Women often complain men put no effort, are fat, lazy, etc. but most values the Red Pill community teaches are actually good to increase the quality of men so women have greater sex and higher quality men.

Some examples:

1. Most redpill concerns are about helping men becoming more physically attractive through exercise and diet. That is a good thing and women like physically fit men.

2. Most redpill concerns about helping men be more social and speak to women more, embrace rejection, etc. Women clearly like more socially adept men, so the red pill benefits women too.

3. The Red pill often teaches men to have a goal, not focus only on women and ideally work for themselves. Women also like men that are not desperate for them and are working on their goal.

However, redpill still still promotes some PUA things that women do not like such as:

• Manipulating women for sex

• Getting younger women

• Not comitting

Some women complain that men that practice TRP are not valuable in the first place because it is "not natural" or some shit, but almost all attractive men (natural or not) need to put effort to be good anyway, so the distinction makes no sense. TRP can be found naturally in men who were risen by good fathers and men.

Still, most of what the redpill promotes is common sense and is not new. All men, redpill or not, often prefer younger women, they are sceptic of commitment and do want to get into women's pants as men are naturally hornier. Redpill is just an admission of this.

So generally I'd say TRP is good for women as it is for men, and anyway most effort is still on men.

I'd say TRP is just trying to fill the role that groups of men and fathers had long ago but not anymore, and it is not so different except it is anonymous.