men. But the mere existence of either doesn't make that a convincing argument regarding general height distribution among genders.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 6 points7 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

Always the mans fault cuz women can do no wrong amirite?

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (17 children) | Copy Link

First of all, were only talking about ONE thing here. I never claimed it's always the men's fault for everything. But in this specific case, tell me - would women need to gatekeep sex and turn down men if men were not thirsty and constantly propositioning them for sex? What would there be to gatekeep if nothing is trying to open the gate?

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug1 point2 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

Poor women, men really want and need them

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman4 points5 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

I mean I have nothing against it but don't be all like "women are the gatekeepers of sex and therefore shall not be slutty, men have it harder and therefore can be studs all they want" when we didn't like , ask for this in the first place. How about just stop being a hypocrite and we're good.

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

That would only be fair. The stereotypical gentleman or noble man would never suggest that men have no responsibilities towards the women they sleep with.

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

I'm not in favor of slut shaming but the mating game is entirely based on the giant hypocrisy of men being worthless by default and women being fucking divine because womb and all that. This hypocrisy was established by nature and feminism is completely driven by it.

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men do turn down women and there are women who aren't so picky.

Rare occurrences.

either way it's men's fault for being thirsty for sex

Precision truth right there.

[–]The3liGator0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

There are exceptions. They are not the rule though.

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I feel like 90-95% of women who aren't 9/10s or higher have been rejected / turned down at some point in their lives. Even if the ratio of rejection as compared to males is far lower, that indicates most women in their life have been rejected at some point at least once and therefore it's not rare at all.

Men just want to ensure we know they're the bigger victims

[–]The3liGator0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Obviously they're going to get rejected when they only go for the same 20% that gets to choose, and have several other women fighting over them. They wouldn't get rejected if they went after lower-tier men.

That last comment was ad-hominem and doesn't help your argument.

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I doubt this "same 20%" figure you speak of. I think what happens is they punch above their weight for men who are holding out for women above their punching weight. It's a chain of punching up and failing to land.

[–]bonersNlaughs3 points4 points  (23 children) | Copy Link

If making another batch of seed took 9 months and pregnancy was done after half an hour and a turkey sandwich, I know I'd not allow myself to sow it in any old soil.

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points  (22 children) | Copy Link

Wow. I can't believe how stupid this sounds. FYI, it's 2018 and birth control is a thing.

[–]bonersNlaughs1 point2 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

The different standards predate the steroids women use take for temporary infertility. Medical Birth control is to regain control not take control.

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman2 points3 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Birth control levels the playing field

[–]bonersNlaughs1 point2 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

If procreation is a playing field then of course Birth control changes the levels players can play. I don't know what you're trying to say to me, or why.

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Because you talk about consequences of sex being different for the different genders and how you'd behave different if it was swapped. I'm saying it's already been leveled which is why you get women acting like men

[–]bonersNlaughs1 point2 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Something being levelled is something being unlevelled. Birth control or no birth control has consequences not set by me. I'm no different from a battery, I see - & + difference but equal to work. RP or BP delusion is delusional and Agonistics Messiah complex is as a Messiah complex as an Atheists.

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Was this supposed to make sense?

[–]bonersNlaughs0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

Yes it's not supposed non-sense, did you try to make sense?

[–]kkokk0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

counterpoint: evolutionary change takes longer than 40 years

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Clearly it doesn't because people can have all the sex they want without worrying about falling pregnant.

[–]kkokk0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

If we evolved to have a certain mentality towards sex under non-BC conditions, then it will take way longer than a century for that mentality to erode.

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Not unless that mentality was imposed by society to manage our natural instinct. Now our natural instinct can just do it's thing

[–]kkokk0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Quite ironic, as you're the one imposing stuff to manage natural instinct. Our natural instinct, as people, is to maximize reproductive success.

Let's assume that women even have the natural instinct to be promiscuous (serial monogamy is arguably different from promiscuity but w/e). Let's assume there is variation such that some men are more controlling of their partners, and others less so.

Over time, the controlling men are going to necessarily be more reproductively fit than the permissive men--as the former run a lower risk of their woman giving birth to another man's child.

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

What I'm saying is our natural instinct isn't to hold out for the best guy. Our natural instinct is to choose from who we have. And, if we're lucky, "fall in love" with them. Besides if natural instinct makes us not want to bond for life, I'll be fighting that along the way.

[–]Mattcwu 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Men are women are different and should sometimes be treated differently.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

We are all sexual beings.

[–]Mattcwu 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Hey, we're both right!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree, but dont shame women for wanting sex. I would have rather been married and having sex only with my husband. Unfortunately, I havent met my husband yet and if I got married at 20 I would have married the wrong person (marriage is not just for sex imo). I would begrudge any man who makes me feel badly about having sexual needs.

[–]VoidInvincibleFull Measure1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

We are called fuckboys, not studs. Get real.

[–]blackedoutfastRed Pill Man2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

life isn't fair. men and women aren't the same.

if a man is able to have lots of ONS and fucks lots of women, that is an achievement and he should be praised for it.

but it's easy for women to have lots of ONSs and casual sex. all a woman has to "do" to get laid is not resist the men who are constantly trying to fuck her. and there are far more potential consequences for a woman who has lots of casual sex than there are for men. being a slut is no achievement and it's nothing to be proud of.

the women who deserve praise are the ones who are able to resist all of the random dudes who are just spitting bullshit at her trying to fuck and the women who don't give into their own hedonistic cravings and short term focus. the women who understand that actions have consequences. the woman who understands her pussy is her true value and doesn't give it away for free is a valuable woman.

[–]Willow-girlSuffering from bovarian oppression1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

the woman who understands her pussy is her true value and doesn't give it away for free is a valuable woman.

So you're saying she should sell it instead?

(You do know that woman who sell sex are called ... prostitutes, right?)

Is it better to be a whore than a slut?

Also, if a particular woman's "true value" is nothing more than a part of her anatomy -- a part that, umm, all women have -- she's a pretty poor specimen, IMO. Having a pussy is pretty basic, KWIM?

[–]blackedoutfastRed Pill Man1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

So you're saying she should sell it instead?

yes more or less, but for most women the optimal way to "sell" it is by marrying a beta bucks. being a literal street whore is high risk and not nearly as socially acceptable as the sex workers try to make you think. it's also not a good long term plan.

Is it better to be a whore than a slut?

a whore can at make profit doing something that a slut does for free, so yes.

Also, if a particular woman's "true value" is nothing more than a part of her anatomy -- a part that, umm, all women have -- she's a pretty poor specimen, IMO. Having a pussy is pretty basic, KWIM?

most women are pretty basic. and since we're talking about casual sex and ONSs, a pussy is really all that there is. ok maybe tits and ass and a pretty face, but close enough. a woman may be funny or smart or good at cooking or whatever, but all of that stuff is more or less irrelevant in a truly casual sex only situation. the entire reason she is there is because she has a warm wet hole between her legs and she's willing to let a man shove his dick into it.

[–]npd_reflect 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

They lose their shit because "slut" is a derogatory term.

If a man says he prefers to date women who are saving sex for marriage, because he himself is saving sex for marriage, then that is a reasonable, non-offensive dating preference.

In general, preferences aren't offensive if:

  1. they are stated without derogatory language
  2. they aren't hypocritical

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 9 points10 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

But women follow none of these rules. Women want equality but shame men for splitting the bill, calling him "broke" and "cheap." But it's ok for women to be hypocritical? As long as it benefits them, it's not a problem? Double standards have been a thing forever, why are they suddenly a problem with sluts?

[–]Mattcwu 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Well, who is "they"?

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

We are they.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Good video, thanks for linking it!

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Jesus dude, you're all over the place here.

[–]npd_reflect3 points4 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

As someone who frequents feminist groups, I can tell you that most, if not all, of the feminists I encounter are against all double standards. I believe all double standards are bad, regardless of who "benefits."

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 5 points6 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

As someone who frequents feminist groups, I can tell you, this is not the case. They are usually the main ones arguing that men should finance them for nothing in return.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪7 points8 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

As someone who frequents feminist groups, I can tell you, this is not the case. They are usually the main ones arguing that men should finance them for nothing in return.

where do you see feminism and feminists arguing that "men should finance them"

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Tumblr?

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

why is there a question mark, you made the assertion that you "frequent feminist groups" and feminists in those groups are th emain ones arguing fo r"men" to finance them for nothign in return

when you say "feminist" , do you mean "woman talking"?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean self proclaimed feminist. I've met a few hardcore feminist irl but I avoid them like the plague.

[–]FlwrPowrWoman5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If you're basing your entire sense of feminism and women off of an extreme site like Tumblr (or worse, some subreddit like r/TumblrInAction that just aggregates all the extreme posts) then I think you can see the issue here lmfao.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

True that. All the feminist I've interacted with online have been batshit insane. The few I've met irl were equally insane tho. But I avoided them like the plague.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The dirty smoke filled back alley speakeasy's where the cabal meets every Tuesday evening.

[–]BuzzLightGear321 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Because they hate personal accountability. Hence why the usually support socialism.

[–]insultin_crayon4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Probably because males are so damn obnoxious about women who have any preferences at all when it comes to dating. Not only that, males are incredibly hypocritical about their preferences. They want a woman with a low to no N count, while that same male may have fucked a few different girls. Those males also want a girl who will commit 100% to him, while he wants to fuck around with other women. Those same males also denigrate women who will not sleep with him and who have standards and preferences because of “dA HyPerGaMy!”

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Probably because males are so damn obnoxious about women who have any preferences at all when it comes to dating.

How so?

Not only that, males are incredibly hypocritical about their preferences.

How so?

They want a woman with a low to no N count, while that same male may have fucked a few different girls. Those males also want a girl who will commit 100% to him, while he wants to fuck around with other women. Those same males also denigrate women who will not sleep with him and who have standards and preferences because of “dA HyPerGaMy!”

This is not the norm. You're talking about manosphere guys, which are a minority.

[–]insultin_crayon0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

They are the majority of this sub and reddit

[–]mistresswhat3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

My general opinion on men who don't want to date sluts is that they should stick with women who meet their preferences because I don't want to deal with their bullshit issues around sex/women/insecurity. And almost every time I say this, someone gets mad because a woman they don't want to date doesn't want to date them either and apparently this is cause for rage. I think it looks like a system that's working. Maybe people are just fucking sensitive about this stuff?

But yeah also don't go yelling about how proud you are of being a hypocrite and expect people not to judge you for it. Hypocrisy is undesirable.

And if you bring up constantly how gross you think the sluts are when you could just quietly date near-virgins, you're not just "expressing a preference." You're screaming into the void hoping to rile someone up. You want sluts to be upset. You're throwing a tantrum for a reason, you don't expect people to be nice about it and you'd be disappointed if they were.

[–]FatmanSlim931 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m sorry you get shit for your opinion, it seems reasonable to me. Personally as a virgin I’d just someone around my number, but there’s no reason to be a dick to people if they don’t agree.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I agree. Guys need to learn to slut shame in private, not in public. You dont want to ruin your chances of fucking a slut.

[–]mistresswhat2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They won't learn. They don't actually like sex that much, but they love upsetting women or at least convincing themselves that they're upsetting women.

[–]AutoModeratorBiased against humans[M] 0 points1 point  (25 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]Here4thebeer3232No Pill6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Isn't the entire reason subs like TRP and the like exist because women don't want to date them? It seems like it's more than just women that get upset by others dating preference

[–]SerpentCypher6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because people don't like people having standards that would exclude them. Same reason why insecure bald guys think women who want a guy with a full head of hair are unreasonable. Or how short guys are with women that have minimum height demands.

This affects women even moreso because they're not used to being judged by men and being preemptively rejected. They're usually doing the judging and rejecting.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's because there really is a pussy cartel.

[–]TedescheMRA5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Because they perceive a double-standard in how promiscuous women are denigrated as sluts, while promiscuous men are congratulated for the same behavior.

And while I’m an MRA, I have to admit this double-standard does exist. I’d be pissed off about it too if I was a woman.

Where it breaks down for me is when these same women lament that there are “no good men” anymore, because some men refuse to pay for their meal on dates or are up-front with them about just wanting casual sex and not a relationship. A lot of these women a hypocrites, because most, of not all people are hypocrites.

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

MRA here, too, I feel ya about the double standard. There's really no term for "man-slut."

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Exactly! Hypocrites! All of them.

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Seriously?

[–]TheBookOfSeilCuckleberry Finn3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

People don’t want to feel like they’re making, or have made “bad” decisions. Especially when they haven’t felt “bad” or “wrong” for making those decisions.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I agree that no one wants to feel shame, but suppose everyone started shaming you personally for choices you made long ago- say you had belonged to the Communist Party or you had dated a woman who was later convicted of murder. Would you want to pay for your bad judgment for the rest of your life even though you were not morally bad for what you did?

[–]TheBookOfSeilCuckleberry Finn1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I wouldn’t care, personally. If people don’t like me, that’s their problem. I’m going to be myself, regardless.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wise man.

[–]bitter_samsara 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

They only hate it because high value men don't want to date sluts. But it's exactly those high value men who have been who have been on a non-stop pussy conquest the day they hit puberty. Of course it looks very hypocritical.

But fair game in my book.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.6 points7 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

I think it’s closer to the opposite actually. Slutty, attractive men tend to care less because they don’t look at sex as some transaction for their commitment, they don’t see it as “buying her virginity/purity” or however you want to phrase it. They get sex so they have less concern about the fact she may have a past. I mean this is just what I’ve observed, it’s the lesser attractive guys who seem to be all concerned about it.

Although I’m not talking about people with some super duper bad skanky rep - I think that would be a red flag for anyone, man or woman.

[–]bitter_samsara 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

it’s the lesser attractive guys who seem to be all concerned

So the women who have this complaint are referring to guys that they're not that attracted to?

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.4 points5 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Huh? I’ve never heard of any woman complaining personally that the men she wants to date won’t date her back because she’s a slut or whatever. Most of the formerly promiscuous women I know are like happily married now to attractive guys.

[–]bitter_samsara 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

The whole premise of the OP is based around women complaining about men who say they don't want to date sluts. Maybe you have a point that women aren't making this complaint, but then you're not arguing my point -- you're arguing the OP.

Aren't you a lawyer or something?

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Oh there are many reasons why women would have a reaction to that which have nothing to do with complaining they themselves can’t get dates from the men they want because they were promiscuous or something.

but then you're not arguing my point -- you're arguing the OP.

I did argue your point. I argued it directly - the part where you’re saying it’s high value men who won’t date promiscuous women.

If I wanted to argue directly against the OP I would have, in a top level comment. Also please don’t downvote that’s against the rules.

[–]bitter_samsara 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Oh there are many reasons why women would have a reaction to that which have nothing to do with complaining they themselves can’t get dates from the men they want because they were promiscuous or something.

I've tried but I can't parse exactly what you're saying here

I did argue your point. I argued it directly - the part where you’re saying it’s high value men who won’t date promiscuous women.

OK, let's assume this is true -- it's mainly less attractive men who claim they don't want promiscuous women. Do women care about that? If the answer is no, you need to make a top-level comment disagreeing with the OP. If the answer is yes, I'm happy to hear you out.

Also please don’t downvote that’s against the rules.

I haven't been downvoting you, chill out.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I've tried but I can't parse exactly what you're saying here

I don't agree with OP that women somehow everywhere are doing this, at least I have never witnessed such a thing, but even assuming some are there are a myriad of other reasons to react that have nothing to do with not being able to get dates from the men they want to get dates from.

If the answer is no, you need to make a top-level comment disagreeing with the OP.

I don't need to do anything lol. I was only commenting to you to argue that I don't agree that it's "high value men" who are all eschewing relationships with promiscuous women. Just because you made that comment buying into OP's premises and actually expanding upon them in your own doesn't mean I have to address them - I was only arguing one point.

I haven't been downvoting you, chill out.

Great, than that's all you have to say. Asking you politely not to downvote isn't being "unchill.

[–]bitter_samsara 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

ok you've made your point, and you know why I'm rejecting it.

Implying with (zero evidence) that I'm breaking core rules isn't unchill? ok

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's probably some kind of natural reaction. Something like that challenges their view of the world a bit and they have to react to square it away. What's the word for that? Can't remember but it's probably just a gut reaction. Pretty sure men get it the same, although the culture is that women have stronger preferences and higher standards, so guys learn to deal with it faster having experienced the same feeling many times.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

u/_neon_shadow

I've never seen such a visceral, antagonistic, reaction as when a man proclaims he doesn't want to date a slut. Women absolutely lose their shit. The way they react, you'd think he murdered someone. Evidently, this is the hill women want to die on.

My question is why? Why do you care so much?

Because we're judging them and subjecting them to possible rejection. To women, there are only 2 things worse than being judged and rejected, and that's (1) being raped; and (2) being judged and rejected by unattractive men.

[–]RoyalAugur92 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

I've never seen such a visceral, antagonistic, reaction as when a man proclaims he doesn't want to date a slut. Women absolutely lose their shit.

Try telling you won't date a single mom - then just sit back and watch the fireworks.

[–]Lauraaa9d0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

We care about the feel,the connect of heart.Women are creature of the emotions.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The same reason men absolutely lose their shit and bitch about it when a woman says she doesn’t like short or broke guys and would reject them immediately.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 19930 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

because a slut nowadays is any woman who had partners before him. if he aint her first she's a sloot by default. if she had three partners or less, that's already orange territory. he will multiply her number with 3 and she a sloot. game over.

why do women give males the time of day baffles me.

[–]HardNycDom10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I’ve never met a chick who was too slutty for me but I have known many who were too uptight.

I LOVE SLUTS - kinky, dirty, freaky, promiscuous sluts. I could never love a chick who wasnt a really kinky slut!!!

[–]happycheese86No Pill2 points3 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

When I hear "I don't want to date a slut" (hypothetically, never actually heard it myself) all I hear is "I don't want her to know how bad I am at relationships/sex/etc"

Realistically these guys that don't want to date sexually empowered women are policing their bodies before they are even in a relationship with them. One of the perks of relationships is sex, no? So you are a hypocrite for wanting the one thing you don't want women to have? Unless it's with you of course.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 5 points6 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

When I hear "I don't want to date a slut" (hypothetically, never actually heard it myself) all I hear is "I don't want her to know how bad I am at relationships/sex/etc"

Lol.

sexually empowered

Lol. What is empowering about being easy? Should I feel empowered for beating up toddlers?

policing their bodies before they are even in a relationship with them.

How is this policing? They don't want to be involved with them, that's the furthest thing from policing. You're policing us by not doing anything to us! What?

So you are a hypocrite for wanting the one thing you don't want women to have?

Nah, you're assuming the guy has a high n count or wants to be a slut. But this isnt always the case.

[–]happycheese86No Pill-4 points-3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

How about I won't shame you for your repressed or religious lifestyle and you don't comment on anyone's sex life ever? I don't like using the word 'easy' because that means the woman has no standards just because she can have more sex than you? Sexually empowered means she's free to do what she will, much like men have had most of history.

Even if the guy is a virgin and wants another virgin, the end result is still SEX! So to make any comments about what women do with their bodies is hypocritical to your end goal.

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Women that sleep with many men are not doing it primarily for pleasure (closer to not at all actually). When the sex is amazing you keep, you don't pass.

[–]happycheese86No Pill1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Source?

[–]peterlongcLove.Is.The.Drug1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Generalities about life, take it or leave it

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I think women are less interested in variety in general.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

How about I won't shame you for your repressed or religious lifestyle

I'm not repressed or religious. I love sluts.

and you don't comment on anyone's sex life ever?

I'll pass.

I don't like using the word 'easy' because that means the woman has no standards just because she can have more sex than you?

No she's easy because it's easy to fuck her. She has no standards.

Sexually empowered means she's free to do what she will, much like men have had most of history.

You can be free without being easy.

Even if the guy is a virgin and wants another virgin, the end result is still SEX! So to make any comments about what women do with their bodies is hypocritical to your end goal.

No it's not.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Your whole comment was negated by you saying you love sluts. Dont be a hypocrite.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Too late.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wanting to have sex or enjoying sex doesn't necessarily mean you're a 'slut'. You're conflating the two ideas. I don't think having sex once, or with one person makes anyone a hypocrite or a 'slut'.

No one is policing anyone, people are choosing what they are comfortable with in a partner. And what end goal? Relationships shouldn't be a means to an end.

Your argument only kind of makes sense if you squint really hard and try and correlate a bunch of mutually inexclusive assumptions that don't really stand on their own.

[–]k-ma¯\_(ツ)_/¯3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Nope. Most guys would fuck a whore, but they wouldn't date her. Sluts are low-value playthings that provide short-term pleasure; a high SMV man who recognizes his worth would never start a relationship with one.

[–]happycheese86No Pill0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

I stay at home and volunteer with parrots and cook food, I'm a former whore. Been with my man for 8 years and we met while he was a client. He wasn't the first to court me in this way. I'm not materialistic and we're happy. Who are you to tell anyone who they should be with? Are you familiar with GFE Girlfriend experience escorts? What is that but a fake relationship as well as fake intimacy? Sexually active women are no different from sexually active men, how many times you fuck or masterbate doesn't make your dick smaller by wearing off layers of skin and no matter how many dicks I take (probably north of 2000) I can still snap a dick off in my vagina. Maybe stop seeing women as holes and men as wallets and you might evolve into a decent human being.

[–]k-ma¯\_(ツ)_/¯3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm a former whore

Congratulations for changing your ways and securing a long-term relationship. I'm sure your man is very unconventional, but as long as you're happy, more power to you.

Girlfriend experience escorts

Like I said, a high SMV man would never start a relationship with a slut, let alone a prostitute. The only men paying for this service are desperate men with low SMV.

how many dicks I take (probably north of 2000) I can still snap a dick off in my vagina

I don't care how tight you think your vagina is. What repulses men from wanting to date sluts is their high n-count, which is highly correlated with marriage infidelity and high divorce rates, and can signal low self-esteem, impulsivity, and risk of STDs. In general, sluts are not suitable to be caring mothers and supportive partners.

[–]happycheese86No Pill-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't care how big you think your wallet and penis are, what repulses women from wanting to date high SMV men is their high N-count, which is highly correlated with marriage infidelity and high divorce rates, risk of STDS, etc. In general, men with big egos are not suitable to be caring fathers that value the family above himself and are rarely supportive partners. Ex: Any man that has a huge ego and thinks women that do the same thing they do are somehow less than them or cause issues.

[–]k-ma¯\_(ツ)_/¯3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Interesting take. I have never heard that women are repulsed from dating high SMV men with lots of money. On the contrary, countless studies and decades of human behavior have stated the opposite. Do you have any statistics to back up your claim?

You seem to think that a "big ego" is the same thing as "high SMV". This is a blatant falsehood, as there are many high SMV men who are also humble. It also appears that you believe that men who have sex frequently have high SMV. This is not necessarily the case. They could be purchasing escort services, or have low standards when it comes to sex.

[–]legaladvicequest1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is well-said.

[–]Yonderlander0 points1 point  (18 children) | Copy Link

It's when it is less of a 'preference' and more of a sexist double standard. A lot of men on RP want to have casual sex but also see themselves settling down when they want to, at the same time seeing women with this outlook as somehow damaged goods. Or 'sluts' (such a dated, hateful term I hate even writing it.)

Its complete bullshit, and very damaging to women having to walk this tightrope between being a confident, sexual being and worrying about being judged by men doing the exact same thing. Meanwhile the men aren't being judged at all. We all have needs, damn right we get pissed off by injustice regarding basic human needs.

Where it is an innocent matter of preference, would be if the guy wasn't being hypocritical- if he isn't into casual sex and wants someone who also isn't, that's fair and fine and I don't think anyone would be pissed about it. Do you get it?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (17 children) | Copy Link

Ok but there are actual scientific studies that show the more partners a woman has, the more broken her pair bonding becomes. She becomes defective. I see where you're coming from tho, and I kind of agree. But again, men deal with the same shit and we are expected to man up and deal with it.

[–]Yonderlander3 points4 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Absolute bullshit scientific studies, I'm a complex person, not a labrador. Do you guys have any idea how ridiculous this 'pair bonding' phrase comes across? I don't suppose you have a link to these 'studies' because I've only ever heard of them in the RP sphere. Men in no way deal with the same tightrope walk, we all know that historically the expectation was for women to deny themselves and for men to try it on without repercussion.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (14 children) | Copy Link

Absolute bullshit scientific studies, I'm a complex person, not a labrador.

Science is science, even if its not pleasant.

Do you guys have any idea how ridiculous this 'pair bonding' phrase comes across? I don't suppose you have a link to these 'studies' because I've only ever heard of them in the RP sphere.

Nah. But you can google it yourself.

Men in no way deal with the same tightrope walk, we all know that historically the expectation was for women to deny themselves and for men to try it on without repercussion.

Men have a harder walk, we have to be successful in a world where most women consider us below average.

[–]Yonderlander4 points5 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Ah bad luck, the 'studies' are merely RP pseudo science. Be honest with yourself- it is just a way for sexist men who want to have their cake and eat it, to clutch at straws and try and give some legitimacy to their dated, extremely sexist attitude.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] -1 points0 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Ah bad luck, the 'studies' are merely RP pseudo science.

A lot of these studies were conducted before TRP existed. Just because you disagree with them and they hurt your feelings, doesn't make them false or "pseudo science."

Be honest with yourself- it is just a way for sexist men who want to have their cake and eat it, to clutch at straws and try and give some legitimacy to their dated, extremely sexist attitude.

That argument might work if TRP guys were conducting the research, but this is not the case. The research is done by neutral scientist and institutions. Honestly, you sound really hurt by all this, you should probably talk to someone about that.

[–]Yonderlander2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Lol yeah I'm hurt all the way to my healthy sex and relationships. I knew going into this there's no changing the minds of deeply sexist men, but it's kind of gratifying that the only response you can come up with is to refer back to this childish pseudo science, and the 'pair bonding' bollocks, rather than address the actual meaningful points raised regarding how life experience will have a far greater effect on bonding, male or female.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] -1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Sigh ...

Look, I'm trying to be nice. But no matter what I say, it won't matter to you. So I'd rather avoid this whole conversation at this point. You're too emotional to objectively participate in this conversation.

[–]Yonderlander1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow that is some boss-monster level passive aggression there, I feel sorry for real people in your life on the receiving end of that! Yeah thanks for being so nice as to dismiss my salient points by painting me as too emotional to be objective... Can't identify one emotional thing I wrote, but that doesn't matter does it? You guys crack me up, in a tragic kind of way. Yep over and out.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

✌🏾

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

"Too emotional" hahahhaha this is what guys who lose always say to women. Nice try.

[–]Yonderlander1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Have you ever thought how complex bonding with another human is? Don't you think that factors such as past experiences, happy vs traumatic childhood, where you are in your life and career, your attachment style, and a million other things would have a much greater bearing than how many cocks have been in you? Also would a woman out of a 6 year relationship who had sex mist days be more affected than one who had 3 relationships but far less sex? Come on, it's so blatantly obvious that life experiences affect 'pair bonding' more than, what, having slightly different sized penises meet ones sexual needs.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I've also met women who are with the man they lost their virginity to, and they still dont feel that close to him. They didnt adequately "pair bond" for some reason. I think she stuck with him because he was her first... but she never feels satisfied. Even being a virgin before him she can still recognize her dissatisfaction. Only insecure guys will be put off by a woman who's had sexual experiences, because theyll be insecure about their sexual prowess.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Come on, it's so blatantly obvious that life experiences affect 'pair bonding' more than, what, having slightly different sized penises meet ones sexual needs.

I'm sure it does, but that doesn't mean the latter doesn't affect it.

[–]Yonderlander1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Thankyou for admitting that, very gracious of you. I guess it's a matter of degree. I'd place the affect of the number of penisis that have been in my vag to be about 0.0001% as effective on my 'ability to pair bond' compared to my life experiences, happiness, childhood and the culture around me, and I doubt the figure is much different for either sex.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah honestly the older I get, the more I'm able to really bond with men. Being emotionally unavailable stunts people more than their sexual status does.

[–]Pastiricawe're all sluts0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

So i'm curious, have you ever read those studies yourself or are you just regurgitating secondary sources?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Some, not all.

Edit: Nice flair.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men are sleeping with women. Do they think these virginal women pop out of nowhere? No.

If men want women with fewer partners, start by not treating women as sexual objects.

I'm also of the opinion (despite only having 2 sexual partners) that sleeping with a lot of men doesnt mean you cant "pair bond". If anything, being a virgin makes someone more susceptible to bad romantic choices... but I can see why men would want that. The men who dont have much to offer want a woman who's only into them because they lost their virginity to them. Kinda pathetic

[–]verticordiaunlikeable but self aware0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Because men's definition of slut can be very... harsh. All women can be "sluts". And if a man cares so much about women's purity or whatever, it just comes across as incel-y.

Don't come at me about STD rates and statistics about virgins making better wives or how men want to be sure their kid is theirs so sluts aren't good partners. I don't care, I'm just the messenger.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd rather come off as an incel than commit to a slut tbh.

[–]TheChemist158Non-Feminist Blue Pill Woman0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

My question is why? Why do you care so much?

I don't.

you, personally, don't care, why do you think other women feel so passionately about this?

In my experience, it's because the guy is being an asshole about it.

I'd rather date someone with a similar history as myself

Versus

Ew, sluts are gross. Why would anyone want to date one?

One is going to offend more people then the other.

[–]kkokk0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

I'd rather date someone with a similar history as myself

You can have a promiscuous past and still prefer to date/marry someone with a low partner count.

[–]TheChemist158Non-Feminist Blue Pill Woman2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Then your getting into hypocrisy territory.

[–]kkokk-1 points0 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

So then all straight people are hypocrites.

[–]TheChemist158Non-Feminist Blue Pill Woman1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Not all straight people are both promiscuous and expect an inexperienced partner.

[–]kkokk-1 points0 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

All straight people expect a partner of the sex opposite them.

So yes, all straight people are hypocrites by your logic.

[–]TheChemist158Non-Feminist Blue Pill Woman1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

And you really think that's comparable?

[–]kkokk0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Why wouldn't it be?

It's not hypocritical to prefer X when you're the opposite of X. Men prefer women. Short girls prefer tall guys. Some ditzy blondes prefer nerdy introverted guys.

[–]TheChemist158Non-Feminist Blue Pill Woman0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Do you think a fat chick that prefers buff men isn't hypocritical?

[–]kkokk1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

yes, I think that isn't hypocritical.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's the definition of a hypocrite.

[–]TessaBrooding0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Meanwhile I, an average internet using non-American, am sipping tea here. Can't imagine living in a society where hookup culture is the norm.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Where do you live?

[–]TessaBrooding0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Czech rep.

[–]femmagorgon0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Meh, I don’t know. I’m 5’11 and if I mention that I prefer dating men that are taller than me, most guys fly off the handle. I have no problem with guys preferring women with big boobs, nice asses etc. Everyone should be allowed to like what they like.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m a guy. I wouldn’t respond angrily, but I think it’s dumb to care about somebody’s history as long as they’re honest. I’d rather a girl with 20 partners that always used condoms than a girl with 5 partners but 3 of them were cheating on their boyfriends with no condoms

[–]ThatMan11997-2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The brutal truth is that. If the man is good-looking enough. All women are sluts.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter